Interconnection between Globalization and Foreign Direct Investment in Africa
- Authors: Diarra S.1, Girinsky A.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- RUDN University
- Issue: Vol 32, No 3 (2024): FORMATION OF A MULTIPOLAR WORLD
- Pages: 555-569
- Section: INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL MOVEMENT
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/economics/article/view/42406
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2329-2024-32-3-555-569
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ONKXNK
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Foreign direct investment (FDI) is an important source of capital inflows to many African countries. Despite the marked improvement in economic, political, and social conditions in these capital-scarce countries, foreign investors do not consider them viable locations to locate in the country. Since FDI brings huge spillovers to the host country, some countries have recently institutionalized globalization as a catalyst to reverse this trend. Against this background, the relationship between FDI and globalization in African countries in recent years is examined. Using an extended panel estimation, the results show that FDI into Africa is indeed driven by globalization. Moreover, it is clear that this positive relationship is due to the economic dimension of globalization. Overall, the potential of globalization to stimulate an FDI boom in Africa has been demonstrated. The relationship between globalization and foreign direct investment (FDI) in Africa is multifaceted and plays a crucial role in the economic development of the continent. Globalization, characterized by the acceleration of trade, capital movements and increased interconnection between countries, has opened up new opportunities for Africa. The FDI, which refers to investments made by foreign companies in productive assets in a host country, is a key vector of this dynamic. At the same time, many African countries face a number of challenges associated with FDI inflows, such as the need to improve infrastructure, improve legal frameworks and reduce corruption. Thus, to maximize the benefits of globalization and attract more FDI, African countries need to continue reforms and strengthen their institutional environment. This will not only increase economic growth, but also increase resilience to external shocks and improve the overall stability of the economy in the region, which will further increase FDI.
Keywords
About the authors
Souleymane Diarra
RUDN University
Author for correspondence.
Email: 1042225132@rudn.ru
PhD scholar student, Department of Finance and Credit, Faculty of Economics 6 Miklukho-Maklaya St, Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation
Andrey V. Girinsky
RUDN University
Email: girinsky-av@rudn.ru
Associated Professor, Ph.D. Faculty of Economics 6 Miklukho-Maklaya St, Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation
References
- Adams, S., & Opoku, E.E.O. (2017). BRIC versus OECD foreign direct investment impact on development in Africa. Foreign capital flows and economic development in Africa: the impact of BRICS versus OECD. P. 147–161.
- Agbloyor, E.K. (2019). Foreign direct investment, political business cycles and welfare in Africa. Journal of International Development, 31(5), 345–373. https://doi.org/0.1002/jid.3408
- Aluko, O.A., Opoku, E.E.O., & Ibrahim, M. (2021). Investigating the environmental effect of globalization: Insights from selected industrialized countries. Journal of Environmental Management. Vol. 281. P. 111892.
- Bhagwati, D. (2004). Globalization-process positive, but not 100 %. Expert, 24, 43. (In Russ.).
- Blonigen, B.A. (2005). A review of the empirical literature on FDI determinants // Atlantic economic journal. Vol. 33. P. 383–403.
- Blonigen, B.A. (2005). A review of the empirical literature on FDI determinants // Atlantic economic journal. Vol. 33. P. 383–403.
- Chédor, S., & Mucchielli, J.L. (1998). Implantation à l’étranger et performance à l’exportation. Une analyse empirique sur les implantations des firmes françaises. Revue économique. P. 617–628.
- Cipollina, M., Giovannetti, G., Pietrovito, F., & Pozzolo, A.F. (2012). FDI and growth: What crosscountry industry data say. The World Economy, 35(11), 1599–1629.
- Dunning, J.H. (1988). The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of international business studies, 19(1), 1–31.
- Fituni, L.L. (2020). Foreign capital in Africa: theories, strategies and novations. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-202013-6-1
- Gygli, S., Haelg, F., Potrafke, N., & Sturm, J.E. (2019). The KOF globalisation index-revisited. The Review of International Organizations, 14, 543–574.
- Kose M.A., Prasad E., Rogoff K., & Wei S.J. (2009). Financial globalization: A reappraisal. IMF Staff papers, 56(1), 8–62.
- Narula R., & Dunning J.H. (2010). Multinational enterprises, development and globalization: Some clarifications and a research agenda. Oxford Development Studies, 38(3), 263–287.
- Vasyukov, E.A. (2020). Comparative analysis of attractive factors for FDI in developing and developed countries. Finance and Management, (1), 38–52. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-7802.2020.1.31832
- Vogel, D.W. (2018). Investment activities of Russian companies in the African market in the context of an improved institutional environment. Economic Relations, 8(2), 217–232. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18334/eo.8.2.38971