The Azerbaijani Factor in the Clash of the Iranian and Turkish ‘Crescents’: A ‘Geopolitical New Moon’ in the South Caucasus
- 作者: Aghazada M.M.1
-
隶属关系:
- RUDN University
- 期: 卷 24, 编号 4 (2024): Preserving Identity in a Global World
- 页面: 520-533
- 栏目: THEMATIC DOSSIER
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/view/42194
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2024-24-4-520-533
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LTWJIH
如何引用文章
详细
The Islamic Republic of Iran and the Republic of Türkiye, two historical rivals in the South Caucasus and the Middle East, pay special attention to relations with the Republic of Azerbaijan. This is primarily due to ethnolinguistic, religious-ideological, and geopolitical factors. The aim of the paper is to identify the distinctive characteristics of the Iranian and Turkish crescents, as well as Azerbaijan’s place in the clash of these two foreign policy strategies. The Iranian crescent refers to Iran’s influence and/or presence in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, and Yemen. The author introduces the term ‘Turkish crescent’ as Türkiye’s foreign policy strategy, the main aim of which is to strengthen the country’s position in the South Caucasus and the Middle East by building up military forces and expanding trade and economic ties, as well as to contain Iranian influence in the region. The Turkish crescent means Türkiye’s influence and/or presence in Libya, Cyprus, Syria, Iraq, Azerbaijan, Qatar, and Somalia. The term ‘geopolitical new moon’ refers to the new geopolitical realities that emerged after the Second Karabakh War in the South Caucasus and have an impact on the regional security architecture, including the policies of Iran and Türkiye in this region. The article analyzes the peculiarities of the Iranian and Turkish crescents and the use of the Azerbaijani factor by Iran and Türkiye in implementing their strategies against each other. This paper is based on constructive realism, as religious, ideological, and ethnic factors play a special role in the rivalry between Iran and Türkiye in the South Caucasus and the Middle East, along with military, political, and economic factors. The author employs a descriptive-analytical approach, gathering necessary information from documents, scientific papers, media materials, and comparative analysis to assess the impact of the rivalry between Türkiye and Iran on Azerbaijan’s foreign policy orientation. It can be concluded that Iran lost to Türkiye in the Azerbaijani segment of the clash of two ‘crescents.’
作者简介
Mirmehdi Aghazada
RUDN University
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: agazade-mm@rudn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5129-5553
SPIN 代码: 5198-7708
PhD (History), Associate Professor, Department of Theory and History of International Relations
Moscow, Russian Federation参考
- Aghazada, M. M. (2021). Azerbaijani-Iranian relations: Main directions and features in 1991–2019 (historiographical overview). Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 21(4), 803–821. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2021-21-4-803-821; EDN: DVPBOP
- Aghazada, M. M. (2023). Azerbaijani-Iranian relations after the Second Karabakh War: Features and trends. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 23(4), 719–733. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2023-23-4-719-733; EDN: PLIBUK
- Akhmedov, V. M. (2022). Religious factors of Iran’s politics in the Syrian crisis. Ekonomicheskie, Sotsial’no-Politicheskie, Etnokonfessional’nye Problemy Afro-Aziatskikh Stran, (5), 247–255. (In Russian). EDN: UPHQPE
- Altunışık, M. B. (2020). The new turn in Türkiye’s foreign policy in the Middle East: Regional and domestic insecurities. Roma: Istituto Affari Internazionali.
- Avatkov, V. A. (2022). Turkey and Azerbaijan: One nation — one state? World Eсonomy and International Relations, 66(2), 90–100. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-2-90-100; EDN: AJIIXX
- Avatkov, V. A., & Sbitneva, A. I. (2023). The Republic of Türkiye on the eve of the centenary: The era of R.T. Erdogan. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 23(4), 595–608. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2023-23-4-595-608; EDN: NTHNRR
- Avcı, S. (2023). İran dış politikasında şii hilali. İslam Medeniyyeti Dergis, 8(50), 107–132. https://doi.org/10.55918/islammedeniyetidergisi.1209043
- Barkin, J. S. (2010). Realist constructivism: Rethinking international relations theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Barzegar, K. (2008). Iran and the Shiite crescent: Myths and realities. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 15(1), 87–99.
- Belov, V. I., & Savicheva, E. M. (2021). Iran and Azerbaijan: Challenges to security and cooperation. Postsovetskie Issledovaniya / Post-Soviet Studies, 4(7), 615–625. (In Russian). EDN: IZLAYZ
- Bostancı, M. (2015). Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti’nin ilânı ve buna yönelik tepkilerin Türk kamuoyundaki yankıları. Tarih Araştırmaları Dergisi, 34(57), 317–356. https://doi.org/10.1501/Tarar_0000000608
- Çakmak, С. (2015). The Arab Spring and the Shiite crescent: Does ongoing change serve Iranian interests? The Review of Faith & International Affairs, 13(2), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2015.1039299
- Chikrizova, O. S., & Ivkina, N. V. (2023). The problem of the “Shiʻa crescent” in the Middle East: A quantitative analysis. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 23(1), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2023-23-1-88-104; EDN: VCNXUU
- Devecioğlu, K. (2024). Türkiye ve Somali: Bölgesel güvenlikten ekonomik kalkınmaya yeni bir iş birliği yaklaşımı. Ankara: Ortadoğu Araştırmaları Merkezi.
- Duran, B. (2022). Türkiye and the future of normalization in the Middle East. Insight Türkiye, 24(2), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.25253/99.2022242.9
- Filin, N. A., Koklikov, V. O., & Khodunov, А. S. (2021). Iranian politicians and experts’ views on the armed conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh in 2020. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Eurasian Studies. History. Political Science. International Relations Series, (1), 10–22. (In Russian). EDN: NGLKVA
- Golmohammadi, V., & Markedonov, S. M. (2024). How Iran perceives Türkiye’s rise in the South Caucasus. Russia in Global Affairs, 22(1), 152–175. https://doi.org/10.31278/1810-6374-2024-22-1-152-175
- Guzaerov, R. I. (2023). Evolution of Turkish-Azerbaijani relations from 1991 to 2023. Postsovetskie Issledovaniya / Post-Soviet Studies, 6(8), 860–870. (In Russian). EDN: QBXBAK
- Khazanov, A. M., & Gasratyan, S. M. (2021). The role of the “Shiite crescent” in the present situation in the Middle East (2000–2020). Rossiya i Musul’manskii Mir, (4), 111–119. (In Russian). EDN: SNHXYK
- Kınık, H. (2022). Türkiye’nin çok boyutlu dış politikasına bir örnek: Türkiye Katar ilişkilerinin gelişimi. Barış Araştırmaları ve Çatışma Çözümleri Dergisi, 10(1), 27–46.
- Komleva, N. A. (2022). “Iranian square” against “Turkish triangle”. Bulletin of Moscow Region State University, (1), 116–132. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18384/2224-0209-2022-1-1106; EDN: KWOIAU
- Lobell, S. E. (2017). Structural realism / offensive and defensive realism. International Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/ 9780190846626.013.304
- Paunic, N. (2016). The rising Shi‘ite crescent: Iranian smart power and implications for the Middle East, Central Asia, and the Persian Gulf. Carleton Review of International Affairs, (3), 70–92. https://doi.org/10.22215/cria.v3i0.120
- Şahin, M. (2022). Türkiye’nin Somali politikasının incelenmesi. Türkiye Ortadoğu Çalışmaları Dergisi, 9(1), 109–147. https://doi.org/10.26513/tocd.863114
- Sarabiev, A. V. (2019). The Middle East Shiite arc: A real threat or geopolitical chimera? Lomonosov World Politics Journal, 11(2), 39–64. (In Russian). EDN: RIQIDM
- Sazhin, V. I. (2019). Iran — Azerbaijan: The Azerbaijani question today. Trudy Instituta Vostokovedeniya RAN, (26), 157–172. (In Russian). EDN: LBSRJF
- Shlykov, P. V. (2023). Turkish somersault. Russia in Global Affairs, 21(3), 142–159. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31278/1810-6439-2023-21-3-142-159; EDN: GJIMNC
- Sinkaya, B. (2007). Şii ekseni tartışmaları ve İran. Avrasya Dosyası, 13(3), 37–63.
- Sinkaya, B. (2022). İslam Cumhuriyeti’nde dış politika: Çelişkiler ve ikilemler. In O. Karaoğlu, N. Elhan (Eds.), İran: Bir ülkenin akademik anatomisi (pp. 389–407). İstanbul: İnkılap Kitabevi Yayın Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ.
- Tuna, F. (2020). Türk dış politikasında realist yaklaşım: Türkiye’nin Doğu Akdeniz ve Libya politikası. Uluslararası Hukuk ve Sosyal Bilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(1), 74–87.
- Uzunöner, M. E., & Çıkrıkçı, T. (2023). Türkiye, ABD ve Rusya’nın Libya iç savaşına yönelik politikalarının karşılaştırmalı analizi. Düşünce Dünyasında Türkiz, 14(64), 11–56. https://doi.org/10.59281/turkiz.1205348
- Valiyev, J. (2021). Türkiye’s South Caucasus policy after the 44-Day War. Caucasus Strategic Perspective, 2(1), 11–25.
- Yurtaev, V. I. (2010). Iran: Geopolitics and development strategy. Rossiya i Musul’manskii Mir, (9), 103–117. (In Russian). EDN: MUSRKR
- Zarqami, B., Shoshtari, S. J., & Ansari Zadeh, S. (2014). Shia geopolitics or Shiite crescent (principles, goals and approaches). Human Geography Research, 46(1), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.22059/JHGR.2014.50600
补充文件
没有额外的文件显示