Western Balkans: External Actors Before and During the Current Crisis

封面

如何引用文章

详细

The Western Balkans has been and remains a particularly dense zone in terms of the number of actors present, where the interests of all the leading actors in world politics are bizarrely intertwined. The Ukrainian crisis has added spice to the Balkan agenda, reviving “frozen conflicts” not only within the borders of the region but also beyond its perimeter. Directly dependent on the outcome of the armed confrontation in Ukraine and separately from it, a clash or, at least, an intensification of external actors in the Balkan direction seems inevitable. The historical-systemic approach used in the study and the paradigm of multipolarity made it possible to trace the probable directions of activity of both regional and external actors. Based on a wide range of sources, the work provides a panorama of the foreign policy positioning of regional capitals; identifies major and minor external actors; shows the transformation of approaches and practical steps of key actors through the prism of the ongoing crisis. External actors - the European Union (EU), China, Great Britain, Russia and the United States - are divided into groups in accordance with their positions regarding the pre-crisis Balkans and the Balkans in the face of the fierce confrontation between Russia and the West. Among Western interests, special attention is paid to Great Britain, whose activity in the Western Balkans after Brexit is affiliated with the West in general, but not with the United States (despite all the history of strategic partnership in the region) and, moreover, with the EU separately. Against the background of the dominance of Western institutions in the region, the paper traces, however, the growing role of China, as well as external actors of the “second plan” with an oriental flavor: Türkiye, Iran, and the states of the Persian Gulf. An analysis of Russia’s prospects in the region has shown that the crisis in the system of international relations has largely nullified the results achieved earlier. The degree of Russia’s involvement in the crisis raises the question of its resource capacity, the ability to further maintain its own positions. Additional difficulties will be associated with the consolidated efforts of the Western allies and other external actors, including China, to balance Russian influence and presence in the Western Balkans.

作者简介

Elena Arlyapova

Institute of System-Strategic Analysis

Email: elena.s.arlyapova@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8095-7229

PhD (Political Science), Research Assistant

Moscow, Russian Federation

Elena Ponomareva

MGIMO University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: nastya304@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8370-8597

Dr. of Sc. (Political Science), Professor, Comparative Politics Department

Moscow, Russian Federation

参考

  1. Alekseeva, T. A. (2015). Re-reading the “classics”: Thucydides and political realism. Comparative Politics Russia, 6(3), 7-20. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2015-6-3(20)-7-20
  2. Allison, G. T. (2017). Destined for war: Can America and China escape Thucydides’s trap? New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
  3. Arežina, S. (2018). Turkish foreign policy towards Balkans and Serbia under Davutoğlu administration. Marmara University Journal of Political Science, 6(2), 203-216. https://doi.org/10.14782/ipsus.460138
  4. Arlyapova, E. S. (2014). Kosovo - a “showcase” of post-conflict regulation? Observer, (12), 101-113. (In Russian.)
  5. Arlyapovа, E. S., & Ponomareva, E. G. (2023). Türkiye in the Western Balkans today: Numbers and estimates. World Eсonomy and International Relations, 67(8), 113-123. (In Russian). http://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2023-67-8-110-120
  6. Arlyapovа, E. S., Ponomareva, E. G., & Proroković, D. (2022). NATO’s capabilities in global governance: On the Balkan scene. International Organisations Research Journal, 17(2), 208-223. https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2022-02-09
  7. Bazavluk, S. V., Kurylev, K. P., & Savin, L. V. (2022). Eurasianism, Eurasian Economic Union and multipolarity: Assessments of foreign experts. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 22(1), 30-42. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-1-30-42
  8. Belloni, R., & Brunazzo, M. (2017). After ‘Brexit’: The Western Balkans in the European waiting room. European Review of International Studies, 4(1), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.3224/eris.v4i1.02
  9. Degterev, D. A. (2019). Multipolar world order: Old myths and new realities. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 19(3), 404-419. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-3-404-419
  10. Dursun-Özkanca, O. (2019). Turkey - West relations: The politics of intra-alliance opposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316998960
  11. Entina, E. G. (2019). Priorities of the USA, EU and UK policy in the Western Balkan region after Brexit. Russia and the Contemporary World, (1), 72-83. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31249/rsm/2019.01.05
  12. Entina, E. G. (2022). Non-Western Balkans. Moscow: Galaktika publ., Izdatel’skii Dom “Zebra E” publ. (In Russian).
  13. Kaloeva, E. B. (2017). Balkans between the West and Russia: Through the prism of public opinion. Current Problems of Europe, (3), 87-113. (In Russian).
  14. Ker-Lindsay, J. (2015). Britain, ‘Brexit’ and the Balkans. The RUSI Journal, 160(5), 24-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2015.1102539
  15. Konyshev, V. N. (2020). Neoclassical realism in the theory of International Relations. Polis. Political Studies, (4), 94-111. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.04.07
  16. Lobanov, K. N., & Shakhov, V. V. (2017). Western Balkans as an object of geopolitical analysis of the current situation in the region. Central Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 12(4), 56-67. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22394/2071-2367-2017-12-4-56-67
  17. Ponomareva, E. G. (2020). Quo vadis, Serbia? A multi-vector policy as a way to retain political agency. Russia in Global Affairs, 18(1), 158-179. https://doi.org/10.31278/1810-6374-2020-18-1-158-179
  18. Ponomareva, E. G., & Krykanov, D. D. (2020). Balkan breath of Beijing (strategy and tactics of Chinese presence in the Western Balkans). The Journal of Political Theory, Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics Politeia, (1), 117-137. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.30570/2078-5089-2020-96-1-117-137
  19. Romanenko, S. A. (2021). The Balkans / South-Eastern Europe: The region of mystery and mysteries of the region. Current Problems of Europe, (2), 22-58. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31249/ape/2021.02.02
  20. Romanova, T. А. (2012). Neoclassical realism and today’s Russia. Russia in Global Affairs, 10(3), 8-21. (In Russian).
  21. Rrustemi, A., de Wijk, R., Dunlop, C., Perovska, J., & Palushi, L. (2019). Geopolitical influences of external powers in the Western Balkans. HCSS Security, 1-213. Retrieved from https://hcss.nl/ wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Geopolitical-Influences-of-External-Powers-in-the-Western-Balkans_0.pdf
  22. Thucydides. (2021). History. Moscow: Azbuka publ. (In Russian).
  23. Ulunyan, Ar. A. (2021). The initiative “One Belt, One Road” and the Balkans: The assessments of the expert community and the media of Central and Eastern Europe (2017-2020). Current Problems of Europe, (2), 59-83. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31249/ape/2021.02.03

版权所有 © Arlyapova E., Ponomareva E., 2023

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名-非商业性使用 4.0国际许可协议的许可。

##common.cookie##