<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of World History</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of World History</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Всеобщая история</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2312-8127</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2312-833X</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">22484</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2312-8127-2019-11-2-117-135</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Ideas and politics in history</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Идеи и политика в истории</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Antidote to Civil War? European ‘small states’ and political legitimacy during World War II</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Противоядие от гражданской войны? Малые государства Европы и политическая легитимность во время Второй мировой войны</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Stefanidis</surname><given-names>Ioannis D.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Стефанидис</surname><given-names>Иоаннис Д.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>ids@law.auth.gr</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">School of Law, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Школа права, Университет Аристотеля</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2019-12-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>12</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">VOL 11, NO2 (2019)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 11, №2 (2019)</issue-title><fpage>117</fpage><lpage>135</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2019-12-23"><day>23</day><month>12</month><year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2019, Stefanidis I.D.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2019, Стефанидис И.Д.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2019</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Stefanidis I.D.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Стефанидис И.Д.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/world-history/article/view/22484">https://journals.rudn.ru/world-history/article/view/22484</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The experience of European small states involved in World War II varied widely. Not all of them entered the war as victims of aggression, and even those that did so did not necessarily share the same dire consequences of warfare and/or foreign occupation; they also exited the war in, sometimes dramatically diﬀerent ways: a number of small states entered the post-war period relatively peacefully, other were plunged into civil war, while a third category experienced a measure of unrest short of civil strife. It is argued in this paper that, among the factors inﬂuencing the outcome of a European small state’s involvement in World War II, the political legitimacy of its government should not be underestimated. The impact of this factor was particularly felt during the sensitive transition period from war and/or occupation into peacetime. Reinterpreting existing material, it is further argued that, during the war, democratic legitimacy increasingly appeared to guarantee a safer ground for both withstanding wartime travails and achieving a relatively smooth restoration of free national institutions, without the risk of civil war.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Опыт малых европейских государств, вовлеченных во Вторую мировую войну, весьма различен. Не все они вступили в войну как жертвы агрессии, и даже те, кто был вовлечен в нее подобным образом, не обязательно испытали на себе все тяжести военного времени и иностранной оккупации. Их развитие после окончания войны также весьма разнится: для некоторых послевоенный период был относительно мирным, другие оказались втянутыми в гражданскую войну, для третьих этот период охарактеризовался непродолжительными гражданскими волнениями. В данной статье автор утверждает, что среди факторов, повлиявших на исход участия малых европейских государств во Второй мировой войне, нельзя недооценивать фактор политической законности их правительств. Влияние этого фактора особенно ощущалось во время чувствительного перехода от войны и/или оккупации к мирному времени. Автор приходит к выводу, что во демократическая легитимность в значительной степени способствовала преодолению тягот послевоенного времени и относительно плавному восстановлению свободных государственных институтов без риска гражданской войны.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>World War II</kwd><kwd>Europe</kwd><kwd>small states</kwd><kwd>legitimacy</kwd><kwd>legitimation</kwd><kwd>transition</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Вторая мировая война</kwd><kwd>Европа</kwd><kwd>малые государства</kwd><kwd>легитимность</kwd><kwd>легитимизация</kwd><kwd>переход</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>S. S. Wolin. Max Weber: Legitimation, Method, and the Politics of Theory, in William Connolly (ed.), Legitimacy and the State, Oxford: Blackwell, 1984, 75.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>R. Bendix. Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait’, London: Methuen, 1966.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>J. Habermas. Legitimation Crisis (tr. by Thomas McCarthy). Boston: Beacon Press, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>P. Lagrou. The Legacy of Nazi Occupation: Patriotic Memory and National Recovery in Western Europe, 1945-1965. Cambridge: C.U.P., 2000.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>M. Conway, P. Romijn. Introduction//Contemporary European History. Vol. 13, No. 4, Theme Issue: Political Legitimacy in Mid-Twentieth Century Europe (Nov., 2004).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>M. Pittaway, H.-F. Dahl. Legitimacy and the Making of the Post-War Order, in Conway and Romijn, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>M. Conway, P. Romijn (eds.). The War for Legitimacy in Politics and Culture 1936-1946. Oxford: Berg, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>P. Romijn, B. Frommer. Legitimacy in Inter-War Europe, in Martin Conway - Peter Romijn, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>M. Vincent, E. Carter. Culture and Legitimacy, in Martin Conway - Peter Romijn, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>P. Romijn, M. Conway, D. Peschanski. National Legitimacy - Ownership, Pretenders and Wars, in Martin Conway - Peter Romijn, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>R. Overy. Scandinavia in the Second World War, in J. Gilmour and J. Stephenson Hiltler’s Scandinavian legacy, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>A. Little. Conclusion, in J. Gilmour and J. Stephenson ‘Hiltler’s Scandinavian legacy, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>M. Conway. The sorrows of Belgium: liberation and political reconstruction, 1944-1947. Oxford, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>N. Wouters, N. Olesen, M. Conway. The war for legitimacy at the local level, in M. Conway, P. Romijn, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Political Intelligence Report on the Netherlands to the Supreme Headquarters, Allied Forces Europe, 31 March 1945, quoted in William I. Hitchcock, Liberation: The Bitter Road to Freedom, Europe 1944-1945, New York: Free Press, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
