Latin America: From the “Washington” to the “Cornwall Consensus”
- 作者: Moseykin Y.N.1, Ojeda Calluni E.2, Moseykina M.N.1
-
隶属关系:
- Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
- Oruro Technical University
- 期: 卷 22, 编号 3 (2022): Latin American Identity Discourse and a New Regional Integration Agenda
- 页面: 506-519
- 栏目: THEMATIC DOSSIER
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/view/32172
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-3-506-519
如何引用文章
详细
The research examines the proposals of the “Cornwall Consensus” in the context of their possible application in Latin America. The authors argue that these proposals could contribute to the development of a new economic development strategy for the post-liberal period. It is likely that the “Cornwall Consensus” proposals become dominant in shaping the global agenda on the new economic paradigm. Although it is important to mention that nowadays there also also “Beijing” and “Delhi” consensuses those are linked to the Chinese and Indian models of economic liberalization and constitute an alternative to the “Washington Consensus”. The article analyzes the effectiveness of the “Washington Consensus” adjustment mechanism, carries out a comparative analysis of the Latin American economies that pursued both liberal and statist development models. Then the article examines the main recommendations and ideas of the “Cornwall Consensus”, the prospects of adapting the Latin American region to the proposals of a new development model against the background of existing experience in implementing the recommendations of the “Washington Consensus”, its consequences and existing “post-neoliberal” alternatives. The authors conclude that, despite the adaptability of the Latin American economies, the question remains whether the proposals of the “Cornwall Consensus” can contribute to the revival of the development policy in Latin America aimed at creating a new type of “welfare state”? The study concludes that the proposals of the “Cornwall Consensus” could contribute to the formulation of a new development policy, since the “welfare state” in its Latin American version, regardless of whether “neoliberal” or “progressive”, has exhausted itself.
作者简介
Yury Moseykin
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: moseykin-yun@rudn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1285-1473
Dr. of Sc. (Economics), Professor, Head, the Department of the National Economy, Dean, Faculty of Economics
Moscow, Russian FederationElvis Ojeda Calluni
Oruro Technical University
Email: eojeda@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0829-1298
PhD (Economics), Visiting Professor
Oruro, BoliviaMarina Moseykina
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Email: moseykina-mn@rudn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9279-4079
Dr. of Sc. (History), Professor, Head, the Department of the Russian History
Moscow, Russian Federation参考
- Ananyin, O. I., Khaitkulov, R. G., & Shestakov, D. E. (2010). Washington Consensus: Landscape after battles. World Economy and International Relations, (12), 15-27. (In Russian).
- Bazhenova, E. S. (2009). 30 years of reforms in the PRC: Results, problems, prospects. Asia and Africa Today, (2), 41-49. (In Russian).
- Berger, Ya. M. (2009). Chinese model of development. World Economy and International Relations, (9), 71-81. (In Russian).
- Borokh, O. N., & Lomanov, A. V. (2005). New socialism of Hu Jintao and PRC’s modern ideology. Pro et Contra, (2), 20-39. (In Russian).
- Davydov, V. M. (2016). Determination of development of Latin America and Caribbean. Pairing of the global and regional problematics. Moscow: ILA RAN publ. (In Russian).
- Davydov, V. M. (Ed.). (2022). Prospects of sustainable development. An appeal to global and Latin American realities. Moscow: Ves’ mir publ. (In Russian).
- Degterev, D. A. (2021). Non-Western theories of development in the global capitalism era. World Economy and International Relations, 65(4), 113-122. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-4-113-122
- Draibe, S., & Riesco, M. (2009). El Estado de bienestar social en América Latina: Una nueva estrategia de desarrollo. Fundación Carolina. Documento de Trabajo, (31), 1-123. Retrieved from https://www.fundacioncarolina.es/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/DT31.pdf
- Galishcheva, N. V. (2014). “Delhi Consensus” - the Indian model of economic liberalization. Asia and Africa Today, (3), 2-8. (In Russian).
- Gelbras, V. (2009). Thirty years of “Reform and Opening” epoch in China. World Economy and International Relations, (6), 73-83. (In Russian).
- Gereffi, G. (2014). Global value chains in a post-Washington Consensus world. Review of International Political Economy, 21(1), 9-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2012.756414
- Hayek, F. A. von. (2005). The road to serfdom. Moscow: Novoye izdatel’stvo publ. (In Russian).
- Klein, E., & Morreo, C. E. (Eds.). (2019). Postdevelopment in practice: Alternatives, economies, ontologies. London: Routledge.
- Lopatina, A. N. (2010). From “Washington Consensus” to “Beijing Consensus”. USA & Canada: Economics, Politics, Culture, (9), 59-71. (In Russian).
- Ramo, J. C. (2004). The Beijing Consensus. London: The Foreign Policy Center.
- Ren, H. (2010). The neoliberal state and risk society: The Chinese state and the middle class. Telos, (151), 105-128. https://doi.org/10.3817/0610151105
- Rhonheimer, M. (2017). Libertad económica, capitalismo y ética cristiana. Madrid: Unión Editorial.
- Stiglitz, J. (1998). More instruments and broader goals: Moving toward the Post-Washington Consensus. Voprosy Ekonomiki, (8), 4-34. (In Russian).
- Stiglitz, J. (2003). Globalization and its discontents. Moscow: Mysl’ publ. (In Russian).
- Stiglitz, J. E. (2008). Is there a Post-Washington Consensus consensus? In N. Serra & J. E. Stiglitz (Eds.), The Washington Consensus reconsidered: Towards a new global governance (pp. 41-56). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199534081.003.0004
- Vinogradov, A. V., Degterev, D. A., Spirina, D. V., & Trusova, A. A. (2018). “Beijing Consensus” in international and domestic political discourse. Far Eastern Studies, (3), 17-28. (In Russian).
- Williamson, J. (1990). Latin American adjustment: How much has happened? Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.