THE PROBLEM OF LEGAL VALIDITY IN THE ANTI-METAPHYSICAL APPROACH (ALF ROSS’S CONCEPTION)

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article analyzes the main approaches to the problem of the validity of law. As a result a num-ber of aspects of the phenomenon designated as “the validity of law” are distinguished: normative sig-nificance, social and (or) psychological efficiency, objective givenness, a binding force. To fill the gap in the theoretical constructions the author proposes such a notion of the validity of law that is independ-ent of philosophical approaches. Legal validity is defined as a specific mechanism (force) of normative influence on people’s conduct. Therefore, the binding force of law is considered not as an obligation to obey the law, but as a mechanism of giving rise to legal obligations. Moreover in this article all existing variations of providing a rationale for the validity of law are classified into two main approaches: meta-physical and anti-metaphysical. Alf Ross’s (Danish legal philosopher, one of the most prominent repre-sentatives of Scandinavian legal realism) concept of legal validity is considered as a perfect example of the anti-metaphysical approach and is reconstructed along with the analysis of major terminological is-sues, which occur in translations and studies of his legacy. The author concludes that a key to a proper understanding of Ross’s concept is an appropriate terminological division between the two basic con-cepts, which reflect his viewpoint regarding the validity of law in the context of Is-Ought problem in law. The author proposes to translate the Danish term «gælden» into Russian as «deistvennost'«, since it concerns law in force and its effectiveness, and «gyldighet» as «deistvitel'nost'«, since it implies a bind-ing force of law related to oughtness. Ross considers the former as a revelation of the latter in the reality and as a proper subject of jurisprudence (doctrinal study of law, based on strict empiricism, non-cognitivism, coherentism).

About the authors

Natalia S Vasilyeva

Saint Petersburg State University Faculty of Law

Author for correspondence.
Email: st212804@student.spbu.ru

Vasilyeva Natalia S. - Postgraduate Student, Faculty of Law, Saint Petersburg State University.

7/9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg 199034, Russia

References

  1. Aarnio, A. (1987) The Rational as Reasonable: A Treatise on Legal Justification. Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster, Tokyo, D. Reidel Publ. Comp. Available from: doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-4700-9.
  2. Alexy, R. (1992) Ponyatie i deistvitel'nost' prava (otvet yuridicheskomu pozitivizmu) [Begriff und Geltung des Rechts]. Translated from German by Lapteva, A. N., Kal'shojera, F. (2011) Mos-cow, Infotropic Media. (in Russian)
  3. Bulygin, E. (2015) Valid Law and Law in Force. In Bernal, C., Huerta, C., Mazzarese, T., Moreso, J.J., Navarro, P.E. & Paulson, S.L. (eds.) Essays in Legal Philosophy. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 284–292. Available from: doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198729365.003.0019.
  4. Chestnov, I. L. (2012) Postclassical Theory of Law. Saint Petersburg, Alef-press. (in Rus-sian)
  5. Coleman, J. L. (2001) The Conventionality Thesis. Philosophical Issues. 11 (1), 354–387. Available from: doi: 10.1111/j.1758-2237.2001.tb00050.x.
  6. Eng, S. (2011) Lost in the System or Lost in Translation? The Exchanges between Hart and Ross. Ratio Juris. 24 (2), 194–246. Available from: doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9337.2011.00482.x.
  7. Fittipaldi, E. (2016) Introduction: Continental Legal Realism. In: Pattaro, E. Roversi, C. (eds.) Legal Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: The Civil Law World. Vol. 12. Netherlands, Springer, pp. 1361–1382. Available from: doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-1479-3-40.
  8. Himma, K.E. (2004) Inclusive Legal Positivism. In: Coleman, J. L., Himma, K. E. & Shapiro, S. J. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law. Oxford, Ox-ford University Press, pp. 125–165. Available from: doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270972.013.0004.
  9. Holtermann, J. V. H. (2016) “This Cannot Be its Meaning in the Mouth of the Judge” (The Case for the New English Language Translation of Alf Ross's On Law and Justice, Forthcoming on Oxford University Press). Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana. Revista Internacional de Filosofía Iberoamericana y Teoría Social. 20 (71), 19–30.
  10. Marmor, A., Sarch, A. (2015) The Nature of Law. In: Zalta E. N. (ed.) The Stanford Ency-clopedia of Philosophy. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/ law-phil-nature/. [Accessed 15th May 2017].
  11. Munzer, S. (1972) Legal Validity. Netherlands, Springer. Available from: doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-9271-2.
  12. Ross, A. (1946) Towards a Realistic Jurisprudence: A Criticism of the Dualism in Law. Co-penhagen, E. Munksgaard.
  13. Ross, A. (1959) On Law and Justice. Berkeley, University of California Press.
  14. Ross, A. (1961) Validnost' i konflikt mezhdu pravovym pozitivizmom i tvennym pravom [Validity and the Conflict between Legal Positivism and Natural Law]. Translated from English by Antonov, M. V. (2009) Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory. (2), 458–473. (in Russian)
  15. Ross, A. (1968) Directives and Norms. New York, Humanities Press.
  16. Timoshina, E. V. (2011) Kontseptsiya normativnosti L.I. Petrazhitskogo i problema deist-vitel'nosti prava v yuridicheskom pozitivizme XX v. [Petrażyckis Concept of Normativity and the Problem of Legal Validity of the Twentieth Century Legal Positivism]. Izvestiya vysshikh ucheb-nykh zavedenii. Pravovedenie. [Proceedings of Higher Education Institutions. Pravovedenie]. (5), 46–71. (in Russian)
  17. Varlamova, N. V. (2013) Normativnost' prava: problemy interpretatsii [The Normative Sub-stance of Law: Problems of Interpretation]. Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava RAN. [Proceed-ings of the Institute of State and Law of the RAS]. (4), 76–115. (in Russian)
  18. Vasilyeva, N. S., Timoshina, E. V. (2017) Obshchaya teoriya sudebnogo metoda Al'fa Rossa [Alf Ross’s General Theory of Judicial Method]. In: Tonkov, E. N., Chestnov, I. L. (eds.) Para-digmy yuridicheskoi germenevtiki [Paradigms of Legal Hermeneutics]. Saint Petersburg, Aleteiya, pp. 284–309. (in Russian)
  19. Wróblewski J. (1982) Three concepts of validity of law. Särtryck ur Tidskrift, utgiven av Ju-ridiska Föreningen i Finland. (5-6), 406–419.
  20. Wróblewski J. (1986) Concepts of Legal System and Conceptions of Validity. Acta Universi-tatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica. 24, 3–22.

Copyright (c) 2017 Vasilyeva N.S.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies