<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Sociology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Sociology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Социология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-2272</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2408-8897</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumamba</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">6412</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Textual Analysis within Sociological Research: Terminological Rather Than Methodological Difficulties?</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Текстовый анализ в социологическом исследовании: терминологические или методологическиетрудности?</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Trotsuk</surname><given-names>Irina V</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Троцук</surname><given-names>Ирина Владимировна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>; Peoples' Friendship University of Russia</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Кафедра социологии; Российский университет дружбы народов</p></bio><email>irina_trocuk@rambler.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Peoples' Friendship University of Russia</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Российский университет дружбы народов</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2011-02-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>02</month><year>2011</year></pub-date><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">NO2 (2011)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">№2 (2011)</issue-title><fpage>15</fpage><lpage>23</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2016-09-07"><day>07</day><month>09</month><year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2011, Trotsuk</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2011, Социология</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2011</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Trotsuk</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Социология</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/6412">https://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/6412</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article aims at providing some clear distinctions between different types of textual analysis that have different but sometimes interconnected theoretical and methodological grounds. Terminological confusions and the lack of clear-cut instructions for the empirical study of textual data within sociological research impede such research.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Проводятся демаркационные линии между различными вариантами текстового анализа. Все они обладают собственными теоретико-методологическими основаниями, которые тем не менее имеют массу точек соприкосновения, что наряду с терминологической путаницей и отсутствием четких инструкций по эмпирической работе с текстовыми данными затрудняет таковую в рамках социологического исследования.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>textual analysis</kwd><kwd>narrative analysis</kwd><kwd>discourse analysis</kwd><kwd>conversational analysis</kwd><kwd>linguistic analysis</kwd><kwd>content analysis</kwd><kwd>coding</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>текстовый анализ</kwd><kwd>нарративный анализ</kwd><kwd>дискурс-анализ</kwd><kwd>конверсационный анализ</kwd><kwd>лингвистический анализ</kwd><kwd>контент-анализ</kwd><kwd>кодирование</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Baxter J. Competing Discourses in the Classroom: a Post-Structuralist Discourse Analysis of Girls' and Boys' Speech in Public Contexts // Discourse &amp; Society. - 2002. - Vol. 13(6). - Pp. 827-842.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Baxter J. Competing Discourses in the Classroom: a Post-Structuralist Discourse Analysis of Girls' and Boys' Speech in Public Contexts // Discourse &amp; Society. - 2002. - Vol. 13(6). - Pp. 827-842.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Billig M. Whose Terms? Whose Ordinariness? Rhetoric and Ideology in Conversation Analysis // Discourse &amp; Society. - 1999. - Vol. 10. - Pp. 543-558.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Billig M. Whose Terms? Whose Ordinariness? Rhetoric and Ideology in Conversation Analysis // Discourse &amp; Society. - 1999. - Vol. 10. - Pp. 543-558.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Billig M. Towards a Critique of the Critical // Discourse &amp; Society. - 2000. - Vol. 11. - Pp. 291-292.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Billig M. Towards a Critique of the Critical // Discourse &amp; Society. - 2000. - Vol. 11. - Pp. 291-292.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Blommaert J. Context is/as Critique // Critique of Anthropology. - 2001. - Vol. 21(1). - Pp. 13-32.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Chatman S. Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. - Ithaka, NY: Cornell University Press, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Cheek J. At the Margins? Discourse Analysis and Qualitative Research // Qualitative Health Research. - 2004. - Vol. 14. - N 8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Coates J. Women, Men and Language. - London: Longman, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Crawford V.M., Valsiner J. Varieties of Discursive Experience in Psychology: Culture Understood Through the Language Used Selected for Their Divergent Viewpoints // Culture &amp; Psychology. - 1999. - Vol. 5(3). - Pp. 259-269.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Crawford V.M., Valsiner J. Varieties of Discursive Experience in Psychology: Culture Understood Through the Language Used Selected for Their Divergent Viewpoints // Culture &amp; Psychology. - 1999. - Vol. 5(3). - Pp. 259-269.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Franzosi R. Narrative Analysis - or Why (and How) Sociologists Should Be Interested in Narrative // Annual Review of Sociology. - 1998. - Vol. 24. - Pp. 517-554.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hammersley M. Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis: Methods or Paradigms? // Discourse &amp; Society. - 2003. - Vol. 14(6). - Pp. 751-781.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hammersley M. Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis: Methods or Paradigms? // Discourse &amp; Society. - 2003. - Vol. 14(6). - Pp. 751-781.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Labov W. Language in the Inner City. - Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1972.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Maynard D.W. On Co-implicating Recipients in the Delivery of Diagnostic News // P. Drew, J. Heritage (eds.) Talk at Work: Interactions in Institutional Settings. - Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1992. - Pp. 331-358.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Reed M. The Limits of Discourse Analysis in Organizational Analysis // Organization. - 2000. - Vol. 7(3).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schegloff E.A. Schegloff's Texts as Billig's Data: a Critical Reply // Discourse &amp; Society. - 1999. - Vol. 10. - Pp. 558-570.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schegloff E.A. Schegloff's Texts as Billig's Data: a Critical Reply // Discourse &amp; Society. - 1999. - Vol. 10. - Pp. 558-570.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stokoe E.H., Weatherall A. Gender, Language, Conversational Analysis and Feminism // Discourse &amp; Society. - 2002. - Vol. 13(6).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stokoe E.H., Weatherall A. Gender, Language, Conversational Analysis and Feminism // Discourse &amp; Society. - 2002. - Vol. 13(6).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Toolan M. Narrative: A Critical Linguistic Introduction. - London: Routledge, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Tracy K. Analysing Context: Framing the Discussion // Research in Language and Social Interaction. - 1998. - Vol. 31(1). - Pp. 1-28.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Vincent R.C. A Narrative Analysis of US Press Coverage of Slobodan Milosevic and the Serbs in Kosovo // European Journal of Communication. - 2000. - Vol. 15(3). - Pp. 321-344.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Barthes R. Miphologuii / Per. s fr. S.N. Zenina. - М., 2000.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Dijk T.V. Jazik. Poznanie. Communikacija / Per. s angl. О.А. Guligui, sost. V.V. Petrova, pod red. V.I. Guerasimova. - М., 1989.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Dmitrieva E.V. Focus-gruppy v marketingue i sociologuii. - М., 1998.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Zolotova G.А. Communikativnaja grammatika russkogo jazika. - М., 1998.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Isupova О.G. Conversacionniy analiz: predstavlenie metoda // Sociologuija: 4М. - 2002. - № 15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Kvadratura smysla: francuzskaya shkola analiza discursa / Per. s fr. и portug.; obsch. red. i vstup. sl. P. Serio; predisl. Ju.S. Stepanova. - М., 2002.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Kupina N.A. Lingvistichiskiy analiz hudojestvennogo teksta. - М., 1980.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Таrshis Е.Ja. Perspectivy razvitija metoda content-analiza // Sociologuija: 4М. - 2002. - № 15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Urubkova L. Ponimanie i perevod // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. - 2003. - № 5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Foucault М. Аrkheologuija znanija. - М., 1996.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Foucault М. Porjadok discursa. - М., 1996.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Zvetaeva N.N. Biographicheskij discurs sovetskoj epokhi // Sociologuicheskij jurnal. - 1999. - № 1/2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Zvetaeva N.N. Biographicheskie narrativy sovetskoj epokhi // Sociologuicheskij jurnal. - 2000. - № 1/2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Shevchenko N.V. Osnovy lingvistiki teksta. - М., 2003.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
