Implementation of conciliation proceedings in Vietnam

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The adoption in Vietnam in 2020 of the "Law on mediation and negotiations in court" was a significant event, indicating the preservation and development of the legal and cultural traditions of the country, as well as the reasonable use of the experience of other states in the field of reconciliation of disputing parties. The named Law has a wide range of application. The purpose of the study is that the author gives an overview of the conciliation procedure in the Vietnamese courts, and carefully analyses individual issues, especially the problems arising from the lack of a unified approach to the procedure for recognizing the results of the conciliation procedure by court. The methodological basis of the study is the methods of consistency, analysis, and synthesis. The authors conclude that the introduction of mediation in court has brought many positive results: disputes and lawsuits have been successfully resolved and negotiated. The article provides a general overview of the mediation procedure in the Vietnamese court, and carefully analyses individual problems arising from the lack of a unified approach to the procedure for recognizing the results of the conciliation process by court.

About the authors

Zlata V. Makarchuk

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Email: makarchuk_zv@pfur.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7859-1355

Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Administrative and Financial Law, Institute of Law

6 Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow, 117198, Russia Federation

Thi Kieu Oanh Vu

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Author for correspondence.
Email: kieuoanh2205hlu@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8925-3415

Ph. D. Student, Law Institute

6 Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow, 117198, Russia Federation

References

  1. Arzumanova, L.L. (2017) An alternative way of resolving tax disputes. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL). 8 (36), 66-75. https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2017.36.8.066-075 (in Russian)
  2. Dang, T. H. & Nguyen, D. N. (2021) Một số vấn đề về Luật Hòa giải, đối thoại tại Tòa án. Tạp chí Tòa án nhân dân điện tử - Cơ quan của Tòa án nhân dân tối cao. Available at: https://tapchitoaan.vn/bai-viet/nghien-cuu/mot-so-van-de-ve-luat-hoa-giai-doi-thoai-tai-toa-an [Accessed 13th July 2021]. (in Vietnamese)
  3. Ervasti, K. (2007) Conflicts before the courts and court-annexed mediation in Finland. In: Scandinavian studies in law. Vol. 51. Procedural Law. Stockholm, pp. 185-200
  4. Ervasti, K. (2014) Court-connected mediation in Finland: experienses and visions. In: Ervo L., Nylund A (eds.). The future of civil litigation. Access to court-annexed mediation in the Nordic countries. Springer, Cham. pp. 121-136
  5. Ervasti, K. (2018) Past, Present and Future of Mediation in Nordic Countries. In: Nylund, A., Ervasti, K., Adrian, L. (eds.). Nordic Mediation Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73019-6_12
  6. Galanter, M. (1986) The emergence of the judge as a mediator in civil cases. Judicature. 69 (5), 257-262.
  7. Hopt, K., & Steffek, F. (eds.). (2012) Mediation: Principles and Regulation in Comparative Perspective. Oxford University Press.
  8. Imperati, S. J., Brownmiller, D. C., & Marshall, D. (2006) If Freud, Jung, Rogers, and Beck Were Mediators, Who Would the Parties Pick and What Are the Mediator's Obligations. Idaho L. Rev. 43, 643-708.
  9. Jacobsson, M., Wahlin, L., & Fromholz, E. (2018) Victim Offender Mediation in Sweden: An Activity Falling Apart?. In: Nylund, A., Ervasti, K., Adrian, L. (eds.). Nordic Mediation Research. Springer, Cham. Рр. 67-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73019-6_5
  10. Le, T. T. (2019) Hòa giải, đối thoại tại Tòa án trong mối tương quan với tố tụng dân sự và tố tụng hành chính. Tạp chí Tòa án nhân dân điện tử - Cơ quan của Tòa án nhân dân tối cao. Available at: https://tapchitoaan.vn/bai-viet/xay-dung-phat-luat/hoa-giai-doi-thoai-tai-toa-an-trong-moi-tuong-quan-giua-to-tung-dan-su-va-to-tung-hanh-chinh [Accessed 13th July 2021]. (in Vietnamese).
  11. Marcum, T. M., Stoner, C. R., & Perry, S. J. (2012) Reframing the mediation lens: the call for a situational style of mediation. Southern Illinois University Law Journal. 36, 317-334.
  12. Nylund, A. (2014) The Many Ways of Civil Mediation in Norway. In: Ervo L., Nylund A. (eds.). The Future of Civil Litigation. Springer, Cham, pp. 97-119. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04465-1_6
  13. Nylund, A. (2017) An introduction to Finnish legal culture. Comparing legal cultures. Fagbokforlaget, Bergen. рр. 285-316
  14. Nylund, A., Ervasti, K., Adrian, L. (2018) Introduction to Nordic Mediation Research. In: Nylund A., Ervasti K., Adrian L. (eds.). Nordic Mediation Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73019-6_1
  15. Romualdi, G. (2019) Problem-Solving Justice and Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Italian Legal Context. Utrecht Law Review, 14 (3), 52-63. http://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.468
  16. Shamlikashvili, Ts.A. (2017) Mediation - А modern method of out-of-court dispute resolution. Interregional Center for Management and Political Consulting Publ. (in Russian)
  17. Van Epps, D.A. (2002) The Impact of Mediation on State Courts. Ohio State Journal on Dispute resolution. 17(3), 627-640
  18. Winslade, J., & Monk, G. D. (2000) Narrative mediation: A new approach to conflict resolution. John Wiley & Sons

Copyright (c) 2022 Makarchuk Z.V., Vu T.K.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies