Turkish Balance, or Türkiye’s Foreign Policy Strategy in the Black Sea Region Following the Special Military Operation

封面

如何引用文章

详细

The Black Sea region in its various geopolitical configurations is a zone of priority for the Turkish elite. Prior to the Treaty of Küçük Kaynarca (1774), the Black Sea was regarded as the “Sultan’s harem.” Being essentially a peninsula between the Mediterranean and Black Sea, Türkiye is interested in maintaining control over the Black Sea space or in sharing it with another strong power having access to it. The authors aim to identify and explore Türkiye’s foreign policy strategy in relation to the Black Sea region as one of the key geopolitical spaces for Ankara’s national interests. The foreign policy strategy is understood as a long-term mechanism of the subject in relation to objects and competing subjects, which aims to achieve the most favorable spatial position with the help of military and non-military means and appropriate resources, taking into account the timeliness factor. The article solves specific tasks: it identifies the stable characteristics of Turkish foreign policy, shaped by historical experience and geography, which underlie Ankara’s foreign policy strategy; it shows and studies the strategic vision of the Turkish elite in relation to the Black Sea region; it reveals the mechanisms of influence of external geopolitical subjects on the region and the combination of these mechanisms with Turkish national interests. The concept of Turkish balance is introduced as mechanism of Türkiye’s foreign policy strategy whose main purpose is to integrate stronger powers into the logic and algorithms of foreign policy balances of stronger powers with their mutual opposition and further balancing act, which allows Türkiye to receive maximum geo-economic and geopolitical dividends. The research methodology is represented by systemic, geopolitical and civilizational approaches. Given the role of the Black Sea region in the military-political dynamics since February 2022, the mechanisms of Türkiye’s foreign policy strategy in relation to the region are becoming crucial for Russia in various areas of national security. Authors propagate that February 2022 is the inertia of the events of March 2014 and deeper, of the postponed crisis of 1991 caused by the disintegration of the USSR. However, it was the beginning of the special military operation that brought the military and political confrontation at the global and regional levels into the format of open confrontation. Russia has challenged the West and its system of allies.

作者简介

Aleksandr Irkhin

Sevastopol State University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: alex.irhin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7895-550X
SPIN 代码: 7399-0942

PhD, Dr. of Sc. (Political Sciences), Head, Political Science and Philosophy Department, Institute of Social Sciences and International Relations

Sevastopol, Russian Federation

Olga Moskalenko

Sevastopol State University

Email: kerulen@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4162-3162
SPIN 代码: 2703-2615

PhD (Philology), Associate Professor, Theory and Practice of Translation Department, Institute of Social Sciences and International Relations

Sevastopol, Russian Federation

Natalia Demeshko

Sevastopol State University

Email: natalidem93@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9620-2410
SPIN 代码: 5312-9118

PhD (Political Science), Associate Professor, Political Science Department, Institute of Social Sciences and International Relations

Sevastopol, Russian Federation

参考

  1. Akgün, M. (2003). Black Sea straits: Invisible connections. In N. Yu. Ulchenko & G. Kazgan (Eds.), Russian-Turkish relations: Current state and prospects: collection of articles of the conference (pp. 43–75). Moscow: IV RAN publ. (In Russian).
  2. Aktürk, Ş. (2020). Turkey’s grand strategy as the third power: A realist proposal. Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs, 25(2), 152–177.
  3. Asmus, R. (2007). The Euro-Atlantic Black Sea region. Russia in Global Affairs, 5(3), 66–77. (In Russian). EDN: TZIZYD
  4. Asmus, R., Dimitrov, K., & Forbrig, J. (Eds.). (2004). A new Euro-Atlantic strategy for the Black Sea region. Washington, D.C.: The German Marshall Fund of the United States.
  5. Avatkov, V. A., & Gudev, P. A. (2021). Geopolitics of Russian-Turkish relations in the Black Sea region. RUDN Journal of Political Science, 23(3), 348–363. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2021-23-3-348-363
  6. Aydin, M. (2004). Europe’s next shore: The Black Sea region after EU enlargement. Occasional Papers, (53), 1–37.
  7. Aydin, M. (2020). Grand strategizing in and for Turkish foreign policy: Lessons learned from history, geography and practice. Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs, 25(2), 203–226.
  8. Aydin, M., & Triantaphyllou, D. (2010). A 2020 vision for the Black Sea region: The commission on the Black Sea proposes. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 10(3), 373–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2010.503648
  9. Chikharev, I. A. (2021a). The Great Mediterranean as a multi-dimensional object of political research. Polis. Political Studies, (3), 129–146. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2021.03.09
  10. Chikharev, I. A. (2021b). Russia in Greater Mediterranean: New Pacific Eurasian transition. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 21(3), 441–458. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2021-21-3-441-458
  11. Chikharev, I. A., & Brovko, V. Yu. (2018). Digital regional studies of Greater Mediterranean: An outline of research program. Russian Political Science, 4(9), 47–54. (In Russian). EDN: KPHFCP
  12. Cioculescu, A. F. (2013). Rethinking the Black Sea: Between the Trans-Atlantic and the Eurasian projects. Scientia Militaria — South African Journal of Military Studies, 41(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.5787/41-1-1051
  13. Degterev, D. A., & Aghazada, M. M. (Eds.). (2023). The Greater Mediterranean as an emerging subsystem of international relations. Moscow: Aspekt Press publ. (In Russian).
  14. Friedman, G. (2016). Flashpoints: The emerging crisis in Europe. Saint Petersburg: Piter publ. (In Russian).
  15. Gaber, Ye. (2020). Turkey’s Black Sea policy: Between “Russian Lake” and “NATO’s backyard”. UA: Ukraine Analytica, (1), 43–52.
  16. Goncharenko, O. (2005). The Black Sea-Caspian region: Regional security structures and democratic control. The Black Sea Security, (1), 3–9. (In Ukrainian).
  17. Irkhin, A. A. (2012). Models of integration of Eurasian space and national interests of Ukraine [dissertation]. Simferopol. (In Ukrainian).
  18. Irkhin, A. A., & Moskalenko, O. A. (2020). Russia’s foreign policy in the Great Mediterranean: Prospects and constraints. Geopolitics Quarterly, 15(4), 110–121.
  19. Irkhin, A. A., & Moskalenko, O. A. (2021). The Black Sea region in the contest of geopolitical projects of the great powers, 1991–2019. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 21(3), 498–516. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2021-21-3-498-516
  20. Kennedy, P. (2018). The rise and fall of the great powers. Ekaterinburg: Gonzo publ. (In Russian).
  21. Kissinger, H. (2018). Diplomacy. Moscow: AST publ. (In Russian).
  22. Krylenko, V., Krylenko, M., & Aleynikov, A. (2019). Length coastline specification of the Azov Sea using Sentinel–2 satellite data. Vestnik of SSUGT, 24(4), 78–92. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.33764/2411-1759-2019-24-4-78-92
  23. Lesser, I. O. (2007). Global trends, regional consequences: Wider strategic influences on the Black Sea. Xenophon Paper, (4), 1–52. Retrieved from https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/103656/XENOPHON_PAPER_4.pdf
  24. Maksimenko, L. (2005). Problems of security and political stability in the Black Sea-Caspian region: Genesis and evolution of conflicts (on the example of Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan). Research of World Politics, (33), 136–149. (In Ukrainian).
  25. Nechaev, V. D., Chikharev, I. A., Irkhin, A. A., & Makovskaya, D. V. (2019). Framework of the geostrategic atlas of the Greater Mediterranean. Lomonosov Geography Journal, (1), 67–74. (In Russian). EDN: STDOTD
  26. Nikiforov, A. R. (2008). Rhythms of the Wider Black Sea space: To compare positions. In A. Malgin (Ed.), International round table “Security issues in the Black Sea region and the neutral status of Ukraine”: collection of materials (pp. 60–67). Simferopol: SONAT publ. (In Russian).
  27. Oreshkova, S. F. (2003). Russia’s wars with the Ottoman Empire: Causes and some historical results. In N. Yu. Ulchenko & G. Kazgan (Eds.), Russian-Turkish relations: Current state and prospects: collection of articles of conference (pp. 21–34). Moscow: IV RAN publ. (In Russian).
  28. Stanchev, H., Palazov, A., Stancheva, M., & Apostolov, A. (2011). Determination of the Black Sea area and coastline length using GIS methods and Landsat 7 Satellite images. Geo-Eco-Marina, (17), 27–31. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.56890
  29. Stoletov, O., Chikharev, I., Moskalenko, O., & Makovskaya, D. (2019). Geopolitical foundations of the project “Geostrategic atlas of the Great Mediterranean.” InterCarto. InterGIS, 25(1), 163–178. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.35595/2414-9179-2019-1-25-163-178
  30. Tsantoulis, I. (2016). Towards a genealogy of regions in international relations: An autopsy of the Black Sea (Region) [dissertation]. London: University College.
  31. Tunander, O. (1997). Post-Cold war Europe: Synthesis of a bipolar friend-foe structure and a hierarchic cosmos-chaos structure? In O. Tunander, P. Bayev & V. Einagel (Eds.), Geopolitics in post-wall Europe: Security, territory and identity (pp. 17–44). London: SAGE.
  32. Walters, W. (2004). The frontiers of the European Union: A geostrategic perspective. Geopolitics, 9(3), 674–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040490478738
  33. Yurchenko, S. (2001). The USA geostrategy in the process of the global power formation [dissertation]. Kiev. (In Russian).

补充文件

没有额外的文件显示


版权所有 © Irkhin A., Moskalenko O., Demeshko N., 2024

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名-非商业性使用 4.0国际许可协议的许可。

##common.cookie##