<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Sociology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Sociology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Социология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-2272</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2408-8897</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumamba</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">6415</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Unknown</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Intellectuals and the Authorities: the Role in the Velvet Revolution in Czechoslovakia (a sociologist's notes)</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Интеллектуалы и власть: заметки социолога о роли в «бархатной» революции в Чехословакии</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Petrusek</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Петрусек</surname><given-names>Милослав</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Кафедра социологииФакультет социальных наук; Институт социологических исследованийКарлов университет в Праге; Karlov University, Prague</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Кафедра социологииФакультет социальных наук; Институт социологических исследованийКарлов университет в Праге</p></bio><email>mpetrusek@seznam.cz</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Karlov University, Prague</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Институт социологических исследованийКарлов университет в Праге</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2011-02-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>02</month><year>2011</year></pub-date><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">NO2 (2011)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">№2 (2011)</issue-title><fpage>44</fpage><lpage>55</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2016-09-07"><day>07</day><month>09</month><year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2011, Petrusek</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2011, Социология</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2011</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Petrusek</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Социология</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/6415">https://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/6415</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article is devoted to the evaluation of the role and place of intellectuals in the ideological preparation of the Velvet revolution in Czechoslovakia in November, 1989. It examines the sociological conceptions of revolution, and their applicability to the analysis of the November events. In the analysis of the subsequent evolution of the Czech republic, the author notes the difficulties of the transition from a post-totalitarian society to the market economy, describes the social-economic system, which emerged as a result of the revolution, characterized by consumerism, domination of mass culture etc, which turned out to be a far cry from what the mass, carried away with a certain euphoria, had expected.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Статья посвящена оценке роли и места интеллектуалов в идеологической подготовке «бархатной» революции в Чехословакии в ноябре 1989 г. Рассматриваются социологические концепции революции, применимость их положений к анализу ноябрьских событий. Автор, анализируя последующее развитие Чехии, отмечает трудности перехода от посттоталитарного общества к рыночной экономике, описывает возникшую в результате революции социально-экономическую систему, характеризующуюся культом потребления, засильем массовой культуры и т.д., оказавшуюся далеко не такой, какой ее представляли «народные массы», которые испытывали определенную эйфорию по поводу будущего.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>intelligensia</kwd><kwd>intellectuals</kwd><kwd>the authorities</kwd><kwd>revolution</kwd><kwd>post-totalitarian society</kwd><kwd>consumption society</kwd><kwd>mass culture</kwd><kwd>human nature</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>интеллигенция</kwd><kwd>интеллектуалы</kwd><kwd>власть</kwd><kwd>революция</kwd><kwd>посттоталитарное общество</kwd><kwd>общество потребления</kwd><kwd>массовая культура</kwd><kwd>человеческая природа</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Adorno T., Horkheimer M. Dialektika osvícenství. - Praha, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Brockmann J. Třetí kultura: Za hranice vědecké revoluce. - Praha, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Dahrendorf R. Úvahy o revoluci v Evropě v dopise, který měl být zaslán jednomu pánovi ve Varšavě. - Praha, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Davies J. C. When Men Revolt and Why? - N.Y., 1971.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Edwards L. Natural History of Revolution. - Chicago, 1970.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Geertz C. Interpretace kultur. - Praha, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Harré R. Embarrassment: A Conceptual Analysis // Shyness and Embarrassment / Ed. by R. Crozier. - Cambridge, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Havel V. O lidskou identitu. - Hamburg, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Kloskowska A. Masová kultura. - Praha, 1967.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Lepenies W. Niebezpeczne powinowactwo z wyboru. - Warszava, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Malia M. Lokomotivy dějin. - Brno, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Petrusek M. Alternativní sociologie. - Praha, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Pipes R. Vlastnictví a svoboda. - Brno, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Skocpol T. States and Social Revolutions. - Cambridge, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Sorokin P. A. The Sociology of Revolution. - N.Y., 1967.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Tocqueville A de. Starý režim a revoluce. - Praha, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Welsch W. Estetyka poza estetyką. - Kraków, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Wilson E. O lidské přirozenosti: Máme svobodnou vůli nebo je naše chování řízeno genetickým kódem? - Praha, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Winock M. Le siecle des intelectuels. - Paris, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Ziólkowski M. Teoria spoleczna na poczatku XXI wieku // Wspólczesne teorie socjologiczne. Т I. - Warszawa, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Batygin G.S. Vlasť i intělektualy // Věstnik RUDN. Serija Sociologija. - 2008. - № 3.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Weber M. Nauka kak prizvanie i professija // Izbrannyje proizvedenija. - M., 1990.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Parsons T. O strukture socialnogo dějstvija. - M., 2000.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Snow Ch. P. Dvе kultury i naucznaja revoljucija // Portrety i razmyslenija. - M., 1985.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
