The Problem of the “Shiʻa Crescent” in the Middle East: A Quantitative Analysis

封面

如何引用文章

详细

The relevance of this research is due to the unabated interest of the international community in the struggle for regional leadership between Iran and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), which has unfolded in the Middle East for a number of years. The growing concerns of the KSA and its geopolitical allies, the United States and the small Arabian monarchies, related to the increasing influence of Iran on the military-political situation in Syria and Iraq, have raised in international discourse the question of the reality or impossibility of creating the so-called “Shiʻa crescent” under the auspices of Tehran. The idea is to unite the states of the Middle East, in which Shiʻa Muslims constitute the vast majority or a significant minority of the population, which would ensure Iran’s decisive victory in the race for dominance in the region. However, until now, the question of a quantitative assessment of the real resources of the states included in the “Shiʻa crescent” has so far remained out of researchers’ sight. In this regard, the aim of this article is to prove the absence of economic and military-political prerequisites for the formation of the “Shiʻa crescent” by using the method of quantitative indicators from databases, rankings and indices and a network analysis of conventional arms supplies within the “Sunni” and “Shiʻa” blocs. The databases of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), the World Trade Organization (WTO), the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the United Nations Register of Conventional Arms, the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), Doing Business, Human Capital, Global Firepower, Global Terrorism, and Global Peace rankings, as well as World Bank statistical reports served as an empirical basis for the research. The theoretical and methodological basis of the study was constructive realism, which takes into account both quantitative indicators and the ideological and value attitudes of the state in the analysis of international relations. The study showed that the “Shiʻa crescent” is a purely propaganda construct, and cannot become a real interstate association.

作者简介

Olga Chikrizova

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: chikrizova-os@rudn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1678-0967

PhD (History), Associate Professor, Department of Theory and History of International Relations

Moscow, Russian Federation

Natalia Ivkina

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

Email: ivkina-nv@rudn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8654-7629

PhD (History), Associate Professor, Department of Theory and History of International Relations

Moscow, Russian Federation

参考

  1. Balanche, F. (2021). From the Iranian corridor to the Shia crescent: Demography and politics. A Hoover Institution Essay, 1-11.
  2. Barkin, J. S. (2010). Realist constructivism: Rethinking International Relations theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Bröning, M. (2008). Don’t fear the Shiites: The idea of a Teheran-controlled “Shi’ite crescent” over the Greater Middle East. Is at odds with reality. IPG, (3), 60-75. Retrieved from https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/ipg/ipg-2008-3/06_a_broening_gb.pdf
  4. Chikrizova, O. S. (2017). “Oppressed - oppressors” dichotomy in Shi’ite perception of international relations. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 17(2), 279⸺289. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2017-17-2-279-289
  5. Chikrizova, O. S. (2021). Shi’ite non-state armed actors in the Middle East: Iraqi case. Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University. Social Sciences, (1), 74⸺85. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.52070/2500-347X_2021_1_842_74
  6. Chikrizova, O. S., & Morozova, N. N. (2020). Shi’ism in Morocco: Historical heritage and modernity. Asia and Africa Today, (5), 28⸺35. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31857/S032150750009547-3
  7. Donnelly, J. (2008). The Ethics of Realism. In C. Reus-Smit & D. Snidal (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international relations (pp. 150-162). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199219322.003.0008
  8. Druzhilovskii, S. B. (2016). Shi’ite crescent in the Middle East. Myth and reality. In Iran in the second decade of the 21st century: Challenges and prospects (pp. 52⸺57). Moscow: IV RAN publ.; Izdatel’ A.V. Vorob’ev publ. (In Russian).
  9. Itzhakov, D. (2018). Iran’s new anti-Israel resistance axis. BESA Center Perspectives Paper, (747), 1-4.
  10. Kelley, J. G., & Simmons, B. A. (2015). Politics by number: Indicators as social pressure in international relations. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 55-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12119
  11. Khazanov, A. M., & Gasratyan, S. M. (2021). The role of the “Shiʻite crescent” in the present situation in the Middle East (2000-2020). Russia and the Moslem World, (4), 111-119. (In Russian).
  12. Komleva, N. A. (2022). “Iranian square” against “Turkish triangle”. Bulletin of Moscow Region State University, (1), 116-132. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18384/2224-0209-2022-1-1106
  13. Kosach, G. G. (2013). Saudi Arabia: Power, Ulama and anti-system opposition (theological-political response to the opponents of the regime). Russia and the Moslem World, (1), 127⸺158. (In Russian).
  14. Kurshakov, V. Yu. (2012). Shiʻite factor in Iranian foreign policy. World Economy and International Relations, (11), 24-32. (In Russian).
  15. Lobell, S. E. (2017). Structural realism / Offensive and defensive realism. International Studies Association and Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.304
  16. Louër, L. (2009). Déconstruire le croissant chiite. Revue internationale et stratégique, 4(76), 45⸺54. https://doi.org/10.3917/ris.076.0045
  17. Louër, L. (2012). Shiism and politics in the Middle East. London: Hurst & Company.
  18. Louër, L. (2019). Sunnis and Shiʻa. A political history. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  19. Mabon, S. (2019). The end of the battle for Bahrain and the securitization of Bahraini Shiʻa. The Middle East Journal, 73(1), 29-50. https://doi.org/10.3751/73.1.12
  20. Mervin, S. (2007). Les mondes chiites et l’Iran. Paris: Khartala - Ifpo.
  21. Nisan, M. (2009). The Shiite strategic crescent and Israel. Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs, 3(1), 37⸺46. https://doi.org/10.1080/23739770.2009.11446349
  22. Pahlavi, P. (2008). Croissant chiite: fondements et limites. Canadian Political Science Association, 1-13.
  23. Pukhovaya, E. D. (2013). “Shi’ite crescent” as a modern geopolitical phenomenon: Virtual or real threat? (based on materials from the Al-Jazeera channel). Moscow University Bulletin of Oriental Studies, (4), 82⸺90. (In Russian).
  24. Sarab’ev, A. V. (2019). The Middle East Shiite arc: A real threat or geopolitical chimera? Moscow University Bulletin of World Politics, 11(2), 39⸺64. (In Russian).
  25. Shumilin, A. I. (2021). Middle East conflicts today: Between religion and geopolitics. World Eсonomy and International Relations, 65(1), 50-60. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-1-50-60
  26. Thual, F. (2007). Le croissant chiite: Slogan, mythe ou réalité ? Hérodote, 1(124), 107⸺117. https://doi.org/10.3917/her.124.0107

补充文件

没有额外的文件显示


版权所有 © Chikrizova O.S., Ivkina N.V., 2023

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名-非商业性使用 4.0国际许可协议的许可。

##common.cookie##