<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Sociology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Sociology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Социология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-2272</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2408-8897</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumamba</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">35234</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2313-2272-2023-23-2-355-367</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">ROZNSD</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Sociological lectures</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Социологический лекторий</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">The phenomenon of self-organization of the rural population: Principles and prospects of research</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Феномен самоорганизации сельского населения: принципы и перспективы исследования</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Vinogradsky</surname><given-names>V. G.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Виноградский</surname><given-names>Валерий Георгиевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru">доктор философских наук, ведущий научный сотрудник Центра аграрных исследований</bio><email>vgrape47@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Vinogradskaya</surname><given-names>O. Ya.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Виноградская</surname><given-names>Ольга Яковлевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru">старший научный сотрудник Центра аграрных исследований</bio><email>vgrape58@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте РФ</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2023-06-30" publication-format="electronic"><day>30</day><month>06</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">VOL 23, NO2 (2023)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 23, №2 (2023)</issue-title><fpage>355</fpage><lpage>367</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2023-07-05"><day>05</day><month>07</month><year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2023, Vinogradsky V.G., Vinogradskaya O.Y.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2023, Виноградский В.Г., Виноградская О.Я.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Vinogradsky V.G., Vinogradskaya O.Y.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Виноградский В.Г., Виноградская О.Я.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/35234">https://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/35234</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p style="text-align: justify;">The phenomenon defined as self-organization implements its cognitive-analytical function in many disciplines - physics and chemistry, cybernetics and computer science, economics and sociology, psychology and cultural studies. Russian and foreign researchers study forms and practices of self-organization of the rural population and, as a rule, consider them through the factors that affect the pace, forms and quality of social-economic transformations, material appearance and event dynamics of the non-urban living space. The most effective factors that affect the reconstruction of the social space of rural areas and, in general, optimization of the rural world are managerial, social-economic, innovative, demographic and urbanistic, climatic and environmental, and also factors of complementary and intermediate character. The authors systematize the main principles in the study of self-organization practices of the rural population, which are empirically manifested in their regional and subject-activity features (local nature, cultural and ethnographic traditions, changing composition of the local population, their work habits, indicators of professional skills and diligence). All the above historically develops into a kind of genius loci (“spirit of place”, “genius locus”) as densely packed in customs and determining mechanisms for the development of initiatives by subjects of self-organization, who aim at building such institutional mechanisms and practices that cannot but contribute to the transition to a new development trajectory, first of individual segments (households, farmer associations, etc.), and then of all basic elements of rural society, which are embodied in the everyday life of rural ‘localities’.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p style="text-align: justify;">Феномен, фиксируемый посредством понятия «самоорганизация», реализует свою познавательную и аналитическую функцию во множестве дисциплин - физике и химии, кибернетике и информатике, экономике и социологии, психологии и культурологии. Отечественные и зарубежные исследователи, изучающие формы и практики самоорганизации сельского населения, как правило, рассматривают их через призму факторов, которые воздействуют на темпы, формы и качество социально-экономических преобразований, материальный облик и событийную динамику негородского жизненного пространства страны. К числу наиболее действенных факторов, которые влияют на реконструкцию социального пространства сельской местности и в целом на оптимизацию сельского мира, относят факторы управленческие, социально-экономические, инновационные, демографические и урбанистические, климатические и экологические, а также дополняющие их или имеющие промежуточный характер. Авторы систематизируют основные принципы исследования практик самоорганизации сельского населения, которые эмпирически проявляются в их региональной и предметно-деятельностной специфике (локальные природные обстоятельства, культурно-этнографические традиции, изменяющийся состав местного населения, его трудовые привычки, индикаторы профессиональной умелости и трудолюбия). Все перечисленное исторически складывается в некий genius loci («дух места», «гений локуса»), плотно упакованный в рамки обычаев и определяющий механизмы выработки и принятия инициативных решений субъектами самоорганизации, нацеленных на построение таких институциональных механизмов и практик, которые не могут не способствовать переходу на новую траекторию развития сначала отдельных сегментов (домохозяйств, фермерских объединений и т.д.), а затем и всех базовых элементов сельского социума, которые воплощены в повседневности своеобычных сельских «локальностей».</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>self-organization</kwd><kwd>informal interaction</kwd><kwd>rural communities</kwd><kwd>practices of self-organization of the rural population</kwd><kwd>rural everyday life</kwd><kwd>lifestyle of the rural population</kwd><kwd>rural world</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>самоорганизация</kwd><kwd>неформальное взаимодействие</kwd><kwd>сельские сообщества</kwd><kwd>практики самоорганизации сельского населения</kwd><kwd>сельская повседневность</kwd><kwd>образ жизни сельского населения</kwd><kwd>сельский мир</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="en">The article was written on the basis of the RANEPA state assignment research program.</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Статья подготовлена в рамках выполнения научно-исследовательской работы государственного задания РАНХиГС.</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Agibalov A.V., Zaporozhtseva L.A., Tkacheva Yu.V. Stsenarny podkhod k razrabotke strategii razvitiya selskih territoriy [Scenario approach to the strategy for the development of rural areas]. Vestnik VGAU. 2019; 3. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Агибалов А.В., Запорожцева Л.А., Ткачева Ю.В. Сценарный подход к разработке стратегии развития сельских территорий // Вестник ВГАУ. 2019. № 3.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Adukov R., Zakharov R. Gosprogramma kompleksnogo razvitiya selskih territoriy: otsenka i vyvody na budushchee [State Program for the Integrated Development of Rural Territories: Assessment and Conclusions for the Future]. Ekonomika Selskogo Khozyaystva Rossii. 2019; 10. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Адуков Р., Захаров Р. Госпрограмма комплексного развития сельских территорий: оценка и выводы на будущее // Экономика сельского хозяйства России. 2019. № 10.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bashmachnikov V.F. K metodologii vyyavleniya faktorov uspeshnosti semeynyh fermerskih khozyaystv v tselyah otsenki perspektiv ih razvitiya [On the methodology for identifying success factors of family farms to assess the prospects for their development]. Aktualnye Voprosy Sovremennoy Ekonomiki. 2021; 7. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Башмачников В.Ф. К методологии выявления факторов успешности семейных фермерских хозяйств в целях оценки перспектив их развития // Актуальные вопросы современной экономики. 2021. № 7.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bozhkov O.B., Trotsuk I.V. Postsovetsky fermersky internatsional v selskom khozyaystve Severo-Zapadnogo regiona [Post-Soviet farmers’ international in the agriculture of the NorthWest Region]. Russian Peasant Studies. 2020; 5 (4). (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Божков О.Б., Троцук И.В. Постсоветский фермерский интернационал в сельском хозяйстве Северо-Западного региона // Крестьяноведение. 2020. Т. 5. № 4.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bolshoy tolkovy slovar russkogo yazyka [Big Explanatory Dictionary of Russian Language]. Saint Petersburg; 1998. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Большой толковый словарь русского языка. СПб., 1998.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vakhitov R.R. Kak my vyzhivali v 1990-ye? Obshchinnaya samoorganizatsiya rossiyan v epokhu liberalnyh reform 1990-h gg. [How did we survive in the 1990s? Communal selforganization of Russians in the era of liberal reforms in the 1990s]. Filosofiya Sotsialnyh Kommunikatsiy. 2009; 1. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вахитов Р.Р. Как мы выживали в 1990-е? Общинная самоорганизация россиян в эпоху либеральных реформ 1990-х гг. // Философия социальных коммуникаций, 2009. № 1.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vinogradsky V.G. “Derevnya” i “selsky mir”: skhodstvo i nesovpadenie [“Village” and “rural world”: Similarities and discrepancies]. Puti Rossii: Granitsy politiki. Pod red. M.G. Pugachevoy. Moscow; 2019. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Виноградский В.Г. «Деревня» и «сельский мир»: сходство и несовпадение // Пути России: Границы политики / Под ред. М.Г. Пугачевой. М., 2019.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Deryabina M.A. Teoreticheskie i metodologicheskie osnovaniya samoorganizatsii sotsialnoekonomicheskih sistem [Theoretical-methodological foundations of self-organization of social-economic systems]. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2019; 7. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Дерябина М.А. Теоретические и методологические основания самоорганизации социально-экономических систем // Вопросы экономики. 2019. № 7.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Karpichev V.S. K voprosu ob issledovanii konstruktivnoy i nekonstruktivnoy sotsialnoy samoorganizatsii [On the study of constructive and non-constructive social self-organization]. Sotsiologiya Vlasti. 2010; 5. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Карпичев В.С. К вопросу об исследовании конструктивной и неконструктивной социальной самоорганизации // Социология власти. 2010. № 5.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kulyasov I.P., Kulyasova A.A. Ekoposeleniya — novaya forma selskih soobshchestv v Rossii [Ecovillages — a new form of rural communities in Russia]. Ekologiya i Zhizn. 2008; 10. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кулясов И.П., Кулясова А.А. Экопоселения - новая форма сельских сообществ в России // Экология и жизнь, 2008. № 10.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Osorgin K.S. Model mestnogo soobshchestva: struktura, funktsii, klyuchevye atributy [Local community model: Structure, functions, key attributes]. Obshchestvennaya geografiya v menyayushchemsya mire: fundamentalnye i prikladnye issledovaniya. Pod red. V.A. Rubtsova, E.I. Baybakova. Kazan; 2019. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Осоргин К.С. Модель местного сообщества: структура, функции, ключевые атрибуты // Общественная география в меняющемся мире: фундаментальные и прикладные исследования / Под ред. В.А. Рубцова, Э.И. Байбакова. Казань, 2019.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rybakova M.V. Potentsial ekoposeleniy v sotsialno-ekologicheskoy modernizatsii sovremennoy Rossii [Potential of ecovillages in the social-ecological modernization of contemporary Russia]. Rossiya: tendentsii i perspektivy razvitiya. Ezhegodnik. Moscow; 2015. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Рыбакова М.В. Потенциал экопоселений в социально-экологической модернизации современной России // Россия: тенденции и перспективы развития. Ежегодник. М., 2015.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Smysly selskoy zhizni (Opyt sotsiologicheskogo analiza) [Meanings of Rural Life (Sociological Analysis)]. Pod red. Zh.T. Toshchenko. Moscow; 2016. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Смыслы сельской жизни (Опыт социологического анализа) / Под ред. Ж.Т. Тощенко. М., 2016.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sumskaya T.V. Problemy byudzhetnoy obespechennosti mestnogo samoupravleniya (na primere Novosibirskoy oblasti) [Problems of budgetary provision of local self-government (on the example of the Novosibirsk Region)]. Federalizm. 2018; 1. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сумская Т.В. Проблемы бюджетной обеспеченности местного самоуправления (на примере Новосибирской области) // Федерализм. 2018. № 1.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Trotsuk I. Neformalnye praktiki: irratsionalnoe povedenie ili vliyanie kultury? Dva kontekstualnyh “freyma” dlya izucheniya neformalnoy ekonomiki [Informal practices: Irrational behavior or cultural influence? Two contextual “frames” for the study of informal economy]. Russian Peasant Studies. 2018; 3 (4). (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Троцук И. Неформальные практики: иррациональное поведение или влияние культуры? Два контекстуальных «фрейма» для изучения неформальной экономики // Крестьяноведение. 2018. Т. 3. № 4.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Trotsuk I.V. “Prirodny altruism” ili vynuzhdennaya ratsionalnost? Dolzhnoe, ozhidaemoe i realnoe v (ne) formalnoy ekonomike [“Natural altruism” or forced rationality? Proper, expected and real in the (in) formal economy]. Russian Peasant Studies. 2017; 2 (4). (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Троцук И.В. «Природный альтруизм» или вынужденная рациональность? Должное, ожидаемое и реальное в (не) формальной экономике // Крестьяноведение. 2017. Т. 2. № 4.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fadeeva O.P. Sibirskoe selo: ot formalnogo samoupravleniya k vynuzhdennoy samoorganizatsii [Siberian village: From formal self-government to forced self-organization]. Eco. 2019; 4. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фадеева О.П. Сибирское село: от формального самоуправления к вынужденной самоорганизации // Эко. 2019. № 4.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fadeeva O.P., Nefedkin V.I. “Regionalny dirizhizm” i selskaya samoorganizatsiya v Tatarstane [“Regional dirigisme” and rural self-organization in Tatarstan]. Russian Peasant Studies. 2018; 3 (3). (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фадеева О.П., Нефедкин В.И. «Региональный дирижизм» и сельская самоорганизация в Татарстане // Крестьяноведение. 2018. Т. 3. № 3.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Heidegger M. Osnovnye ponyatiya metafiziki. Mir–konechnost–odinochestvo [The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics — World, Finitude, Solitude]. Saint Petersburg; 2013. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хайдеггер М. Основные понятия метафизики. Мир-конечность-одиночество. СПб., 2013.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Heidegger M. Pismo o gumanizme [Letter on humanism]. Vremya i bytie. Saint Petersburg; 2007. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хайдеггер М. Письмо о гуманизме // Время и бытие. СПб., 2007.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khitsenko V.E. Samoorganizatsiya: elementy teorii i sotsialnye prilozheniya [SelfOrganization: Elements of Theory and Social Application]. Moscow; 2014. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хиценко В.Е. Самоорганизация: элементы теории и социальные приложения. М., 2014.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shomina E.S. Samoorganizatsiya zhiteley v selskih poseleniyah — vzglyad skvoz rozovye ochki [Self-organization of villagers — a look through rose-colored glasses]. Sotsiologicheskaya Nauka i Sotsialnaya Praktika. 2020; 8 (2). (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шомина Е.С. Самоорганизация жителей в сельских поселениях - взгляд сквозь розовые очки // Социологическая наука и социальная практика. 2020. Т. 8. № 2.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shchukina M.Yu. Sotsialnaya aktivnost kak faktor samoorganizatsii rossiyskih ekoposeleniy [Social activity as a factor of self-organization of Russian ecovillages]. Problemny Analiz i Gosudarstvenno-Upravlencheskoe Proektirovanie, 2014; 7 (5). (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Щукина М.Ю. Социальная активность как фактор самоорганизации российских экопоселений // Проблемный анализ и государственно-управленческое проектирование, 2014. Т. 7. № 5.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fischer H.W., Chatre A., Devalkar S., Sohoni M. Rural institutions, social networks, and selforganized. Environmental Research Letters. 2021; 16 (10).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fischer H.W., Chatre A., Devalkar S., Sohoni M. Rural institutions, social networks, and selforganized // Environmental Research Letters. 2021. Vol. 16. No. 10.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kondratiev M.V., Fadeeva O.P. Practices of public participation in local self-governance: Case studies of Siberian villages. Regional Research of Russia. 2021; 11 (4).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kondratiev M.V., Fadeeva O.P. Practices of public participation in local self-governance: Case studies of Siberian villages // Regional Research of Russia. 2021. Vol. 11. No. 4.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Krugman P.R. The Self-Organizing Economy. Oxford, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lin K. Social quality theory. A New Perspective on Social Development. K. Lin, P. Herrmann (Eds.). New York; 2015.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lin K. Social quality theory // A New Perspective on Social Development / K. Lin, P. Herrmann (Eds.). N.Y., 2015.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McKey D., Rostain S., Iriarte J., Glaser B., Birk J.J., Holst I., Renard D. Pre-Columbian agricultural landscapes, ecosystem engineers, and self-organized patchiness in Amazonia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 2010; 107 (7).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McKey D., Rostain S., Iriarte J., Glaser B., Birk J.J., Holst I., Renard D. Pre-Columbian agricultural landscapes, ecosystem engineers, and self-organized patchiness in Amazonia // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 2010. Vol. 107. No. 7.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nikulin A., Trotsuk I., Wegren S. Ideology and philosophy of the successful regional development in contemporary Russia: The Belgorod case. Russian Peasant Studies. 2018; 3 (1).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nikulin A., Trotsuk I., Wegren S. Ideology and philosophy of the successful regional development in contemporary Russia: The Belgorod case // Крестьяноведение. 2018. Т. 3. № 1.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nikulin A.M., Trotsuk I.V., Wegren S.K. The importance of strong regional leadership in Russia: the Belgorod Miracle in agriculture. Eurasian Geography and Economics. 2017; 58 (3).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nikulin A.M., Trotsuk I.V., Wegren S.K. The importance of strong regional leadership in Russia: the Belgorod Miracle in agriculture // Eurasian Geography and Economics. 2017. Vol. 58. No. 3.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sherwood S., van Bommel S., Paredes M. Self-organization and the bypass: Re-imagining institutions for more sustainable development in agriculture and food. Agriculture. 2016; 6 (4).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sherwood S., van Bommel S., Paredes M. Self-organization and the bypass: Re-imagining institutions for more sustainable development in agriculture and food // Agriculture. 2016. Vol. 6. No. 4.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sobolev A., Kurakin A., Pakhomov V., Trotsuk I. Cooperation in rural Russia: Past, present and future. Universe of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology. 2018; 27 (1).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sobolev A., Kurakin A., Pakhomov V., Trotsuk I. Cooperation in rural Russia: Past, present and future // Мир России. 2018. Т. 27. № 1.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sovolev A., Kurakin A., Trotsuk I. Methodological approaches to the study of Russian cooperation and “Theory and practice of cooperation” as an academic discipline. Russian Peasant Studies. 2017; 2 (1).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sovolev A., Kurakin A., Trotsuk I. Methodological approaches to the study of Russian cooperation and “Theory and practice of cooperation” as an academic discipline // Крестьяноведение. 2017. Т. 2. № 1.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Trotsuk I. “To trust or not to trust” is not the question; “How to study trust” is much more challenging task. Russian Sociological Review. 2016; 15 (4).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Trotsuk I. “To trust or not to trust” is not the question; “How to study trust” is much more challenging task // Russian Sociological Review. 2016. Vol. 15. No. 4.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhang S., de Roo G., Rauws W. Understanding self-organization and formal institutions in peri-urban transformations: A case study from Beijing. Environment and Planning B-Urban Analytics and City Science. 2020; 47 (2).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zhang S., de Roo G., Rauws W. Understanding self-organization and formal institutions in peri-urban transformations: A case study from Beijing // Environment and Planning B-Urban Analytics and City Science. 2020. Vol. 47. No. 2.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
