Вежливость и невежливость в корейских социальных сетях

Обложка

Цитировать

Полный текст

Аннотация

Технологические преимущества и сложности компьютерно-опосредованной коммуникации побуждают пользователей социальных сетей применять язык творчески, преодолевая неблагоприятные факторы и используя благоприятные. Творческий подход к языку становится источником языковых изменений, часто выходящих за рамки социальных сетей. Соответственно, данная среда не только накладывает ограничения, но и обладает развивающим потенциалом. Коммуникативные акты осуществлются в соответствии с желанием коммуникантов быть вежливыми, особенно в «угрожающих лицу актах», что хорошо описано П. Браун и С. Левинсоном (Brown & Levinson 1987). В исследованиях, проводимых в последнее время, особое внимание уделяется нормам вежливости и невежливости, а также уместности их применения (Locher & Watts 2005 Locher & Bousfield 2008). Участники коммуникации используют не только стратегии смячения угрозы лицу собеседника, но также и стратегии невежливости, которые часто являются замаскированной вежливостью. Автор опирается на данные корпуса Национального института корейского языка, включающего 26 миллионов слов и 3836 ситуаций общения в социальных сетях двух или более человек. Цель исследования - проследить, как коммуниканты выражают не/вежливость с помощью различных единиц языка. Среди них были выделены междометия, орфографические идеофоны и эмотиконы, избыточная эмоциональная пунктуация, опущение знаков препинания, преднамеренное нарушение орфографических норм, в частности для создания эффекта интимного общения, обильное использование сленга и т. д. Все эти стратегии приводят к языковым изменениям на уровне лексики, грамматики и дискурсивных норм.

Об авторах

Санха Ри

Университет Махидол; Университет иностранных языков Хангук

Автор, ответственный за переписку.
Email: srhee@hufs.ac.kr
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0312-0975

профессор лингвистики Университета Махидол, Тайланд, и профессор эмерит Университета иностранных языков Хангук, Республика Корея. Получил докторскую степень по специальности «Лингвистика» в Техасском университете, Остин, в 1996 г. Среди его публикаций - монография World Lexicon of Grammaticalization (Кембридж, 2019), главы в книге The Cambridge Handbook of Korean Linguistics (Кембридж, 2022), статьи в журналах Nature, Journal of Pragmatics, Language Sciences, Russian Journal of Linguistics, Lingua и др. Его основной исследовательский интерес - выявление когнитивных и дискурсивных механизмов, влияющих на изменение языка с кросс-лингвистической и типологической точек зрения.

Тайланд; Сеул, Республика Корея

Список литературы

  1. Ahn, Mikyung. 2019. Linguistic and nonlinguistic politeness strategies in Korean internet discourse. Discourse and Cognition 26 (2). 49-66. http://doi.org/10.15718/discog.2019.26.2.49
  2. Ahn, Mikyung & Foong Ha Yap. 2020. ‘That being so, but…’: An analysis of Korean kunyang as a marker of speaker’s attenuated divergent stance. Journal of Pragmatics 160. 31-43. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.12.010
  3. Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2006. Introduction: Sociolinguistics and computermediated communication. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10 (4). 419-438. http://www.blackwellsynergy. com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.14679841.2006.00286.x
  4. Bae, So-Yon & Soon Hee Kwon. 2020. Communication style in ‘Solitude Room’ in social media: Communication with an image in the space of anonymity. Journal of Research in Curriculum and Instruction 24 (3). 296-308. http://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2020.24.3.296
  5. Baumer, Martina & Henriette van Rensburg. 2011. Cross-cultural pragmatic failure in computer-mediated communication. Coolabah 5. 34-53. https://doi.org/10.1344/co2011534-53
  6. Bolander, Brook & Miriam A. Locher. 2020. Beyond the online offline distinction: Entry points to digital discourse. Discourse, Context & Media 35. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100383
  7. Bousfield, Derek. 2008. Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  8. Bousfield, Derek & Miriam A. Locher (eds.). 2008. Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  9. Brown, Penelope & Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals of Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Cohen, Jonathan & Miriam Metzger. 1998. Social affiliation and the achievement of ontological security through interpersonal and mass communicaton. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 15 (1). 41-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15295039809367032
  11. Crystal, David. 2001. Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Culpeper, Jonathan, 1996. Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25. 349-367. http://doi.org/ 10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3
  13. Culpeper, Jonathan. 2005. Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research 1. 35-72. http://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35
  14. Culpeper, Jonathan. 2010. Conventionalised impoliteness formulae. Journal of Pragmatics 42. 3232-3245. http://doi.org/10.1515/IPRG.2010.027
  15. Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield & Anne Wichmann. 2003. Impoliteness revisited: With special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. Journal of Pragmatics 35. 1545-1579. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00118-2
  17. Culpeper, Jonathan, Michael Haugh & Dániel Z. Kádár (eds.) 2017. The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  18. Dainas, Ashley R. & Susan C. Herring. 2021. Interpreting emoji pragmatics. In Chaoqun Xie, Francisco Yus & Hartmut Haberland (eds.), Approaches to Internet pragmatics: Theory and practice, 107-144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. http://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.318.04dai
  19. Daniel, Jiyoung. 2010. A study of net-lingo in Korean and English. Journal of the Institute of Education of Korean Language and Literature 22. 321-391.
  20. Dresner, Eli & Susan C. Herring. 2010. Functions of the non-verbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force. Communication Theory 20 (3). 249-268. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01362.x
  21. Eelen, Gino. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.
  22. Fetzer, Anita. 2021. Computer-mediated discourse in context: Pluralism of communicative action and discourse common ground. In Chaoqun Xie, Francisco Yus & Hartmut Haberland (eds.), Approaches to Internet pragmatics: Theory and practice, 47-74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. http://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.318.02fet
  23. Fraser, Bruce. 1990. Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 14. 219-236. http://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90081-N
  24. Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face Interaction. New York: Patheon Books.
  25. Grice, Herbert Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics vol. 3: Speech acts, 41-58. New York: Academic Press.
  26. Haugh, Michael & Derek Bousfield. 2012. Mock impoliteness, jocular mockery and jocular abuse in Australian and British English. Journal of Pragmatics 44. 1099-1114. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.02.003
  27. Haugh, Michael & Klaus P. Schneider. 2012. Im/politeness across Englishes. Journal of Pragmatics 44. 1017-1021. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.05.010
  28. Heine, Bernd & Thomas Stolz. 2008. Grammaticalization as a creative process. Language Typology and Universals (STUF) 61. 326-357. http://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2008.0028
  29. Jeong, Jin Su. 2003. A study of computer communication language. Master’s thesis, Cheongju University, Korea.
  30. Jung, Han De Ro. 2010. A note on the ‘formal nouns + -yo’ constructions - focused on the internet communication language. Language & Information Society 13. 37-65.
  31. Kádár, Dániel Z., Vahid Parvaresh & Rosina Márquez Reiter. 2021. Alternative approaches to politeness and impoliteness: An introduction. Journal of Politeness Research 17 (1). 1-7. http://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2020-0028
  32. Kim, Jai-june, Ba-woo Kim & Jae-beom Kim. 2008. A research note on measuring the delinquency index of internet communication language. Inmwunsahoykwahakyenkwu 21. 168-196.
  33. Kim, Tae-sik. 2004. A study of deviational language uses in computer-mediated communication. MA thesis, Dongguk University, Korea.
  34. Konrad, Artie, Susan C. Herring & David Choi. 2020. Sticker and emoji use in Facebook messenger: Implications for graphicon change. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 25. 217-235. http://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmaa003
  35. Koo, Hyun Jung. 2002a. Computer-mediated communication: Postmodernism in language culture. Kwukehak 39. 251-277.
  36. Koo, Hyun Jung. 2002b. Turn taking system of conditionals in discourse. The Journal of Linguistic Science 21. 1-24.
  37. Koo, Hyun Jung. 2008. Grammaticalization of negation markers in Korean. Discourse and Cognition 15 (3). 1-27.
  38. Koo, Hyun Jung. 2009. Force dynamics as a variational factor: A case in Korean. LACUS Forum 33. 201-210.
  39. Koo, Hyun Jung. 2012. On grammaticalization of -kinun construction in Korean. Discourse and Cognition 19 (3). 1-28.
  40. Koo, Hyun Jung. 2016. On change of the terms of address between couples during the 70 years of post-colonization as reflected in mass media. Korean Semantics 51. 85-110.
  41. Koo, Hyun Jung & Seongha Rhee. 2013. On an emerging paradigm of sentence-final particles of discontent: A grammaticalization perspective. Language Sciences 37. 70-89. http://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.langsci.2012.07.002
  42. Koo, Hyun Jung & Seongha Rhee. 2018. Systematicity and synesthesia of ideophones in Korean. Paper presented at the Ideophones in the Language Sciences Workshop, the 20th International Congress of Linguists, Cape Town International Convention Center, South Africa, July 2-6, 2018.
  43. Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.
  44. Lee, Ki-Yeon & Ji-Soo Lee. 2010. A study of middle and high school students slang. Hankwukewa Mwunhwa 8. 143-178.
  45. Lee, Jeong-bok. 2011. Internet language and sociolinguistics: Focusing on the handa-yo speech level. Wulimalyenkwu 29. 5-40.
  46. Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. Longman, London and New York.
  47. Lehmann, Christian. 1987. Sprachwandel und Typologie. In Norbert Boretzky, Werner Enninger & Thomas Stolz (eds.), Beiträge zum 3. Essener Kolloquium über Sprachwandel und seine bestimmenden Faktoren vom 30.9. bis 2.10.1987 [recte 1986] an der Universität Essen, 201-225. Bochum: Brockmeyer.
  48. Lerner, Gene H. 1992. Assisted storytelling: Deploying shared knowledge as a practical matter. Qualitative Sociology 15 (3). 247-271.
  49. Lerner, Gene H. & Tomoyo Takagi. 1999. On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction: A co-investigation of English and Japanese grammatical practices. Journal of Pragmatics 32. 49-75. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00051-4
  50. Locher, Miriam A. 2010. Introduction: Politeness and impoliteness in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Politeness Research 6. 1-5. http://doi.org/10.1515/JPLR.2010.001
  51. Locher, Miriam A. & Derek Bousfield. 2008. Introduction. In Derek Bousfield & Miriam A. Locher (eds.), Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice, 1-13. Berlin: Mouton. http://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208344.0.1
  52. Locher, Miriam A. & Tatiana V. Larina. 2019. Introduction to politeness and impoliteness research in global contexts. Russian Journal of Linguistics 23 (4). 873-903. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2019-23-4-873-903
  53. Locher, Miriam A. & Richard J. Watts. 2005. Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1). 9-33. http://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9
  54. Maillart, Christelle & Christtophe Parisse. 2019. Nouns and pronouns. In Jack S. Damico & Martin J. Ball (eds.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Human Communication Sciences and Disorders, Vol. 1, 1268-1272. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publishing. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483380810.n419
  55. Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen. 2014. A pragmatic and multimodal analysis of emoticons and gender in social networks. In Antonia Sánchez Macarro & Ana Belén Cabrejas Peñuelas (eds.), New insights into gendered discursive practices: Language, gender and identity construction (English in the World series), 175-197. València: Publicacions de la Universitat de València.
  56. Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen. 2015. Typographic alteration in formal computer-mediated communication. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 212. 140-145. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.311
  57. Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen. 2016. Emoticons in transactional and interactional exchanges: Social networking chitchat versus working negotiation. Odisea 17. 19-35. http://doi.org/10.25115/odisea.v0i17.351
  58. Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen & Alfonso Sánchez-Moya. 2017. ‘I know how you feel’: Multifaceted insights into the expression of support strategies in computer-mediated-communication. In Chelo Vargas-Sierra (ed.), Professional and academic discourse: An interdisciplinary perspective (EpiC Series in Language and Linguistics 2), 214-223. (AESLA 2016).
  59. Moyer, Morgan, Kaitlyn Harrigan, Valentine Hacquard & Jeffrey Lidz. 2015. 2-year olds’ comprehension of personal pronouns. In Elizabeth Grillo, Kyle Jepson & MariaLaMendola (eds.), Online Proceedings Supplement of the 39th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Boston, MA. Retrieved from http://www.bu.edu/bucld/files/2015/06/Moyer.pdf (accessed 01 March 2023)
  60. Norde, Muriel. 2009. Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  61. Park, Dong-geun. 2002. A study on linguistic functions of Net lingo. Korean Language Research 10. 1-22.
  62. Park, Dong-geun. 2003. A study of the lexical productivity on Net lingo. Korean Language Research 12. 41-59.
  63. Park, Hyun-Koo. 2004. A study of icon-characters as nonveral politeness strategies on the internet environment. Hankwukenlonhakpo 48 (1). 142-166.
  64. Parvaresh, Vahid & Tahmineh Tayebi. 2018. Impoliteness, aggression and the moral order. Journal of Pragmatics 132. 91-107. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.010
  65. Rhee, Seongha. 2019a. Politeness pressure on grammar: The case of first and second person pronouns and address terms in Korean. Russian Journal of Linguistics 23 (4). 950-974. http://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2019-23-4-950-974
  66. Rhee, Seongha. 2019b. Lexicalization patterns in color naming in Korean. In Ida Raffaelli, Daniela Katunar & Barbara Kerovec (eds.), Lexicalization patterns in color naming. A cross-linguistic perspective, 109-131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. http://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.78.06rhe
  67. Rhee, Seongha. 2020. On the many faces of coarseness: The case of the Korean mak 'coarsely'. Journal of Pragmatics 170. 396-412. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.025
  68. Rhee, Seongha. 2021. On grammaticalization of truthfulness-based emphatic discourse markers. In Fuxiang Wu, Yonglong Yang, Haiping Long (eds.), Grammaticalization and studies of grammar 10, 461-499. Beijing: Commercial Press.
  69. Rhee, Seongha & Hyun Jung Koo. 2014. Grammaticalization of causatives and passives and their recent development into stance markers in Korean. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 50 (3). 309-337. http://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2014-0018
  70. Shin, Hee-Sam. 2004. Lexical meaning of internet communication language. Korean Semantics 15. 207-225.
  71. Shin, Hee-Sam. 2008. Formation of neologisms on the internet. Journal of Korean Language Education Research 9. 65-88.
  72. Sohn, Ho-Min. 1999. The Korean Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  73. Song, Jae Jung. 2005. The Korean Language: Structure, Use and Context. London: Routledge.
  74. Tracy, Karen & Sarah Tracy. 1998. Rudeness at 911: Reconceptualizing Face and Face Attack. Human Communication Research 25 (2). 225-251. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1998.tb00444.x
  75. Um, Ju Hyun. 2006. A study on the variation of sentence enders in the Internet communication language. Master’s thesis, University of Inchon, Korea.
  76. Yae, Sunhee. 2015. Stance-variations of ‘fear’-derived intensifiers in Korean. The Journal of Linguistics 75. 189-204.
  77. Yus, Francisco. 2022. Smartphone Communication: Interactions in the App Ecosystem (Routledge Studies in New Media and Cyberculture). New York: Routledge.
  78. Zappettini, Franco, Douglas M. Ponton & Tatiana V. Larina. 2021. Emotionalisation of contemporary media discourse: A research agenda. Russian Journal of Linguistics 25 (3). 586-610. http://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-3-586-610

© Ри С., 2023

Creative Commons License
Эта статья доступна по лицензии Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Данный сайт использует cookie-файлы

Продолжая использовать наш сайт, вы даете согласие на обработку файлов cookie, которые обеспечивают правильную работу сайта.

О куки-файлах