Processes of Secession and Irredentism in Bosnia and Herzegovina: History, Status, Prospects
- Authors: Shabaga A.V.1, Kojovic S.1
-
Affiliations:
- RUDN University
- Issue: Vol 16, No 4 (2024)
- Pages: 568-586
- Section: Ideas and politics in history
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/world-history/article/view/42222
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8127-2024-16-4-568-586
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HIDRQA
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to analyze political processes in Bosnia and Herzegovina against the background of deep ethnic and religious contradictions. In this regard, the problem of secession and irredentism in Bosnia and Herzegovina is examined, considered in a broad historical context. The phenomenon of Bosnia and Herzegovina is shown as a result of the influence of liberal ideas, which largely stimulated the disintegration of Yugoslavia. The fierce military conflicts generated by this disintegration led to secessionist-irredentist projects on the part of the Serbian and, partly, Croatian population and Bosniak attempts to reincarnate the previous (Yugoslav) concept based on the primacy of citizenship over other forms of identity. In this regard, the options for a possible state structure are examined: unitarism (which the Bosniaks advocate) or confederation (the position of the Serbian population), in which many see the first step towards secession with the possibility of subsequent entry into a neighboring state. Croatian representatives prefer either a unitary or a confederative theory of state structure depending on the status of the Croatian ethnic group in one or another model. The analysis of the problem under study is based on the theory of the multipolar world by E.M. Primakov, which makes it possible to consider the place of Bosnia and Herzegovina both in the global dimension and on a regional scale. The study also uses the methodology of M. Weber, according to which interethnic contradictions are predetermined by the incommensurability of values, in some cases turning into the reduction of religious dogmas into social norms. The conclusion is that, due to a number of political, religious and cultural reasons considered, secessionism and irredentism are more pronounced among the Balkan peoples than among other peoples. Europe. At present, these processes are far from complete in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and even possible entry into other confederative associations, such as the EU, will not be a reliable guarantee of their cessation.
About the authors
Andrey V. Shabaga
RUDN University
Author for correspondence.
Email: shabaga-av@rudn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7610-9721
SPIN-code: 6526-4436
Doctor of Sciences (Philosophy), professor of the Department of Theory and History of International Relations
6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow, 117198, Russian FederationSara Kojovic
RUDN University
Email: koevich_s@pfur.ru
postgraduate student of the Department of Theory and History of International Relations, assistant of the Department of Foreign Languages 6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation
References
- Baranovsky KY. Kvebekskii separatizm — ostraya problema Kanadskoi federatsii [Quebec Separatism — an Acute Problem of the Canadian Federation]. USA&Canada: Economy — Politics — Culture. 2001;(11):64–79. (In Russ.).
- Khenkin SM. Separatism against the State: the Case of Catalonia. Polis. Political Studies. 2018;(3):167–173. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2018.03.11
- Muro D, Vidal D, Vlaskamp MC. Does international recognition matter? Support for unilateral secession in Catalonia and Scotland. Nations and Nationalism. 2020;26(1):177–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12557
- Egorova M. North of Italy the secession or federal reform? Geopolitica. 2009;(30):88–91.
- Oskolkov PV. Separatism in the ideology and practice of Flemish right-wing populist parties. Vestnik MGIMO-universiteta. 2017;56(5):171–174. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2017-5-56-169-182
- Krivorotov AK. Greenland and Denmark: Arctic Secessionism in a Global Powerplay. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2021;14(1):128–131. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2021-14-1-6
- Iustinus MIu. Epitoma Historiarum Philippicarum Pompei Trogi. Saint Petersburg; 2005. (In Russ.).
- Alekseev SV. (trans.). The chronicle of the priest of Duklyanin. Saint Petersburg; 2005. (In Russ.).
- Denikin AI. Istoriya russkoi smuty. Borba generala Kornilova. Avgust 1917 — aprel’ 1918. [History of the Russian Time of Troubles. General Kornilov’s Struggle. August 1917 — April 1918]. Minsk; 2002. (In Russ.).
- Primakov EM. Mysli vsluh [Thoughts Out Loud]. Moscow; 2011. (In Russ.).
- Weber M. Nauka kak prizvanie i professiya [Science as a Vocation and Profession]. In: Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Selected Works]. Moscow; 1990. (In Russ.).
- Weber M. Smysl «svobody ot otsenki» v sotsiologicheskoi i ekonomicheskoi nauke [The Meaning of “Freedom from Evaluation” in Sociological and Economic Science]. In: Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Selected Works]. Moscow; 1990. (In Russ.).
- Tatham M, Thau M. The More the Merrier: Accounting for Regional Paradiplomats in Brussels. European Union Politics. 2014;15(2):145–178.
- Mikeš M. Bosna i Hercegovina i vladavina prava [Bosnia and Herzegovina and the rule of law]. Atlantik, Banja Luka: Atlantik; 2008. (In Serb.).
- Ponomareva EG. Novye gosudarstva na Balkanah [New States in the Balkans]. Moscow: MGIMO-Universitet; 2010. (In Russ.).
- Chupic C. Od vladavine kontrolisanog haosa do dobro ureђenog demokratskog poretka, Nova srpska politichka misao [From the reign of controlled chaos to a well-ordered democratic order, New Serbian political thought]. Beograd: Nova srpska politichka misao; 2001. (In Serb.)
- Kuzmanovic R. Ustavno parvo [Constitutional law]. Banјo Luka: Pravni fakultet; 2002. (In Serb.).
- Poplasen N. Rushene Deјtona [Demolition of Dayton]. Banja Luka: Insitit za meђunarodno pravo i mezhunarodnu poslovnu saradnju; 2001. (In Serb.).
- Ramet SP. Balkan babel: the disintegration of Yugoslavia from the death of Tito to the fall of Milošević. Routledge; 2018.
- Neskovic R. Nedovrshena drzhava. Politichki sistem Bosne i Hercegovine [An unfinished state. Political system of Bosnia and Herzegovina]. Saraјevo: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung; 2013. (In Serb.).
- Kuzmanovic R. Eseјi o ustavnosti i drzhavnosti [Essays on constitutionality and statehood]. Banja Luka: Centar za publikaciјe Pravnog fakulteta; 2004. (In Serb.)
- Calic MJ. Geschichte Jugoslawiens im 20 Jahrhundert [History of Yugoslavia in the 20th Century]. Wien: CH Beck; 2010.
- Weber M. Politika kak prizvanie i professiya [Politics as a Vocation]. In: Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Selected Works]. Moscow; 1990. (In Russ.).
- Sundhaussen H. Jugoslawien und seine Nachfolgestaaten 1943–2011: Eine ungewöhnliche Geschichte des Gewöhnlichen [Yugoslavia and its successor states 1943–2011: An unusual history of the ordinary]. Böhlau, Wien; 2014.
- Stojanovic D, Kamberovic H. Ratovi 1990-ih u regionalnim historiografijama — Kontroverze, interpretacije, nasljeđe [Wars of the 1990s in regional historiographies — Controversies, interpretations, legacy]. Sarajevo, 2020.
- Krajišnik M. Kako se rachala Republika Srpska [How the Republika Srpska was born]. Banja Luka: Besјeda; 2016. (In Serb.).
- Nikiforov KV. “Nachertanie” Ilii Garashanina i vneshnyaya politika Serbii v 1842–1853 gg. [Ilija Garashanin’s “The Draft” and Serbia’s Foreign Policy in 1842–1853]. Moscow, 2015. (In Russ.).
- Karaula Zh. Jedan povijesni izvor o nastanku ilirizma: “Kako je postao Ilirizm?” [One historical source on the origin of Illyrianism: “How did Illyrianism become?’]. Zbornik Jankovich. 2019;(4):112–138. (In Serb.).
- Feldman A. Kállay’s dilemma on the challenge of creating a manageable identity in Bosnia and Herzegovina (1882–1903). Review of Croatian History. 2017;13(1):98–115.
- Tretyakova M. Makedoniya-2001. Novyi vitok krizisa: istoricheskie predposylki i politicheskie posledstviya [Macedonia-2001. A New Round of Crisis: Historical Prerequisites and Political Consequences]. Moscow; 2021. (In Russ.).
- Križanić J. Politika [Politics]. Moscow; 1965. (In Russ.).
- Bachmann K. Orban-Rhetorik sorgt in Slowakei für düstere Vorahnungen [Orban’s rhetoric causes dark forebodings in Slovakia]. Wiener Zeitung. 7 März 2016.