Comparative analysis of the economic feasibility of using ultra-small spacecrafts

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The relevance of the issue under consideration is associated with the evolution of existing technologies, due to which the functionality increases and the mass of the payload decreases, as a result of which the question of the use of cost-effective launch vehicles is raised. The purpose of this work is to carry out a comparative analysis of the feasibility of using ultra-light launch vehicles to provide services for the delivery of small spacecraft to low-earth orbit. The article is written within the framework of socio-economic research methods. Retrospective analysis and comparative approach are combined with the use of quantitative methods. The theoretical significance of the study consists in the analysis of the modern operation of small spacecraft and the state of the world rocket and space industry, analysis of the existing strategy of the State Corporation «Roscosmos» in the development of a new line of reusable launch vehicles and consideration of promising projects of domestic private companies involved in the creation of ultra-light launch vehicles. The practical significance lies in the possibility of using the results of studying the intensity of space launches when making strategic decisions on the use of ultra-light launch vehicles. Based on the assessment of existing forecasts for the development and creation of small-sized spacecraft, it is concluded that the world space market is interested in the types of satellites and classes of launch vehicles for their launch.

About the authors

Yulia A. Nazarova

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

Author for correspondence.
Email: nazarova-yua@rudn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5017-0281

Associate Professor of the Department of Management of Innovation in the Engineering Business, Engineering Academу, RUDN University, Cand. of Sci. (Economic)

6 Miklukho-Maklaya St, Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation

Vladimir A. Tikhonov

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

Email: tihon_94@mail.ru

Student of the Department of Management of Innovation in the Engineering Business, Engineering Academу, RUDN University

6 Miklukho-Maklaya St, Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation

References

  1. Kamalieva RN, Charkviani RV. Creation of ultralight spacecraft structures from composite materials. Procedia Engineering. 2017;185:90—197.
  2. Santoni F, Piergentili F, Candini GP, Perelli M, Negri A, Marino M. An orientable solar panel system for nanospacecraft. Acta Astronautica. 2014;101:120—128.
  3. Notaro V, Benedetto M, Colasurdo G, et al. A small spacecraft to probe the interior of the Jovian moon Europa: Europa Tomography Probe (ETP) system design. Acta Astronautica. 2020;166:137—146.
  4. Salmin VV, Tkachenko SI, Volocuev VV, Kaurov IV. Improving the efficiency of Earth monitoring missions by equipping small Aist-2 spacecraft with an electric motor. Procedia Engineering. 2017;185:198—204.
  5. Kang J, Zhu ZH. Dynamics and control of de-spinning giant asteroids by small tethered spacecraft. Aerospace Science and Technology. 2019: 94: 105394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ast.2019.105394
  6. Kozlov DI, Anshakov GP, Antonov Y G, Makarov VP, Somov DI. Precision Control Systems of Motion on Russian Spacecraft for Ecological Remote Sensing. IFAC Proceedings Volumes. 1998;31:27—38.
  7. Gadsvind IN. Small spacecraft – a new area of space activity. International research journal. 2018;12–2(78):84—91. (In Russ.)
  8. Felicetti L, Piergentili F, Santoni F. Thermosphere density and wind measurements in the equatorial region using a constellation of drag balance nanospacecraft. Advances in Space Research. 2014;54:546—553.
  9. Iakubivskyi I, Mačiulis L, Janhunen P, Dalbins J, Noorma M, Slavinskis A. Aspects of nanospacecraft design for main-belt sailing voyage. Advances in Space Research. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.07.023
  10. Grundmann JT, Bauer W, Biele J, et al. Capabilities of Gossamer-1 derived small spacecraft solar sails carrying Mascot-derived nanolanders for in-situ surveying of NEAs. Acta Astronautica. 2019;156:330—362.
  11. Skvortsov YuV, Glushkov SV, Chernyakin SA. Space Factors Influence on the Size Stability of Small Spacecraft Structure Elements. Procedia Engineering. 2017;185:105–109.
  12. Klyushnikov VY, Kuznetsov II, Osadchenko AS. Methods for ensuring the fault tolerance of small spacecraft and ultralight means of launching them into orbit. 2nd scientific and technical conference with international participation “Innovative automatic spacecraft for fundamental and applied scientific research. Problems of creating service and scientific systems”. 2017:317—328. (In Russ.)
  13. Badawy A, McInnes CR. Small spacecraft formation using potential functions. Acta Astronautica. 2009;65:1783—1788.
  14. Rhatigan JL, Lan W. Drag-enhancing deorbit devices for spacecraft self-disposal: A review of progress and opportunities. Journal of Space Safety Engineering. 2020;7:340—344.
  15. Baranov AA, Grishko DA, Shcheglov GA, Sholmin AS, Stognii MV, Kamenev ND. Feasibility analysis of LEO and GEO large space debris de/re-orbiting taking into account launch mass of spacecraft-collector and its configuration layout. Advances in Space Research. 2021;67:371—383.
  16. Shamardina OV, Liskov KV, Glushko VO, Razumova YV, Vishtak KO, Zakirnichnaia EE. Development of small spacecraft and deorbiting systems: a review of market formation research. Bulletin of Eurasian science. 2019;1:45. (In Russ.)
  17. Studnikov PE. Features of deployment of an orbital grouping of small spacecraft. Innovation and investment. 2020;3:240—242. (In Russ.)
  18. Levandovich AV, Mosin DA, Severenko AV, Ertmincev IA. Method for determining the parameters of the corrective propulsion system for a small spacecraft. Proceedings of the military space Academy of A. F. Mozhaisky. 2018;611:176—184. (In Russ.)
  19. Nazarova YuA, Tikhonov VA. Prospects for the development and creation of ultralight launch vehicles. International Conference Engineering Systems – 2020. 2020:42—50. (In Russ.)
  20. Naumochkin DV, Petuhov AI, Poluian MM. Analysis of trends in the development of ultra-small spacecraft. Armament and economy. 2019;4(50):37—43. (In Russ.)

Copyright (c) 2021 Nazarova Y.A., Tikhonov V.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies