Narrative and Critical Imaginations in International Relations

Cover Page

Abstract


Narrative strategies have gained growing attention in IR. One key promise is mobilizing a diversity of interpretations and exploring the politics contestedness in ways that support the view of IR as focused on the multiplicity of the world(s) of international and global affairs. This article brings a broad map of the use of narrative approaches in IR and connects it with Edward Said’s notion of “worldliness” in order to highlight the political aspects of writing and representation within academia. It situates this “narrative turn” within the complexities of a broader context of crisis in Eurocentric forms of knowledge and representation. In addition, it reveals a double movement of scholarly disenchantment and re-enchantment that signals towards the productivity of intellectual unease about representational practices and the place of the “I” voice in academic writing. Bearing in mind these reactions and shared pursuit of a more empathetic relationship between researcher and researched, scholars and the public in general, teachers and students, I thus briefly tell the experience of openly discussing and practicing a narrative approach in the classroom and how students tended to engage (or not) with narrative as a way of making sense of their “I” in IR.


About the authors

Jessica da Silva C. De Oliveira

Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais

Author for correspondence.
Email: jessicascoliveira@gmail.com
Poços de Caldas, Brazil

PhD (International Relations), Lecturer, the Department of International Relations

References

  1. Anievas, A., Manchanda, N. & Shilliam, R. (Eds). (2015). Race and Racism in International Relations - Confronting the Global Colour Line. London & New York: Routledge.
  2. Bartelson, J. (1995). A Genealogy of Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Blaney, D. & Tickner, A. (2017). Worlding, Ontological Politics and the Possibility of Decolonial IR. Millenium: Journal of International Studies, 45 (3), 293-311. doi: 10.1177/0305829817702446
  4. Brigg, M. & Bleiker, R. (2010). Autoethnographic International Relations: Exploring the Self as a Source of Knowledge. Review of International Studies, 36 (3), 779-798. doi: 10.1017/S0260210510000689
  5. Campbell, D. (1992). Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  6. Campbell, D., Bialasiewics, L., Elden, S., Graham, S., Jeffrey, A. & Williams, A.J. (2007). Performing Security: The Imaginative Geographies of Current US Strategy. Political Geography, 26, 405-422. DOI: 10.1016/ j.polgeo.2006.12.002
  7. Cohn, C. (1987). Sex and Death in the Rational World of Defense Intellectuals. Signs, 12 (4), 687-718.
  8. Dauphinee, E. (2010). The Ethics of Autoethnography. Review of International Studies, 36 (3), 799-818. doi: 10.1017/S0260210510000690
  9. Dauphinee, E. (2007). The Ethics of Researching War: Looking for Bosnia. Manchester University Press.
  10. Dauphinee, E. (2013a). Critical Methodological and Narrative Developments in IR: a Forum. URL: https://thedisorderofthings.com/2013/03/12/critical-methodological-and-narrative-developments-in-ir-a-forum/ (accessed: 11.11.2016)
  11. Dauphinee, E. (2013b). The Politics of Exile. London & New York: Routledge.
  12. Dauphinee, E. (2013c). Writing as Hope: Reflections on the Politics of Exile. Security Dialogue, 44 (4), 347-361. doi: 10.1177/0967010613492838
  13. Dauphinee, E. (2015). Narrative Engagement and the Creative Practices of International Relations. In: Steele, B.J. & Amoureux, J. (Eds.). Reflexivity and International Relations: Positionality, Critique, and Practice. London: Routledge. P. 44-60.
  14. De Oliveira, J. da S.C. (2020). Postcolonial Maghreb and the Limits of IR. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  15. Der Derian, J. & Shapiro, M. (Eds.). (1989). International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics. Lexington, MA: Lexington.
  16. Doty, R.L. (2004). Maladies of Our Souls: Voice and the Writing of Academic International Relations. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 17 (2), 377-392. doi: 10.1080/0955757042000245951
  17. Doty, R.L. (2010). Autoethnography - Making Human Connections. Review of International Studies, 36 (3), 1047-1050. doi: 10.1017/S026021051000118X
  18. Enloe, C. (2004). The Curious Feminist: Searching for Women in a New Age of Empire. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  19. Enloe, C. (2014). Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  20. Fanon, F. (1963/2004). The Wretched of the Earth. New York: Grove Weidenfeld.
  21. Foucault, M. (1969/1984). What is an Author? In: Rabinow, P. (Eds.). The Foucault Reader. New York: Pantheon Books. P. 101-120.
  22. Giroux, H.A. (2004). Edward Said and the Politics of Worldliness: Toward a “Rendezvous of Victory”. Cultural Studies/Critical Methodologies, 4 (3), 339-349. doi: 10.1177/1532708603262783
  23. Henderson, E.A. (2013). Hidden in Plain Sight: Racism in International Relations Theory. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 26 (1), 71-92. doi: 10.1080/09557571.2012.710585
  24. Inayatullah, N. & Blaney, D. (2004). International Relations and the Problem of Difference. New York/London: Routledge.
  25. Inayatullah, N. (2011). Falling and Flying: an Introduction. In: Inayatullah, N. (Eds.). Autobiographical International Relations - I, IR. London & New York: Routledge. P. 1-12.
  26. Jackson, P.T. (2011). The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations. London & New York: Routledge.
  27. Krishna, S. (1993). The Importance of Being Ironic: A Postcolonial View on Critical International Relations Theory. Alternatives, 18, 385-417. doi: 10.1177/030437549301800306
  28. Luceli, C. & Sula, E. (2016). Survival ‘Beyond Positivism’? The Debate on Rationalism and Reflectivism in International Relations Theory. Politikon Journal of Political Science, 30, 43-55. doi: 10.22151/politikon.30.3
  29. Malmvig, H. (2006). State Sovereignty and Intervention: A Discourse Analysis of Interventionary and Non-Interventionary Practices in Kosovo and Algeria. London & New York: Routledge
  30. Mignolo, W. (2008). The Geopolitics of Knowledge and the Colonial Difference. In: Moraña, M., Dussel, E. & Jáuregui, C.A. (Eds.). Coloniality at Large - Latin America and the Postcolonial Debate. Durham & London: Duke University Press. P. 225-258
  31. Milliken, J. (1999). The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods. European Journal of International Relations, 5 (2), 225-254. doi: 10.1177/1354066199005002003
  32. Moulin, C. (2016). Narrative. In: Mhurchú, A.N. & Shindo, R. (Eds). Critical Imaginations in International Relations. London/New York: Routledge. P. 136-152.
  33. Muppidi, H. (2013). Reflections on Narrative Voice. URL: https://thedisorderofthings.com/2013/03/23/reflections-on-narrative-voice/ (accessed: 07.05.2017).
  34. Park-Kang, S. (2015). Fictional IR and Imagination: Advancing Narrative Approaches. Review of International Studies, 41 (2), 361-381. doi: 10.1017/S0260210514000291
  35. Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.
  36. Said, E. (1983). The World, the Text and the Critic. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  37. Said, E. (1994). Culture and Imperialism. New York: Vintage Books.
  38. Said, E. (2001). Beginnings. In: Viswanathan, G. (Eds.). Power, Politics, and Culture - Interviews with Edward W. Said. New York: Vintage Books. P. 3-38.
  39. Sartre, J. P. (1963/2004). Preface. In: Fanon, F. The Wretched of the Earth. New York: Grove Weidenfeld. P. xliii-lxii.
  40. Shapiro, M. (1989). Textualizing Global Politics. In: Der Derian, J. & Shapiro, M. (Eds.). International/Intertextual Relations - Postmodern Readings of World Politics. New York: Lexington Books. P. 11-22.
  41. Shindo, R. (2012). Rethinking Community: Translation Space as a Departure from Political Community. International Political Sociology, 6 (2), 149-164. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-5687.2012.00156.x
  42. Smith, L.T. (1999). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous People. London & New York: Zed Books.
  43. Suganami, H. (2008). Narrative Explanation and International Relations: Back to Basics. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 37 (2), 327-356. doi: 10.1177/0305829808097643
  44. Vitalis, R. (2005). Birth of a Discipline. In: Long, D. & Schmidt, B.C. (Eds.). Imperialism and Internationalism in the Discipline of International Relations. New York: SUNY Press. P. 159-181.
  45. Vrasti, W. (2010). Dr. Strangelove or How I Learned to Stop Worrying about Methodology and Love Writing. Millenium: Journal of International Studies, 39 (1), 79-88. doi: 10.1177/0305829810371017
  46. Vrasti, W. (2017). Ethnography/Autoethnography/Autobiography. In: Guillaume, X. & Bilgin, P. (Eds.). Routledge Handbook of International Political Sociology. London/New York: Routledge. P. 272-280.
  47. Walker, R.B.J. (1993). Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  48. Weber, C. (2001). International Relations Theory: A Critical Introduction. London/New York: Routledge.
  49. Wibben, A.T.R. (2011). Feminist Security Studies: A Narrative Approach. New York: Routledge.

Statistics

Views

Abstract - 592

PDF (English) - 297

Cited-By


PlumX

Dimensions


Copyright (c) 2020 De Oliveira J.C.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies