The Quantum Concept of Consciousness: For or Against?

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The study examines a problematic hypothesis of possible approaches to identifying the quantum physical foundations of the functioning of consciousness. The authors proceed from the fact that in modern conditions, not a single science, nor all sciences taken together, gives a final answer to the question of the “mechanism” of the origin of thought. However, this does not mean at all that research in this direction needs to be stopped. The authors express confidence that modern and subsequent research into the “quantum concept of consciousness” will lead to the identification of previously unknown patterns, opening the way to the formation of new principles and approaches. As an example, the corresponding Penrose - Hameroff concept is considered. Quantum mechanics complements the tools of neurobiology and other branches of neuroscience, which together form an interdisciplinary field of knowledge that is dynamically growing and developing. The authors are not apologists for the omnipotence of quantum physics. Quantum correlates of consciousness actually mean that it is not today’s quantum mechanics itself that explains the emergence of mental states, but the fact that in the birth of these states it is essential that in the very process of the formation of neurodynamic impulses in the neurons of the cerebral cortex that generate mental states, there are processes of quantum nature. It should also be recognized that the quantum-molecular level (nanolevel) of processes in the neurons of the brain really exists and it is this that is the source of proto-consciousness. Science strives to move forward, new research programs are emerging within the framework of quantum biology, quantum psychology, quantum information science, which in turn can shed light on the hypothesis of the “quantum concept of consciousness.”

About the authors

Victor N. Knyazev

Moscow State Pedagogical University; National Research University MPEI

Author for correspondence.
Email: kvn951@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1956-7229

DSc in Philosophy, Professor of the Department of Philosophy

1 Malaya Pirogovskaya St., 119991, Moscow, Russian Federation; 14 Krasnokazarmennaya St., 111250, Moscow, Russian Federation

Galina V. Parshikova

Bryansk State Technical University

Email: parshikovagalina@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-9700-2853

PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Humanitarian and Social Disciplines

7 blv. 50 years of October, 241035, Bryansk, Russian Federation

References

  1. Axel R. Q&A. Neuron. 2018;99:1110.
  2. Hameroff S, Penrose R. Consciousness in the Universe: A Review of the «Orch OR» Theory. In: Biophysics of Consciousness: A Foundational Approach. Singapore: World Scientific; 2016. P. 517—630.
  3. Stapp HP. Mind, matter and quantum mechanics. 3rd Edition. Berlin: Springer; 2009.
  4. Penrouz R, Shimoni A, Kartrayt N, Khoking S. The big, the small and the human mind. Saint Petersbirg: Amfora publ.; 2008. (In Russian).
  5. Kurtsveyl R. How to create a mind: the secret of human thinking revealed. Moscow: Eksmo publ.; 2015. (In Russian).
  6. Chalmers D. The conscious mind. In search of a fundamental theory. Moscow: URSS, Librokom publ.; 2013. (In Russian).
  7. Menskiy MB. Man and the quantum world. Fryazino: Vek2 publ.; 2007. (In Russian).
  8. Eccles J. How the self controls its brain. Berlin: Springer; 1994. P. 145—165.
  9. Wang H, Sun Y. On Quantum Models of the Human Mind. Topics in Cognitive Science. 2014;6(1);98—103. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12064
  10. Ball P. Physics of life: The dawn of quantum biology. Nature. 2011;(474):272—274. https://doi.org/10.1038/474272a
  11. Cherepanov IV. The role of quantum mechanics in understanding the phenomenon of consciousness. RUDN Journal of Philosophy. 2022;26(4):770—789. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2022-26-4-770-789
  12. Smith Q. Why Cognitive Scientists Cannot Ignore Quantum Mechanics? In: Consciousness: New Philosophical Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003. P. 409—447.
  13. Parshikova GV. Linguistic concept and qualitative content of mental states in objectification of the nature of consciousness. Pushkin Leningrad State University Journal. 2015;2(1):70—79. (In Russian).
  14. Vasilyev VV. The difficult problem of consciousness. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya publ.; 2009. (In Russian).
  15. McCalloch WS, Pitts W. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull. Math. Biophys. 1943;5:115—133. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12274.003.0011
  16. Aksenov SV, Novoseltsev VB. Organization and use of neural networks: (methods and technologies). Novoseltseva VB, editor. Tomsk: Izd-vo nauch.-tekhnicheskoy lit. publ.; 2006. (In Russian).
  17. Guzik V, Gushanskiy S, Polenov M, Potapov V. Architecture and Software Implementation of a Quantum Computer Model. 5th Computer Science On-line Conference (CSOS). Czech Republic; 2016. P. 59—68.
  18. Penrouz R. Shadows of the Mind: in Search of the Science of Consciousness. Part I. Understanding the Mind and the new Physics. Moscow, Izhevsk: Institut kompyutornykh issledovaniy publ.; 2003. (In Russian).
  19. Jaeger L. The Second Quantum Revolution. From Entanglement to Quantum Computing and Other Super-Technologies. Copernicus; 2018.
  20. Aspelmeyer M, Zeilinger A. A quantum renaissance. Physics World. 2008;21(7):22—28. https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-7058/21/07/34
  21. Wichert А. Quantum Cognition and the Mind. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness. 2021;8(1):161—170. https://doi.org/10.1142/s2705078521500016
  22. Fisher M. Quantum Cognition: The Possibility of Processing with Nuclear Spins in the Brain. Annals of Physics. 2015;(362):593—602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2015.08.020
  23. Knyazev VN, Parshikova GV. Об особенностях функционирования сознания в контексте квантовой информатики. Metaphysics. 2022;4(46):130—143. (In Russian).
  24. Menskiy MB. Consciousness and Quantum Mechanics: Life in Parallel Worlds (Miracles of Consciousness — from Quantum Reality). Fryazino: Vek2 publ.; 2011. (In Russian).
  25. Kanke VA. Philosophy of mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology. Moscow: KNORUS publ.; 2011. (In Russian).
  26. Menskiy MB. Intuition and the quantum approach to the theory of consciousness. Voprosy filosofii. 2015;(4):48—57. (In Russian).
  27. Dubrovskiy DI. Critical analysis of the Penrose-Hameroff theory of Consciousness. Part 1. Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki. 2017;22(1):125—136. (In Russian).
  28. Dubrovskiy DI. Critical analysis of the Penrose-Hameroff theory of Consciousness. Part 2. Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki. 2017;22(2):89—102. (In Russian).

Copyright (c) 2023 Knyazev V.N., Parshikova G.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies