<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Sociology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Sociology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Социология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-2272</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2408-8897</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumamba</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">6484</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Unknown</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">The Issue of Objectivity in Social Sciences</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Проблема объективности в социальных науках</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kachkachishvili</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Качкачишвили</surname><given-names>Иаго</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Кафедра социологии и социальной работы; Тбилисский государственный университет; Tbilisi State University</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Кафедра социологии и социальной работы; Тбилисский государственный университет</p></bio><email>rudn@rudn.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Tbilisi State University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Тбилисский государственный университет</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2009-01-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>01</month><year>2009</year></pub-date><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">NO1 (2009)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">№1 (2009)</issue-title><fpage>5</fpage><lpage>16</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2016-09-07"><day>07</day><month>09</month><year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2009, Kachkachishvili</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2009, Социология</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2009</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Kachkachishvili</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Социология</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/6484">https://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/6484</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article is devoted to the analysis of the major approaches to the issue of objectivity pertaining to the humanities and offers different alternatives of its solution provided by the contemporary Western sociological thought.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Анализируются основные подходы к проблеме объективности гуманитарного знания, предлагаются различные варианты ее решения, имеющиеся в современной западной социологии.</p></trans-abstract><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. - M.: Progress, 1990.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вебер М. Избранные произведения. - М.: Прогресс, 1990.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dyurkgeim E. Metod Sotsiologii // Dyurkgeim E. Sotsiologiya. - M.: Kanon, 1995.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Дюркгейм Э. Метод Социологии // Дюркгейм Э. Социология. - М.: Канон, 1995.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bauman Z. Is there a postmodern sociology? // The Postmodern Turn (New Perspectives on Social Theory). Ed. by Steven Seidman. - Cambridge University Press, 1998.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bauman Z. Is there a postmodern sociology? // The Postmodern Turn (New Perspectives on Social Theory). Еd. by Steven Seidman. - Cambridge University Press, 1998.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bauman Z. Postmodernity, or Living with Ambivalence // Contemporary Social Theory. Ed. by Anthony Elliot. - Blackwell Publishers, 1999.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bauman Z. Postmodernity, or Living with Ambivalence // Contemporary Social Theory. Еd. by Anthony Elliot. - Blackwell Publishers, 1999.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Blumer H. Symbolic Interactionism. - Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Eagleton T. After Theory. - New York: Basic Books, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Garfinkel H. Studies in Ethnomethodology. - NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1967.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Harvey D.W. Explanation in Geography. - London: Edward Arnold, 1969.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Harvey D. Postmodernism // Contemporary Social Theory. Ed. by Anthony Elliot. - Blackwell Publishers, 1999.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Harvey D. Postmodernism // Contemporary Social Theory. Еd. by Anthony Elliot. - Blackwell Publishers, 1999.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Lyotard J-F. The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. - Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Mouzelis N. The Poverty of Sociological Theory // Sociology. - Vol. 27. - № 4. - November. - 1993.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rosaldo R. Subjectivity in social analysis // The Postmodern Turn (New Perspectives on Social Theory). Ed. by Steven Seidman. - Cambridge University Press, 1998.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rosaldo R. Subjectivity in social analysis // The Postmodern Turn (New Perspectives on Social Theory). Еd. by Steven Seidman. - Cambridge University Press, 1998.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Weber M. The Methodology of the Social Sciences. Edward Shils and Henry Finch (eds.) - New York: Free Press, 1949.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
