The green vector of the World economy’s development and its reflection in international trade
- Authors: Voronina T.V.1, Yeletsky A.N.1, Yatcenko A.B.1, Kondratiev A.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Southern Federal University
- Issue: Vol 32, No 4 (2024): TRENDS, STRATEGIES AND MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS IN THE CONTEXT OF GLOBAL DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION
- Pages: 763-783
- Section: INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN THE CONDITIONS OF GLOBALIZATION
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/economics/article/view/42964
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2329-2024-32-4-763-783
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NCVFYY
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
For more than 30 years, the world community has been discussing the need for green global economic development. The role of international trade is increasing in fostering global green transition. The study’s main purpose is to identify trends in international trade in green goods based on its volume and structure analysis, ascertain potential risk factors that hinder green exports. The authors consider green trade as a tool for implementation and of the green direction state and indicator in the global economic development. The total volume of green trade was calculated based on 226 commodity sub-codes (IMF data). Focus of the study was on exports analysis of electric vehicles, nuclear reactors, electric generating plants for wind farms, biodegradable packaging, industrial waste for recycling and use. These groups characterize individual green sectors’ global development. The analysis systematized green agenda evolution and theoretical approaches to its justification; identified key trends in green exports and the leading countries in “volume of green goods exports” and “share in green goods global exports” (China, Germany, USA, Japan, etc.). The largest contribution to green trade is made by 3 sub-items: industrial waste for recycling and use (12.5% of global green exports), electric vehicles (9.6%) and solar panels (4.2%). It was concluded that the contribution of green trade to the world GDP is insignificant (1.8%) at the present time with its slow growth rate (by 0.3 percentage points in 2010-2021). However, the share of green trade in world exports is already quite noticeable and has reached 8% (comparable to world food exports). Global green products exports showed steady growth in 2010-2021. Three factors’ groups were substantiated as the main obstacles to the green trade development: institutional, technical, and geopolitical. Each of these groups can initiate green protectionism not so much in a defensive as in offensive form.
About the authors
Tatiana V. Voronina
Southern Federal University
Author for correspondence.
Email: t.v.voronina@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9972-9736
SPIN-code: 3530-0787
Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor, Professor of the World Economy and International Relations Department
105/42 Bolshaya Sadovaya St, Rostov-on-Don, 344006, Russian FederationAlexey N. Yeletsky
Southern Federal University
Email: ane904@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9389-0051
SPIN-code: 8268-7565
Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor of the World Economy and International Relations Department
105/42 Bolshaya Sadovaya St, Rostov-on-Don, 344006, Russian FederationAshkhen B. Yatcenko
Southern Federal University
Email: ashkhen@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9527-8336
SPIN-code: 5201-3733
Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the World Economy and International Relations Department
105/42 Bolshaya Sadovaya St, Rostov-on-Don, 344006, Russian FederationArtem A. Kondratiev
Southern Federal University
Email: arkon@sfedu.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-4700-2512
Postgraduate Student
105/42 Bolshaya Sadovaya St, Rostov-on-Don, 344006, Russian FederationReferences
- Baba, A.Е., Shayanmehr, S., Radmehr, R., Bayitse, R., & Agbozo, E. (2024). Investigating environmental quality among G20 nations: The impacts of environmental goods and lowcarbon technologies in mitigating environmental degradation. Geoscience Frontiers, 15(1), 101695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101695
- Barbier, E.B., Markandya, A., & Pearce, D.W. (1990). Environmental sustainability and costbenefit analysis. Environment and Planning, 22(9), 1259–1266.
- Beaufi T., Ward, H., Jakob, M., & Wenz, L. (2023). Assessing diff european carbon border adjustment mechanism implementations and their impact on trade partners. Communications Earth & Environment, (4), 131. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00788-4
- Birkbeck, C.D. (2021). Greening international trade: Pathways forward. geneva.
- Bobylev, P.M., & Semejkin, A.YU. (2020). «Zelenyj» protekcionizm Evropy. Energeticheskaya politika, 10(152), 24–33. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.46920/2409-5516_2020_10152_24
- Cherniwchan, J., & Najjar, N. (2022). Do environmental regulations affect the decision to export? American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Posted, 14(2), 125–160. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20200290
- Cherniwchan, J., & Taylor, M.S. (2022). International trade and the environment: Three remaining empirical challenges. NBER Working Paper, 30020. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4104006
- de Melo, J., & Solleder, J.-M. (2020). Barriers to trade in environmental goods: How important they are and what should developing countries expect from their removal. World Development, 130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104910
- Egorova, M.S. (2014). Economic mechanisms and transition conditions to green economy. Fundamental research, (6), 1262–1266. (In Russ.).
- Gomonov, K.G., Sipakova, P.O., & CHapurnaya, A.P. (2019). Introduction of microgeneration and energy-saving technologies within the concept of green economy: foreign experience and Russia. RUDN Journal of Economics, 27(3), 442–454. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2329-2019-27-3-442-454
- Jakob, M. (2021). Climate policy and international trade — A critical appraisal of the literature. Energy Policy, 156. 112399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112399
- Kaufman, N., Saha, S., & Bataille, C. (2023). Green Trade Tensions. Green industrial policy will drive decarbonization, but at what cost to trade? IMF. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/ en/Publications/fandd/issues/2023/06/green-trade-tensions-kaufman-saha-bataille
- Makarov, I. (2023). Taxonomy of trade barriers: Five types of protectionism. Contemporary World Economy, 1 (1).
- Meadows, D.H., Meadows, D.L., Randers, J., & Behrens III, W.W. (1972) The Limits to Growth; A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books. Retrieved 15.03, 2024 from https://archive.org/details/TheLimitsToGrowth/page/n11/mode/2up
- Mesarovic, M., Pestel, E., & Mihram, G.A. (1977). Мankind at the turning point. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 7(1), 73–74. https://doi.org/10.1109/ TSMC.1977.4309596
- Nurgisaeva, A.A., & Tamenova, S.S. (2020). Conceptual foundations of the «green» economy. Economics: Strategy and Practice, (3), 189–200. (In Russ.). https://doi: 10.51176/JESP/ issue_3_T14
- Pearce, D.W., Barbier, E.B., & Markandya, A. (1989). Blueprint for a Green Economy. London. Pearce, D. (1992). Green Economics. Environmental Values, 1(1), 3–13.
- Rogatnyh, E.B., & Serdun’, M.A. (2022). Green economy and its impact on economic growth in the 21st century. Russian Foreign Economic Journal, (3), 18–32. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/2072-8042-2022-3-18-32
- Tang, Y., Zhang, Q., & Fang, K. (2024). Does international trade reduce global carbon inequality? Evidence from a producer-consumer shared responsibility. Journal of Environmental Management, 355. 120307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120307
- Tinbergen, J.; Dolman, A.J., edit.; Ettinger, J.v. (1977). Reshaping the International Order : AReport to the Club of Rome. London: Hutchinson. Retrieved 15.03, 2024 from https://discovered. ed.ac.uk/discovery/fulldisplay?vid=44UOE_INST:44UOE_VU2&tab=Everything&docid=alma99243173502466&lang=en&context=L&query=creator,exact,Jentleson,%20 Bruce%20W.,%201951-
- Tkachenko, A.A. (2014). “Zelenaya” ekonomika i ee budushchee. Ekonomika i upravlenie, (6), 26–31. (In Russ.).
- Xue, S., Xiao, H.,& Ren, J.(2024). Cross-borderinteractionsonthesustainabledevelopmentbetween global countries. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, (204). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107525
