Dimensions of International Hierarchy in the Post-Soviet Space: Analytical Approaches and Empirical Reflections

Обложка

Цитировать

Полный текст

Аннотация

The article is dedicated to dimensions of international hierarchy in the post-soviet space. The phenomenon of hierarchy in International Relations is a specific theme. Given the traditional divide between domestic and international domains of political life, hierarchy as an ordering principle is traditionally ascribed to the domestic sphere of the modern state, whereas anarchy is the feature characterizing the relations between states on international arena.

Об авторах

Vahagn R Aglyan

Email: aglyan@ysu.am

Список литературы

  2. Waltz K. Theory of International Politics, McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA: 1979.
  3. Weber C. International Relations Theory: A Critical Introduction, 3rd edition, Routledge; London & NY, 2001.
  4. Evans G. and Newnham J. The Penguin Dictionary of International Relations, The Penguin Books, 1998.
  5. Power Transitions: Strategies for the 21st Century, by Ronald L. Tammen, Jacek Kugler, Douglas Lemke, Allan C. Stam III, Mark Abdollahian, Carole Alsharabati, Brian Efird, A.F.K. Organski. Chatham House Publishers, NY and London: 2000.
  6. Lake D. The State and International Relations in The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, Oxford University Press, NY: 2008.
  7. Lake D. Hierarchy in International Relation, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2009.
  8. Weber K. Hierarchy Amidst Anarchy: Transaction costs and Institutional Choice, State University of New York Press, 2000.
  9. Williamson Oliver. The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting, New York: Free Press: 1985.
  10. Lake D. Escape from the State of Nature: Authority and Hierarchy in World Politics, International Security, Vol. 32, No. 1 (Summer 2007).
  11. Drezner D. Allies, adversaries, and economic coercion: Russian foreign economic policy since 1991, Security Studies: 1997, 6, N3.
  12. Hopf T. Common-Sense Constructivism and Hegemony in World Politics, International Organization, April 2013, vol. 76, issue 2.
  13. Menon R., Spruyt H. The Limits of Neorealism: Understanding Security in Central Asia, Review of International Studies, Jan.1999, vol. 25, N1.
  14. Worldwide Threat Assessment of the US Intelligence Community: Statement for the Record, House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, James R. Clapper, Director of National Intelligence, April 11, 2013.
  15. Roeder Ph. From Hierarchy to Hegemony: The Post-Soviet Security Complex in Regional Orders: Building Security in a New World, ed. by D. Lake and Ph. Morgan, Pennsylvania State University Press, 1997.
  16. Bailes A., Baranovsky V. and Dunay P. Regional security cooperation in the former Soviet area, SIPRI Yearbook 2007: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security.
  17. Butt A.I. Anarchy and Hierarchy in International Relations: Examining South America's War-Prone Decade, International Organization, vol. 67, issues 03, July 2013.
  18. Nabers D. Power, Leadership and Hegemony in International Politics in Regional Leadership in the Global System: Ideas, Interests and Strategies of Regional Powers; Edited by Daniel Flemes, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Ashgate, 2010.
  19. Neil Macfarlane S. The United States and regionalism in Central Asia, International Affairs, 80:3, 2004.
  20. Ivanov Igor S. The New Russian Diplomacy, The Nixon Center and Brookings Institution Press, Washington D.C., 2002.
  21. Bouldin M. The Ivanov Doctrine and Military Reform: Reassessing Stability in Russia, The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 17:4, 2004.
  22. de Haas M. An Analysis of Soviet, CIS and Russian military doctrines, 1990-2000, The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 2001, 14:4.
  23. Cooley A. and Spruyt H. Contracting States: Sovereign Transfers in International Relations, Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford, 2009.
  24. Miller E.A., Toritsyn A. Bringing the Leader Back In: Internal Threats and Alignment Theory in the Commonwealth of Independent States, Security Studies, 14:2, 2005.
  25. German T. Securing the South Caucasus: Military Aspects of Russian Policy towards the Region since 2008, Europe-Asia Studies, 64:9, 2012.
  26. Drezner D. Military Primacy Does not Pay (Nearly as Much as You Think), International Security, vol.38, N1, Summer 2013.

© Aglyan V.R., 2014

Creative Commons License
Эта статья доступна по лицензии Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Данный сайт использует cookie-файлы

Продолжая использовать наш сайт, вы даете согласие на обработку файлов cookie, которые обеспечивают правильную работу сайта.

О куки-файлах