Financial Policy of the Roman Governor towards Provincial Communities during Period of the Principate
- Authors: Telepen S.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Mozyr State Pedagogical University named after I.P. Shamyakin
- Issue: Vol 16, No 3 (2024): Legal and social life of ancient societies
- Pages: 341-351
- Section: THE ECONOMICS OF ANTIQUITY
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/world-history/article/view/41617
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8127-2024-16-3-341-351
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JAABXS
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The area of responsibility of the governor of the province was to perform both commanding, judicial and fiscal duties. The latter had to replenish the treasury with tax revenues from the provinces. The governors needed funds to maintain the military troops accommodated in the province. Besides that, at least by the beginning of the 2nd century ensuring the financial stability of the provincial communities themselves became an important area. It was controlled by the governor. Tendance about the welfare of provincial cities is reflected, in particular, in the correspondence of Pliny the Younger with Trajan, the speeches of Dion Chrysostom as well as epigraphic documents of a legal nature. This and a number of other sources reflect various ways to maintain the financial well-being of communities by reducing the local taxes, lump-sum contributions and various unproductive expenses. In this regard, the Antonins’ is marked by a turn in the financial strategy of the Roman state towards the “humanization” of the provincial policy. Monitoring of city finances was an aspect that required the constant attention to the state of income and expenditure of provincial communities. At the same time, the viceroy was not limited to the personnel resources of his staff but tried to involve the local aristocracy, endowing its representatives with control and judicial powers, acting, however, in the context of the customs and practices evolved in each individual community.
Keywords
About the authors
Sergey V. Telepen
Mozyr State Pedagogical University named after I.P. Shamyakin
Author for correspondence.
Email: telepen_serg@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5560-8599
SPIN-code: 6953-0339
PhD in History; Associate Professor of the Department of History and Humanities
28 Student St., Mozyr, 247760, BelarusReferences
- Smirnova IK. Politika Trayana v provincii Vifiniya-Pont (k ocenke osobennostej provincialnoj politiki v epohu Principata) [Trajan’s policy in the province of BithyniaPontus (to assess the features of provincial politics in the era of the Principate)]: Abstract of a candidate of historical sciences. Leningrad; 1978. 22 p. (In Russ.).
- Burton GP. The Roman Imperial State, Provincial Governors and the Public Finances of Provincial Cities, 27 B.C. — A.D. 235. Historia. 2004;(53):311–342.
- Shmal’ko AV. Rimskaya social’naya politika v provincii Vifiniya-Pont vo vtoroj polovine I v. do n.e. — I v. n.e. [Roman social policy in the province of Bithynia-Pontus in the second half of the 1st century. BC. — I century AD]. In: Ancient antiquity and the Middle Ages: Probl. social development: Collection of scientific papers. Sverdlovsk: UrSU; 1985, рр. 16–24. (In Russ.).
- Jones AHM. The Greek City from Alexander to Justinian. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1940. viii, 393 p.
- Williams W. Antoninus Pius and the Control of Provincial Embassies. Historia. 1967;(16):470–483.
- Souris GA. The Size of the Provincial Embassies to the Emperor under the Principate. ZPE. 1982;(48):235–244.
- Millar F. The Emperor in the Roman World (31 BC — AD 337). London: Duckworth; 1977. xvi, 656 p.
- Maksimova MI. Antichnye goroda Yugo-Vostochnogo Prichernomor’ya: Sinopa. Amis. Trapezund [Ancient cities of the South-Eastern Black Sea region: Sinope. Amis. Trebizond]. Moscow-Leningrad: Academy of Sciences of the Soviet Union; 1956. 472 p. (In Russ.).
- Jacques F. Le privilège de liberté. Politique impériale et autonomie municipale dans les cités de l’Occident romain (161–244). Rome: Ecole Française de Rome; 1984. xxxv, 867 p.
- Oliver JH. Greek Constitutions of Early Roman Emperors from Inscriptions and Papyri. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society; 1989. xxxv, 634 p.
- Sherwin-White AN. The Letters of Pliny. A Historical and Social Commentary, Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1966. хv, 808 p.
- Desideri P. Dione di Prusa. Un intellettuale greco nell’impero romano. Messine — Florence: Casa editrice G. D’Anna; 1978. xiv, 642 р.
- Jones CP. A New Commentary on the Letters of Pliny. Phoenix. 1968;22(2):111–142.
- Garnsey P. Honorarium decurionatus. Historia. 1971;(20):309–325.
- Jacques F. Ampliatio et mora : Evergètes récalcitrants d’Afrique romaine. Antiquités africaines. 1975;(9):159–180.
- Dignas B. Economy of the Sacred in the Hellenistic and Roman Asia Minor. Oxford: University Press; 2002. xiv, 364 p.
- Eck W. Senatoren von Vespasian bis Hadrian. Prosopographische Untersuchungen mit Einschluss der Jahres- und Provinzialfasten der Statthalter. München: C.H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung; 1970. viii, 284 S.
- Debord P. Aspects sociaux et économiques de la vie religieuse dans l’Anatolie grécoromaine. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1982. ix, 476 p.