Editorial Policies

Aims and Scope

Journal goals:

promote scientific exchange and cooperation between scientists and practitioners from around the world in the field of psychological, pedagogical, interdisciplinary research on language education and testing;
introduce Russian and foreign readers to the latest scientific trends, current problems and best practices in the field of language education and testing;
highlight the scientific achievements of Russian and foreign scientists on the most significant, including controversial, problems of language education and testing;
provide a platform for researchers, graduate students, and experts to discuss issues of educational and diagnostic capabilities of language tests in the process of teaching and learning languages in Russia and abroad.

Subjects

A wide range of issues are discussed on the pages of the magazine:

Russian and international testing systems;
interdisciplinary research in language education and testing;
intelligent systems in testing;
a wide range of language exams for different target audiences for both migration and educational purposes;
experience in organizing and providing educational and methodological support for testing;
testing in the practice of teaching the native languages of the peoples of Russia;
test as a tool for studying the ethnocultural and linguistic diversity of Russia;
multilingualism in a wide linguistic and linguocultural range;
pedagogical and psychological aspects of teaching the Russian language;
innovative technologies in methods of teaching the Russian language;
integration of pedagogical means into the process of teaching the Russian language.

Sections

Articles

Open Submissions

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

A double-blind peer review method is mandatory for processing of all scientific manuscripts submitted to the editorial staff of the journal. This implies that neither the reviewer is aware of the authorship of the manuscript, nor the author maintains any contact with the reviewer.

Members of the editorial board and leading global experts in corresponding areas of sciences, invited as independent readers, perform peer reviews. All reviewers are recognized experts in the subject of the peer-reviewed materials and have publications on the subject of the peer-reviewed article over the past 3 years.
Editor-in-chief, deputy editor-in-chief or science editor choose readers for peer review. We aim to limit the review process to 2-4 weeks, though in some cases the schedule may be adjusted at the reviewer’s request.
Reviewer has an option to abnegate the assessment should any conflict of interests arise that may affect perception or interpretation of the manuscript. Upon the scrutiny, the reviewer is expected to present the editorial board with one of the following recommendations:

to accept the paper in its present state;
to invited the author to revise their manuscript to address specific concerns before final decision is reached;
that final decision be reached following further reviewing by another specialist;
to reject the manuscript outright.

If the reviewer has recommended any refinements, the editorial staff would suggest the author either to implement the corrections, or to dispute them reasonably. Authors are kindly required to limit their revision to 3 months and resubmit the adapted manuscript within this period for final evaluation.
We politely request that the editor be notified verbally or in writing should the author decide to refuse from publishing the manuscript. In case the author fails to do so within 3 months since receiving a copy of the initial review, the editorial board takes the manuscript off the register and notifies the author accordingly.
The editors conduct no more than three rounds of peer review for each manuscript. If, after the three-fold revision of the manuscript, the majority of the reviewers or the editorial board have significant comments on the text, the manuscript is rejected and removed from consideration. In this case, the authors are sent a corresponding notification about the rejection of the manuscript.
If author and reviewers meet insoluble contradictions regarding revision of the manuscript, the editor-in-chief resolves the conflict by his own authority.
The editorial board reaches final decision to reject a manuscript on the hearing according to reviewers’ recommendations, and duly notifies the authors of their decision via e-mail. The board does not accept previously rejected manuscripts for re-evaluation.
Upon the decision to accept the manuscript for publishing, the editorial staff notifies the authors of the scheduled date of publication.
Kindly note that positive review does not guarantee the acceptance, as final decision in all cases lies with the editorial board. By his authority, editor-in-chief rules final solution of every conflict.
10. The authors have the right to argue the decision of the editorial board to reject the manuscript and to remove it from consideration. To do this, they should send an appeal to the editorial board, addressed to the editor-in-chief. The appeal should include detailed reasons for the authors' disagreement with the decision of the editorial board (based on the conclusions of the reviewers), give reasons in favor of revising the decision, and send the revised manuscript (if such revision is appropriate). Disputes and requests from authors to revise the decisions of the editorial board are considered personally by the editor-in-chief at the meeting of the editorial board. The decisions made by the editor-in-chief are not subject to challenge.
Original reviews of submitted manuscripts remain deposited permanently (not less than 5 years).
Manuscript reviews are not published. Reviews can be sent to the Ministry of Education and Sciense of Russian Federation in case of query.

Publication Frequency

The Journal is published quarterly, 4 issues per year.

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge (open license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC BY 4.0)).

This journal is an open access journal. All articles are made freely available to readers immediately upon publication. Our open access policy is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition - it means that articles have free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. For more information please read BOAI statement.

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC BY 4.0)

You are free to:

Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format

Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

----

The page is based on original materials from the Creative Commons: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en

Indexing

Publishing Ethics

When selecting (including reviewing), preparing (editing) and publishing articles in the journal, the editors are guided by international standards of publication ethics.

The Editorial Board of the Journal will carefully and responsibly consider all reasonable requests regarding the detected violations in the published materials.

The editors consider it the duty of the author and the reviewer to inform the editors as soon as possible about the missed errors and violations that they have identified after the publication of the article.

The journal's publisher, RUDN University, is a co-founder and a member of the Association of Scientific Editors and Publishers (ASEP), Russia, and supports the ASEP Declaration on the Ethical Principles of Scientific Publications

The ethic policy of this journal is based on recommendations from international committees:

When developing these rules, the publisher and the editorial board of the journal used not only their editorial and publishing practice but also the experience of the journals published by leading international scientific literature publishers, such as Elsevier, Springer, Taylor, and Francis, etc.

Editorial responsibilities

Editors have sole responsibility for the acceptance or rejection of a manuscript. The manuscript may be rejected by the editor on the stage prior to peer-review for a solid reason (inappropriate topic for the journal, clearly of poor scientific quality, the article was previously published elsewhere, an essential contradiction to ethical principles of the Journal was detected). Editors should only accept a paper when reasonably certain. Editors should guarantee that the quality of the papers conforms to internationally accepted scientific and publication ethical guidelines. If there is a conflict of interest of the editor with the author of the article, the article should be transmitted to another editor.

The editor transmits all the submitted manuscripts, which were not rejected according to the reasons stated below, for peer-review. The editor chooses the reviewers out of the most competent specialists on the topic of the article.

Editors should preserve anonymity of reviewers and should not tell the reviewers the names of the authors.

Editors should guarantee the quality of the papers and the integrity of the academic record and be willing to publish corrections, clarifications, retractions, and apologies when needed.

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Review and professional publication articles should also be accurate and objective, and editorial opinion works should be clearly identified as such.

Advertising Policies

The editorial board adheres to ethical standards in its work and, above all, defending the right to editorial independence. Placement of promotional materials and sponsorship can not influence in any way on editorial decisions and editorial content. The journal does not publish materials to accompany the advertising and does not sell advertising for specific articles. Advertising and information materials is not mixed with the editorial content.

All decisions on advertising placement are only accepted by the publisher. The editors reserve the right not to accept advertising materials, the placement does not meet the publication policy.

Data Access and Retention

Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

Plagiarism takes many forms, from passing off another paper as the author(s) own paper to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another(s) paper (without attribution), to claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

The Editorial Board considers the following to be the forms plagiarism:

Use (word for word citing) of any materials in any value without indicating the source;
use of images, pictures, photographs, tables, diagrams, schemes, or any other forms of graphical information presentation without indicating the source;
use of images, pictures, photographs, tables, diagrams, schemes, or any other forms of graphical information presentation published in scientific and popular issues without approving by the copyright holder;
use of the materials without written permission, the authors or copyright holders of which don’t permit use of their materials without special approvement.

The Editorial Board considers the following to be the forms of incorrect borrowing:

Absence of graphical highlighting of literal text citation when there are references to the source;
incorrect references (incomplete bibliographic description of the sources, which prevents their identification;
reference not to the first source of the borrowed text without a clear indication of this fact (mistake in primary source determination);
absence of references from the text to the sources enumerated in the list below the article;
excessive citation (in case there are references to the sources and graphical highlighting of the cited text), the volume of which is not justified by the genre and aims of the article.

Only original works are acceptable for publication in journal. The journal does not allow any forms of plagiarism.

If the authors have used the work and/or words of others, this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

The journal is using "ANTIPLAGIAT" software for plagiarism detection in all Russian-language manuscripts. If the editorial board of the journal has reasons for a more detailed check, additional tools for searching for borrowings can be involved. Google Scholar is used for English-language manuscripts. Papers will be rejected from any stage of the publication process (even if the article was published already) if plagiarism will be fined.

The Editorial Board of the Journal strongly discourages the use of any technique to increase the text score in the Anti-Plagiarism system.

Articles that show signs of technical modifications in order to artificially increase the uniqueness of the text will not be published in the journal even if revised. The editors report all such facts to the reviewer and, if the author works in an educational institution, to its management.

If unauthorized borrowings are detected, as well as with a low coefficient of originality of the text (<85%) and large amounts of borrowings that are not justified by the goals of the article, the manuscript is rejected from publication.

Articles whose content repeats the results and conclusions obtained in other scientific publications of the author (monographs, previous publications in journals and collections), as well as studies already described earlier in dissertations and abstracts, in the absence of development of the provisions presented in them and new results, to publications are not accepted.

Identification of plagiarism of ideas and plagiarism of data is carried out as part of scientific peer review, as well as after the publication of manuscripts - upon the fact of readers' requests with relevant statements. When establishing the fact of unauthorized borrowing of data (results of scientific work) or ideas, the manuscript (article) will be withdrawn and rejected from publication, even if it has already been published.

Papers will be rejected from any stage of the publication process (even if the article was published already) if plagiarism will be fined.

Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper. Publication of some kinds of articles (eg, clinical guidelines, translations) in more than one journal is sometimes justifiable, provided certain conditions are met. The authors and editors of the journals concerned must agree to the secondary publication, which must reflect the same data and interpretation of the primary document. The primary reference must be cited in the secondary publication.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Information obtained privately, as in conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties, must not be used or reported without explicit, written permission from the source. Information obtained in the course of confidential services, such as refereeing manuscripts or grant applications, must not be used without the explicit written permission of the author of the work involved in these services.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

First author. The first author in the list of co-authors should be the head of the author's team of the manuscript, who took the greatest part in the process of preparing the text and is familiar with the entire process of conducting scientific work. The head of the team of authors should also be a "correspondence author" - to communicate with the editors of the journal and readers (after the publication of the article).

The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human Subjects

Authors should include a statement in the manuscript that informed consent was obtained for experimentation with human subjects. The privacy rights of human subjects must always be observed.

Statement of Human Rights

When reporting experiments on human subjects, authors should indicate whether the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 and 2008. If doubt exists whether the research was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration, the authors must explain the rationale for their approach, and demonstrate that the institutional review body explicitly approved the doubtful aspects of the study.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose (declare in the corresponding section of the manuscript) any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that might be construed to affect the results or the conclusions of their manuscript.

Examples of potential conflicts of interest which should be disclosed include:

receiving funding in support of the research or the preparation of the manuscript, any connection (employment, consultancies, stock ownership, royalties, providing expert opinions) with organizations that have a direct interest in the subject of research or review;
application or registration of patents for research results (copyright, etc.);
obtaining financial support for any of the stages of research or the preparation of the manuscript (including grants and other financial support).

Explicit and potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed as early as possible.

Information on conflicts of interest received from the authors of the manuscripts is not provided to the reviewers and is available only to the editorial board when deciding on the publication of the manuscript. Also, information on conflicts of interest is published as part of the full text of the article.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the authors obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper. If the editor or the publisher learn from a third party that a published work contains a significant error, it is the obligation of the author to promptly correct or retract the paper or provide evidence to the editor of the correctness of the original paper.

Editorial Policy for Corrections to Published Articles

If inaccuracies and factual errors are made in the article that do not require retraction of the article, the editorial carries out the procedure for publishing the corrections.

The purpose of corrections made to a scientific article after publication is to convey truthful, accurate information to the reader, help avoid illegal borrowing, and eliminate erroneous data.

Any necessary changes will be accompanied with a post-publication notice which will be permanently linked to the original article so that readers will be fully informed of any necessary changes. This can be in the form of a Correction notice, an Expression of Concern, a Retraction and in rare circumstances a Removal.

Authors should notify us as soon as possible if they find errors in their published article, especially errors that could affect the interpretation of data or reliability of information presented. It is the responsibility of the corresponding author to ensure consensus has been reached between all listed co-authors prior to putting forward any requests for corrections or retractions to an article.

Any minor errors will not be accompanied by a separate correction notice. Instead, a footnote will be added to the article detailing to the reader that the article has been corrected. Minor errors do not impact the reliability of, or the reader’s understanding of, the scholarly content.

The reprint of the article with corrections is carried out simultaneously with the retraction of the previous publication in case of multiple typos, incorrect citation, incorrect wording, incorrect facts, the need for corrections to the team of authors and other cases where changes are required that affect the interpretation of the article and at the same time the scientific integrity of the article does not remain unchanged.

Reprint of the corrected article may be initiated by the author (s), readers, or the editors of the journal.

The procedure for correcting errors when reprinting an article

If the editorial board has received information about the need to make corrections from third parties, the editor or the Editor-in-Chief will politely send the authors a notification about the need to analyze the identified errors.
After an analysis of the identified errors, the editorial representatives report the need to reprint the article with corrections to the author (s) to agree on the corrections.
The printed issue of the journal publishes an error message indicating the number / year and pages of the issue with the article in which the error was made, a description of the error and text with the corrected error, and retractions of the previous version of the article containing errors.
It is also indicated on whose initiative the retraction and reprint procedure is carried out.
In the online version of the journal, an error message is posted on the site page and / or PDF file with the article.
Readers are given the opportunity to work with the revised version of the article by posting it on the site next to the previous retracted version, in which the retraction was noted.
Information about the corrections, retractions and republishing is transferred to the Russian Index of Science Citation (elibrary.ru) and other databases in which the journal is indexed.

Retraction guidelines

In some cases, the Editorial Board may consider retracting a publication.

The article will be officially retracted if at any stage of review, prepress, or after publication, the editors or readers reveal a violation of the requirements of publication ethics. The retraction of the article due to violation of publication ethics will also entail a ban on the publication of articles in this journal for all members of the authors team involved in the incident in the future.

The reasons for retraction may be the following:

it constitutes plagiarism, including borrowed pictures, tables, diagrams, etc. If plagiarism was detected after publication (see Plagiarism Policy);
the third party expresses claims concerning copyrights for the article or its parts;
the findings have previously been published elsewhere before the date of its publication in the journal.

The published article has serious errors, which place its scientific value in question.

In such cases, the Editor should initiate the revision, after which the article may be retracted. The Act on retraction is complied, which is signed by the editor-in-chief. The copy of the Act is being sent to the author of the article.

In this case, the article is not physically withdrawn from the published edition and the file of the issue on web site. The Editorial Office publishes the notification on retraction of the article on the corresponding page of the issue content on the official site of the Journal. The Editorial Office should attentively consider issuing an expression of concern about the revealed problems in the published materials.

The Editorial Board considers it a responsibility of authors and reviewers to promptly inform about the missed mistakes and breaches revealed after the publication of the article.

Privacy Statement

Information about the authors (surname, name, family name, affiliation, e-mail, contact number), which is provided by them for publication in the journal, is becoming available for an indefinite range of persons, for which the authors give their permission by providing his article in the online system on the website of the journal.

The following data is published for the convenience of the authors with the aim of the full and correct account of publications and their citation by the corresponding bibliography companies and providing the possibility of contacting the authors ans the scientific society.

Personal information provided by the authors in addition to the enumerated below include additional e-mails and phones. These will be used only for contacting the authors in the process of preparing the publication. The Editorial Board may not transmit this information to a third party, who can use it for some other purposes.

Publication Fee

Publication process in this journal is free for all authors.

The journal charge no publication fees for authors - including those of peer-review management, manuscript processing, journal production, Open-Access, online hosting and archiving.

The journal asks no article processing charge in any forms.

Policy in the field of personal data processing

Terms and conditions for processing personal data of users of the RUDN UNIVERSITY SCIENTIFIC PERIODICALS PORTAL (hereinafter referred to as Terms and Conditions)

1. Conditions, purposes, content and procedure for processing personal data (hereinafter referred to as PD) using automation tools, measures aimed at protecting PD, as well as measures aimed at identifying and preventing violations of the legislation of the Russian Federation in the field of PD, which are carried out by the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University), legal/postal address: Moscow, st. Miklukho-Maklaya, 6.

2. The Operator processes of the RUDN Scientific Journals Portal (hereinafter referred to as the Portal) users PD in accordance with these Terms and Conditions within the framework of legal relations with the Operator regulated by the current Russian legislation and Policy.

3. The Operator processes the following types of PD of users.

Surname,
Name,
Middle name / patronymic (if any)
E-mail,
User ID stored in the cookie*,
ORCID iD (if available),
SPIN code (if available),
Scopus Author ID (if available),
ResearcherId (if available),
Mendeley Profile (if available),
Publons Profile (if available),
Organization (Organization name, organization address),
Academic Degree,
Academic Title
Position,
personal page on the website of the organization (place of work) of the user on the Internet.

^{____________________}

^{* Used only in the journal site system. PD marked in paragraph 3 with the symbol (*) are not subject to transfer and distribution.}

4. The Operator has the right to process the PD listed above in order to carry out the legal activities of the mass media - the Journal posted on the Portal, including providing the User with information about the Journal through the website and by e-mail.

5. To access the published materials of the Journal's website (full-text content of issues, information about the Journal, members of the editorial board and editorial board, rules for authors and other sections of the site) for reading and copying, the User does not need to register.

6. The Portal User voluntarily provides the Operator with his PD in the following cases:

6.1. when registering on the Journal website as an Author:

6.1.1. the only author in the article or the corresponding author in the presence of several co-authors in the article - to upload the article to the Journal's website for the purpose of its consideration by the editors of the Journal and publication in the Journal. By uploading an article to the Journal's website, the Author accepts the offer - transfers the rights to use the article and expresses consent to the processing of his PD by the Operator.

! The author's license agreement for the publication of the article (public offer) is placed in the "Copyright" section of the journal's website in the public domain (registration on the site as a User is not required for preliminary familiarization with the text of the offer).

At the same time, the User, filling out the registration form, makes all the PD listed in clause 3 of these Terms.

By ticking the mandatory field "Legal information^✱ / Consent to the processing of personal data" of the registration form, the User, having previously clicked on the link "Consent to the processing of personal data" below and read the text in the window that opens, confirms that he has read these Terms and Conditions and the Policy and his consent to the processing by the Operator of the User's PD entered in the registration form. Without such confirmation, the registration of the User will not be completed.

6.1.2. a co-author of an article who is not a correspondent author, for the subsequent submission of information about the co-author in the process of uploading an article by a correspondent author to the Journal's website for the purpose of its consideration by the editors of the Journal and publication in the Journal. By filling out the registration form, the User agrees to the processing of his PD by the Operator.

At the same time, the User, filling out the registration form, puts a tick in the role of the Author and makes all the PD listed in clause 3 of these Terms.

The processing by the Operator of the PD of the User registered as the Author / Co-author includes the collection, recording, systematization, accumulation, storage, clarification (updating, changing), extraction, copying, use, transfer as part of the article metadata (provision, access), including distribution, depersonalization, blocking, deletion and destruction of PD in accordance with the current legislation of the Russian Federation.

6.1.3. when registering on the website of the Journal as a Reviewer to participate in the review of a scientific article submitted for consideration by the editors of the Journal.

At the same time, the User, filling out the registration form, makes all the PD listed in clause 3 of these Terms.

By checking the box "Legal information^✱ / Consent to the processing of personal data" of the registration form, the User, having previously clicked on the link below "Consent to the processing of personal data" and having read the text in the window that opens, confirms that he has read these Terms and Conditions and the Policy and his consent to the processing by the Operator of the User's PD entered in the registration form. Without such confirmation, the registration of the User will not be completed.

Having received a review request sent by the Editorial Board to the Reviewer’s e-mail address with an offer attached and expressing in response to the request consent to participate in reviewing in the user’s personal account, the Reviewer accepts the offer - transfers the rights to use the subsequently prepared review and expresses consent to the processing by the Operator of his PD.

Processing by the Operator of the User's PD, registered as a Reviewer, includes collection, systematization, accumulation, storage, clarification (updating, modification), extraction, copying, use, transfer to third parties (provision, access); depersonalization, blocking and destruction of PD in accordance with the current legislation of the Russian Federation.

At the same time, the following PD of the reviewer are subject to transfer to third parties, namely and exclusively to Scientific Electronic Library LLC (eLIBRARY.ru) and the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation: surname, first name, middle name / patronymic (if any), academic degree, academic title, email, position, organization name. Transfer can be carried out only if the Reviewer accepts the Offer.

PD of the reviewer are not subject to distribution.

7. A user who has registered on the Portal as a Author (including Co-author) / Reviewer has the right to withdraw his consent to the processing of PD by sending the Operator a corresponding notification to the email address of the Journal's editors, specified in the "Contacts" section of the Journal's website on the Portal.

Username
Password
Remember me

Forgot password?	Register

Username
Password
Remember me

Forgot password?	Register

Vol 10, No 2 (2024)

Editorial Policies

Aims and Scope

Sections

Articles

Innovative technologies in Russian language teaching methodology

Innovative technologies in language education

Educational space research

Linguocultural adaptation in teaching the Russian Language

Interdisciplinary studies of the Russian language

Scientific debut

Russian language in teaching methods

Russian language in scientific coverage

Russian language in professional education

Russian literary word

Testing systems in modern language education

Language education and testing

Language education and testing: educational and methodological support

Evaluation of the Language Programs Quality

Linguistic View of the World in Education