The Republic of Türkiye and Ukraine: Using the Crimean Tatar Question in Foreign Policy after 2014
- 作者: Demeshko N.E.1, Irkhin A.A.1
-
隶属关系:
- Sevastopol State University
- 期: 卷 22, 编号 4 (2022): Postcolonialism and Anti-colonial Struggle
- 页面: 755-770
- 栏目: 国际安全
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/view/33066
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-4-755-770
如何引用文章
详细
In historical retrospect, the use of national issues and contradictions has repeatedly become the weakening mechanisms for some great powers in regard to others. In this case, various technologies to construct national myths and ideologies based on tribalism and national exclusiveness and superiority were applied. After the “Crimean spring” in 2014, the Crimean Tatar issue gained a new level of relevance. The Republic of Türkiye and Ukraine are actively using the Crimean Tatar factor to oppose the reintegration of Crimea into the Russian Federation and, consequently, to weaken Russia’s positions in the Black Sea and Mediterranean region. In the article the authors analyze the peculiarities of the influence of the Republic of Türkiye on the Crimean Tatars, as well as the Ukrainian initiatives in relation to the Crimean Tatars and joint Turkish-Ukrainian projects, with the target group consisting of the Crimean Tatars. The methodological basis of the research is system-based, geopolitical, civilizational and institutional approaches, which are implemented both directly and by using a number of general scientific and political science methods. The current policy of Türkiye and Ukraine on the Crimean Tatar issue has common features. Firstly, it is currently topical for the policy elites of these states, both at the domestic and international political levels. Under these circumstances, if the Crimean Tatar issue is an opportunity for Kiev to re-establish its jurisdiction over Crimea, then for Ankara the Crimean Tatar population helps to enlist the electoral support, as well as to consider Crimea and the Black Sea region as a Turkish sphere of influence. Secondly, the conditional Turkish-Ukrainian alliance presents itself as a “protector” of the Crimean Tatars from “Russian aggression.” Thirdly, Türkiye and Ukraine are projecting a positive state image by demonstrating protection of interests and observance of the Crimean Tatars rights on the territory of Russia. Fourthly, the actions of Türkiye and Ukraine in terms of the Crimean Tatar can be characterized as a double standard policy. This thesis is confirmed by the national policy of the Republic of Türkiye, and the approaches of Ukraine to the solution of the Crimean Tatar issue before the reunification of Crimea with Russia.
作者简介
Natalia Demeshko
Sevastopol State University
Email: natalidem93@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9620-2410
PhD (Political Science), Associate Professor, Political Science Department, Institute of Social Sciences and International Relations
Sevastopol, Russian FederationAleksandr Irkhin
Sevastopol State University
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: alex.irhin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7895-550X
PhD, Dr. of Sc. (Political Science), Head, Political Science Department, Institute of Social Sciences and International Relations
Sevastopol, Russian Federation参考
- Akhmadeev, K. N. (2018). The Turkish factor in the Crimean Tatar ethnopolitical process. Obshchestvo: Politika, Ekonomika, Pravo, (3), 27-30. (In Russian).
- Akıllı, E., & Çelenk, B. (2019). TİKA’s soft power: Nation branding in Turkish foreign policy. Insight Turkey, 21(3), 135-151. https://doi.org/10.25253/99.2018EV.05
- Allworth, E. (1998). The Tatars of Crimea: Return to the homeland. Durham, London: Duke University Press.
- Avatkov, V. A. (2018). Turkic world and Turkic organizations. World Politics, (2), 11-25. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8671.2018.2.26047
- Avatkov, V. A. (2021). Geopolitical dimension of Turkish-Ukrainian relations. Postsovetskie Issledovaniya, 4(3), 219-225. (In Russian).
- Aydın, F. T. (2014). Crimean Tatars and Russia’s annexation of Crimea. Turkish Policy Quarterly, 13(3), 81-92.
- Baranov, A. V. (2018). Geopolitical role of Crimea and Sevastopol in the Black Sea - Mediterranean region (2014-2018). Paradigmy Istorii i Obshchestvennogo Razvitiya, (10), 90-97. (In Russian).
- Belyakova, N. S. (2015). Crimea and Russian-Turkish relations. Russia and the Moslem World, (9), 37-46. (In Russian).
- Bredikhin, A. (2017). The Crimean Tatar issue in the foreign policy of the Ukrainian authorities (2014-2017). Rossiya i Novye Gosudarstva Evrazii, 4(37), 37-47. (In Russian).
- Demeshko, N. E. (2018). Ukrainian presidents and Crimean Tatars: Problems, promises, results. Uchenye Zapiski Krymskogo Federal’nogo Universiteta Imeni V.I. Vernadskogo. Filosofiya. Politologiya. Kul’turologiya, (1), 85-96. (In Russian).
- Demeshko, N. E. (2020). International political opposition to the integration of the Crimean Tatars into the geopolitical space of Russia [thesis]. Simferopol: SevGU publ. (In Russian).
- Fisher, A. W. (1978). The Crimean Tatars. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.
- Fisher, A. W. (2010). Between Russians, Ottomans, and Turks: Crimea and Crimean Tatars. Piscataway: Gorgias Press.
- Grosfeld, E. V., & Kharabuga, V. V. (2017). Activity of the Medglis of the Crimean-Tatar people to create the national stateholders of the Crimean-Tatar in the Crimea (2017). Uchenye Zapiski Krymskogo Federal’nogo Universiteta Imeni V.I. Vernadskogo. Filosofiya. Politologiya. Kul’turologiya, 3(2), 55-64. (In Russian).
- Irkhin, A. A. (2016). The USA and Turkey: Strategic alliance and tactical differences. Retrospective and forecast. Sevastopol: Ribest publ. (In Russian).
- Irkhin, A. A., & Demeshko, N. E. (2019). Crimean aspect of Russian-Turkish relations: factors of soft and hard power. Perspectivy, 2(18), 37-49. (In Russian). Retrieved from http://www.perspektivy.info/rus/gos/0krymskij_aspekt_rossijsko-tureckih_otnoshenij_faktory_magkoj_i_zhestkoj_sily_2019-08-28.htm
- Koçak, M. (2014). Crimea and the Crimean Tatars after annexation by Russia. Seta Perspective, (9), 1-6.
- Korobov, A. A., & Smetannikov, S. S. (2015). Turkey’s influence on the regional political processes in the Republic of Crimea: Constructive analysis. The Bulletin of the Volga Region Institute of Administration, 4(49), 24-33. (In Russian).
- Malinovs’ka, N. (2019). Crimean trajectories in public policy on mainland Ukraine: Construction of ethnic policy narrative after 2014. Ideology and Politics, 1(12), 41-59. (In Ukrainian).
- Özçelik, Z. (2020). The Russian occupation of Crimea in 2014: The second Sürgün (the Soviet genocide) of the Crimean Tatars. Troyacademy, 5(1), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.31454/usb.721939
- Shevchuk, O. G. (2007). Turkish factor of ethnopolitical situation in Crimea. Geopolitics and Ecogeodynamics of Regions, (2), 131-135. (In Ukrainian).
- Uehling, G. L. (2004). Beyond memory: The Crimean Tatars’ deportation and return. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Williams, B. G. (2001). The Crimean Tatars: The diaspora experience and the forging of a nation. Leiden, Boston, Köln: Brill.
- Williams, B. G. (2016). The Crimean Tatars: From Soviet genocide to Putin’s conquest. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Wilson, A. (2017). The Crimean Tatar question: A prism for changing nationalisms and rival versions of Eurasianism. Journal of Soviet and Post-Soviet Politics and Society, 3(2), 1-45.
补充文件
没有额外的文件显示