Identifying Altitudinal Change in Post-Conflict Scenarios and Pathways to Rehabilitation: Case Study of Japanese Students’ Perceptions of Russia and Their Sources of Information in 2021-2022

封面

如何引用文章

详细

Recent crises in international relations have created tensions in communication and hindered the achievement of understanding between societies. Under these complicated circumstances, young people are not only objects of public influence but also agenda-setting actors capable of learning and acting on the basis of knowledge about the international situation. This article focuses on how the Japanese students perceive their close neighbor Russia and examines how their views on the image of the neighboring country and its citizens have changed from 2021 to 2022. To examine the changes in perception, within the research project “Student’s representations of neighboring countries: Russia and Japan,” students from four Japanese universities were interviewed (online questionnaire). In the present work the results of the studies are analyzed in order to draw conclusions about the drivers of the change in the public perception of Russia. The author focused on university students for this study because it was assumed that they would eventually become part of the political elite of the country. The tendency for social and political advocacy among the youth was also a contributing factor that supported university students being the group favorably consider for this research. The university student population also provides a higher level of homogeneity among respondents, increasing the internal validity of the findings. Comparing the results of the 2022 survey with the results of the 2021 survey, we can observe some significant changes in the perception of Russia by Japanese youth. First of all, we can observe a shift in perception from the sphere of culture to the sphere of security. The quotes from students throughout this article should be taken into account when looking at the results and analysis. This research also confirms that negative and positive cognitive opinions about a neighboring country can coexist among Japanese youth.

作者简介

Larisa Zhilina

Dostoevsky Omsk State University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: larissa-zhilina@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6337-3870
SPIN 代码: 6910-2963

PhD (History), Associate Professor, Department of Philology, Translation Studies and Media Communications

Omsk, Russian Federation

参考

  1. Buhmann, A. (2016). Measuring country image: Theory, method, and effects. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-15407-3
  2. Burnett, J. J, & Dune, P. M. (1986). An appraisal on the use of student subjects in marketing research. Journal of Business Research, 14(4), 329-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(86)90024-X
  3. Chugrov, S. V., & Streltsov, D. V. (2017). Interdependence of Russo-Japanese relations and mutual images of Japan and Russia. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 18(1), 22-40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S146810991600030X; EDN: YVCSDL
  4. Crawford, N. C. (2000). The passion of world politics: Propositions on emotion and emotional relationships. International Security, 24(4), 116-156.
  5. Davidson, J., & Milligan, C. (2007). Embodying emotion sensing space: Introducing emotional geographies. Social & Cultural Geography, 5(4), 523-532. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464936042000317677
  6. Degterev, D. A. (2022). Value sovereignty in the era of global convergent media. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 22(2), 352-371. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-2-352-371; EDN: OSWUKF
  7. Dempsey, K. E, & McDowell, S. (2019). Disaster depictions and geopolitical representation in Europe’s migration ‘crisis’. Geoforum, 98, 153-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.11.008
  8. Gregory, D. (1994). Geographical imaginations. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
  9. Hall, C. M. (2002). Travel safety, terrorism and the media: The significance of the issue-attention cycle. Current Issues in Tourism, 5(5), 458-466. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500208667935
  10. Harzing, A.-W., & Maznevski, M. (2002). The interaction between language and culture: A test of the cultural accommodation hypothesis in seven countries. Language and Intercultural Communication, 2(2), 120-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708470208668081
  11. Heslop, L. A., Lu, I. R. R., & Cray, D. (2008). Modeling country image effects through an international crisis. International Marketing Review, 25(4), 354-378. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651330810887440
  12. Jenes, B. (2005). Possibilities of shaping country image. The Hungarian Journal of Marketing and Management, 39(2), 18-29.
  13. Kim, B., & Vasileva, K. (2017). Popular culture as an important element in creating a national image of Korea. Advanced Science Letters, 23(10), 9866-9869. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.9813
  14. Kukkonen, K. (2011). The map, the mirror and the simulacrum: Visual communication and the question of power. In M. Stocchetti & K. Kukkonen (Eds.), Images in use: Towards the critical analysis of visual communication (pp. 55-67). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.44.05kuk
  15. McAndrew, F. T., & Milenkovic, M. A. (2002). Of tabloids and family secrets: The evolutionary psychology of gossip. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(5), 1064-1082. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00256.x
  16. McAuliffe, C. (2007). Visible minorities: Constructing and deconstructing the ‘Muslim Iranian’ diaspora. In C. Aitchison, P. Hopkins & M.-P. Kwan (Eds.), Geographies of Muslim identities: Diaspora, gender and belonging (pp. 29-56). Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
  17. Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. New York: Public Affairs.
  18. Sommerfeld, R. D., Krambeck, H.-J., Semmann, D., & Milinski, M. (2007). Gossip as an alternative for direct observation in games of indirect reciprocity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(44), 17435-17440. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704598104
  19. Sriramesh, K., & Verčič, D. (2009). A theoretical framework for global public relations research and practice. In K. Sriramesh & D. Verčič (Eds.), the global public relations handbook, revised and expanded edition: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 3-24). New York: Routledge.
  20. Stepchenkova, S. S., & Morrison, A. M. (2008). Russia’s destination image among American pleasure travelers: Revisiting Echtner and Ritchie. Tourism Management, 29(3), 548-560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2007.06.003
  21. Tasci, A. D. A., Gartner, W. C., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2007). Measurement of destination brand bias using a quasi-experimental design. Tourism Management, 28(6), 1529-1540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2007.02.009
  22. Zhilina, L. (2015). Public attitude and mutual perceptions: Japan and Russia. CEU Political Science Journal, 10(1-2), 1-30. EDN: WJTPYP
  23. Zhilina, L. V. (2008). Representations of neighboring countries at the beginning of 21st century - Russia and Japan in students’ imaginations. The forming of public opinion about foreign countries (on the basis of the interrogations of university of Russia (2006) and Japan (2007)). Omsk: Omskblankizdat publ. (In Russian). EDN: VTPPQX
  24. Zhilina, L. V. (2019). The challenges of political socialization of the contemporary Japanese youth. Russian Japanology Review, 2(1), 57-80. https://doi.org/10.24411/2658-6789-2019-10003; EDN: TAOZRD
  25. Zhilina, L. V., & Podalko, P. E. (2013). Student’s representations of the neighboring countries: Russia and Japan (comparative studies). Aoyama Journal of International Politics, Economics and Communication, (89), 25-98. EDN: VPXAEL
  26. Zimako, O. Z. (2009). Face of a nation: Democracy in Nigeria, foreign relations and national image. Lagos: Modern Approach.

补充文件

没有额外的文件显示


版权所有 © Zhilina L., 2024

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名-非商业性使用 4.0国际许可协议的许可。

##common.cookie##