Large AI Spaces and Russia’s Strategy in the Context of the “Sanctions War”

封面

如何引用文章

详细

The article is devoted to the study of the role of technological development in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) in the international political processes, the formation of large policy spaces in the field of AI, as well as the development of Russia in this area. The author provides an analysis of national AI strategies, examines the priority spheres and directions of development of these technologies for different countries, the availability of resources for the goals set, and the specifics of national AI policies of the leading states. The article compares the data on the volume of funding for AI developments, patent activities, and the existing infrastructure for high-performance computing in the countries, that occupy leading positions in the field of AI. The paper provides a brief overview of the key scientific and technological areas that are crucial for the creation of next-generation AI technologies: quantum computing and neuromorphic technologies within the framework of existing major national projects on the study of the brain. The author devotes a special place to the study of international political aspects of technological development in the field of AI in the work. From the perspective of the impact of AI policy on integration processes, the conclusion is made about the formation of two spaces: the first unites the OECD countries with the unconditional leadership of the USA and the EU in the field of research, development, infrastructure, resources, and international standards. The second, restrained space, relies on the technological and financial power of China, where are starting to get involved countries, including Russia, that are facing with narrowing range of opportunities for cooperation with Western countries. The author concludes that the confrontation between the two AI spaces is influenced by a more general trend of decoupling of the economies of the USA and China, which in turn contributes to technological isolation trends at the global level. A special place in the article is devoted to the analysis of the development of AI technologies in Russia; it considers official documents, leading players, and Russia’s positions at the international level. The possible directions of Russia’s cooperation with the world leading players are considered, which allows to develop AI technologies and at the same time maintain technological sovereignty in this area.

作者简介

Roman Vykhodets

Ural Federal University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: marketing812@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5910-9815

PhD (Philosophy), Associate Professor, Department of Theory and History of International Relations

Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation

参考

  1. Anokhin, K. V. (2010). The last great frontier of the life sciences. Economic Strategies, 12(11), 56-63. (In Russian).
  2. Arute, F., Arya, K., Babbush, R., Bacon, D., Bardin, J. C., et al. (2019). Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature, 574, 505-510. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5
  3. Balakin, D. A., & Alikberova, A. R. (2019). Digital Silk Road in the context of the People’s Republic of China. Opción, 35(22), 308-318.
  4. Danilin, I. V. (2020). The U.S. - China technology war: Risks and opportunities for P.R.C. and global tech sector. Comparative Politics Russia, 11(4), 160-176. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24411/2221-3279-2020-10056
  5. Giglavy, A. V., Sokolov, A. V., Abdrakhmanova G. I., Chulok, A. A., & Burov, V. V. (2013). Long-term trends in the ICT sector. Foresight-Russia, 7(3), 6-24. (In Russian).
  6. Hillman, J. E. (2021). The Digital Silk Road: China’s quest to wire the world and win the future. London: Harper Business.
  7. Kefeli, I. F. (2020). Asphatronics: On the way to the theory of global security. Saint-Petersburg: IPC SZIU RANHiGS publ. (In Russian).
  8. Kheyfets, B. A. (2020). China’s technological rise: New challenges for Russia. Voprosy Ekonomiki, (6), 104-120. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2020-6-104-120
  9. Leksyutina, Y. V. (2020). U.S. - China Relations in 2018-2019: Trade war and the process of decoupling. World Economy and International Relations, 64(6), 85-93. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-6-85-93
  10. Liu, Y., & Avdokushin, E. F. (2019). Forming the foundations of the “Digital Silk Road”. The World of the New Economy, 13(4), 62-71. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2019-13-4-62-71
  11. Minsky, M. (2006). The emotion machine: Commonsense thinking, artificial intelligence, and the future of the human mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  12. Pantserev, K. A. (2020). States of Sub-Saharan Africa on the way to the creation of the artificial intelligence: The myth or the reality? Asia and Africa Today, (10), 29-33. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31857/S032150750011108-0
  13. Park, S. (2020). Trade conflict between the U.S. and China: What are the impacts on the Chinese economy? International Organisations Research Journal, 15(2), 213-235. https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2020-02-10
  14. Poo, M., Du, J., Ip, N. I., Xiong, Z., Xu, B., et al. (2016). China Brain Project: Basic neuroscience, brain diseases, and brain-inspired computing. Neuron, 92(3), 591-596 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.10.050
  15. Qiu, J. (2016). Research and development of artificial intelligence in China. National Science Review, 3(4), 538-541. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nww076
  16. Reshetnikova, M. S., Pugacheva, I. A., & Lukina, Yu. D. (2021). Trends in the development of artificial intelligence technologies in China. Russian Journal of Innovation Economics, 11(1), 333-350. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18334/vinec.11.1.111912
  17. Schwab, K. (2019). Globalization 4.0. A new architecture for the fourth industrial revolution. Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics, (1), 79-84. (In Russian).
  18. Strukova, P. E. (2020). Artificial intelligence in China: The current state of industry and development trends. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Asian and African Studies, 12(4), 588-606. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu13.2020.409
  19. Ulnicane, I. (2020). Ever-changing big science and research infrastructures: Evolving European Union policy. In K. C. Cramer & O. Hallonsten (Eds.), Big science and research infrastructures in Europe (pp. 76-100). Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839100017.00010
  20. Vinogradov, A. O., Salitsky, A. I., & Semenova, N. K. (2019). US - China economic confrontation: Ideology, chronology, meaning. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 19(1), 35-46. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-1-35-46
  21. Vykhodets, R. S., & Ruschin, D. A. (2021). The role of big brain science in technological leadership in artificial intelligence. Society. Environment. Development, (3), 11-16. (In Russian).
  22. Zhong, H., Wang, H., Deng, Y., Chen, M., Peng, L., et al. (2020). Quantum computational advantage using photons. Science, 370, 1460-1463. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe8770

版权所有 © Vykhodets R.S., 2022

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名-非商业性使用 4.0国际许可协议的许可。

##common.cookie##