The Republic of Türkiye on the Eve of the Centenary: The Era of R.T. Erdogan
- 作者: Avatkov V.A.1, Sbitneva A.I.1
-
隶属关系:
- Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences
- 期: 卷 23, 编号 4 (2023): 100th Anniversary of the Republic of Türkiye: International Dimension
- 页面: 595-608
- 栏目: THEMATIC DOSSIER
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/view/37250
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2023-23-4-595-608
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NTHNRR
如何引用文章
详细
In 2023, the Republic of Türkiye celebrated its centenary. Standing at the head of republican Türkiye in 1923, the first president of the country, M.K. Ataturk, saw it as independent and free from logic imposed from outside. Nevertheless, Türkiye, whose history included both a pro-Western period and an open struggle against manifestations of the Western neocolonialism based on national interests, has experienced a series of ups and downs over a century-long period. Moreover, a new M.K. Ataturk appeared in its lifetime in the person of the ambitious R.T. Erdogan, who seeks to start the history of the country from scratch. The ideological and foreign policy foundations of Türkiye have undergone the greatest transformation in the last 100 years. Modern Ankara is approaching an important milestone in its history as an independent regional power and a leader who holds a confident course towards joining the “top league” - a group of world actors-members of the UN Security Council. The ideal of the president of the country is a neo-imperial Türkiye, combining the best practices of the past “Kemalism” and modern “neo-Ottomanism,” which is realized through the export of “Turkishness” and the promotion of Turkocentric ideologies into the world, supported by practical actions in a vast geographical space that goes far beyond Türkiye. The study concludes that over the long history of its existence, the Republic of Türkiye has developed a number of ideological and value concepts that serve as a support for the implementation of its foreign policy. As an anthropological state, Türkiye, like a human being, has primary - vital - and secondary needs, related to the perception of other international actors. At the same time, it is important that while the satisfaction of secondary needs is carried out by Ankara quite successfully, the replenishment of primary causes certain difficulties. The economic situation remains particularly difficult, which, in turn, is capable of affecting the general welfare of the state in the future, making it unstable amid general international environment and thereby provoking a certain “existential crisis.”
作者简介
Vladimir Avatkov
Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: v.avatkov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6345-3782
Dr. of Sc. (Political Sciences), Head, Department of the Middle and post-Soviet East
Moscow, Russian FederationAlina Sbitneva
Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: a_sbitneva@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9196-9348
Researcher, Department of the Middle and post-Soviet East Moscow, Russian Federation
参考
- Altun, F. (2022). Küresel belirsizlik çağında istikrarlaştırıcı güç Türkiye. Istanbul: Paradigma Yayınları.
- Avatkov, V. A. (2022). The outlines of the new world order and the aggressiveness of the West. Svobodnaya Mysl’, (4), 21-26. (In Russian).
- Avatkov, V. A., & Guzaerov, R. I. (2023). The Syria crisis in Turkey’s foreign policy. Pathways to Peace and Security, 1(64), 115-125. (In Russian). http://doi.org/10.20542/2307-1494-2023-1-111-125
- Batalov, E. Ya. (2019). Anthropology of International Relations. Moscow: Aspekt Press publ. (In Russian).
- Bdoyan, D. G. (2017). Russian-Turkish disagreements on the Middle East. Observer, (6), 23-33. (In Russian).
- Chmyreva, V. A. (2021). Ukraine, Turkey, Britain: Contours of interaction, challenges and opportunities for Russia. Post-Soviet Studies, 4(3), 226-233. (In Russian).
- Çakır, N. (2013). Türkiye’nin güvenliği ve terörizm. Ankara: Korza Yayıncılık.
- Davutoğlu, A. (2001). Stratejik derinlik. Türkiye’nin uluslararası konumu. İstanbul: Küre Yayınları.
- Demeshko, N. E., & Irkhin, A. A. (2022). The Republic of Türkiye and Ukraine: Using the Crimean Tatar question in foreign policy after 2014. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 22(4), 755-770. http://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-4-755-770
- Druzhilovsky, S. B. (2016). The Internal Causes of Political Instability in the Republic of Turkey. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 47(2), 15-21. (In Russian).
- Erdoğan, R. T. (2021). Daha adil bir dünya mümkün. Istanbul: Turkuvaz Kitap.
- Evstafiev, D. G., & Ilnicky, A. M. (2020). Assumptions about the world to come. Russia in Global Affairs, 18(4), 58-68. (In Russian).
- Guzaerov, R. I. (2022). A new era of Turkey’s Neighborhood Policy. International Relations, (2), 1-17. (In Russian). http://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0641.2022.2.37854
- Irkhin, A. A., & Moskalenko, O. A. (2021). “The World is Bigger than Five”. Turkey’s emergence as a global actor in world politics: Prospects and challenges for Russia. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 21(1), 91-107. (In Russian). http://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2021-21-1-91-107
- James, W. (1950). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Dover Publications.
- Karpat, H. K. (2019). Osmanlı’dan günümüze asker ve siyaset. İstanbul: Timaş Yayınları.
- Kireev, N. G. (2007). History of Turkey: 20th century. Moscow: Kraft+ publ. (In Russian).
- Krylov, D. S., & Ostanin-Golovnya, V. D. (2023). Non-Western models of democracy in the Arab East: Ideological and value aspects. Current Problems of Europe, (1), 289-319. (In Russian).
- Kurylev, K. P., & Yenokyan, A. V. (2023). Armenia as object of influence of Turkish policy of “soft power”: Difficulties, successes and prospects. Middle & Post-Soviet East, (1), 77-101. (In Russian).
- Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper and Row.
- Mayorova, M. A. (2022). The dichotomy of regional and global leadership in modern international relations on the example of Russia and Turkey. Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law, 15(3), 69-83. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31249/kgt/2022.03.04
- Mozloev, A. T. (2021). Russia, Turkey and Iran on the way to potential leadership in regional power. In M. G. Troyanskiy (Ed.), Eastern Almanac (pp. 73-78). Moscow: Kvant Media publ. (In Russian).
- Nadein-Raevskiy, V. A. (2017). Erdogan as an example of a charismatic politician. Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law, 10(6), 138-154. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2017-10-6-138-154
- Tsibenko, V. V. (2022). Constructing an ideological discourse of imaginative geography in Turkey. Journal of International Analytics, 13(3), 130-144. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2022-13-3-130-144
- Yilmaz, I., & Bashirov, G. (2018). The AKP after 15 years: Emergence of Erdoganism in Turkey. Third World Quarterly, 39(9), 1812-1830. http://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2018.1447371
补充文件
没有额外的文件显示