Self-Regulation of genetic studies in Russia: search for the optimal model

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The article is devoted to the general analysis of self-regulatory practices of genetic research in Russia (conducted by public research institutions and commercial companies). Selfregulation is a special type of regulation, performed by organizations providing genetic research and their associations as well as by relevant professional and scientific community; it is regulated by local acts, agreements, memoranda, professional standards, codes of ethics, etc. and is aimed at establishing relationships in the field of organization, provision and use of results of genetic studies. Basically, selfregulation is especially critical in various aspects of organization and conducting genetic research in the worldwide perspective. The analysis provided by this article allows concluding that self-regulation practice in Russia is applied in several public research institutions, but rather fragmentarily. Moreover, the development of such form of regulation goes slowly. At the same time non-public genomic institutions are trying to evade any significant self-regulation of their activities; they do not provide for any expanded rules or standards of their practices (or they just confine themselves to references and general provisions which are not in line with the specifics of the mentioned activities). On the other hand, it is important to keep in mind that the current Russian legislation is full of gaps in terms of regulating genetic research process. Analysis of several websites of Russian private companies providing genetic profiling services revealed that those organizations almost never place complex information guides on their information portals; they neither provide the standards for performing genetic research in an intelligible form. The websites do not contain any information on possible risks or threats to health connected with application of medical procedures, while the issue of disclosure the gathered genomic information to third parties (e.g., enforcement agencies) is often ignored. More than that, there are hardly any published standards for conducting genomic research or documents on protecting patients’ rights, etc. Thus, we are forced to acknowledge that the institute of self-regulation in the field of genetic studies is not developed well enough in Russia. The current fragmented nature of legal regulation and selfregulation concerning genetic research may contribute to violation of rights and legitimate interests of patients in terms of confidentiality and safeguarding genetic information, gathered in the process of research. The state therefore should within the established goals of intensive genetic technological development provide all the necessary conditions (including of legal character). However, it is still not clear how the issues of legal regulation of status of genetic research participants, protection of genetic data, incentives for providing genetic research, etc. should be handled. We assume that one of the possible ways of tackling the aforementioned challenges is developing relevant complex legal regulation (including departmental acts) and/or investing the frontline public research institutions with special functions (i.e., within a special council, commission, or association). Such powers will contribute to regulating certain aspects of administering and conducting genetic research and using its results in the framework of legal regulation, which should be mandatory, including for non-public organizations, offering genetic services in the territory of the Russian Federation.

About the authors

Emil V. Alimov

The Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: emil.alimov@gmail.com

Candidate of Legal Sciences, Researcher of Department of Constitutional Law

34 B. Cheremushkinskaya str., Moscow, 117218, Russian Federation

Felix A. Leshchenkov

The Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation

Email: foreign2@izak.ru

Researcher of the Department of Constitutional, Administrative and Criminal Law and International Law

34 B. Cheremushkinskaya str., Moscow, 117218, Russian Federation

References

  1. Alimov, E.V. (2020) The Legal Status of Participants in Genetic Research in Russia: Statement of the Problem. Vestnik of Moscow City University. Series “Legal Sciences”. (3), 33-41. doi: 10.25688/2076-9113.2020.39.3.04 (in Russian)
  2. Blasimme, A., Moret, C., Hurst, S.A. & Vayena, E. (2017) Informed Consent and the Disclosure of Clinical Results to Research Participants. The American Journal of Bioethics. 17(7), 58-60. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1328532
  3. Blinov, A.G. (2018) Legal Environment of Genome Research and Prospects of its Optimization in Russia. Herald of Omsk University. Series “Law”. 4(57), 138-144. doi: 10.25513/19905173.2018.4.138-144 (in Russian)
  4. Branum, R., Wolf, S. M. (2015) International Policies on Sharing Genomic Research Results with Relatives: Approaches to Balancing Privacy with Access. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 43(3), 576-593. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12301
  5. Dubov, A.B. & Dyakov, V.G. (2019) Genomic Information Security: Legal Aspects of International and National Regulation. Courier of the Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL). (4), 127-137. doi: 10.17803/2311-5998.2019.56.4.127-137 (in Russian)
  6. Isasi, R., Kleiderman, E. & Knopper, B.M. (2016) Editing policy to fit the genome? Science. 351(6271), 337-339. doi: 10.1126/science.aad6778
  7. Kalinichenko, P.A. & Kosilkin, S.V. (2019) Genomic Research: Council of Europe Standards and Legal Regulation in Russia. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL). (4), 108-118. doi: 10.17803/2311-5998.2019.56.4.108-118 (in Russian)
  8. Knoppers, B.M. (2014) International ethics harmonization and the global alliance for genomics and health. Genome Medicine. 6(2), 13. doi: 10.1186/gm530
  9. Lapaeva, V.V. (2020) Concept of Improving Russian Legislation Regulating the Development of Research in the Field of the Human Genome. Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the RAS. 15(2), 111-134. doi: 10.35427/2073-4522-2020-15-2-lapaeva (in Russian)
  10. Lévesque, E., Joly, Y. & Simard, J. (2011) Return of Research Results: General Principles and International Perspectives. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 39(4), 583-592. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00625.x
  11. Lin, Z., Owen, A.B. & Altman, R.B. (2004) Genomic Research and Human Subject Privacy. Science. 305(5681). doi: 10.1126/science.1095019
  12. Mashkova, K.V. & Shirokov, A.Yu. (2020) The Formation of the Legal Status of Applied Genomic Research through the Formation of Self-Regulatory Professional Associations. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 15(10), 132-140. doi: 10.17803/1994-1471.2020.119.10. 132-140 (in Russian)
  13. Mashkova, K.V., Varlen, M.V. & Shirokov, A.Yu. (2020) Self-Regulation of Genomic Studies and Prospects of Personified Medicine. Lex Russica. (8), 54-61. doi: 10.17803/17295920.2020.165.8.054-061 (in Russian)
  14. Montgomery, J. (2018) Modification of the Human Genome: Human Rights Challenges Raised by Scientific and Technical Developments. European Court of Human Rights Precedents. 3(51), 42-56. (in Russian)
  15. Munnich, A. (2019) La Médecine Génomique Personnalisée: Prédire ou Médire? Bulletin de l’Academie Nationale de Medecine. 203(6), 409-412. Doi.org/10.1016/j.banm.2019.06.006 (in French)
  16. Nanba, S.B., Akopyan, O.A., Alimov, E.V., Garmaeva, M.A. & Bedoeva, Z.N. (2020) State Programs for the Development of Genetic Technologies. Opción. (26), 732-750
  17. Nazarov, V. & Sisigina, N. (2018) Genetic Health Economy. Ekonomicheskaya Politika. 13(6), 188-213. doi: 10.18288/1994-5124-2018-6-188-213 (in Russian)
  18. Rothstein, M.A., Knoppers, B.M. & Harrell, H.L. (2016) Comparative Approaches to Biobanks and Privacy. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 44(1), 161-172. Doi: 10.1177/ 1073110516644207
  19. Thorogood, A., Dalpé, G. & Knoppers, B. (2019) Return of Individual Genomic Research Results: are Laws and Policies Keeping Step? European Journal of Human Genetics. (27), 535- 546. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0311-3
  20. Varlen, M.V., Mashkova, K.V., Zenin, S.S., Bartsits, H.L. & Suvorov, G.N. (2019) Search for General Principles of Genomic Self-regulation Researching the Context of Ensuring Priority Protection of Rights and Legitimate Interests of the Individual. Issues of Law. 3(72), 11-20. (in Russian)
  21. Yankovskiy, N.K. & Borinskaya, S.A. (2003) Genom cheloveka: nauchnyye i prakticheskiye dostizheniya i perspektivy. Analiticheskiy obzor. Vestnik RFFI. (2), 46-63. (in Russian)
  22. Zenin, S.S. (2020) State regulation and self-regulation of relations in the field of genetic research: towards the formation of an optimal moth. Issues of Law. 3(77), 7-8. (in Russian)

Copyright (c) 2021 Alimov E.V., Leshchenkov F.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies