«China-Vietnam-India» format in the South-China sea in the context of regional security

Cover Page

Cite item


This article is devoted to the role of the territorial dispute in the South China sea in relations between China, Vietnam and India in the regional subsystem of Southeast Asia. The regional space under consideration is characterized by high economic dynamism and active integration processes, including participation of non-regional actors. Particular importance is attached to the positions of the three States on fundamental aspects that have a destructive impact on the development of regional processes. Attention is paid to the conceptualization of the policy of the three States in the waters of this sea. Following consideration of the problems the authors conclude that the intersection of the interests of the three countries in this sea threatens to exacerbate the fragility of the political and strategic landscape of the regional subsystem, registration open, but citizenries order on the space of the SCS. The article notes that the confrontational tone in relations between China, Vietnam and India brings with it many threats, in particular the clash of state interests in the energy plane, the arms race between the three nuclear powers (USA, India, China), which was accompanied by increased military presence of non-regional player (USA) in the region, complicated by territorial and historical conflicts.

About the authors

Tatyana I. Ponka

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

Author for correspondence.
Email: ponka-rudn@mail.ru

PhD (History), associate professor, Department of theory and history of international relations

6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow, 117198, Russia

Nikita S. Kuklin

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

Email: kuklin-ns@rudn.ru

Assistant Professor, Department of theory and history of international relations

6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow, 117198, Russia

Ivan R. Dubrovsky

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

Email: 1032171352@rudn.ru

Applicant at the Department of theory and history of international relations

6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow, 117198, Russia


  1. The 29th ASEAN Ministerial Meeting (AMM), Jakarta, Indonesia, 20–21 July 1996. ASEAN Documents Series 1996–1997. URL: https://asean.org/?static_post=table-of-contents-asean-documents-series-1996-1997. [Аccessed: 23.06.2020]. (In Russ.).
  2. The 2002 Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea. Ocean Development and International Law, July 2003, Vol. 34, (3).
  3. Zolotukhin I.N. Territorial’nye spory v Yuzhno-Kitajskom more: sovremennoe sostoyanie problem. Izvestiya Vostochnogo instituta. 2017. (4) (36).
  4. ASEAN in crisis: Divided We Stagger. Economist, 18.08.2012. URL: http://www.economist.com/node/21560585 [Accessed: 23.06.2020]. (In Russ.).
  5. Statement of the Ministry of foreign Affairs of the people’s Republic of China on the decision of the Arbitration court in the South China sea case established at the request of the Republic of the Philippines] Ministry of foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China 12.07.2016. URL: https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/web/zyxw/t1379490. Shtml. [Аccessed: 03.07.2020]. (In Chin.).
  6. Hiebert M., Poling G.B. Examining the South China Sea Disputes. Center for Strategic and International Studies. 2015.
  7. Thayer C.A. Closer Look at the ASEAN+China Single Draft South China Sea Code of Conduct. The Diplomat, August 03, 2018. URL: https://thediplomat.com/2018/ 08/a-closer-look-at-the-asean-china-single-draft-south-china-sea-code-of-conduct. [Аccessed: 23.06.2020].
  8. China hopes to complete talks on S. China Sea COC in 3 years. China Daily, 13 November 2018. URL: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201811/13/WS5beaae29 a310eff303 2886fc.html. [Аccessed: 23.06.2020].
  9. Ponka T.I., Belchenko A.S., Trusova A.A. The dual-track approach of the PRC to the resolution of disputes in the South China Sea. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 2017, 17 (3).
  10. Lokshin G.M. Yuzhno-Kitajskoe more: ostrova razdora. Аziya i Аfrika segodnya. 2015. (9).
  11. Roberts C.B. The South China Sea Precedent: Rising Instability Amidst Revisionist Tendencies. S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. 2018. 07 August. URL: https://www.rsis.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CO18133.pdf.
  12. Shen J.M. China’s Sovereignty over the South China Sea Islands: A Historical Perspective. Chinese Journal of International Law, Vol. 1, (1), 2002.
  13. Ye Zicheng. China big strategy. Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexue chuban she,2003. (In Chin.).
  14. Holmes J.R., Yoshihara T. Chinese Naval Strategy in the 21st Century: The Turn to Mahan. London and New York: Routledge, 2008.
  15. Law of the people’s Republic of China on the territorial sea and adjacent zone. Official website of the NPC. URL: http://www.npc.gov.cn/wxzl/wxzl/2000-12/05/ content_4562.htm. [Аccessed: 23.06.2020]. (In Chin.).
  16. Mosyakov D.V., Shpakovskaya M.А., Chang Vu Tkhui. V’etnam i ego otnosheniya s Kitaem, SSHА i Rossiej. Yugo-Vostochnaya Аziya: aktual’nye problemy razvitiya. 2019, (4). (45).
  17. Miku Oishi & Nguyen Minh Quang. Brothers in Trouble: China-Vietnam Territorial Disputes and Their Bilateral Approach to Conflict Management. International Journal of China Studies Territorial Disputes Vol. 8, (3), December 2017.
  18. Thêm bằng chứng khẳng định Hoàng Sacủa Việt Nam [Additional evidence that the Paracel Islands belong to Vietnam]. URL: www.vietnamnet.vn от 25 июля 2012. [Аccessed: 23.06.2020].
  19. Luật biển Việt Nam [Law of the sea of Vietnam] Quốc hội nước Cộng hòa xã hội chủ nghĩa Việt Nam khóa XIII, kỳ họp thứ 3. 21.06.2012. [XIII National Assembly of the SRV, 3rd Session]. URL: https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Giao-thong-Van-tai/ Luat-bien-Viet-Nam-2012-143494.aspx. [Аccessed: 24.06.2020].
  20. Luật Cảnh sát biển Việt Nam [The law on Vietnamese maritime police] Quốc hội nước Cộng hòa xã hội chủ nghĩa Việt Nam khóa XIV, kỳ họp thứ 6. [XIV National Assembly of the SRV, 6th Session] 19.11.2018. URL: https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Bo-may-hanh-chinh/Luat-Canh-sat-bien-Viet-Nam-2018-329798.aspx. [Аccessed: 24.06.2020]. (In Russ.).
  21. Soobshhestvo АSEАN v sovremennom mire. Ed. G.M. Lokshin, E.V. Kobelev, V.M. Mazyrin. M.: ID «FORUM», 2019.
  22. Lê Văn Mỹ. Ngoại giao Trung Quốc trong quá trình trỗi dậy và những vấn đề đặt ra cho Việt Nam [Le Wan Mu. Chinese diplomacy in the process of recovery and challenges for Vietnam] Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences, 2013.
  23. Trả lời phỏng vấn của Thứ trưởng Ngoại giao Phạm Quang Vinh về Bộ quy tắc ứng xử ở Biển Đông [Interview with Deputy foreign Minister Pham Quang Vinh on the Code of conduct in the South China sea]. URL: http://www.mofahcm.gov.vn/mofa/nr 040807104143/nr040807105039/ns120701214140. [Аccessed: 27.06.2020].
  24. Yadav D. «Look East» to «Act East»: India’s Policy Shift or «Old Wine»? India and China: Constructing A Peaceful Order in the Indo-Pacific. ed. by Gurpreet S. Khurana, Antara Ghosal Singh. New Delhi: National Maritime Foundation. 2016.
  25. Lebedeva N.B. Indijskij okean: vyzovy XXI v. i Indiya [ocherki mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenij] otv. red. T.L. SHaumyan. M.: IV RАN. 2018.
  26. Koda Y. Maritime Security in the Region: SCS and ECS as Key Arenas for Converging Political Interests. Asia-Pacific Review, Vol. 23, (2), 2016.
  27. Freedom to Use the Seas: India’s Maritime Military Strategy. Integrated Headquarters, Ministry of Defence (Navy), 2007.
  28. Holmes, James R., Winner, Andrew C. and Toshi Yoshihara. Indian Naval Strategy in the Twenty-First Century. Abingdon: Routledge, 2009.
  29. Indian Maritime Doctrine 2009. URL: https://www.indiannavy.nic.in/sites/default/ files/Indian-Maritime-Doctrine-2009-Updated-12Feb16.pdf. [Аccessed: 01.07.2020].
  30. Mehta S. Changing Roles of Navies in the Contemporary World Order with Specific Reference to the Indian Navy. Journal of Defence Studies, Vol. 3, (2), April 2009.
  31. Nguyễn Xuân Linh. Một số vấn đề cơ bản về Luật biển quốc tế. NXB Tp. HCM [Nguyen Xuan Linh. Some main issues of international law of the sea. Ho Chi Minh: International publishing house]. 1995.
  32. Prakash SV. Media Briefing by Official Spokesperson on EAM’s visit to Hanoi Ministry of External Affairs of India. September 15, 2011. URL: https://www.mea.gov.in/media-briefings.htm?dtl/2951/media+briefing+by+official+ spokesperson+on+eams+visit+to+hanoi. [Аccessed: 27.06.2020].
  33. Huong Le Thu. China’s dual strategy of coercion and inducement towards ASEAN. The Pacific Review, 2019, Vol. 32, (1).
  34. Scott D. India’s role in the South China Sea: Geopolitics and geoeconomics in play’, India Review, 2013. Vol. 12, (2).
  35. World oil transit chokepoints. U.S. Energy Information Administration. 25.07.2017. URL: https://www.eia.gov/international/content/analysis/special_topics/World_Oil_ Transit_Chokepoints/wotc.pdf. [Аccessed: 26.06.2020].
  36. Saha P. India and the South China Sea Dispute. India and China: Constructing A Peaceful Order in the Indo-Pacific. ed. by Gurpreet S Khurana, Antara Ghosal Singh. New Delhi: National Maritime Foundation. 2016.
  37. Lokshin G.M. V’etnamo-kitajskie otnosheniya: tiraniya geografii i zdravyj smysl. Yugo-Vostochnaya Аziya: aktual’nye problemy razvitiya. 2013.
  38. We’ll send force to protect our interests in South China Sea, says Navy chief. The Hindu. December 03, 2012. URL: https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/ We%E2%80%99ll-send-force-to-protect-our-interests-in-South-China-Sea-says-Navy-chief/article124332 24ece. (Аccessed: 29.06.2020).
  39. Statement by the government of the people’s Republic of China on China’s territorial sovereignty and Maritime rights and interests in the South China sea/ State Council of the people’s Republic of China. 12.07.2016. URL: http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2016-07/12/content_5090631.htm. [Аccessed: 26.06.2020]. (In Chin.).
  40. Scott D. India’s Incremental Balancing in the South China Sea. E-international Relations. July 26, 2015. URL: https://www.e-ir.info/2015/07/26/indias-incremental-balancing-in-the-south-china-sea/. [Аccessed: 29.06.2020].
  41. MacDoland J., Donahue A., Danyluk B. Energy Futures in Asia. Booz Allen Hamilton report sponsored by the Director of Net Assessment. Department of Defence. Wash., D.C., November 2004.

Copyright (c) 2020 Ponka T.I., Kuklin N.S., Dubrovsky I.R.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies