The second cassation in the arbitration proceedings: The genesis, results of the procedural activity and prospects for uniformity of judicial and arbitration practice

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article considers relevant issues on the topic of the Genesis and results of the procedural activity of the Judicial Board for economic disputes of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation as the second cassation instance. Taking into account, on one hand, the relative recency of this court in the arbitration process, and the significance of its role in the aspect of ensuring uniformity of judicial and arbitration practice on the other, this may prove to be of certain importance. The authors aim to summarize and analyze the judicial and statistical indicators of the second cassation for the 2015-2019 period. The methodological basis of the article consists of general scientific (analysis, analogy, description, synthesis, system-oriented) and private scientific methods (statistical, comparative legal, formal legal). Based on the results of the study, the main trends and problems of the second cassation review of judicial acts on economic disputes are identified. Based on the analysis of statistical indicators of cassation activity, the authors come to the conclusion that it is necessary to modernize the structure and functioning of the second cassation instance and increase its role in ensuring uniformity of judicial and arbitration practice. In conclusion, generalized proposals aimed at improvement of the efficiency of the second cassation instance are formulated. The study was conducted on the basis of judicial statistics published on the website of The Judicial Department of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation.

About the authors

Sergey V. Nikitin

Russian State University of Justice

Author for correspondence.
Email: svnikitin56@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9635-1259

Doctor of Legal Sciences, Full Professor, the head of civil and administrative proceedings

69 Novocheremushkinskaya str., Moscow, 117418, Russian Federation

Malkhaz Sh. Patsatsiya

Russian State University of Justice

Email: besleti@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7109-8522

Doctor of Legal Sciences, Full Professor, Chief researchеr of Center of justice research

69 Novocheremushkinskaya str., Moscow, 117418, Russian Federation

References

  1. Arifulin, A.A. (2017) Proceedings in the court of cassation instance. In: Nikitin, S.V. (ed.). Arbitration proceeding: a textbook. Moscow, RGUP Publ. pp. 256-258. (in Russian).
  2. Borisova, E. A. (2020) Cassation in civil cases: Monograph. Moscow, Gorodets Publ. (in Russian).
  3. Budylin, S.L. (2020) An Upside-Down Trial, or the Chinese Notice Case. Case Comment on the Judgment of the Chamber for Commercial Disputes of the SC RF No. 305-ЭС19-13455, 29 November 2019. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii. (4), 21-31. (in Russian).
  4. Budylin, S.L. (2015) The Precedent at a Crossroads. A Brief History of Judicial Law-Making in Russia. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii. (11), 112-149. (in Russian).
  5. Zagaynova, S.K., Skuratovskiy, M.L. & Timofeev Y.A. (2018) Revision of judicial acts in the civil procedure: a textbook. Timofeeva, Yu. A. (eds.). Moscow, Statut Publ. (in Russian).
  6. Kovtkov, D.I. (2018) Appeal proceedings in the civil process of the Russian Federation and other foreign countries. Monograph. Moscow, Justice Inform Publ. (in Russian).
  7. Lutsenko, S.I. (2020) A disciplinary responsibility of a judge for the violation of the unity of judicial practice. Sovremennoe pravo. (4), 85-91. (in Russian).
  8. Momotov, V.V. (2018) The Russian Judicial Reform in 2018: Concept, Objectives, Content // Journal of Russian Law. (10), 134-146. (in Russian).
  9. Pavlova, M.S. (2018) The Problem of determining the time limit for filing a cassation appeal to the Judicial Board of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. Arbitration and civil procedure. (9), 51-56. (in Russian).
  10. Patsatsiya, M.Sh. (2015) About discretionary powers of officials of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in civil and arbitral procedure. Herald of Civil Procedure. (5), 10-61. (in Russian).
  11. Patsatsiya, M.Sh. (2017) On the temporal aspect of the application of part 8 of article 291.6 of the Commercial Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. Herald of Civil Procedure. (4), 12-38. (in Russian).
  12. Potapenko, S.V. (2014) From the concept of a unified science of procedural law to the creation of a new “unified” Civil Procedure code. Russian Justitia. (9), 2-5. (in Russian).
  13. Reshetnikova, I.V. (2020) Judicial Review in the second cassation. In: Reshetnikova, I.V. (ed.). The practice of application of the Commercial Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. 5-nd edition, revised and expanded. Moscow, Yurayt Publ. pp. 441-443. (in Russian).
  14. Reshetnikova, I.V. & Tsaregorodtseva, E.A. (2018) Novelties in the Administrative Procedure within the Framework of Judicial Proceedings Tasks. Arbitration and civil procedure. (7), 5-9.
  15. Reshetnikova, I.V. (2019) Contemplating legal proceedings. Selected. Moscow, Statut Publ. (in Russian).
  16. Tai, Y.V. (2016) Per aspera ad astra, or Court Reform, Two Years, All Systems Performing Well? Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii. (9), 64-83. (in Russian).
  17. Terekhova, L.A. (2016) On the Rule of Exhaustion When Appealing Court Decisions. Arbitration and civil procedure. (1), 25-29 (in Russian).
  18. Terekhova, L.A. (2019) Evidence in courts of cassation and supervisory instance. Herald of Civil Procedure. (1), 157-169 (in Russian).
  19. Timofeev, Y.A. (2018) Issues of Arrangement and Development of Judicial Act Review Systems. Arbitration and civil procedure. (7), 46-50.

Copyright (c) 2021 Nikitin S.V., Patsatsiya M.S.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies