Email this article 
Holy Union in modern Russian historiography
- Authors: Zhidkova O.V.1, Popova E.A.2
-
Affiliations:
- Odintsovo Campus of the Moscow State Institute of International Relations MFA of Russia
- Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
- Issue: Vol 11, No 3 (2019)
- Pages: 235-246
- Section: HISTORIOGRAPHICAL STUDY
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/world-history/article/view/23262
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8127-2019-11-3-235-246
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article analyzes the research of modern Russian historians on the problems associated with the emergence, activity and significance of the Holy Union as an interstate Association of the first half of the XIX century. The study, analysis and evaluation of the Holy Union were engaged in scientists and pre-revolutionary and Soviet periods. But their conclusions were largely determined by the political and ideological features of the two periods of the Russian state. The modern Russian historiography of the Holy Union is characterized by the rejection of both the assessments of historians of tsarist Russia praising Imperial decisions and those explaining the activities of the Holy Union from the reactionary positions of historians of the Soviet period. At the present stage of Russian historical science, due to the absence of ideological restrictions and the involvement of a wide range of archival sources, scientists continue to study the Holy Alliance as an integral part of the Vienna system of international relations of the first half of the XIX century, and as an independent Association of European States. At the same time, in the works of Russian scientists, the Holy Union is considered and evaluated the personal and religious factors of this organization.
About the authors
Oxana Vital'evna Zhidkova
Odintsovo Campus of the Moscow State Institute of International Relations MFA of Russia
Author for correspondence.
Email: jidkova.ov@mail.ru
PhD (in History), associate professor of the Department of regional management and national policy
3 Novo-Sportivnaya St., Odintsovo, 143007, RussiaElena Anatol'evna Popova
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Email: e-popova@yandex.ru
PhD (in History), Associate Professor of the Department of World History
6 Miklukho-Maklay St., Moscow, 117198, RussiaReferences
- Istorija vneshnej politiki Rossii. Pervaja polovina XIX v. (Ot vojn Rossii protiv napoleona do Parizhskogo mira 1856 g.). Moscow: Mezhdunar. otnoshenija, 1999. (In Russ.)
- Evropejskaja diplomatija i mezhdunarodnye processa jepohi napoleonovskih vojn: Nauchnoe izdanie. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 2012. (Serija “1812 god v istorii i kul’ture Rossii”). (In Russ.)
- Orlik O.V. Rossija v mezhdunarodnyh otnoshenijah 1815–1829 gg. (Ot Venskogo kongressa do Andrianopol’skogo mira). Moscow: Nauka, 1998. (In Russ.)
- Kudrjavceva E.P. Venskaja sistema mezhdunarodnyh otnoshenij i ee krushenie (1815– 1854 gody) // Novaja i novejshaja istorija. 2014. No. 4. Pp. 88–106. (In Russ.)
- Degoev V.V. Vneshnjaja politika Rossii i mezhdunarodnye sistemy: 1700–1918 gg. Moscow, 2004. (In Russ.)
- Parsamov V.S. Svjashhennyj sojuz i ego interpretatory // Rossija i sovremennyj mir. 2017. No. 4 (97). Pp. 45–60. (In Russ.)
- Bahturina A.Ju. Zarozhdenie i sushhnost’ idei Svjashhennogo Sojuza // Voprosy istorii. 1997. No. 4. Pp. 151–155. (In Russ.)
- Bahturina A.Ju. Svjashhennyj Sojuz: Rossija v sud’be Evropy // Rubezhi. 1998. No. 3–4. Pp. 54–62. (In Russ.)
- Jakovlev A.I. Ideologija Svjashhennogo Sojuza vo vneshnej i vnutrennej politike Rossii pervoj chetverti XIX v. // Sovremennaja nauchnaja mysl’. 2019. No. 2. Pp. 11–27. (In Russ.)
- Makarova T.A. Rol’ Aleksandra I v mezhdunarodnyh otnoshenijah i predposylki sozdanija Svjashhennogo Sojuza // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija 4: Istorija. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija. 2008. No. 1 (13). Pp. 164–169. (In Russ.)
- Andreev A.Ju. “Liturgika” Svjashhennogo sojuza: k voprosu o religioznyh vzgljadah Aleksandra I // Filaretovskij al’manah. 2016. No. 12. Pp. 123–154. (In Russ.)
- Andreev A.Ju. Imperator Aleksandr I, mitropolit moskovskij Filaret i idei Svjashhennogo sojuza // Filaretovskij al’manah. 2017. No. 13. Pp. 104–121. (In Russ.)
- Lenivihina N.O. Rossija na kongressah Svjashhennogo sojuza: Ahen, 1818 g. // Nauchnye dostizhenija: sbornik statej mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii. Rossija, Moskva, 26–27 fevralja 2016. Moscow, 2016. Pp. 102–112. (In Russ.)
- Lenivihina N.O. Dejatel’nost’ rossijskoj diplomatii po podgotovke kongressa Svjashhennogo Sojuza v Troppau (1820 g.) // Istorija Rossii: na perekrestke mnenij: sbornik nauchnyh statej po itogam III Mezhregional’nyh istoricheskih chtenij, posvjashhennyh pamjati professora B.S. Abalihina. Volgograd, 2007. S. 36–42. (In Russ.)
- Miroshnikova M.L. Diplomatija Francii i Rossii v 20-e gody XIX veka (franko-russkie otnoshenija na kongressah Svjashhennogo sojuza v Troppau-Lajbahe i Verone – 1820– 1822 gody): avtoreferat dis.. kand. ist. nauk. Moscow: MGU imeni M.V. Lomonosova, 1990. (In Russ.)
- Savel’eva O.A. Grecheskij patriot na sluzhbe Rossii. I.A. Kapodistrija i Svjashhennyj sojuz // Rossijskaja diplomatija v portretah. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija, 1992. Pp. 135–150. (In Russ.)
- Zhidkova O.V. Rossijsko-francuzskie otnoshenija v 20–40-e gg. XIX veka: avtoref. dis.. kand. ist. nauk. Moscow: RUDN University, 2007. (In Russ.)
- Zhidkova O.V. Rossijsko-francuzskie otnosheniya v 20–40-e gg. XIX veka: dis.. kand. ist. nauk. Moscow, 2007. 172 p.
- Zhidkova O.V. Vosstanie v Pol’she 1830–1831 gg. i diplomatija Rossii i Francii // Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Serija: Vseobshhaja istorija. 2015. No. 3. Pp. 70–78.
- Hazin A.L., Bogdanov S.V. Kommunikativnye instrumenty reshenija mezhdunarodnyh problem v dejatel’nosti kongressov Svjashhennogo Sojuza // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Serija 21: Upravlenie (gosudarstvo i obshhestvo). 2016. No. 4. Pp. 169–214.
- Kutejnikov A.E. Svjashhennyj Sojuz – pervaja v istorii stabil’naja mezhdunarodnaja struktura // Voprosy istorii. 2012. No. 4. Pp. 116–123.
