Southeast Asian States’ Approaches to Peacekeeping and Conflict Resolution

详细

This paper conducts a comparative analysis of three cases - Indonesia, Thailand and Vietnam - to examine the distinctive features of Southeast Asian states’ involvement in peacekeeping. These cases provide representative insights into the motivations and experiences of regional states that joined UN peacekeeping operations at different historical junctures: Indonesia in the 1950s, Thailand in the 1990s, and Vietnam in the 2000s. By identifying the common and unique aspects of this engagement, the authors argue that Southeast Asian nations’ approaches to peacekeeping are deeply rooted in the values that underpin their foreign and domestic policies. Appealing to these values, Southeast Asian states contribute conceptual innovations to existing peacekeeping models, which are predominantly based on Western perspectives. By generalizing the peacekeeping experiences of Southeast Asian states, this paper fills a gap between broader publications that focus on Asian peacekeeping practices and single-country studies. The research underscores that Southeast Asian states, following a challenging period of decolonization and nation-building in the framework imposed by the Westphalian international relations system, have been trying to infuse their own approaches into the Westernized realm of international interaction. Since the 1950s, several regional states have participated in UN peacekeeping operations. The involvement of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) in resolving the Cambodian conflict in the late 1980s and the Thailand - Cambodia settlement in 2008-2011 has stimulated the development of regional peacekeeping practices. By contributing to peacekeeping operations, Southeast Asian states aspire to enhance their regional and even global influence. In certain instances, their engagement in peacekeeping has ideological, cultural or religious motivations, or stems from specific foreign and domestic policy considerations.

作者简介

Valeria Vershinina

MGIMO University

Email: vv.vershinina@inno.mgimo.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7848-8497

PhD (Political Science), Expert, ASEAN Centre

Moscow, Russian Federation

Ekaterina Koldunova

MGIMO University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: e.koldunova@inno.mgimo.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9973-9574

PhD (Political Science), Director, ASEAN Centre, Associate Professor, Department of Asian and African Studies

Moscow, Russian Federation

Nikita Kuklin

MGIMO University

Email: ns.kuklin@inno.mgimo.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5715-847X

PhD (History), Expert, ASEAN Centre

Moscow, Russian Federation

参考

  1. Acharya, A. (1992). Regional military-security cooperation in the Third World: A conceptual analysis of the relevance and limitations of ASEAN. Journal of Peace Research, 29(1), 7-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343392029001002
  2. Alagappa, M. (Ed.). (2001). Coercion and governance: The declining political role of the military in Asia. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  3. Bar-Yaacov, N. (1980). Keeping the peace between Egypt and Israel, 1973-1980. Israel Law Review, 15(2), 197-268. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021223700006622
  4. Cabellero-Anthony, M., & Acharya, A. (Eds.). (2005). UN peace operations and Asian security. London: Routledge.
  5. Capie, D. (2014). Evolving attitudes to peacekeeping in ASEAN. In New trends in peacekeeping: In search for a new direction (pp. 111-125). Tokyo: The National Institute for Defense Studies. Retrieved from http://www.nids.mod.go.jp/english/event/symposium/pdf/2014/E-06.pdf
  6. Capie, D. (2016). Indonesia as an emerging peacekeeping power: Norm revisionist or pragmatic provider? Contemporary Southeast Asia, 38(1), 1-27.
  7. Chapman, N. (2017). Mechanisms of Vietnam’s multidirectional foreign policy. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 36(2), 31-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341703600202
  8. Chinwanno, Сh. (2004). Thailand’s perspective on security cooperation in the Asia Pacific. In S. S. Tan & A. Acharya (Eds.), Asia-Pacific security cooperation: National interests and regional order (pp. 190-206). London: M.E. Sharpe.
  9. Cook, A. D. B. (2017). Southeast Asian perspectives on UN peacekeeping: Indonesia and Malaysia. In B. Howe & B. Kondoch (Eds.), Peacekeeping and the Asia-Pacific (pp. 37-39). Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004322059_004
  10. Guo, Yanjun, & Puja, I. G. A. W. (Eds.). (2022). Sustaining peace in ASEAN and the Asia-Pacific: Preventive diplomacy measures. Singapore: World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/12242
  11. Howe, B., & Kondoch, B. (Eds.). (2017). Peacekeeping and the Asia-Pacific. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004322059
  12. Hutabarat, L. F. (2014). Indonesian participation in the UN peacekeeping as an instrument of foreign policy: Challenges and opportunities. Jurnal Global dan Strategis, 8(2), 183-199.
  13. Hutabarat, L. F. (2017). Indonesian female peacekeepers in the United Nations peacekeeping mission. Jurnal Pertahanan, 3(3), 183-199. https://doi.org/10.33172/jp.v3i3.214
  14. Jenne, N. (2014). Preah Vihear: A guide to the Thai-Cambodian conflict and its solutions. By Charnvit Kasetsiri, Pou Sothirak, Pavin Chachavalpongpun (review). Contemporary Southeast Asia, 36(1), 168-170.
  15. Jenne, N. (2023). Peacekeeping: An emerging area of Southeast Asia’s defence and security cooperation? In A. Chong & N. Jenne (Eds.), Asian military evolutions (pp. 170-194). Bristol: Bristol University Press.
  16. Jones, C. (2020). South East Asian powers and contributions to peacekeeping operations: UN - ASEAN partnering for peace? Australian Journal of International Affairs, 74(3), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2019.1693501
  17. Jones, C., & Mulloy, G. (Eds.). (2021). East Asia, peacekeeping operations, and humanitarian assistance and disaster relief. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003179160
  18. Koldunova, E. (2019). Which “ASEAN Way” forward? Southeast Asian perspectives on peace and institutions. In A. Kulnazarova & V. Popovski (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of global approaches to peace (pp. 347-366). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78905-7_17
  19. Kraisoraphong, K., & Howe, B. (2014). Thailand’s participation in UN peacekeeping missions: The reciprocal transference of expertise and norms. Journal of International Peacekeeping, 18(3-4), 236-255. https://doi.org/10.1163/18754112-1804007
  20. Kuklin, N. S. (2023). Conceptual foundations of Indonesian foreign policy. Moscow: Aspekt Press publ. (In Russian).
  21. Mahbubani, K., & Sng, J. (2017). The ASEAN miracle: A catalyst for peace. Singapore: Ridge Books.
  22. Murwanto, I. P., Rosyidin, M., Susiatiningsih, H., & Paramasatya, S. (2020). Indonesia’s commitment to the United Nations peacekeeping operations in constructivist perspective: Case study of roadmap vision 4,000 peacekeepers 2015-2019 policy. Jurnal Pertahanan, 6(3), 342-356. https://doi.org/10.33172/jp.v6i3.869
  23. Phan, X. D., & Nguyen, C. V. H. (2022). Vietnam’s peacekeeping contributions: Drivers and prospects. ISEAS Perspective, (46), 1-11. Retrieved from https://www.iseas.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/ISEAS_Perspective_2022_46.pdf
  24. Pivovarov, D. V. (2006). Vietnam and the UN in 2005. South East Asia: Actual Problems of Development, (9), 386-395. (In Russian).
  25. Rogozhina, N. G. (2021). The role of ASEAN in political conflict resolution in Myanmar. Analysis and Forecasting. IMEMO Journal, (2), 28-37. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.20542/afij-2021-2-28-37
  26. Thayer, C. (2014). The contrasting cases of Cambodia and Vietnam: Active engagement and considering engagement in United Nations peacekeeping operations. In Ch. Aoi & Y.-K. Heng (Eds.), Asia-Pacific nations in international peace support and stability operations (pp. 211-244). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

版权所有 © Vershinina V.V., Koldunova E.V., Kuklin N.S., 2023

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名-非商业性使用 4.0国际许可协议的许可。

##common.cookie##