Email this article 
Innovative Paradigm of Technogenic Civilization: Problems of Methodology
- Authors: Kryuchkova S.E.1, Khrapov S.A.2, Glazkov A.P.2
-
Affiliations:
- Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
- Astrakhan State University
- Issue: Vol 27, No 1 (2023): PHILOSOPHY OF V. SESEMANN
- Pages: 108-122
- Section: THE FUTURE OF HUMAN AND HUMANITY
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/34157
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2023-27-1-108-122
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PMBWQM
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article attempts to develop the methodological foundations of innovation as a new field of scientific research that studies innovation in science, culture and society. On the basis of the philosophical and methodological approach, the term “innovation” is conceptualized. The definition of the concept of innovation proposed in the article is based on the “procedural approach” in the interpretation of innovation activity and at the same time emphasizes the significance of the final result in the form of a new product that has commercial (social) value. In the context of modern trends in technogenic civilization, the essential features of innovative activity are revealed, its high degree of uncertainty and sensitivity to random changes and the influence of the external environment is revealed, it is shown that, along with organization, self-organization processes play an important role in it, manifested in complex, spontaneous changes accompanying the emergence of innovations. It is concluded that these features are evidence of the synergistic nature of innovation. The “rehabilitation” of synergetics is being carried out, which is considered as an ontological basis for building an innovative methodology. The article also formulates the basic principles of innovation methodology: openness of innovation, unity of linearity and non-linearity, probabilistic nature, the principle of systemic communication and organization, interdisciplinarity, the principle of relying on feedback. The possibility of creating an innovative method is being assessed. On this basis, the modern status of innovation is determined as an independent field of knowledge that has its own object, subject, functions, subjects, methodology, social mechanisms and the sphere of innovative consciousness, as well as other distinctive features of any particular science. A new approach to understanding the social and humanitarian expertise of high-risk innovative projects is proposed.
About the authors
Svetlana E. Kryuchkova
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Author for correspondence.
Email: svetlana.kryuchkova2015@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9213-8503
Doctor of philosophical sciences, Professor of the Department of Humanities
49 Leningradskiy prospekt, Moscow, 125993, Russian FederationSergey A. Khrapov
Astrakhan State University
Email: khrapov.s.a.aspu@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1962-748X
Doctor of philosophical sciences, Professor of the Department of Philosophy
20A Tatishcheva St, Astrakhan, 414056, Russian FederationAlexander P. Glazkov
Astrakhan State University
Email: alpglazkov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7606-2433
Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Head of the Department of Philosophy
20A Tatishcheva St, Astrakhan, 414056, Russian FederationReferences
- Khrapov SA. "Man" technogenic in the socio-cultural space of technogenic civilization. Astrakhan: Astrakhan University; 2019. (In Russian).
- Schwab K, Davis N. Technologies of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Moscow: Eksmo; 2018. (In Russian).
- Aseeva IA. Axiological priorities of the VI technological way. Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. 2017;51(1):124—137. (In Russian).
- Fagerberg J. Innovation. A Guide to the Literature. In: Fagerberg J, Mowery D, Nelson R, editors. Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006. P. 1—26.
- Glazkov AP, Vostrikov IV, Khrapov SA. Philosophy of Management. Astrakhan: Sorokin Roman Vasilyevich; 2022. (In Russian).
- Drugova EA. Innovation in the search for a new humanitarian content: ontology, axiology, methodology. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya. 2013;21(1):4—19. (In Russian).
- Lapin NI. Theory and practice of Innovation. Moscow: Universitetskaya kniga; Logos; 2008. (In Russian).
- Godin B. Innovation: the History of a Category. In: Working Paper N 1, Project on the Intellectual History of Innovation. Montreal: INRS; 2008.
- Tard G. The Laws of imitation. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt; 2011. (In Russian).
- Zombart V. Bourgeois: towards the history of the spiritual development of a modern economic man. In: Collected works in 3 vol. Vol. 1. Saint Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’; 2005. (In Russian).
- Yakovets YuV. Epochal innovations of the XXI century. In: International Institute of P. Sorokin — N. Kondratiev. Moscow: Ehkono-mika; 2004. (In Russian).
- Kondratiev ND. Big cycles of conjuncture and theory of vision. Moscow: Ehkonomika; 2002. (In Russian).
- Pirozhkova SV, Omelaenko VV. A. Bogdanov's socio-philosophical ideas in the context of social design tasks. Russian studies in Philosophy. 2019;57(6):525—533. https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967.2019.1682876
- Schumpeter JA. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Moscow: Ehkonomika; 1995. (In Russian).
- Glazyev SYu. Modern theory of long waves in economic development. Economic science of modern Russia. 2012;57(2):27—42. (In Russian).
- Yelkina EE. Methodological problems of innovative activity. Bibliosfera. 2008;(4):10—14. (In Russian).
- Kotsemir MN, Abroskin A, Meisnerr D. Innovation Concepts and Typology — An Evolutionary Discussion. Moscow: Higher School of Economics Research Paper; 2013.
- OECD. Oslo Manuals. Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd edition. Paris: OECD PUBLICATION; 2005.
- Knyazeva EN. Preface. In: Innovative complexity. Saint Petersburg: Aleteiya; 2016. (In Russian).
- Linton J. Implementation Research: State of The Art and Future Directions. Technovation. 2002;22(2):65—79. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4972(01)00075-x
- Kryuchkova SE, Kryuchkova EV. Innovatika. Moscow: Yanus-K; 2016. (In Russian).
- Rumyantseva LN. On the concepts of «innovation» and «culture». Filosofiya obrazovaniya. 2010;(1):30—35. (In Russian).
- Collingridge D. The social control of technology. New York: St. Martin's Press; London: Pinter; 1980.
- European Commission. Horizon 2020. EU Research and Innovation Framework. Available from: http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e5f19eb4-55ff-41ca-824e-f21fc612dd39.0001.04/DOC_1 (accessed: 23.05.2022). (In Russian).
- Aseeva I, Pirozhkova S. Prognostic approaches and ethical foundations of techno-social expertise. Voprosy filosofii. 2021;(12):65—76. (In Russian).
- Gubarev VV. Science and Synergetics. Voprosy filosofii. 2009;(10):159—165. (In Russian).
- Stepin VS. Synergetics and system analysis. In: Synergetic paradigm: Cognitive-communicative strategies of scientific knowledge. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya; 2004. (In Russian).
- Budanov VG. Synergetic mechanisms of scientific knowledge growth and culture. Filosofiya nauki. 1996;(2):191—198. (In Russian).
- Dudchenko VS. Fundamentals of Innovative Methodology. Moscow: Institut sotsiologii RAN; 1996. (In Russian).
- Fedorov VK, Bendersky GP, Epaneshnikova EK. Innovation as an activity and a system (on the methodology of innovation theory). Innovatsii. 2011;7(153):65—68. (In Russian).
