Nomen proprium transdisciplinary model

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The topic of this study is at the intersection of philology, semiotics, hermeneutics and philosophy and has a rich research history for each of these areas. At the same time, none of these spheres of knowledge has a more or less unambiguous theory of a proper name that could satisfy the requirements of consistency and not conflict with the provisions of other hypotheses put forward by researchers of different eras and scientific fields. This state of affairs shows the need to use a transdisciplinary approach to the problem of studying the nomen proprium phenomenon and a possible methodology for its modeling. The transdisciplinary model of a proper name is implemented in this article based on the Mirology (according to V.I. Moiseev) as a type of knowledge in which all private knowledge about a nomen proprium, accumulated by the history of its research, is considered as part of integral knowledge. The nomen proprium modeling is suggested to be one of the aspects of the world-like system of the linguistic, socalled World of the Word, the essence of which are meaning (connotation), anthropo (humanness) and intentionality. On these grounds and by the natural laws of the implementation of the main types of speech activity (biological and physiological aspect), the existence of the word as the return of its meaning (psycho-cognitive aspect) and the word’s variability (communicative-pragmatic aspect) the author propose the transdisciplinary nomen proprium model. This model allows us to consider a proper name in the broad sense of its symbolic essence as a text, discourse and communication. Such an integral structure permits us to identify new directions in the nomen proprium phenomenon description and to present a comprehensive interpretation of already available in various scientific fields data.

About the authors

Helena G. Lugovskaya

T.G. Shevchenko Pridnestrovian State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: lugowska@spsu.ru
Ph.D., Associate Professor of the Department of Russian Language and Intercultural Communication Tiraspol, Moldova, Pridnestorovie

References

  1. Arshinov, V.I., & Budanov, V.G. (2009). Synergetics as a methodology of communicative constructivism. In V.A. Lektorskii (Ed.), Constructivist approach in epistemology and human sciences. Kanon+, 266–268. (In Russ.).
  2. Bondaletov, V.D. (1983). Russian onomastics. Prosveshchenie. (In Russ.).
  3. Borovikova, N.V. (2010). Proper name as a sign in language and speech. Bulletin of the Irkutsk State Linguistic University, (1), 13−19. (In Russ.).
  4. Cherniak, A.Z. (2019). References of proper names as the problem of contemporary philosophy of language. RUDN Journal of Philosophy, 23(1), 56–65.
  5. Chernyak, A.Z. (2016). Proper names as hard designators. Bulletin of the of Peoples’ Friendship Russian University. Series Philosophy, (2), 113−120. (In Russ.).
  6. Ehrikson, E.H. (1996). Identity, youth and crisis. Progress. (In Russ.).
  7. Florenskii, P.A. (1990). Imyaslavie as philosophy presupposition. Works in 2 volumes, Vol. 2. Pravda. (In Russ.).
  8. Goffman, I. (2000). Presenting oneself to others in everyday life. Kanon-press-TS: Kuchkovo pole. (In Russ.).
  9. Knyazeva, E.N. (2011). The transdisciplinarity of research. Vestnik TGPU (TSPU Bulletin), 10(112), 191–201. (In Russ.).
  10. Kripke, S. Naming and Necessity. Retrieved August 14, 2023, from http://socialistica.lenin.ru/analytic/txt/k/kripke_1.htm
  11. Lazareva, V.A. (2017). Name proper problems of reference. Indrik. (In Russ.).
  12. Losev, A.F. Philosophy of name. Retrieved Jule, 11, 2023, from http://predanie.ru/ lib/book/72798/
  13. Lugovskaya, E.G. (2018). Communication as a self. XVIII All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference “Days of Science — 2018”. Conference Proceedings, Part II. Ozersk Technological Institute Publ., 112–116. (In Russ.).
  14. Lugovskaya, E.G. (2022). The Word Mirology. Integral Philosophy, (12), 99–109. (In Russ.).
  15. Moiseev, V.I. (2022a). Mirology: Science of world-like systems. (In Russ.).
  16. Moiseev, V.I. (2022b). Images of world-like knowledge. Integral’naya filosofiya, (12), 13–37. (In Russ.).
  17. Nikonov, V.A. (1974). Name and society. Nauka. (In Russ.). Podol’skaya, N.V. (1988). Dictionary of Russian onomastic terminology. A.V. Superanskaya (Ed.). 2nd ed., rev. and add. Nauka. (In Russ.).
  18. Superanskaya, A.V. (2007). General theory of the proper name. LKI Publ. (In Russ.).
  19. Suprun, V.I. (2000). Onomastic field of the Russian language and its artistic and aesthetic potential. Peremena. (In Russ.).

Statistics

Views

Abstract: 590

PDF (Russian): 301

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Copyright (c) 2023 Lugovskaya H.G.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies