Comparison of methods for analysis of structural systems under sudden removal of a member

Cover Page

Cite item


The paper provides the conclusions of a comparative analysis of various approaches, design models, methods for analysis of a loaded structural system and the results of such analysis for a sudden failure of a structural member. It shows that the analysis methods recommended by Russian and foreign standards are based on the same methodology. And the recommended options for choosing secondary design schemes in static, quasi-static and dynamic formulations have different complexity, however, give results which are close enough and acceptable for practical purposes. Some differences in the results are associated with different approaches to consider the reaction redistribution time for the removed structural member, i.e., in essence, with the mode of failure of this member. The issue of criteria for a special limiting state is also discussed. The authors present the expediency of including an additional criterion in regulatory documents that considers the second-order effects on the buckling of the structural elements under accidental impacts and, accordingly, provisions for protecting structural systems against the exhaustion of the bearing capacity due to the loss of stability. As such criterion, the achievement of the limiting equilibrium point on the diagram “axial force vs. transverse deflection” can be adopted.

About the authors

Sergey Yu. Savin

Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University)

Author for correspondence.
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6697-3388

Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Structures

26 Yaroslavskoye Shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation

Natalia V. Fedorova

Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University)

ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5392-9150

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Architectural and Construction Design, Director of the Branch in Mytishchi

26 Yaroslavskoye Shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation


  1. Eremeev P.G. Design methods for progressive collapse: harmonization of Russian and international regulatory documents. Industrial and Civil Engineering. 2022;(4):23–28. (In Russ.)
  2. Barabash M.S. Modeling the life cycle high-rise buildings structures in view resistance progressive destruction. International Journal for Computational Civil and Structural Engineering. 2013;9(4):101–106. (In Russ.)
  3. Perelmuter A.V., Kriksunov E.Z., Mosina N.V. Implementation of the calculation of monolithic residential buildings for progressive (avalanche) collapse in the environment of the computer complex “SCAD Office”. Magazine of Civil Engineering. 2009;4(2):13–18. (In Russ.)
  4. Almazov V.O., Kao Z.K. Dynamics of progressive destruction of monolithic multi-storey frames. Moscow: ASV Publ.; 2014. (In Russ.)
  5. Almazov V.O., Plotnikov A.I., Rastorguev B.S. Problems of buildings resistance to progressive collapse. Vestnik MGSU. 2011;(2–1):16–20. (In Russ.)
  6. Belostotsky A.M., Karpenko N.I., Akimov P.I., Sidorov V.N., Karpenko S.N., Petrov A.N., Kaytukov T.B., Kharitonov V.A. About development of methods of analysis and assessment of vulnerability of spatial plate-shell reinforced concrete structures with allowance for physical non-linearities, crack formation and induced anisotropy. International Journal for Computational Civil and Structural Engineering. 2018;14(2):30–47.
  7. Travush V.I., Gordon V.A., Kolchunov V.I., Leontiev Y.V. Dynamic effects in the beam on an elastic foundation caused by the sudden transformation of supporting conditions. International Journal for Computational Civil and Structural Engineering. 2018;14(4):27–47.
  8. Kodysh E.N., Trekin N.N., Chesnokov D.A. Protection of multistory buildings from progressing collapse. Industrial and Civil Engineering. 2016;(6):8–13. (In Russ.)
  9. Li S., Shan S., Zhai C., Xie L. Experimental and numerical study on progressive collapse process of RC frames with full-height infill walls. Engineering Failure Analysis. 2016;59:57–68.
  10. Yu J., Tan K.-H. Experimental and numerical investigation on progressive collapse resistance of reinforced concrete beam column sub-assemblages. Engineering Structures. 2013;55:90–106.
  11. Sasani M., Sagiroglu S. Progressive collapse resistance of Hotel San Diego. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2008;134(3):478–488.
  12. Adam J.M., Buitrago M., Bertolesi E., Sagaseta J., Moragues J.J. Dynamic performance of a real-scale reinforced concrete building test under a corner-column failure scenario. Engineering Structures. 2020;210:110414.
  13. Fedorova N.V., Korenkov P.A. Static and dynamic deformation of monolithic reinforced concrete frame building in ultimate limit and beyond limits states. Building and Reconstruction. 2016;68(6):90–100. (In Russ.)
  14. Fedorova N.V., Ngoc V.T. Deformation and failure of monolithic reinforced concrete frames under special actions. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019;1425(1):012033.
  15. Ilyushchenko T.A., Kolchunov V.I., Fedorov S.S. Crack resistance of prestressed reinforced concrete frame structure systems under special impact. Building and Reconstruction. 2021;93(1):74–84.
  16. Geniev G.A., Klyueva N.V. Experimental and theoretical investigations of uncut beams during emergency disconnecting individual elements from operation. News of Higher Educational Institutions. Construction. 2000;502(10):21–26. (In Russ.)
  17. Wang T., Chen Q., Zhao H., Zhang L. Experimental study on progressive collapse performance of frame with specially shaped columns subjected to middle column removal. Shock and Vibration. 2016;2016:1–13.
  18. Geniev G.A., Kolchunov V.I., Klyueva N.V., Nikulin A.I., Pyatikrestovsky K.P. Strength and deformability of reinforced concrete structures under beyond-design impacts. Moscow: ASV Publ.; 2004. (In Russ.)
  19. Kolchunov V.I., Klyueva N.V., Androsova N.B., Bukhtiyarova A.S. Resistance of building and structures to undesigned actions. Moscow: ASV Publ.; 2014. (In Russ.)
  20. Kolchunov V.I., Skoruk L.N. Technical conception for reconstruction of a folded roof of a hangar of the “Zhuliany” airport in Kiev. Industrial and Civil Engineering. 2013;(5):22–25. (In Russ.)
  21. Abdelazim W., Mohamed H.M., Benmokrane B. Inelastic second-order analysis for slender GFRP-reinforced concrete columns: experimental investigations and theoretical study. Journal of Composites for Construction. 2020;24(3).

Copyright (c) 2022 Savin S.Y., Fedorova N.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies