Typing of adaptive immunity cells: markers of populations and their functional significance

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Relevance. Single-cell sequencing technologies (scRNA-seq) provide unique opportunities for studying the heterogeneity of immune populations, enabling the analysis of expression profiles, ligand-receptor interactions, and differentiation trajectories at the single-cell level. However, the quality of cell typing significantly depends on the accuracy of data annotation. Marker ambiguity, variability in their expression depending on physiological context, limitations of automated tools such as CellTypist, Azimuth, and SingleR, and the incompleteness of databases like PanglaoDB and CellMarker, including insufficient information on the functional roles of markers, substantially hinder the identification of cell populations and require additional efforts to achieve meaningful results. Aim. To systematize markers of T- and B-cells of the adaptive immune response to facilitate scRNA-seq data annotation. Materials and Methods. An analysis of 30 scientific publications from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (2008-2024) and marker data from PanglaoDB and CellMarker was conducted. Results and discussion. Key and additional T-cell (CD3D, CD3E, CD3G, CD4, CD8A, CD8B, FOXP3, GZMA, TBX21) and B-cell (CD19, MS4A1, CD27, IGHM, IGHD) markers, their roles in immune processes, including activation, cytotoxicity, and regulation, were examined. Subpopulations such as Th1 cells (T-bet, IFN-γ), follicular helper cells (CXCR5, BCL-6), and regulatory B-cells (CD24, IL-10) and their functions in health and disease were described. Conclusion. The systematization of T- and B-cell markers was developed to improve the quality of single-cell sequencing data annotation and is applicable for enhanced typing of cell functional states in health and pathological conditions, including infectious, autoimmune, and oncological diseases. This opens opportunities for a deeper understanding of immune processes and the development of immunotherapy approaches, such as CAR-T therapy. However, the limited specificity of markers and the lack of standardized annotation algorithms highlight the need for further research to refine typing methods.

Full Text

Introduction

Deciphering immune cell composition and function is key to understanding both normal immunity and its disruption in disease [1]. Modern sequencing technologies, such as single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), provide unprecedented opportunities to investigate immune populations by enabling the analysis of gene expression profiles, ligand–receptor interactions, and differentiation trajectories at single-cell resolution [2]. In the field of cancer research, the analysis of immune cell types through scRNA-seq holds great importance, as the makeup and functional traits of the tumor microenvironment (TME) affect molecular diagnostics, the creation of targeted treatments, and the prognosis of the disease. For instance, identifying T-cell subpopulations with exhaustion markers (PD‑1+, LAG‑3+) in the TME indicates immunosuppression, making immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-PD‑1 antibodies, a preferred therapeutic strategy to restore immune function. High infiltration of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells is associated with favorable prognosis in breast cancer and other malignancies, whereas a predominance of regulatory T cells (FOXP3+, CD25+) may necessitate combined approaches, such as CTLA‑4 inhibitors or CAR-T cell therapies, to overcome immunosuppression [1, 3]. Identifying markers such as CXCR5+ and BCL‑6+ for follicular helper T cells aids in assessing humoral immune activity and selecting patients likely to respond to immunotherapy [3, 4].

The advancement of single-cell sequencing technologies has led to the development of numerous computational tools, including automated annotation methods such as CellTypist, Azimuth, and SingleR, which aim to streamline and standardize this process [5–7]. While these tools are widely used for basic immune cell population typing, they have limitations in performing detailed subpopulation analysis. They often lack information on expression variability across different physiological states and do not provide insights into the origin or functional roles of specific markers. As a result, accurately distinguishing clusters into biologically meaningful cell populations can be challenging. To achieve higher-resolution annotations, manual reclustering is frequently required, typically guided by expert knowledge and supported by curated cell marker databases such as PanglaoDB, CellMarker, and MonacoImmuneData [8–10]. However, these resources often lack detailed information on the functional roles and expression contexts of markers, limiting the depth and accuracy of annotations and necessitating additional manual literature searches. Emerging tools such as CellMeSH, which utilize indexed scientific literature for probabilistic cell type annotation, offer a promising solution to these challenges but have not yet become part of standard practice [11].

Given the limitations of current automated annotation methods and the incomplete characterization of immune cell markers in existing databases, this review aims to systematize key markers of T and B lymphocytes within the adaptive immune system, taking into account their developmental origin, functional roles, and transcriptional context. As central mediators of adaptive immunity, T and B lymphocytes play critical roles in shaping the antitumor immune response, thereby influencing treatment outcomes and disease prognosis. Markers of innate immune cells will be discussed in a forthcoming publication. This review serves as a complementary resource for the accurate annotation and interpretation of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data, supporting more reliable identification of immune cell populations.

T cells

T cells are central components of the adaptive immune system, providing protection against pathogens and maintaining immune homeostasis. They originate in the bone marrow from a common lymphoid progenitor (CLP) and undergo maturation in the thymus through processes of positive and negative selection, ultimately giving rise to functionally competent CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (Figure) [3].

Figure. Markers of adaptive immune cell populations. The figure shows a scheme of adaptive immune cell differentiation, with key markers indicated at various stages. Colors represent the maturation sites of different cell populations

T-cell development in the thymus

T cell differentiation begins with the migration of hematopoietic progenitor cells from the bone marrow to the thymus, where they undergo maturation and selection. In the thymus, thymocytes undergo development through three main stages: double-negative (DN), double-positive (DP), and single-positive (SP).

At the double-negative stage (DN, DN1-DN4), thymocytes lack expression of CD4 and CD8A/CD8B coreceptors but exhibit variable levels of CD44 and IL2RA. A critical milestone is the DN3 stage, where the proto-TCR (PTCRA) begins to be expressed, enabling progression to the double-positive stage [3, 12].

During the double-positive (DP) stage, T cells co-express CD4 and CD8A/CD8B and undergo selection based on the specificity of their T cell receptor (TCR). Depending on the outcome, cells differentiate into CD4+ or CD8+ lineages. At this stage, molecules such as CCR7 and PTPRC are expressed, playing key roles in cell migration and functional maturation [13].

At the single-positive stage (SP), T lymphocytes acquire either a CD4+ or CD8+ naive T-cell phenotype. The differentiation trajectory is determined by TCR interactions with MHC class I or II molecules. The cytokine microenvironment and activation of transcription factors, such as Runx3 for CD8+ and GATA‑3 for CD4+, are pivotal in this process [14]. Following the SP stage, NKT cells may emerge, serving regulatory functions at the interface of innate and adaptive immunity.

Peripheral activation and memory cell formation

Following their maturation in the thymus, naïve T cells circulate to peripheral lymphoid tissues, where antigen presentation triggers their activation and differentiation into effector T cells. Some activated T cells directly eliminate pathogens or infected cells, while others differentiate into memory T cells, including central memory, effector memory, and tissue-resident memory subsets. These memory cells persist in lymphoid organs and tissues, ensuring a faster and more effective response upon re-exposure to antigens. During memory formation, both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells may express similar markers, such as SELL, CCR7, and PTPRC [13].

T-cell activation and specialization are orchestrated by networks of transcription factors (e. g., TBX21, GATA3, FOXP3), epigenetic mechanisms (e. g., DNA methylation, histone modification), and metabolic shifts, such as transitions between glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation [14].

CD4+ T-helper cells differentiate into various subpopulations under the influence of specific cytokines and signaling pathways: Tfh, Th1, Th2, Th9, Th17, and Tregs. Follicular helper T cells (Tfh), expressing CXCR5, PDCD1, and BCL6, regulate B-cell maturation and germinal center formation [3, 15]. Th1 cells, characterized by TBX21 expression and IFN-γ production, are critical for defense against intracellular pathogens by activating macrophages [3]. Th2 cells express GATA3 and produce IL4, IL5, and IL13, promoting humoral immunity and stimulating B cells to produce antibodies [3]. Th9 cells, associated with IRF4, SPI1, and IL9, contribute to defense against helminths and are involved in allergic responses [14]. Th17 cells, expressing RORC and producing IL17A and IL22, protect mucosal surfaces against fungi and bacteria [3]. Regulatory T cells (Tregs), expressing CD4, IL2RA, and FOXP3, suppress excessive immune responses and prevent autoimmune reactions by secreting IL‑10 and TGF-β [3, 16, 17].

CD8+ cytotoxic T cells are key in eliminating virus-infected and transformed cells through the production of cytotoxic proteins (granzymes, perforin) and antiviral cytokines, such as IFN-γ. Upon activation, they form pools of effector and memory cells, regulated by transcription factors TBX21 and EOMES [3].

Additional subpopulations include γδ T cells, which express TRDC, TRGC1, TRGC2 and are capable of rapid antigen recognition independent of MHC presentation. [18, 19]. These cells are divided into subsets such as Vδ1+ (tissue surveillance) and Vδ9Vδ2+ (mucosal protection). NKT cells combine features of NK and T cells, expressing CD3D, CD3E, CD3G and NK markers (NCAM1) [20]. They recognize lipid antigens presented by CD1D and differentiate into functional subsets: NKT1 (TBX21, IFNG), NKT2 (GATA3, IL‑4), and NKT17 (RORC, IL‑17) [21]. Two types of NKT cells are distinguished: invariant NKT (iNKT) and variable NKT (vNKT). iNKT cells express an invariant TCR composed of the TRAV10, TRAJ18 α-chain and co-express markers such as CD3D, CD3E, CD3G, NCAM1, KLRB1, and CXCR6. They recognize lipid antigens via CD1D and swiftly secrete diverse cytokines such as IFN-γ, IL‑4, and IL‑17, bridging innate and adaptive immunity [20, 22]. vNKT cells have more diverse TCRs (e. g., TRAV12–2, TRAJ9, TRAV1–2, TRAJ7, TRAV8–1, TRAV11) and express CD3D, CD3E, CD3G, NCAM1, FCGR3A, CD2, and CD28. These cells produce proinflammatory mediators such as TNF-α and IL‑2, playing a significant role in infection control and tumor immune surveillance [20].

T-cell functional activity is defined by various markers. Cytotoxicity is characterized by the expression of granzymes (GZMA, GZMB), PRF1, FASLG, and TNFSF10, particularly in CD8+ and γδ T cells [23]. Cytokine secretion, such as IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL‑2, and IL‑17, varies by subpopulation, with Th1 cells producing IFN-γ and Th2 cells producing IL‑4 and IL‑5 [1]. T-cell activation and proliferation are accompanied by the expression of IL2RA and MKI67, reflecting cell division in response to antigenic stimulation. Apoptosis is regulated by molecules such as FAS, TNFRSF10A, TNFRSF10B, and CASP, preventing excessive inflammation [3]. In conditions of chronic antigenic stimulation, such as viral infections or tumors, T cells may exhibit exhaustion, marked by the expression of inhibitory receptors like PD‑1, CTLA‑4, TIM‑3, and LAG‑3 [24]. A list of T-cell subpopulation markers and their functional significance is provided in Table 1.

Table 1
Markers and functional significance of T-cell subpopulations

 Subpopulation/Stage

 Main markers

 Additional markers

 Functional significance of markers

 References

 Double negative cells (DN1–DN4)

 CD44, IL2RA (CD25),
PTCRA (pre-TCRα)

 –

 Absence of CD4 and CD8 indicates early development; CD44 and CD25 regulate migration and proliferation on DN1–DN4 substages; PTCRA on DN3 initiates transition to DP stage

 [3, 12]

 Double positive cells (DP

 CD4, CD8A, CD8B, TCR, CCR7, PTPRC (CD45RA),
SELL (CD62L), CD3D, CD3E, CD3G, IL7R (CD127)

 –

 Simultaneous expression of CD4 and CD8 reflects TCR specificity testing; CD3D/E/G form TCR complex; CCR7 supports migration

 [13]

 Single positive cells (SP), naive T-cells

 CD4, CD8A/CD8B, TCR, CCR7, PTPRC (CD45RA), SELL (CD62L), IL7R (CD127)

 CD27, CD28

 Differentiation into CD4+ or CD8+ upon interaction with MHC–II or MHC–I; CCR7 and CD62L ensure migration to lymphoid organs

 [14]

 CD4+ Tfh (follicular helper)

 CXCR5, PDCD1 (PD‑1), BCL6, ICOS, CD40LG (CD40L)

 MAF, IL21R

 Support B-cell maturation and germinal center formation; ensure antibody class switching

 [3, 15]

 CD4+ Th1

 TBX21 (T-bet), IFNG (IFN-γ), STAT4, CXCR3, IL2RA (CD25)

 IL18R1, IL18RAP, CXCR6

 Activate macrophages; form antiviral immunity and immunity against intracellular infections

 [3]

 CD4+ Th2

 GATA3, IL13, PTGDR2 (CRTH2), STAT6, IL4R, IL5RA

 IL10, IL1RL1(ST2)

 Support humoral immunity; stimulate antibody production (IgE)

 [3]

 CD4+ Th9

 IRF4, SPI1 (PU.1), IL9

 STAT5, STAT6, TGFBR1 (TGF-βR)

 Protection against helminths; participation in allergic reactions

 [3, 14]

 CD4+ Th17

 RORC (RORγt), IL17A (IL‑17), IL22, CCR6, STAT3, IL23R

 IL21, CCL20

 Protection of mucosal surfaces from fungi and bacteria; regulation of neutrophil recruitment and activation

 [3]

 Treg
(regulatory T-cells)

 CD4, IL2RA (CD25), FOXP3, CTLA4, TIGIT, IKZF2 (Helios)

 CD127, IL10, TGFB1 (TGF-β)

 Suppression of autoimmune reactions; maintenance of tolerance to autoantigens (via IL‑10, TGF-β)

 [3, 16]

 CD8+ cytotoxic (effector T-cells)

 CD8A, CD8B, PRF1 (Perforin), GZMB (Granzyme B),
IFNG (IFN-γ), GNLY, NKG7, TBX21 (T-bet), EOMES

 GZMK, KLRG1

 Destruction of infected and tumor cells via perforin and granzymes; participation in antiviral immunity (via IFN-γ synthesis)

 [3, 23]

 γδ T-cells

 TRDC, TRGC1, TRGC2, FCGR3A (CD16),
NCAM1 (CD56), CD3D, CD3E, CD3G, KLRG1, NKG7

 IL17A, CCR5

 Rapid antigen response without MHC presentation; tissue surveillance (Vδ1+) and mucosal protection (Vδ9Vδ2+)

 [18, 19]

 NKT-cells

 CD3D, CD3E, CD3G,
NCAM1
(CD56), TCR, CD1D

 

 Combine functional properties of T- and NK-cells; secretion of cytokines (IFN-γ, IL‑4, IL‑17) in response to lipid antigens

 [20, 21]

 iNKT (invariant)

 CD3D, CD3E, CD3G, NCAM1 (CD56), TRAV10, TRAJ18 (TCR Vα24-Jα18), KLRB1 (CD161), CXCR6, NCAM1

 IFNG (IFN-γ), IL4, IL17A (IL‑17)

 Immunoregulation, rapid cytokine response, antitumor activity.

 [20, 22]

 vNKT (variable)

 TRAV12–2, TRAJ9, TRAV1–2, TRAJ7, TRAV8–1,
TRAV11
(TCR Vα3.2-Jα9, Vα1-Jα7, Vα8, Vα11),
FCGR3A (CD16), CD3D, CD3E, CD3G, NCAM1 (CD56),
CD2, CD28

 TNF, IL2

 Antiviral and antitumor activity, immune response modulation.

 [20]

 Memory T-cells

 CD45RO, CD62L, CCR7, SELL (CD62L), IL7R (CD127), CD27

 KLRG1, CX3CR1

 Ensure enhanced and rapid secondary immune response; divided into central (TCM), effector (TEM), and resident (TRM) cell

 [3]

 Exhausted T-cells

 PDCD1 (PD‑1), CTLA4, HAVCR2 (TIM‑3), LAG3, TIGIT, TOX

 EOMES, CD244 (2B4)

 Indicate T-cell dysfunction under chronic antigenic stimulation (tumors, viral infections); loss of effective proliferation and cytotoxic response

 [3, 24]

Notes: Main markers are associated with the specific subpopulation, functionally relevant, and used for cell identification in flow cytometry and scRNA-seq. Additional markers are less specific, support biological interpretation, may vary depending on the cell state, and are validated by the CellMarker 2.0 and PanglaoDB databases.

B cells

B cells are key components of adaptive immunity, responsible for humoral responses through antibody secretion and antigen presentation. Derived from CLPs they mature in the bone marrow through immunoglobulin (Ig) gene rearrangement, forming unique B-cell receptors (BCR). Their heterogeneity is reflected in diverse functional subtypes, differentiation stages, and activation statuses, identifiable by distinct surface and transcriptional markers [25, 26].

B-cell development in the bone marrow

B-cell development is divided into early (pro-B, pre-B) and late (immature, mature) stages. In the bone marrow, pro-B cells, characterized by CD34, CD19, and the transcription factor PAX5, initiate heavy-chain immunoglobulin gene rearrangement under the influence of EBF1 and RAG1/2 enzymes [25, 27]. Successful heavy-chain rearrangement leads to pre-B cells, which express CD19, MS4A1, MME, and components of the pre-B cell receptor (pre-BCR) including IGHM (μ chain), VPREB1 and IGLL1 (λ-like chain). The pre-BCR comprises an immunoglobulin μ heavy chain and a surrogate light chain formed by VPREB1 and λ5 proteins. Interactions between these components activate signaling pathways via adapter molecules Igα and Igβ, promoting pre-B cell proliferation and initiating light-chain gene rearrangement [25, 28]. During B cell development, cells expressing IGHM, CD19, MS4A1, MME, and CD22, undergo negative selection to eliminate autoreactive clones, a process mediated by BCR recognition of autoantigens and signaling through CD79A [25, 28]. Mature B cells, co-expressing IgM and IgD, complete maturation and migrate to peripheral lymphoid organs, such as lymph nodes and the spleen, guided by chemokines like CXCR4 [25, 27]. Mature B cells remain naïve until antigen encounter and are generally defined by the absence of CD27 and the presence of IGHD expression [25].

Peripheral activation and memory cell formation

In peripheral lymphoid organs, mature B cells are activated upon antigen binding to the BCR, triggering signaling cascades via CD79A/CD79B and activation of transcription factors such as NFKB1 and IRF4. T-dependent activation requires co-stimulation from T-helper cells through CD40-CD40L interactions and cytokine secretion (e. g., IL‑4, IL‑21, BAFF), activating STAT5 and STAT6 pathways to promote proliferation and differentiation. This process leads to germinal center formation, where B cells expressing BCL6 undergo somatic hypermutation and class-switch recombination, producing high-affinity antibodies of IgG, IgA, or IgE isotypes. T-independent activation, induced by polyvalent antigens like bacterial polysaccharides, relies on signals through CD21 and Toll-like receptors, activating NF-κB. Activated B cells express CD69 and HLA-DRA/HLA-DRB1, reflecting their proliferative and antigen-presenting status [25, 28].

Upon activation, B cells differentiate into plasma cells expressing SDC1 and PRDM1, which secrete antibodies (IgM, IgG, or IgA) to neutralize pathogens. Others become memory B cells, marked by CD27 and BCL6, ensuring faster and stronger immune responses during subsequent encounters with the same antigen [25, 29].

B cells demonstrate considerable functional and phenotypic diversity, resulting in the formation of specialized subpopulations with unique immunological functions (Figure 1). Follicular B cells, expressing FCER2 and BCL6, localize in lymph nodes and participate in T-dependent immune responses, forming germinal centers. Marginal zone B cells, predominantly in the spleen, express high levels of CR2, IGHM and CD1c, providing rapid T-independent responses to blood-borne pathogens. B1 cells, located in serous cavities, produce natural antibodies (IgMhi) and express CD5, playing a key role in early immune responses to infections [25, 27].

Regulatory B cells (Bregs) are critical for maintaining immune tolerance, suppressing excessive Th1/Th17 responses through the secretion of IL‑10, TGF-β, and IL‑35. They express CD19, CD24, CD38, and CD27 and are activated by CD40L, CpG, and IL‑21 signals [26, 30, 31].

B-cell functional activity encompasses three main roles. First, antibody production is carried out by plasma cells expressing SDC1 and PRDM1, which secrete IgM, IgG, or IgA antibodies to neutralize pathogens. Second, antigen presentation is mediated by activated B cells expressing HLA-DRA/HLA-DRB1 and CD69, which efficiently interact with T-helper cells to enhance adaptive immune responses. Third, immunosuppression is driven by Bregs and transitional B cells through IL‑10, TGF-β, and IL‑35 secretion, as well as PD-L1 expression, suppressing effector T cells and preventing autoimmune reactions. These functions are regulated by transcription factors (PAX5, BCL6, PRDM1, IRF4, NFKB1) and epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation [25, 29]. A list of B-cell subpopulation markers and their functional significance is provided in Table 2.

Table 2
Markers and functional significance of B-cell subpopulations

 Subpopulation/Stage

 Main markers

 Additional markers

 Functional significance of markers

 References

 Pro-B cells

 CD34, CD19, PAX5

 DNTT (TdT), RAG1, RAG2

 Initiate heavy chain immunoglobulin rearrangement for BCR formation

 [25, 27]

 Pre-B cells

 CD19, MS4A1 (CD20),
MME (CD10), EBF1

 CD79A (Igα), CD79B (Igβ)

 Complete light chain rearrangement, forming a functional BCR

 [25, 27, 28]

 Immature B-cells

 IGHM (IgM), CD19,
MS4A1
(CD20), MME (CD10)

 CD22, CD79A (Igα)

 Undergo negative selection to eliminate autoreactive clones

 [25, 27, 28]

 Naive (Mature) B-cells

 IGHM (IgM), IGHD (IgD), CD19, CD21, CD22, CD72, PAX5, TCL1A, IL21R,
TNFRSF13C
(BAFFR)

 PTPRC (CD45), CD79A (Igα), CD79B (Igβ), MS4A1 (CD20)

 Maintain antigen-independent status, readiness for activation in peripheral lymphoid organs

 [25, 27, 28]

 Follicular B-cells

 CD19, MS4A1 (CD20), CD23, IGHM (IgM), IGHD (IgD)

 BCL6

 Participate in T-dependent responses, form germinal centers

 [25, 27]

 Marginal zone B-cells

 CD19, CD21,
IGHM
(IgM), CD1C

 MS4A1 (CD20)

 Provide T-independent response to pathogens circulating in peripheral blood

 [25, 27, 29]

 B1‑cells

 CD19, CD5, ITGAM (CD11b), IGHM (IgM)

 CD43

 Produce natural antibodies, participate in early immune response

 [25, 27]

 Memory B-cells

 CD19, CD27, MS4A1 (CD20), BCL6, CD22, TNFSF13B (CD30L), CD37, CD39, CD44, CD73, CD80, CD86, CXCR3, CXCR5, FCRL4

 CD72, CD79B (Igβ), CD82, FAS (CD95), EBI2, ITGAX (CD11c), PDCD1 (PD‑1), CD274 (PD-L1), TBX21 (T-bet), ZEB2

 Secondary immune response, reaction to repeated antigen

 [25, 27, 29]

 Plasma cells

 SDC1 (CD138), PRDM1 (BLIMP‑1), XBP1, IRF4, CD38, IL6R, IL10R, IL21R

 BHLHE40, CD19, CD27, CD45RO, ITGA4 (CD49d), CD69, CD71, FAS (CD95)

 Produce antibodies after terminal differentiation

 [25, 27, 29]

 Regulatory (Breg)

 CD19, CD24, CD38,
CD27, IL10

 CD274 (PD-L1), TGFB1 (TGF-β), CD5

 Suppress inflammatory reactions

 [26, 29, 31]

 Activated B-cells

 CD19, CD69, CD86, NFKB1, MS4A1 (CD20), CD21, CD22, CD23, CD27, CD38, CD39, CD40, CD71, CD72, HLA-DRA, HLA-DRB1 (HLA-DR),
IRF4, MYC

 AICDA, BACH2

 Ensure proliferation and antigen presentation

 [25, 28]

Notes: Main markers are associated with the specific subpopulation, functionally relevant, and used for cell identification in flow cytometry and scRNA-seq. Additional markers are less specific, support biological interpretation, may vary depending on the cell state, and are validated by the CellMarker 2.0 and PanglaoDB databases.

Conclusion

The rapid development of scRNA-seq has enabled deeper insights into cellular heterogeneity and immune cell function. Yet, the value of these insights' hinges on precise and reliable cell type annotation. This review provides a systematic overview of markers for adaptive immune cells, ranging from early progenitors to functionally specialized subpopulations. These marker panels can significantly improve the accuracy of automated annotation by reducing the rate of false positives and false negatives. Such standardization has important practical implications in oncoimmunology, facilitating a better understanding of disease pathogenesis, more accurate prediction of responses to immunotherapy, and the identification of novel therapeutic targets. Nevertheless, a comprehensive understanding of the immune system requires the analysis of both adaptive and innate immune compartments. The systematization of markers for innate immune cells will be the focus of future work.

×

About the authors

Anton A. Fedorov

Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center

Author for correspondence.
Email: anton.fedorov.2014@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5121-2535
SPIN-code: 1315-8100
Tomsk, Russian Federation

Anastasia A. Fedorenko

Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center

Email: anton.fedorov.2014@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3297-1680
SPIN-code: 8092-0070
Tomsk, Russian Federation

Marina R. Patysheva

Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center

Email: anton.fedorov.2014@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2865-7576
SPIN-code: 5714-4611
Tomsk, Russian Federation

Tatiana S. Gerashchenko

Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center; RUDN University

Email: anton.fedorov.2014@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7283-0092
SPIN-code: 7900-9700
Tomsk, Russian Federation; Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Gerashchenko T, Frolova A, Patysheva M, Fedorov A, Stakheyeva M, Denisov E, Cherdyntseva N. Breast cancer immune landscape: interplay between systemic and local immunity. Advanced Biology. 2024;8(7):e2400140. doi: 10.1002/adbi.202400140
  2. Suvà ML, Tirosh I. Single-Cell RNA sequencing in cancer: lessons learned and emerging challenges. Molecular Cell. 2019;75(1):7–12. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.05.003
  3. Sun L, Su Y, Jiao A, Wang X, Zhang B. T cells in health and disease. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy. 2023;8(1):235. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01471‑y
  4. Peng J, Sun BF, Chen CY, Zhou JY, Chen YS, Chen H, Liu L, Huang D, Jiang J, Cui GS, Yang Y, Wang W, Guo D, Dai M, Guo J, Zhang T, Liao Q, Liu Y, Zhao YL, Han DL, Zhao Y, Yang YG, Wu W. Single-cell RNA-seq highlights intra-tumoral heterogeneity and malignant progression in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cell Research. 2019;29(9):725–738. doi: 10.1038/s41422-019-0195‑y
  5. Aran D, Looney AP, Liu L, Wu E, Fong V, Hsu A, Chak S, Naikawadi RP, Wolters PJ, Abate AR, Butte AJ, Bhattacharya M. Reference-based analysis of lung single-cell sequencing reveals a transitional profibrotic macrophage. Nature Immunology. 2019;20(2):163–172. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0276‑y
  6. Domínguez Conde C, Xu C, Jarvis LB, Rainbow DB, Wells SB, Gomes T, Howlett SK, Suchanek O, Polanski K, King HW, Mamanova L, Huang N, Szabo PA, Richardson L, Bolt L, Fasouli ES, Mahbubani KT, Prete M, Tuck L, Richoz N, Tuong ZK, Campos L, Mousa HS, Needham EJ, Pritchard S, Li T, Elmentaite R, Park J, Rahmani E, Chen D, Menon DK, Bayraktar OA, James LK, Meyer KB, Yosef N, Clatworthy MR, Sims PA, Farber DL, Saeb-Parsy K, Jones JL, Teichmann SA. Cross-tissue immune cell analysis reveals tissue-specific features in humans. Science (New York, NY). 2022;376(6594): eabl5197. doi: 10.1126/science.abl5197
  7. Stuart T, Butler A, Hoffman P, Hafemeister C, Papalexi E, Mauck WM, 3rd, Hao Y, Stoeckius M, Smibert P, Satija R. Comprehensive Integration of Single-Cell Data. Cell. 2019;177(7):1888–1902.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.031
  8. Franzén O, Gan LM, Björkegren JLM. PanglaoDB: a web server for exploration of mouse and human single-cell RNA sequencing data. Database: the Journal of Biological Databases and Curation. 2019;2019doi: 10.1093/database/baz046
  9. Hu C, Li T, Xu Y, Zhang X, Li F, Bai J, Chen J, Jiang W, Yang K, Ou Q, Li X, Wang P, Zhang Y. CellMarker 2.0: an updated database of manually curated cell markers in human/mouse and web tools based on scRNA-seq data. Nucleic Acids Research. 2023;51(D1): D870‑d876. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac947
  10. Monaco G, Lee B, Xu W, Mustafah S, Hwang YY, Carré C, Burdin N, Visan L, Ceccarelli M, Poidinger M, Zippelius A, Pedro de Magalhães J, Larbi A. RNA-Seq Signatures Normalized by mRNA Abundance Allow Absolute Deconvolution of Human Immune Cell Types. Cell Reports. 2019;26(6):1627–1640.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.01.041
  11. Mao S, Zhang Y, Seelig G, Kannan S. CellMeSH: probabilistic cell-type identification using indexed literature. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2022;38(5):1393–1402. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab834
  12. Wegrzyn AS, Kedzierska AE, Obojski A. Identification and classification of distinct surface markers of T regulatory cells. Frontiers in Immunology. 2022;13:1055805. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1055805
  13. Liu X, Zhu Z, Wang X. Specificity and function of T cell subset identities using single-cell sequencing. Clinical and Translational Discovery. 2023;3(3): e199. doi: 10.1002/ctd2.199
  14. Dutta A, Venkataganesh H, Love PE. New Insights into Epigenetic Regulation of T Cell Differentiation. Cells. 2021;10(12) doi: 10.3390/cells10123459
  15. Crotty S. T Follicular Helper Cell Biology: A Decade of Discovery and Diseases. Immunity. 2019;50(5):1132–1148. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.04.011
  16. Sakaguchi S. Regulatory T cells: history and perspective. Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, NJ). 2011;707:3–17. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61737-979-6_1
  17. Jumaniyazova ED, Lokhonina AV, Sentyabreva AV, Kosyreva AM. Molecular genetic signatures of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and their changes induced by proton irradiation. RUDN Journal of Medicine. 2024;28(4):413–426. doi: 10.22363/2313-0245-2024-28-4-413-426 EDN: GKJBSB
  18. Ribot JC, Lopes N, Silva-Santos B. γδ T cells in tissue physiology and surveillance. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2021;21(4):221–232. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-00452-4
  19. Schönefeldt S, Wais T, Herling M, Mustjoki S, Bekiaris V, Moriggl R, Neubauer HA. The diverse roles of γδ T cells in cancer: from rapid immunity to aggressive lymphoma. Cancers. 2021;13(24) :6212. doi: 10.3390/cancers13246212
  20. Godfrey DI, Uldrich AP, McCluskey J, Rossjohn J, Moody DB. The burgeoning family of unconventional T cells. Nature Immunology. 2015;16(11):1114–23. doi: 10.1038/ni.3298
  21. Liman N, Park JH. Markers and makers of NKT17 cells. Experimental & Molecular Medicine. 2023;55(6):1090–1098. doi: 10.1038/s12276-023-01015‑y
  22. Gang M, Wong P, Berrien-Elliott MM, Fehniger TA. Memory-like natural killer cells for cancer immunotherapy. Seminars in Hematology. 2020;57(4):185–193. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2020.11.003
  23. Koh CH, Lee S, Kwak M, Kim BS, Chung Y. CD8 T-cell subsets: heterogeneity, functions, and therapeutic potential. Experimental & Molecular Medicine. 2023;55(11):2287–2299. doi: 10.1038/s12276-023-01105‑x
  24. Jenkins E, Whitehead T, Fellermeyer M, Davis SJ, Sharma S. The current state and future of T-cell exhaustion research. Oxford Open Immunology. 2023;4(1):iqad006. doi: 10.1093/oxfimm/iqad006
  25. Tsai DY, Hung KH, Chang CW, Lin KI. Regulatory mechanisms of B cell responses and the implication in B cell-related diseases. Journal of Biomedical Science. 2019;26(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12929–019–0558–1
  26. Zheremyan EA, Ustiugova AS, Uvarova AN, Karamushka NM, Stasevich EM, Gogoleva VS, Bogolyubova AV, Mitkin NA, Kuprash DV, Korneev KV. Differentially activated B cells develop regulatory phenotype and show varying immunosuppressive features: a comparative study. Frontiers in Immunology. 2023;14:1178445. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1178445
  27. LeBien TW, Tedder TF. B lymphocytes: how they develop and function. Blood. 2008;112(5):1570–80. doi: 10.1182/blood‑2008–02–078071
  28. Clavarino G, Delouche N, Vettier C, Laurin D, Pernollet M, Raskovalova T, Cesbron JY, Dumestre-Pérard C, Jacob MC. Novel Strategy for phenotypic characterization of human B lymphocytes from precursors to effector cells by flow cytometry. PloS One. 2016;11(9): e0162209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162209
  29. Somers V, Dunn-Walters DK, van der Burg M, Fraussen J. Editorial: new insights into B cell subsets in health and disease. Frontiers in Immunology. 2022;13:854889. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.854889
  30. Bradford HF, Mauri C. Diversity of regulatory B cells: Markers and functions. European Journal of Immunology. 2024;54(11):2350496. doi: 10.1002/eji.202350496
  31. Kaminski DA, Wei C, Qian Y, Rosenberg AF, Sanz I. Advances in human B cell phenotypic profiling. Frontiers in Immunology. 2012;3:302. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00302

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Figure. Markers of adaptive immune cell populations. The figure shows a scheme of adaptive immune cell differentiation, with key markers indicated at various stages. Colors represent the maturation sites of different cell populations

Download (113KB)

Copyright (c) 2026 Fedorov A.A., Fedorenko A.A., Patysheva M.R., Gerashchenko T.S.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.