Leo Tolstoy and Russian Religious Philosophy (part II)
- Authors: Zwahlen R.M1, Tsygankov AS2
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of Ecumenical Studies of the University of Freiburg
- RAS Institute of Philosophy
- Issue: Vol 22, No 1 (2018)
- Pages: 85-92
- Section: TRANSLATIONS AND PUBLICATIONS
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/18144
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2018-22-1-85-92
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The Ideas of Leo Tolstoy are one of the key catalyzers for the emergence of the “new religious consciousness” and religious philosophy at the beginning of the XX century in Russia. Many religious philosophers who, unlike Leo Tolstoy, believed in the possibility of reforming the Russian Orthodox Church, developed a detailed arguments both for and against Tolstoy’s moral doctrine. As for faith in Christ resurrection, art of understanding, attitude to “this world”, progress and culture, many of them followed the ideas of Vladimir Solovyov, who had sharply criticized the views of Leo Tolstoy. In 1912 the publishing house called “The Way” released a book “About Leo Tolstoy’s religion”, it was dedicated to the memory of the deceased Count in 1910, which would serve as “his own great task” - “religious awakening of modern society” - and at the same time to deal with the errors of Tolstoy. The results of debate with the Tolstoy’s religion had given a good basis for the projections of the key issues of Russian philosophy: first, the relationship between faith and reason, and secondly, the relationship between spirit and nature, and thirdly, the conflict between the individual and society, fourthly, purpose and meaning of human creativity and culture. In view of the different interpretations of the ideas of Leo Tolstoy Russian religious philosophy revealed itself not as a homogenous unity, but they demonstrated diversity of personal aspirations of its members. What they have in common are the appreciation of the literary work of Russian writer and his lofty moral claims, but at the same time, they separated themself from him, in order to remain faithful to Church dogmas.
About the authors
Regula M Zwahlen
Institute of Ecumenical Studies of the University of Freiburg
Author for correspondence.
Email: m1dian@yandex.ru
1700, Switzerland, Freiburg, st. Europe 20
A S Tsygankov
RAS Institute of Philosophy
Email: m1dian@yandex.ru
Goncharnaya Str., 12/1, Moscow, Russia, 109240
References
- Berdjaev NA. Vethij i novyj zavet v religioznom soznanii L. Tolstogo [Old and New Testaments in Tolstoy’s religious consciousness] L.N. Tolstoj: pro et contra. St. Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Russkogo Hristianskogo Gumanitarnogo Instituta; 2000. p. 243—263. (In Russ).
- Berdjaev NA. Duhi russkoj revoljucii [The spirits of the Russian Revolution] “Iz glubiny”. Sbornik statej o russkoj revoljucii. Moscow: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta; 1990. р. 123—139. (In Russ).
- Bulgakov SN. Chelovekobog i chelovekozver’ [Man-God and man-beast] L.N. Tolstoj: pro et contra. St. Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Russkogo Hristianskogo Gumanitarnogo Instituta; 2000. p. 601—638. (In Russ).
- Bulgakov SN. Prostota i oproshhenie [Simplicity and simplification] L.N. Tolstoj: pro et contra. St. Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Russkogo Hristianskogo Gumanitarnogo Instituta; 2000. p. 274—298. (In Russ).
- Bulgakov SN. L.N. Tolstoj [L.N. Tolstoy] Tihie dumy. Moscow: Respublika; 1996. 510 p. (In Russ).
- Zen’kovskij VV. Problema bessmertija u L.N. Tolstogo [The problem of immortality by L.N. Tolstoy] O religii L’va Tolstogo. Moscow: Put’; 1912. p. 27—58. (In Russ).
- Il’in IA. O soprotivlenii zlu siloj [On the resistance to evil by force] L.N. Tolstoj: pro et contra. St. Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Russkogo Hristianskogo Gumanitarnogo Instituta; 2000. p. 331—342. (In Russ).
- Ivanov VI. Lev Tolstoj i kul’tura [Leo Tolstoy and Culture] L.N. Tolstoj: pro et contra. St. Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Russkogo Hristianskogo Gumanitarnogo Instituta; 2000. p. 563—574. (In Russ).
- Rozanov VV. Еshhe o gr. L.N. Tolstom i ego uchenii neprotivlenii zlu [Оn c. LN Tolstoy and his teachings of non-resistance to evil] L.N. Tolstoj: pro et contra. St. Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Russkogo Hristianskogo Gumanitarnogo Instituta; 2000. p. 264—273. (In Russ).
- Stepun FA. Religioznaja tragedija L’va Tolstogo [The religious tragedy of Leo Tolstoy] L.N. Tolstoj: pro et contra. St. Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Russkogo Hristianskogo Gumanitarnogo Instituta; 2000. p. 445—470. (In Russ).
- Tolstoj LN. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij v 90-ta tomah. [Complete Works in 90 volumes that] Vol. 5. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo hudozhestvennoj literatury; 1935. 376 р. (In Russ).
- Trubeckoj EN. Spor Tolstogo i Solov’eva o gosudarstve [The dispute Tolstoy and Solovyov about the state] O religii L’va Tolstogo. Moscow: Put’; 1912. p. 59—75. (In Russ).
- Frank SL. Nravstvennoe uchenie L.N. Tolstogo [The moral teachings of L. Tolstoy] L.N. Tolstoj: pro et contra. St. Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Russkogo Hristianskogo Gumanitarnogo Instituta; 2000. p. 299—308. (In Russ).
- Jekzempljarskij V.I. Gr. L.N. Tolstoj i sv. Ioann Zlatoust v ih vzgljadah na zhiznennoe znachenie zapovedej Hristovyh [C. L.N. Tolstoy and St. John Chrysostom in their views on the vital importance of the commandments of Christ] O religii L’va Tolstogo. Moscow: Put’, 1912. pp. 76—113. (In Russ).
- Jern Vl. Tolstoj protiv Tolstogo [Tolstoy against Tolstoy] O religii L’va Tolstogo. Moscow: Put’; 1912. p. 214—248. (In Russ).
- Schestow L. Tolstoi und Nietzsche. Die Idee des Guten in ihren Lehren. Deutsche Übersetzung von Nadja Strasser. München: Matthes und Seitz Verlag;1994. 304 S.