<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Structural Mechanics of Engineering Constructions and Buildings</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Structural Mechanics of Engineering Constructions and Buildings</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Строительная механика инженерных конструкций и сооружений</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">1815-5235</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2587-8700</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">29952</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/1815-5235-2021-17-4-366-378</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Analytical and numerical methods of analysis of structures</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Аналитические и численные методы расчета конструкций</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Study on overstrength and ductility of reinforced concrete building with different infill through nonlinear analysis</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Исследование сверхпрочности и пластичности железобетонного здания с различным заполнением с помощью нелинейного анализа</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9483-5652</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Chaulagain</surname><given-names>Hemchandra</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Чаулагейн</surname><given-names>Хемчандра</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Assistant Professor of the School of Engineering</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доцент Инженерной школы</p></bio><email>hchaulagain@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0574-6181</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Giri</surname><given-names>Ram</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Гири</surname><given-names>Рам</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>student, School of Engineering</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>студент, Инженерная школа</p></bio><email>er.ramgiri@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Pokhara University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Университет Покхары</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2021-12-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>12</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">VOL 17, NO4 (2021)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 17, №4 (2021)</issue-title><fpage>366</fpage><lpage>378</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2022-01-10"><day>10</day><month>01</month><year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2021, Chaulagain H., Giri R.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2021, Чаулагейн Х., Гири Р.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2021</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Chaulagain H., Giri R.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Чаулагейн Х., Гири Р.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/structural-mechanics/article/view/29952">https://journals.rudn.ru/structural-mechanics/article/view/29952</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p style="text-align: justify;">The building structure with infill wall shows higher global stiffness along with the uncertain behaviour during 2015 Gorkha earthquake. It significantly increased the collapse rate of structures during earthquakes. The response of buildings with different infills during seismic excitations is not completely accounted by current seismic codes in the region. On the other hand, due to the different geological region, availability of infill materials for reinforced concrete building also differs on region to region. In most of the situations the burnt clay brick, concrete blocks and stone block are used as infill materials during building construction. In this scenario, this study explores the importance of selection of right infill material for better seismic performance during earthquakes. For this, building constructed at Pokhara Metropolitan City is considered for case study. The structural model is prepared with and without considering infills. The solid, hollow concrete block and clay brick masonry are taken as infill material during analysis. The structural behaviour during earthquakes is studied with non-linear static pushover. The result shows that the hollow concrete block masonry infill (INHB) shows better structural performance compared to other infill types.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p style="text-align: justify;">Конструкция здания с заполняющей стеной продемонстрировала более высокую общую жесткость наряду с ненадежным поведением во время землетрясения 2015 года в Горкхе. Это значительно увеличило скорость обрушения конструкций во время землетрясений. Реакция зданий с различным заполнением во время сейсмических волнений не полностью учитывается действующими сейсмическими нормами в регионе, а наличие заполнителей для железобетонного строительства различается от региона к региону. В большинстве случаев обожженный глиняный кирпич, бетонные блоки и каменные блоки используются в качестве заполнителей при строительстве зданий. В этом контексте исследуется важность выбора правильного заполняющего материала для улучшения сейсмических характеристик во время землетрясений. Рассматривается здание, построенное в столичном городе Покхара. Структурная модель составляется с учетом и без учета заполнения. Полнотелый, пустотелый бетонные блоки и кладка из глиняного кирпича при анализе принимаются в качестве заполнителя. Поведение конструкций во время землетрясений изучается с помощью нелинейного статического толчка. Результат показывает, что заполнители INHB демонстрируют лучшие структурные характеристики по сравнению с другими типами заполнителей.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>non-linear analysis</kwd><kwd>infill masonry</kwd><kwd>pushover curve</kwd><kwd>inter-storey drift</kwd><kwd>ductility factor</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>нелинейный анализ</kwd><kwd>заполнение кирпичной кладки</kwd><kwd>кривая вытеснения</kwd><kwd>межэтажный дрейф</kwd><kwd>коэффициент пластичности</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Chaulagain H., Rodrigues H., Silva V. Seismic risk assessment and hazard mapping in Nepal. Natural Hazards. 2015;78:583-602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1734-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Upreti B.N. Causes, consequences and future earthquake disaster in Nepal-insights from the 2015 Gorkha earthquake. Department of Geology, School of Mines, University of Zambia; 2015.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Chaulagain H., Rodrigues H., Jara J., Spacone E., Varum H. Seismic response of current RC buildings in Nepal: a comparative analysis of different design/construction. Engineering Structures. 2013;49:284-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.10.036</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Chen H., Xie Q., Li Z., Xue W., Liu K., et al. Seismic damage to structures in the 2015 Nepal earthquake sequences. Journal of Earthquake Engineering. 2016;21(4):1-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2016.1185055</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Barros M., Cavaco E.S., Neves L.A.C., Julio E.N. Effect of non-structural masonry brick infill walls on the robustness of a RC framed building severely damaged due to a landslide. Engineering Structures. 2019;180:274-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.027</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Kahn L.F., Hanson R.D. Infilled walls for earthquake strengthening. Journal of the Structural Division. 1979; 105(ST2):283-296.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Rodrigues H., Furtado A., Pouca N.V., Varum H., Barbosa A.R., et al. Seismic assessment of a school building in Nepal and analysis of retrofitting solutions. International Journal of Civil Engineering. 2018;16(S1):1573-1589. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40999-018-0297-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Crisafulli F., Carr A. Proposed macro-model for the analysis of infilled frame structure. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering. 2007;40(2):69-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.40.2.69-77</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Sugano S. State-of-the-art in techniques for rehabilitation of buildings. Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Mexico: Pergamon, Elsevier Science Ltd.; 1996.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>NPC. Nepal Earthquake 2015 Post Disaster Needs Assessment (vol. A). Government of Nepal, Nepal Planning Commission, Kathmandu; 2015.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>IS 2185. Concrete masonry specifications. Part 1. Solid and hollow concrete blocks. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards; 2005.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>NRA. Hollow concrete blocks manual for load bearing structures for houses that have been under the housing reconstruction programme. Kathmandu: Government of Nepal National Reconstruction Authority; 2019.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>IS 1077. Common burnt clay building bricks - specification. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards; 1992.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>NBC 109. Masonry unreinforced. Kathmandu: Government of Nepal Ministry of Physical Planning and Works, Department of Urban Development and Building Construction; 1994.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Elnashai A.S. Advanced inelastic static (pushover) analysis for earthquake applications. Structural Engineering and Mechanics. 2001;12(1):51-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/SEM.2001.12.1.051</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Kalkan E., Kunnath S.K. Assessment of current nonlinear static procedures for seismic evaluation of buildings. Engineering Structures. 2007;29(3):305-316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.04.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>ATC-40. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. Applied Technical Council, California Seismic Safety Commission, Report No. SSC 96-01. Redwood City; 1996.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>FEMA 356. Pre-standard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency; 2000</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Li J.H., Su R.K.L., Chandler A.M. Assessment of low-rise building with transfer beam under seismic forces. Engineering Structures. 2003;25(12):1537-1549. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00121-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Mwafy A.M., Elnashai A.S. Static pushover versus dynamic collapse analysis of RC buildings. Eng. Struct. 2001;23(5):407-424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00068-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>SeismoStruct. A computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structure. Available from: http//www.seismosoft. com (accessed: 25.02.2021).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Mander J.B., Priestley M.J.N., Park R. Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. J. Struct. Eng. 1998;114(8):1804-1826. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Martinez-Rueda J.E. Energy dissipation devices for seismic upgrading of RC structures. PhD Thesis. London: Imperial College, University of London; 1997.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Elnashai A.S., Elghazouli A.Y. Performance of composite steel/concrete members under earthquake loading. Part 1. Analytical model. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam. 1993;22:315-345.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Menegotto M., Pinto P.E. Method of analysis for cyclically loaded RC plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behaviour of elements under combined normal force and bending. In: Symposium on the Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well-Defined Repeated Loads. Zurich: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering; 1973. p. 15-22.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Filippou F.C., Popov E.P., Bertero V.V. Effects of bond deterioration on hysteretic behaviour of reinforced concrete joints. Report EERC 83-19. Berkeley: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California; 1983.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Crisafulli F.J. Seismic behavior of reinforced concrete structures with masonry infills. PhD Thesis. New Zealand: University of Canterbury; 1997.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Smyrou E., Blandon C., Antoniou S., Pinho R., Crisafulli F. Implementation and verification of a masonry panel model for nonlinear dynamic analysis of infilled RC frames. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. 2011;9(6):1519-1534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-011-9262-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Pinho R., Elnashai A.S. Dynamic collapse testing of a full-scale four storey RC frame. ISET Journal of Earthquake Engineering, Special Issue on Experimental Techniques. 2000;37(4):143-164.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Newmark N.M., Hall W.J. Earthquake spectra and design. Berkeley: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute; 1982.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Uang C.M., Bertero V.V. Earthquake simulation tests and associated studies of a 0.3 scale model of a six-story concentrically braced steel structure. Report No. UCB/EERC-86/10. Berkeley: University of California; 1986.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Elnashai A.S., Mwafy A.M. Overstrength and force reduction factor of multi story reinforced concrete building. The Structural Design of Tall Structure Building. 2002;11(5):329-335.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>ATC 34. A critical review of current approaches to earthquake resistant design. Redwood City: Applied Technical Council; 1995.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>IS 1893. Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures (part 1). New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards; 2002.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Eurocode 8. Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1. General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Brussels: CEN; 2004.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
