The Chinese view on the Ukranian factor in the international policy


Cite item

Abstract

The relevance of the research topic is due to the current situation on the territory of Ukraine, which is characterized by extraordinary tension and confrontation between Russia and the countries of the collective West. The purpose of the study is to determine the Ukrainian factor in international policy and the position of the People’s Republic of China. This work is based on clerical, statistical and journalistic sources. This study is based on the theory of political realism, suggesting constant competition of states defending their national interests. In the process of research the author widely uses institutional, analytical and problem-chronological methods. The main conclusions of the study are the establishment of the main causes of the emergence of the Ukrainian crises, starting from the first years of independence of the state, the identification of Ukraine as an important outpost of the USA and its allies in the region of Eastern Europe, identifying the impact of the Ukrainian crisis of 2022 on international relations in general and specific countries, discovering the implementation of the process of transition from a unipolar world order led by the USA to a multipolar, identifying the reasons for non-interference in the conflict on the territory of Ukraine, which include the assessment of the northern Black Sea Region by the People’s Republic of China as a region meeting strictly economic interests, characterization of the special military operation as an aspect that forced the process of changing the geopolitical situation.

About the authors

Yiping Xie

Yan’an University

Author for correspondence.
Email: xieyiping@yau.edu.cn
Ph.D in history, senior lecturer of the faculty of history 716000, People’s Republic of China, Yan’an, Shaanxi Province, Baota District

References

  1. Belaschenko DA, Voinov AA. Influence of Euromaidan and its consequences on the political regime of Ukraine. Development of political institutions and processes: foreign and national experience. 2019;205–211.
  2. Nadtoka TB, Matveev NV. Gini coefficient in the context of the assessment of the level and quality of life. Development of Territorial Socio-Economic Systems: Theory and Practice. 2016;34–36.
  3. Drobysheva TV. The Ukrainian Conflict: Origins and Dynamics. Politics and Society. 2018;(3):54–61.
  4. Aladyina NV. Ukrainian policy towards NATO joining. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations. 2008;(2):54–61.
  5. Kuimova A, Siemon TW. Russia and Black Sea security. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. 2018.
  6. Kurylev KP. The Ukraine factor in international security: regional and global levels. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations. 2014;(2):12–22.
  7. Vorontsov AV. The DPRK’s position on Russia’s special military operation in Ukraine. Institute of Oriental Studies RAS. 2022;(13):32–35.
  8. Cooley A, Nexon D. How Hegemony Ends. Russia in global affairs. 2020;(18):137–152.
  9. Degterev DA, Ramich MS, Tsvyk AV. “Power transition” and the Outlines of “Conflict Bipolarity”. Vestnik RUDN. International relations. 2021;(2):210–231.
  10. Li N. Chinese Factor in Changing Geopolitical Reality (1991–2022). International relations. 2023;(3):47–61.
  11. Liu X. Policy of the People’s Republic of China in the Black Sea Region (1976–2022). International relations. 2023;(1):20–31.

Copyright (c) 2024 Xie Y.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies