The Evolution of the Cooperation between South American Countries in the Amazon Basin: From the Development of the Amazon Cooperation Treaty to the Signing of the Leticia Pact for the Amazon

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

This article is focused on special characteristics of formation and development of the interaction between South American countries located on the territory of the Amazon Basin from the development of the Amazon Cooperation Treaty (ACT) in 1978 to the signing of the Leticia Pact for the Amazon in 2019. Considering the evolution of cooperation between South American countries in the Amazon River basin, the author relied on the regional integration theory and the Neoliberal IR theory and proposed his own periodization of this process with an analysis of the stages of interaction. The main methods used by the author in the study are systemic analysis and structural-functional analysis, thanks to which the author was able to examine in detail the main directions and characteristics in the sphere of interaction of South American countries in the ACTO. The method of content analysis was used in dealing with documents of the organization. The author came to the conclusion that for South American countries geographically located in the one area, one of the most important components in the interaction was the creation of a common mechanism - ACTO. Without the creation of ACTO and the implementation of coordinated activities in this area, there would be a certain risk of an institutional vacuum in the Amazon, which, due to the activity of illegal armed groups, could potentially lead to the emergence of quasi-governmental entities. In the context of the global transition to a sustainable development model, such format of interaction as the ACTO plays a special role because natural disasters occurring in the Amazon region strongly affect climate change on a global scale. Thanks to the existing coordination among member countries in the ACTO the Leticia Pact was signed.

About the authors

Boris Igorevich Nekrasov

RUDN University

Author for correspondence.
Email: nekrasov.b.i@my.mgimo.ru

Postgraduate Student, the Department of Theory and History of International Relations

Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Acosta, A. (2013). Extractivism and Neo-extractivism: Two Sides of the Same Curse. In: Lang, M. & Mokrani, D. (Eds.). Beyond Development. Alternative Visions from Latin America. Amsterdam; Quito: Transnational Institute; Rosa Luxemburg Foundation. P. 61—86.
  2. Alferova, E.V., Dubovik, O.L. (2011). Environmental Protection and Quality of Life: Legal Aspects: collection of scientific works of INION RAS. Moscow: Institut nauchnoi informatsii po obshchestvennym naukam RAN publ. (In Russian).
  3. Betsill, M., Hochstetler, K. & Stevis, D. (Eds.). (2014). Advances in International Environmental Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
  4. Borzova, A.Yu. & Pavlova, M.P. (2019). Cooperation of Latin American and Caribbean States in Terms of Maintaining the Sustainable Development of the Region. Latinskaia Amerika, 8, 47—60. (In Russian). doi: 10.31857/S0044748X0005579-5
  5. Borzova, A.Yu. (2014). Brasil Approaches to the Problems of National and Regional Security. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 2, 55—63. (In Russian).
  6. Drobot, G.A. & Kochetkova, E.V. (2009). Ecology Problems as a Global Threat to Security. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science, 3, 61—73. (In Russian).
  7. Gudynas, E. (2013). Development Alternatives in Bolivia: The Impulse, the Resistance, and the Restoration. NACLA Report on the Americas, 46 (1), 22—26.
  8. Iwanowski, Z.V. (2020). Latin America at the End of the Decade. Social Problems, Political Changes, and New Challenges. Svobodnaya Mysl’, 1680 (2), 71—84. (In Russian).
  9. Lalander, R. & Lembke, M. (2018). The Andean Catch-22: Ethnicity, Class and Resource Governance in Bolivia and Ecuador. Globalizations, 15 (5), 636—654. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2018.1453189
  10. Martynov, B.F. (2010). Brazil: Priorities and Phobias of a Rising Power. Security Index, 4 (95), 16, 44—57. (In Russian).
  11. Martynov, B.F. (2019). The History of International Relations of the Latin American and Caribbean Countries (20th — Beginning of 21st Century). Moscow: Aspekt Press publ. (In Russian).
  12. Nikolaeva, L.B. (2018). Latin American Economy in the Face of Climate Change. New Priorities. Iberoamérica, 4, 5—26. (In Russian).
  13. O’Neill, K. (2017). The Environment and International Relations. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781107448087.001
  14. Pereira, J.C. (2015). Environmental Issues and International Relations, a New Global (Dis)Order: The Role of International Relations in Promoting a Concerted International System. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 58 (1), 191—209.
  15. Selishcheva, T.A. (2016). Problems of Environmental Sustainability of Eurasian Region. Peterburgskii Ekonomicheskii Zhurnal, 1, 12—21. (In Russian).
  16. Shinkarenko, A.A. (2017). Socio-ecological Conflicts in Peru. In: Iwanowski, Z.V. (Eds.). Political Conflicts in Latin America: Challenges to Stability and New Opportunities. Moscow: ILA RAN publ. P. 262—279. (In Russian).
  17. Shinkarenko, A.A. (2018a). “Eco-territorial Turn” in Latin America in the Context of the Search for a Development Model. In: Voda, K.R., Vorotnikova, T.A., Kulkova, O.S., Nevsky, A.A., Timofeeva, P.P. & Shinkarenko, A.A. (Eds.). “Global South” in a Polycentric World Order (World Development. Issue 19). Moscow: IMEMO RAN publ. P. 11—20. (In Russian). doi: 10.20542/978-5-9535-0547-5
  18. Shinkarenko, A.A. (2018b). Between Neoextractivism and the “Green” Geopolitics. Features of “Eco-territorial Turn” in Latin America. Polit Book, 4, 103—116. (In Russian).
  19. Simonova, L.N. (Eds.). (2017). Possibilities and Limits of Innovative Development of Latin America. Moscow: ILA RAN publ. (In Russian).
  20. Sudarev, V.P. & Simonova, L.N. (Eds.). (2017). Latin America at the Turn of Global and Regional Trends. Moscow: ILA Ran publ. (In Russian).
  21. Svampa, M. (2011). Modelo de Desarrollo y cuestión ambiental en América Latina: categorías escenarios en disputa. In: Wanderley, F. (Eds.). El desarrollo en cuestión: reflexiones desde América Latina. La Paz: CIDES / UMSA. P. 411—441.
  22. Tigre, M.A. (2017). Regional Cooperation in Amazonia. A Comparative Environmental Law Analysis. Leiden, Boston: Brill, Nijhoff.
  23. Timofeeva, Yu.A. & Budykina, K.Yu. (2020). Amazon Wildfires and MERCOSUR — EU Relations. Latinskaia Amerika, 7, 79—88. (In Russian).
  24. Vorotnikova, T.A. (2018). “Suma qamaña”: Bolivia in Search of an Alternative Development Model. In: Voda, K.R., Vorotnikova, T.A., Kulkova, O.S., Nevsky, A.A., Timofeeva, P.P. & Shinkarenko, A.A. (Eds.). “Global South” in a Polycentric World Order (World Development. Issue 19). Moscow: IMEMO RAN publ. P. 20—25. (In Russian).

Copyright (c) 2020 Nekrasov B.I.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies