Russia in Greater Mediterranean: New Pacific Eurasian Transition

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The relevance of the issues raised in the article is related to the active return of Russia to the Mediterranean region, as well as the international political transformations taking place in it. The purpose of the article is to identify the historical foundations, current state and strategic prospects of Russia’s presence and international influence in the Greater Mediterranean region. The article is based on the methodology of critical geopolitics, historical and comparative approaches, which critically analyze the geopolitical structures of the region, built in the interests of various regional and extra-regional political forces. The historical material of the ancient, medieval, new and modern periods in the history of the macro-region is used, including the poorly studied times of the Mongol presence on the eastern shores of the Mediterranean Sea. Scientific works on the history, geography and international relations in the region, written in the 18th - 19th centuries, as well as modern scientific information on the trends of technological, infrastructural and political development of the Mediterranean region are introduced into scientific circulation. An important element of the article is the thesis about the special role of Russia in the Pacific-European (Eurasian) transit. From the author’s point of view, it includes not only the full implementation of Russia’s transport and logistics potential in the macro-region, but also the transfer of modern technologies, as well as the promotion of the formation of sustainable political regimes. As a result, a conclusion is made about the deep historical foundations of Russia’s presence and influence in the region, its strategic prospects are justified, and the main directions of our country’s international activities in the Mediterranean region are highlighted. An important conclusion of the article is the thesis about the need for a multilateral balanced approach to solving macro-regional problems.

About the authors

Ivan Alexandrovich Chikharev

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: ichikharev@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8573-9271

PhD in Political Science, Associate Professor, Department of Geopolitics, Faculty of Global Processes

Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Abulafia, D. (2005). Mediterraneans. In W. V. Harris (Ed.), Rethinking the Mediterranean (pp. 64—94). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Abulafia, D. (2010). The Great Sea: A human history of the Mediterranean. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  3. Arbatova, N. K. (1990). Mediterranean: Problems of security. Moscow: Nauka publ. (In Russian).
  4. Ascherson, N. (2017). Black Sea. The birthplace of civilization and barbarism. Moscow: Corpus publ. (In Russian).
  5. Bicchi, F. (2011). The Union for the Mediterranean, or the changing context of Euro-Mediterranean relations. Mediterranean Politics, 16(1), 3—19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2011.547365
  6. Braudel, F. (2002). The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean world in the age of Philip II. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury publ. (In Russian).
  7. Campbell, D. (1795). A journey over land to India, partly by a Route never gone before by any European, comprehending his Shipwreck and Imprisonment with Hyder Ali and his subsequent negociations and transactions in the East. London: Cullen and Company.
  8. Chikharev, I. A. (2021). The Great Mediterranean as a multi-dimensional object of political research. Polis. Political Studies, (3), 129—146. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2021.03.09
  9. Chikharev, I. A., & Brovko, V. Yu. (2018). Digital regional studies of Greater Mediterranean: An outline of research program. Russian Political Science, 4(9), 47—54. (In Russian).
  10. Gozzi, G. (2018). Critical perspectives on Euro-Mediterranean relations after the “Arab Spring”. International Journal of Political Science & Urban Studies, 6, 19—38. https://doi.org/10.14782/ipsus.421015
  11. Ilyin, I. A. (1956). Our tasks (vol. 1). Paris: Izdanie Russkogo Obshche-Voinskogo Soyuza publ. (In Russian).
  12. Irwin, E. (1785). A series of adventures. London: Cullen and Company.
  13. Kalaitzidis, A. (2015). US foreign policy in the Eastern Mediterranean: The limits of smart power. In S. N. Litsas & A. Tziampiris (Eds.), The Eastern Mediterranean in transition: Multipolarity, politics and power (pp. 51—63). London: Routledge.
  14. Krausch, K., & Youngs, R. (2009). The end of the ‘Euro-Mediterranean vision’. International Relations, 85(5), 963—975. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2009.00841.x
  15. Laipson, E. (2018). America and the Mediterranean: An arena for transnational threat management. In L. A. Secat & H. Gallego (Eds.), IEMed. Mediterranean Yearbook (pp. 47—53). Barcelona: IEMed. Retrieved from https://www.iemed.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/IEMed-Mediterranean-Yearbook-2018_ENG.pdf
  16. Litsas, S. (2016). Russia in the Eastern Mediterranean: Intervention, deterrence, containment. Digest of Middle East Studies, 26(1), 56—73. https://doi.org/10.1111/dome.12103
  17. Mackinder, H. (1943). The round world and the winning of peace. Foreign Affairs, 21(4), 595—605. https://doi.org/10.2307/20029780
  18. Martin, R. M. (1837). History of the British possessions in the Mediterranean: Comprising Gibraltar, Malta, Gozo, and the Ionian Islands. London: Whittaker & Co.
  19. Modelski, G. (2005a). The evolution of global politics (I). Polis. Political Studies, (3), 62—82. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2005.03.06
  20. Modelski, G. (2005b). The evolution of global politics (II). Polis. Political Studies, (4), 124—142. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2005.04.10
  21. Nechaev, V. D., Chikharev, I. A., Irhin, A. A., & Makovskaya, D. V. (2019). Framework of the geostrategic atlas of the Greater Mediterranean. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Serya 5, Geografiya, (1), 67—75. (In Russian).
  22. O’Tuathail, G. (1998). Postmodern geopolitics? The modern geopolitical imagination and beyond. In G. O’Tuathail & S. Dalby (Eds.), Rethinking geopolitics (pp. 16—38). London: Routledge.
  23. Paine, T. (2010). Thoughts on the peace, and the probable advantages thereof to the United States of America. A new edition. Philadelphia: Gale ECCO Print Editions.
  24. Purdy, J. (1826). New sailing directory for the Mediterranean Sea. London: R.H. Laurie.
  25. Ratzel, F. (1911). Das Meer als Quelle der Völkergrösse: eine politisch-geographische Studie. Munchen, Berlin: Druck und Verlag von W. Oldenburg in Munchen und Berlin.
  26. Rotchev, A. G. (1991). Memoirs of a russian traveler. Moscow: Nauka. Glavnaya redakciya vostochnoj literatury publ. (In Russian).
  27. Shmelyov, N. P., Gusejnov, V. A., & Yaz’kova, A.A. (Eds.). (2006). Mediterranean — Black Sea region — Caspian region: Between the Greater Europe and the Greater Middle East. Moscow: Granitsa publ. (In Russian).
  28. Smyth, H. (1854). The Mediterranean: A memoir physical, historical, and nautical. London: J.W. Parker and Son.
  29. Stoletov, O. V., Chikharev, I. A., Moskalenko, O. A., & Makovskaya, D. V. (2019). Geoinformation support of the Mediterranean branch of the Silk Road. InterCarto. InterGIS, 25(1), 102—113. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.35595/2414-9179-2019-1-25-102-113
  30. Strabo. (1994). Geography. Book XI. Moscow: Ladomir publ. (In Russian).
  31. Zonova, T. (2015). Mediterranean trend in the Russia’s foreign policy. Rivista di Studi Politici Internazionali, 82(4), 521—529.

Copyright (c) 2021 Chikharev I.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies