TRADE IN DATA: DIFFERENT APPROACHES, ONE REALITY

Cover Page

Abstract


The development of the digital economy and new technologies raises the question whether it is possible to consider personal data as a new economic asset. Provides an overview of the positions on this issue in foreign and domestic scholarships. Opinions range from recognition of trade in public values unacceptable to statements concerning a shadow data market. Based on a hypothetical assumption of data tradability, the authors examine approaches to the definition of personal data as an object of civil rights. The research paper demonstrates that possible obstacles to the introduction of economic data circulation can emerge from legislative formulations as well as from general legal approach to the regime of personal data defense. The research paper examines experience of different countries in providing legal conditions for the legitimate commercial processing the collected data. The article illustrates reasons why trade in personal data is not a threat to human information rights and explains how the problem of privacy defense can be resolved. The nascent experience of foreign countries suggests that profiting from data commerce requires to remove regulatory barriers, and at the same time to publicly accompany market processes, since the State remains the main guarantor of the rights of its citizens. Taking into account the current development of the Russian digital economy and the approach to understanding personal data as a social value, the authors present their own recommendations for the Russian legislator on realization of the data commercialization project. The article is prepared within the research work on the public order of the RANEPA.


About the authors

Olga S. Magomedova

Russian Foreign Trade Academy of the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: olga.magomedova.96@mail.ru
6 A Vorob'evskoe roadway, Moscow, 119285, Russian Federation

analyst, Center of responsible business conduct

Alexandra A. Koval

Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation

Email: koval-aa@ranepa.ru
82 Vernadskogo Prospect, Moscow, 119571, Russian Federation

junior researcher, Center Russia-OECD RANEPA

Antonina D. Levashenko

Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation

Email: antonina.lev@gmail.com
82 Vernadskogo Prospect, Moscow, 119571, Russian Federation

head, Center Russia-OECD RANEPA

References

  1. Braginskii, M.I., Vitryanskii, V.V. (2011) Dogovornoe pravo. Kniga vtoraya: dogovory o peredache imushchestva [Law of contracts. Second book: contracts for transfer of property] 2nd ed., Moscow, Statut Publ. (in Russian).
  2. Burri, M. (2017) “The Governance of data and data flows in trade agreements: The pitfalls of legal adaptation”, UC Davies Law Review. (51), 65–132.
  3. Duch-Brown, N., Martens, B., Mueller-Langer, F. (2017) The economics of ownership, access and trade in digital data. Digital economy working paper. JRC Technical Reports, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/sites/jrcsh/files/jrc104756.pdf (Accessed 15 April 2020).
  4. Drexl, J. (2017) “Designing competitive markets for industrial data between propertisation and access”, Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law. (8), 257–292.
  5. Emerich, Y. (2018) Les biens et l’immatérialité en droit civil et en common law. Les Cahiers de droit. 59 (2), 389–423, available at: https://www.erudit.org/en/journals/cd1/2018-v59-n2cd03792/1048586ar.pdf (Accessed 15 April 2020). (in French).
  6. Grishaev, S.P., Bogacheva, T.V., Svit, Ju.P. (2019) Postatejnyi Kommentarii k Grazhdanskomu Kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federacii. Chast' Pervaya. Material podgotovlen s ispol'zovaniem pravovyh aktov po sostojaniju na 17 avgusta 2019 goda [Article-by-article Commentary on the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Part one. The material based on legal acts as of August 17, 2019]. (in Russian).
  7. Janeček, V. (2018) Trade in data: constructive limits of personal data ownership, available at: https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/business-law-blog/blog/2018/05/trade-data-constructive-limitspersonal-data-ownership. (Accessed 15 April 2020).
  8. Hartmann P.M., Zaki, M., Feldmann, N., Neely, A. (2014) Big Data for big business? A taxonomy of data-driven business models used by start-up firms. Cambridge service alliance working paper, available at: https://cambridgeservicealliance.eng.cam.ac.uk/resources/ Downloads/Monthly%20Papers/2014_March_DataDrivenBusinessModels.pdf. (Accessed 15 April 2020).
  9. Heiko, W. (2017) Trading in data: an industry perspective. In Lohsse, S., Schulze, R., Staudenmayer, D. (eds.) Trading data in the digital economy: legal concepts and tools. Baden-Baden, Nomos, pp. 323–326.
  10. Heller, M.A. (1998) The tragedy of the anticommons: property in the transition from marx to markets. Harvard law journal, 111 (3), 621–688.
  11. Hoeren, T. (2013) Dateneigentum: versuch einer anwendung von § 303a StGB im zivilrecht, Multmedia and Recht. (8), 486–491, available at: https://www.itm.nrw/wp-content/uploads/Dateneigentum_MMR_2013_486-491.pdf. (Accessed 15 April 2020). Hoeren, T. (ed.) (2014) Big data und recht. München, C.H. Beck Verlag.
  12. Krasheninnikov, P.V. (ed.) (2011) Postateinyi kommentarii k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii, chasti vtoroi: v 3 t. [Article-by-article Commentary to the Civil Code of Russian Federation, Part two: in 3 volumes]. Moscow, Statut Publ, available at: http://pravo. sociolife.ru/docs/Codex/GC_komments_2_tom-1_Krasheninnikov_2011.pdf (Accessed 13 April 2020). (in Russian).
  13. Lametti, D. (2003) The concept of property: relations through objects of social wealth. Unversity of Toronto law journal. (53), 325–378.
  14. Prins, J. (2004) The propertization of personal data and identities. Electronic journal of comparative law. 8 (3), 1–7, available at: https://www.ejcl.org/83/art83-1.PDF. (Accessed 15 April 2020).
  15. Purtova, N. (2013) Illusion of Personal Data as No One's Property. Law, Innovation, and Technology. 7 (1), 83–111, available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2346693 (Accessed 15 April 2020).
  16. Purtova, N. (2018) The law of everything. Broad concept of personal data and future of EU data protection law, Law, Innovation and Technology. 10 (1), 40-81, available at: https://www. tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17579961.2018.1452176?scroll=top&needAccess=true (Accessed 15 April 2020).
  17. Regan, P. (2002) Privacy as a common good in the digital world. Information, Communication & Society. 5(3), 382–405.
  18. Savel'ev, A.I. (2019) Na puti k koncepcii regulirovanija dannyh v usloviyah cifrovoi jekonomiki. [On the way to the concept of data regulation in the digital economy]. Zakon [Law]. (4), 174–195. (in Russian).
  19. Schwartz, P.M., (2004) Property, privacy, and personal data. Harvard law review, 117 (7), 2055– 2128, available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=721642 (Accessed 15 April 2020).
  20. Stepanov, I. (2020) Introducing a property right over data in the EU: the data producer’s right — an evaluation. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology. 34 (1), 65–86, available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13600869.2019.1631621?src= recsys (Accessed 15 April 2020).
  21. Tene, O., Polonetsky, J. (2013) Big data for all: privacy and user control in the age of analytics. Northwestern journal of technology and intellectual property, (11), 239–273.
  22. Trofimova, T.V. (2005) Klassifikacija nematerial'nyh blag i ee pravovoe znachenie [Classification of non-material values and its legal meaning]. Grazhdanskoe pravo [Civil Law]. (3), 23– 24. (in Russian).
  23. Westin, A. (1967) Privacy and Freedom. New York, Atheneum Press.
  24. Yuh-Jzer, J., Shi-Cho, C. (2008) Online personal data licensing: regulating abuse of personal data in cyberspace. Hideyasu S. (ed.). Intellectual property protection for mulrimedia information technology. Japan, Ritsumeikan University, pp. 162–185.
  25. Zech, H. (2016) Data as a tradeable commodity. De Franceschi, A. (ed.). European contract law and the digital single market, implications of the digital revolution. Cambridge, Intersentia, pp. 51–80.

Statistics

Views

Abstract - 273

PDF (Russian) - 143

Cited-By


PlumX

Dimensions

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Magomedova O.S., Koval A.A., Levashenko A.D.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies