Latin America in/and the AIIB: A Constructivist Analysis

封面

如何引用文章

详细

This research focuses on the relationship between Latin America and China. The authors try to answer the question of why the countries of the region have been passive in the context of their interaction with the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB). The relevance of the topic stems from the gradual increase in China’s importance and presence in the Latin American region. Today, China is one of the key economic partners of several Latin American countries. To date, however, countries in the region have not been very active in their engagement with the AIIB, despite the existence of specific material incentives. Methodologically, the study is based on a constructivist approach. According to the authors, alternative paradigms of international relations, such as liberalism and realism, fail to explain the paradox of stubborn inaction by the countries of the region. This is due to the fact that the historically rooted and culturally bound procedural nature of international relations allows constructivism to uncover the individual facts that led to this result. The authors conclude that governments in the Latin American region have “constructed” between themselves quite a few customary modes of behaviour which debilitate their demonstrated capacity for agency in international affairs. This has created a vacuum of effective strategy in relations with China in the region. Moreover, this pattern of engagement is not limited to China and is evident in the relations of regional countries with the US and other extra-regional powers.

作者简介

Mariano Turzi

UCA-UCEMA

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: marianoturzi@uca.edu.ar
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4370-6412

PhD (Latin American Studies), Professor of International Relations

Buenos Aires, Argentina

Álvaro Mendez

ESIC University; London School of Economics and Political Science

Email: a.mendez@lse.ac.uk
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0919-5081

PhD (International Relations), Co-director, the Global South Unit, the LSE IDEAS, Senior Research Fellow, the LSE IDEAS, London School of Economics and Political Science

Madrid, Spain; London, United Kingdom

参考

  1. Alden, C., & Aran, A. (2017). Foreign policy analysis: New approaches. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  2. Barnett, M. (1999). Culture, strategy and foreign policy change: Israel’s road to Oslo. European Journal of International Relations, 5(1), 5-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066199005001001
  3. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London: The Penguin Press.
  4. Bernstein, M. H. (1955). Regulating business by independent commission. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  5. Best, J. (2008). Historical development and defining issues of constructionist inquiry. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 41-64). New York: Guilford Press.
  6. Brands, H. W. (2003). Ideas and foreign affairs. In R. D. Schulzinger (Ed.), A companion to American foreign relations (pp. 1-14). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
  7. Brenes, E. R. (2014). Strategy development. In U. Jäger & V. Sathe (Eds.), Strategy and competitiveness in Latin American markets: The sustainability frontier (pp. 109-117). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  8. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1961). The mirror image in Soviet-American relations: A social psychologist’s report. Journal of Social Issues, 17(3), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1961.tb01682.x
  9. Checkel, J. T. (1998). The constructivist turn in international relations theory. World Politics, 50(2), 324-348.
  10. Cooper, A. F., & Shaw, T.M. (Eds.). (2009). The diplomacies of small states: Between vulnerability and resilience. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230246911
  11. Dahl, R. A. (1961). Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  12. Dargent, E. (2015). Technocracy and democracy in Latin America: the experts running government. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107446663
  13. Daza, M. L., & del Solar, B. (2017). Piñera. Biografía no autorizada. Santiago, Chile: Debate.
  14. De la Vega, L. F., & Callado, J. E. (2002). Casos de marketing. México: Pearson Educación.
  15. De Mooij, M. (2011). Consumer behavior and culture: Consequences for global marketing and advertising. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  16. Dominguez, J. I. (2007). International cooperation in Latin America: The design of regional institutions by slow accretion. In A. Acharya & A. I. Johnston (Eds.), Crafting cooperation: Regional international institutions in comparative perspective (pp. 83-128). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491436.003
  17. Ebel, R. H., Taras, R. C., & Cochrane, J. D. (1991). Political culture and foreign policy in Latin America: Case studies from the Circum-Caribbean. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  18. Edelstein, D. M. (2012). Conclusions: Rethinking interwar grand strategies. In J. W. Taliaferro, N. M. Ripsman & S. E. Lobell (Eds.), The challenge of grand strategy: The great powers and the broken balance between the World Wars (pp. 308-336). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139136808.012
  19. Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962-1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
  20. Feldmann, P. R. (2014). Management in Latin America: Threats and opportunities in the globalized world. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04750-8
  21. Finlay, D. J., Holsti, O. R., & Fagen, R. R. (1967). Enemies in politics. Chicago: Rand McNally.
  22. Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887-917. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550789
  23. Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (2001). Taking stock: The constructivist research program in international relations and comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), 391-416. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.391
  24. Flockhart, T. (2016). Constructivism and foreign policy. In S. Smith, A. Hadfield & T. Dunne (Eds.), Foreign policy: Theories, actors, cases (pp. 79-94). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198708902.003.0004
  25. Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1971). Untangling the Cold War: A strategy for testing rival theories. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
  26. García, R. E., & Mendez, A. (2021). Mañana today: A long view of economic value creation in Latin America. Global Policy, 12(3), 410-413. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12938
  27. Gerner, D. (1995). The evolution of the study of foreign policy. In L. Neack, J. A. K. Hey & P. J. Haney (Eds.), Foreign policy analysis: Continuity and change in its second generation (pp. 17-32). London: Prentice Hall.
  28. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. London: Macmillan Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16161-4
  29. Giddens, A. (1985). The nation-state and violence: Volume two of a contemporary critique of historical materialism. Oakland: University of California Press.
  30. Giddens, A., Duneier, M., Appelbaum, R. P., & Carr, D. (2017). Essentials of sociology. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
  31. Goldstein, J., & Keohane, R. O. (1993a). Ideas and foreign policy: An analytical framework. In J. Goldstein & R. O. Keohane (Eds.), Ideas and foreign policy: Beliefs, institutions, and political change (pp. 3-30). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  32. Goldstein, J., & Keohane, R. O. (Eds.). (1993b). Ideas and foreign policy: Beliefs, institutions, and political change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  33. Graebner, N. A. (1964). Ideas and diplomacy: Readings in the intellectual tradition of American foreign policy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  34. Grieco, J. M., Ikenberry, G. J., & Mastanduno, M. (2015). Introduction to international relations: Enduring questions and contemporary perspectives. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  35. Grosse, R. (1990). Doing business in the Andes countries. In V. H. Kirpalani (Ed.), International business handbook (pp. 67-96). London: Haworth Press.
  36. Hellinger, D. C. (2014). Comparative politics of Latin America: Democracy at last? London: Routledge.
  37. Holsti, K. J. (1996). The state, war, and the state of war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628306
  38. Holsti, O. R. (1962). The belief system and national images: A case study. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 6(3), 244-252. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200276200600306
  39. Holsti, O. R. (1967). Cognitive dynamics and images of the enemy. In J. C. Farrell & A. P. Smith (Eds.), Image and reality in world politics (pp. 16-39). New York: Columbia University Press.
  40. Houghton, D. P. (2007). Reinvigorating the study of foreign policy decision making: Toward a constructivist approach. Foreign Policy Analysis, 3(1), 24-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2007.00040.x
  41. Houghton, D. P. (2009). The role of self-fulfilling and self-negating prophecies in international relations. International Studies Review, 11(3), 552-584. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2009.00873.x
  42. Houghton, D. P. (2018). Constructivist analyses of foreign policy. In C. Thies (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of foreign policy (pp. 223-240). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.400
  43. Huntington, S. (2004a). Who are we?: The challenges to America’s national identity. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
  44. Huntington, S. (2004b). The Hispanic challenge. Foreign Policy, (141), 30-45. https://doi.org/10.2307/4147547
  45. Hurn, B. J., & Tomalin, B. (2013). Cross-cultural communication: Theory and practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230391147
  46. Jessup, J. M., & Jessup, M. L. (1993). Doing business in Mexico. Rocklin, CA: Prima Pub.
  47. Kaarbo, J. (2015). A foreign policy analysis perspective on the domestic politics turn in IR theory. International Studies Review, 17(2), 189-216. https://doi.org/10.1111/misr.12213
  48. Kacowicz, A. M. (1998). Zones of peace in the Third World: South America and West Africa in comparative perspective. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  49. Katzenstein, P. J., Keohane, R. O., & Krasner, S. D. (Eds.). (1999). Exploration and contestation in the study of world politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  50. Keohane, R. O. (1988). International institutions: Two approaches. International Studies Quarterly, 32(4), 379-396. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600589
  51. Kras, E. (1995). Management in two cultures: Bridging the gap between U.S. and Mexican managers. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
  52. Krasner, S. D. (1993). Westphalia and all that. In J. Goldstein & R. O. Keohane (Eds.), Ideas and foreign policy: Beliefs, institutions, and political change (pp. 235-264). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  53. Kratochwil, F. (1989). Rules, norms and decisions: On the conditions of practical and legal reasoning in international relations and domestic affairs. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511559044
  54. Kukla, A. (1994). The structure of self-fulfilling and self-negating prophecies. Theory & Psychology, 4(1), 5-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354394041001
  55. Lambert, P. (2006). Myth, manipulation, and violence: Relationships between national identity and political violence. In W. Fowler & P. Lambert (Eds.), Political violence and the construction of national identity in Latin America (pp. 19-36). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230601727_2
  56. Lantis, J. S., & Beasley, R. (2018). Comparative foreign policy analysis. In C. Thies (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of foreign policy (pp. 185-207). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.398
  57. Lebow, R. N. (2016). National identities and international relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316710982
  58. Leidner, D., Carlson, S., Elam, J., & Corrales, M. (1997). A multicultural perspective of the impact of EIS on organizational intelligence, decision making and structure. INSEAD Working Paper, 1-29. Retrieved from https://flora.insead.edu/fichiersti_wp/inseadwp1997/97-98.pdf
  59. Lewis, R. D. (2003). The cultural imperative: Global trends in the 21st century. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
  60. Martin, L. (2014). Home sweet anywhere: How we sold our house, created a new life, and saw the world. Naperville, IL: Sourcebooks.
  61. Mendez, A. (2017). Colombian agency and the making of US foreign policy: Intervention by invitation. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  62. Mendez, A. (2019). Latin America and the AIIB: Interests and viewpoints. Global Policy, 10(4), 639-644. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12733
  63. Mendez, A., & Alden, C. (2021). China in Panama: From peripheral diplomacy to Grand Strategy. Geopolitics, 26(3), 838-860. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2019.1657413
  64. Mendez, A., & Turzi, M. (2020). The political economy of China - Latin America relations: The AIIB membership. New York: Palgrave Pivot.
  65. Merke, F. (2016). English school and constructivism. In D. R. Mares & A. M. Kacowicz (Eds.), Routledge handbook of Latin American security (pp. 88-97). London: Routledge.
  66. Merton, R. (1948). The self-fulfilling prophecy. The Antioch Review, 8(2), 193-210. https://doi.org/10.2307/4609267
  67. Oelsner, A., & Vion, A. (2011). Friends in the region: A comparative study on friendship building in regional integration. International Politics, 48(1), 129-151. https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2010.37
  68. Onuf, N. G. (1989). World of our making: Rules and rule in social theory and international relations. Columbia, S.C: University of South Carolina Press.
  69. Onuf, N. G. (1998). International relations in a constructed world. In V. Kubálkova, N. G. Onuf & P. Kowert (Eds.), Constructivism: A user’s manual (pp. 58-70). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
  70. Osgood, C. E. (1966). Perspective in foreign policy. Palo Alto, CA: Pacific Books.
  71. Penn, J. R. (2001). Rivers of the world: A social, geographical, and environmental sourcebook. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
  72. Raat, W. D., & Brescia, M. M. (2010). Mexico and the United States: Ambivalent vistas. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
  73. Radcliffe, S. A., & Westwood, S. (1996). Remaking the nation: Place, identity and politics in Latin America. London: Routledge.
  74. Riggirozzi, P., & Tussie, D. (2017). Rethinking our region in a post-hegemonic moment. In J. Briceño-Ruiz & I. Morales (Eds.), Post-hegemonic regionalism in the Americas: Toward a Pacific - Atlantic divide? (pp. 16-31). London: Routledge.
  75. Roniger, L. (2012). Favors, “merit ribbons,” and services. In T. Hilgers (Ed.), Clientelism in everyday Latin American politics (pp. 25-40). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137275998_2
  76. Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York, NY: The Free Press.
  77. Sheingate, A. D. (2003). Political entrepreneurship, institutional change, and American political development. Studies in American Political Development, 17(2), 185-203. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0898588X03000129
  78. Sikkink, K. (1993). The power of principled ideas: Human rights policies in the United States and Western Europe. In J. Goldstein & R. O. Keohane (Eds.), Ideas and foreign policy: Beliefs, institutions, and political change (pp. 139-170). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  79. Sikkink, K. (2015). Latin America and the idea of international human rights. In J. I. Dominguez & A. Covarrubias (Eds.), Routledge handbook of Latin America in the world (pp. 349-361). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  80. Sotomayor, A. C. (2015). Legalizing and judicializing territorial and maritime border disputes in Latin America: Causes and unintended consequences. In M. Jaskoski, A. C. Sotomayor & H. A. Trinkunas (Eds.), American crossings: Border politics in the Western Hemisphere (pp. 38-65). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  81. Standish, P., & Bell, S. M. (2004). Culture and customs of Mexico. London: Greenwood Press.
  82. Stephens, G. K., & Greer, C. R. (1995). Doing business in Mexico: Understanding cultural differences. Organizational Dynamics, 24(1), 39-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(95)90034-9
  83. Stigler, G. J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003160
  84. Stoessinger, J. G. (1967). China and America: The burden of past misperceptions. In J. C. Farrell & A. P. Smith (Eds.), Image and reality in world politics (pp. 72-91). New York: Columbia Univesity Press.
  85. Sullivan, M. P. (2001). Theories of international relations: Transition vs persistence. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230107335
  86. Thornton, C. (2018). A Mexican international economic order? Tracing the hidden roots of the charter of economic rights and duties of states. Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development, 9(3), 389-421. https://doi.org/10.1353/hum.2018.0020
  87. Toranzo Roca, C. F. (1992). Diversidad étnica y cultural. La Paz, Bolivia: Instituto Latinoamericano de Investigaciones Sociales.
  88. Vermeer-Künzli, A. (2009). The merits of reasonable flexibility: The contribution of the law of treatiese to peace. In G. Nolte (Ed.), Peace through international law: The role of the international law commission. a colloquium at the occasion of its sixtieth anniversary. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03380-3_8
  89. Vucetic, S. (2018). Identity and foreign policy. In C. Thies (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of foreign policy. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.435
  90. Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of international politics. London: Adisson-Wesley Publishing Company.
  91. Weeks, G. (2015). U.S. and Latin American relations. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
  92. Wehner, L. (2010). From rivalry to mutual trust: The othering process between Bolivia and Chile. GIGA Working Papers, (135), 1-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1616642
  93. Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391-425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027764
  94. Wendt, A. (1994). Collective identity formation and the international state. The American Political Science Review, 88(2), 384-396. https://doi.org/10.2307/2944711
  95. Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612183
  96. Wiarda, H. J. (1995). Democracy and its discontents: Development, interdependence, and U.S. policy in Latin America. London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  97. Wight, C. (2006). Agents, structures and international relations: Politics as ontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491764
  98. Wolfers, A. (1962). Discord and collaboration: Essays on international politics. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Press.
  99. Zhang, Xin. (2017). Chinese capitalism and the Maritime Silk Road: A world-systems perspective. Geopolitics, 22(2), 310-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1289371

版权所有 © Turzi M., Mendez Á., 2022

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名-非商业性使用 4.0国际许可协议的许可。

##common.cookie##