Eurasian Economic Union: Prospects and Problems of Integration in the Post-Soviet Space

Cover Page

Abstract


The article examines the state of integration processes in the post-Soviet area over the past decade, with a focus on the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), which has contributed to a holistic, comprehensive picture of the current situation with previous developments, consistent disclosure of the conditions for the development of integration processes, highlighting opportunities for the development of integration processes, their defining, designations of cause-and-effect relationships in international political processes in the region. With structural and functional analysis, presented by the mechanisms of functioning of the relevant factors of efficiency in the modern environment and to assess the mechanisms of their activity in changing conditions, the following elements are distinguished in the work: study of the stages of integration processes in the region, identification of factors influencing, analysis and comparison of statistical trade and economic indicators of the EAEU member states, as well as the prospects for the development of integration in the post-Soviet space. The use of SWOT analysis makes it possible to identify potential and weak factors in the development of the EAEU, assess the possibilities for the participation of the Russian Federation in this organization, using possible scenarios for the further functioning of the EAEU. Based on the analysis of macroeconomic indicators, political and economic processes within Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Armenia and Kyrgyzstan, the authors conclude that there is a high risk of contradictions in these areas in relations between the EAEU countries, which suggests the most likely scenario for the further development of integration processes in violation of the deadlines implementation of plans. The financial factor is the insufficient mechanism for overcoming integration ties in comparison with the European Union. As a prospective development of the EAEU, the most optimal way is seen as its transformation into a kind of economic and political organization.


About the authors

Dmitrij Aleksandrovich Belashchenko

Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod - National Research University

Author for correspondence.
Email: dmi-belashhenko@yandex.ru
Nizhni Novgorod, Russian Federation

PhD in History, Associate Professor, the Department of History and Theory of International Relations, Institute of International Relations and World History

Vitalij Valer’evich Tolkachev

Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod - National Research University

Email: tolkatchev_v@mail.ru
Nizhni Novgorod, Russian Federation

PhD in History, Associate Professor, the Department of Global Diplomacy and International Law, Institute of International Relations and World History

Imomidin Fozilovich Shodzhonov

Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod - National Research University

Email: shodzhonov@inbox.ru
Nizhni Novgorod, Russian Federation

Assistant, the Department of Region Studies of Foreign Countries and Local History, Institute of International Relations and World History

References

  1. Astapenya, R. & Balcones, D. (2016). Belarusian-Russian Relations against the Background of the Conflict in Ukraine. Minsk — London: Ostrogorski Centre publ. (In Belorussian).
  2. Bayramov, V., Breban, D. & Mukhtarov, E. (2019). Economic Effects Estimation for the Eurasian Economic Union: Application of Regional Linear Regression. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 52 (3), 209—225. doi: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2019.07.001
  3. Belashchenko, D.A. & Voynov, A.A. (2019). Impact of the Ukrainian Crisis on Eurasian Integration: Problems, Consequences, Prospects. Gumanitarnye Problemy Voennogo Dela, 2, 27—31. (In Russian).
  4. Charap, S. & Colton, T.J. (2017). Everyone Loses: The Ukraine Crisis and the Ruinous Contest for Post-Soviet Eurasia. Routledge.
  5. Charap, S. Demus, A. & Shapiro, J. (Eds.). (2018). Getting Out from “In-Between”: Perspectives on the Regional Order in Post-Soviet Europe and Eurasia. RAND Corporation. URL: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/
  6. pubs/conf_proceedings/CF300/CF382/RAND_CF382.pdf (accessed: 04.02.2020).
  7. Degterev, D.A. & Kurylev, K.P. (Eds.). (2017). Foreign Policy of the CIS Countries. Moscow: Aspekt Press publ. (In Russian).
  8. Durdyeva, A.A. (2015) Integration Dilemma within the Eurasian Space in the Context of the Ukrainian Crisis. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 3 (42), 134—140. (In Russian).
  9. Golam, M. & Monowar, M. (2018). Eurasian Economic Union: Evolution, Challenges and Possible Future Directions. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 9 (2), 163—172. doi: 10.1016/j.euras.2018.05.001
  10. Hattori, M. (2016). The Role of the Eurasian Economic Union in Trade and Industrial Policy of Russia. Russian and East European Studies, 45, 135—155. doi: 10.5823/jarees.2016.135
  11. Kirilko, D.S. (2016). Political Aspect of the Relations of Member Countries GUAM with the European Union. Scientific Bulletin of the Diplomatic Academy of Ukraine, 23 (2), 120—126. (In Ukrainian).
  12. Kirkham, K. (2016). The Formation of the Eurasian Economic Union: How Successful is the Russian Regional Hegemony? Journal of Eurasian Studies, 7 (2), 111—128. doi: 10.1016/j.euras.2015.06.002.
  13. Lapenko, M.V. (2014). The Ukrainian Crisis and Its Impact on the Implementation of the Project to Create the Eurasian Economic Union. Connections: The Quarterly Journal, XIV (1), 132—149. DOI: 10.11610/
  14. connections.rus.14.1.06. (In Russian).
  15. Libman, A. (2017). Russian Power Politics and the Eurasian Economic Union: The Real and the Imagined. Rising Powers Quarterly, 2 (1), 81—103.
  16. Libman, A.M. (2019). Learning from the European Union? Eurasian Regionalism and the “Global Script”. Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law, 12 (2), 247—268. doi: 10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-2-247-268
  17. Lyakhovsky, V.V. & Sashina, V.Y. (2010). Formation of the Customs Union of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia within the Eurasian Economic Community. Topical Issues of Customs, 1, 14—22. (In Belorussian).
  18. URL: http://elib.bsu.by/bitstream/123456789/35545/1/lyakhovsky_sashina_2010_1_CA_issues.pdf (accessed: 04.02.2020).
  19. Meshkova, T.A. (Eds.). (2019). Eurasian Economic Integration: Development Prospects and Strategic Objectives for Russia: Report of the Higher School of Economics. 20th April International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development, Moscow, April 9—12. Moscow: Izdatelskiy dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki publ. (In Russian).
  20. Mukhin, A. (Eds.). (2015). Justification of Eurasian Integration. Moscow: Algoritm publ. (In Russian).
  21. Pieper, M. (2020). The Linchpin of Eurasia: Kazakhstan and the Eurasian Economic Union between Russia’s Defensive Regionalism and China’s New Silk Roads. International Politics. doi: 10.1057/s41311-020-00244-6
  22. Rasmussen, M.V., Struwe, L.B., Hoffmann, R., Pradhan-Blachet, F., Kidmose, J. et al. (2014). The Ukraine Crisis and the End of the Post-Cold War European Order: Options for NATO and the EU. Centre for Military Studies University of Copenhagen, June. URL: https://cms.polsci.ku.dk/english/publications/ukrainecrisis/Ukraine_Crisis_CMS_Report_June_2014.pdf (accessed: 04.02.2020).
  23. Samokhvalov, V. (2016). On the Edges: Post-Soviet Eurasia and Its Periphery. University of Cambridge Repository, 1—27. URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/254890/Samokhvalov-2016-Perspectives_on_European_Politics_and_Society-AM.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed: 04.02.2020).
  24. Sergi, B.S. (2018) Putin’s and Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union: A Hybrid Half-Economics and Half-Political “Janus Bifrons”. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 9 (1), 52—60. doi: 10.1016/j.euras.2017.12.005
  25. Skriba, A.S. & Altukhov, A.O. (2019). The EU — Russia Geopolitical Contradictions and Participation of the Post-Soviet States in Regional Economic Integration. Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law, 12 (2), 51—70. (In Russian). doi: 10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-2-51-70
  26. Skriba, A.S. (2014). Challenges of Eurasian Integration after the Ukrainian Crisis. International Organisations Research Journal, 9 (3), 96—111. (In Russian).
  27. Tolkachev, V.V. & Chalbaeva, A.A. (2015). Prospects for the Development of Integration Associations in the Post-Soviet Space: Experience of the Customs Union of Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan. Molodoj uchenyj, 2, 428—432. (In Russian).
  28. Vinokurov, E. (2017). Eurasian Economic Union: Current State and Preliminary Results. Russian Journal of Economics, 3 (1), 54—70. doi: 10.1016/j.ruje.2017.02.004
  29. Zhuravleva, G.P. & Tutaeva, D.R. (2018). The Eurasian Economic Union as a New Stage of International Integration. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, 4 (100), 190—196. (In Russian). doi: 10.21686/2413-2829-2018-4-190-196
  30. Ziyadullaev, N.S. & Ziyadullaev, S.N. (2016). The CIS and the Eurasian Economic Union: History, Modernity, Development Strategies. Market Economy Problems, 2, 55—63. (In Russian).

Statistics

Views

Abstract - 155

PDF (Russian) - 122

Cited-By


PlumX

Dimensions


Copyright (c) 2020 Belashchenko D.A., Tolkachev V.V., Shodzhonov I.F.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies