<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Sociology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Sociology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Социология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-2272</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2408-8897</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumamba</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">30393</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2313-2272-2022-22-1-137-149</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Contemporary society: the urgent issues and prospects for development</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Современное общество: актуальные проблемы и перспективы развития</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Education and social networking: Between connectivism and the critical social philosophy of the new media</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Образование в условиях развития социальных сетей: между сплоченностью и критической социальной философией новых медиа</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>De Martino</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Де Мартино</surname><given-names>Марио</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат политических наук, доцент кафедры маркетинга</p></bio><email>de-martino-m@rudn.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kovalenko</surname><given-names>S. A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Коваленко</surname><given-names>Сергей Александрович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат исторических наук, доцент кафедры сравнительной образовательной политики, директор Центра сравнительного международного образования</p></bio><email>kovalenko-sa@rudn.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Tkach</surname><given-names>G. F.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ткач</surname><given-names>Геннадий Федорович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат физико-математических наук, доцент кафедры сравнительной образовательной политики</p></bio><email>tkach-gf@rudn.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Isidori</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Изидори</surname><given-names>Эмануэле</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>профессор кафедры наук об активности и здоровье человека</p></bio><email>emanuele.isidori@uniroma4.it</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">RUDN University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Российский университет дружбы народов</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">University of Rome Foro Italico</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Римский университет Форо Италико</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2022-03-03" publication-format="electronic"><day>03</day><month>03</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">VOL 22, NO1 (2022)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 22, №1 (2022)</issue-title><fpage>137</fpage><lpage>149</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2022-03-03"><day>03</day><month>03</month><year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2022, De Martino M., Kovalenko S.A., Tkach G.F., Isidori E.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2022, Де Мартино М., Коваленко С.А., Ткач Г.Ф., Изидори Э.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2022</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">De Martino M., Kovalenko S.A., Tkach G.F., Isidori E.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Де Мартино М., Коваленко С.А., Ткач Г.Ф., Изидори Э.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/30393">https://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/30393</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p style="text-align: justify;">The so-called ‘Internet Studies’ have highlighted the importance of pedagogy declined as a philosophy of education, as a science able to provide, together with other social and cultural sciences, a significant contribution to the understanding of the implications and educational potential of the Net in the age of infosphere. Over the past few years, the so-called ‘social networking pedagogy’ has emerged as an interdisciplinary approach focusing on curriculum and training. It is a pedagogy that identifies in the interaction that takes place, for example, in social networks (‘containers’ for communicative interaction) the possibility of developing a learning and training model that not only opens up new scenarios for education of the future through new media but also allows to understand critically the whole contemporary culture. Therefore, starting from the analysis of this scenario and using a theoretical methodology based on mainly hermeneutical-deconstructive and historical-dialectical approaches, the article outlines the possible epistemological framework for the ‘networking pedagogy’ within the Internet studies, and identifies its main issues. The authors highlight how this specific pedagogy develops today as a ‘pedagogy of culture’ characterized by a positive and optimistic approach to the new media (with particular reference to social networks). After identifying the advantages and disadvantages of the new media, such a pedagogy intends to consider pedagogical issues that teachers and trainers have to focus on and transform into effective educational communication content and tools for the curriculum. The article examines the contributions of the critical pedagogy scholars David Trend and Henry Giroux who can be considered the pioneers of networking pedagogy. The article concludes by highlighting the importance of ethics as a pedagogical practice that, through control, regulation and supervision of communicative interactions in social networks, paves the way for their conscious and educational use.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p style="text-align: justify;">Так называемые «исследования Интернета» обозначили важность педагогики как философии образования и как науки, способной наряду с другими социальными и культурологическими дисциплинами внести значительный вклад в понимание последствий развития и образовательного потенциала Сети в современную информациюю эпоху. За последние несколько лет так называемая «социально-сетевая педагогика» оформилась как междисциплинарный подход, сосредоточенный на вопросах обучения и составления учебных планов. Именно педагогика исследует взаимодействие, которое складывается, например, в социальных сетях (как своего рода «контейнерах» коммуникативных практик), определяя возможности развития моделей обучения, которые смогут стать основой новых образовательных сценариев для будущего на основе новых медиа, а также позволяя критически аналазировать всю современную культуру. Основываясь на анализе таких сценариев и опираясь на теоретико-методологические постулаты герменевтически-деконтруктивистского и историко-диалектического подходов, авторы намечают возможные эпистемологические контуры «сетевой педагогики» в контексте интернет исследований, выделяя ее основные тематики. Авторы характеризуют векторы развития данного направления как «педагогики культуры», которой свойственна позитивно-оптимистическая трактовка новых медиа (прежде всего социальных сетей). Отмечая их основные преимущества и ограничения, такая педагогика систематизирует те вопросы обучения, на которых следует сосредоточиться учителям и преподавателям, чтобы разрабатывать эффективный образовательно-коммуникативный контент и новые обучающие инструменты. Авторы оценивают вклад представителей критической педагогики Дэвида Тренда и Генри Жиру как пионеров сетевой педагогики. В заключение подчеркивается важность этики как педагогической практики, которая посредством инструментов контроля, регуляции и наставничества в социально-сетевой коммуникации прокладывает путь для ее осознанного использования в образовательных целях.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>education</kwd><kwd>Internet</kwd><kwd>social networks</kwd><kwd>new media</kwd><kwd>training</kwd><kwd>infosphere</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>образование</kwd><kwd>Интернет</kwd><kwd>социальные сети</kwd><kwd>новые медиа</kwd><kwd>обучение</kwd><kwd>инфосфера</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Bueno L. Innovar el procesoeducativo: La construcción de los sujetos. Mexico; 2013.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Castañeda L., Gutiérrez I. Redes sociales y otros tejidos online para conectar personas. Aprendizaje con redes sociales. Tejidos educativos para los nuevos entornos; 2010.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Chatti M.A., Jarke M., Quix C. Connectivism: The network metaphor of learning. International Journal of Learning Technology. 2010; 5 (1).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Cole R.A. (Ed.). Issues in Web-Based Pedagogy: A Critical Primer. Greenwood Publishing Group; 2000.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Collins A., Halverson R. Rethinking Education in the Age of Technology: The Digital Revolution and Schooling in America. Teachers College Press; 2018.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Davidovitch N., Belichenko M. Using Facebook in higher education: Exploring effects on social climate: Achievements and satisfaction. International Journal of Higher Education. 2018; 7 (1).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Davies J. Facework on Facebook as a new literacy practice. Computers &amp; Education. 2012; 59 (1).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Debord G. Society of the Spectacle. Bread and Circuses Publishing; 2012.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Dutton W.H. Internet studies: The foundations of a transformative field. The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies. Oxfor; 2013.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Farmer H., Ramsdale J. Teaching competencies for the online environment. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology. 2016; 42 (3).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Floridi L. Pensare l’infosfera: La filosofia come design concettuale. Raffaello Cortina Editore; 2020.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Freire P. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Routledge; 2013.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Aronowitz S., Giroux H. Postmodern Education: Politics, Culture, and Social Criticism. University of Minnesota Press; 1991.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Goffman E., Perren H.B.T, Setaro F. La presentación de la persona en la vida cotidiana. Buenos Aires; 1981.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Jarvis J. What Would Google Do? Reverse Engineering the Fastest Growing Company in the History of the World. New York; 2011.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Kuhn C. Are Students Ready to (Re)-Design Their Personal Learning Environment? The Case of the E-Dynamic. Space; 2017.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Longo G.O. La lunga strada di Homo technologicus. Scienza &amp; Società. 2018; 11.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Luckin R. Re-Designing Learning Contexts: Technology-Rich, Learner-Centred Ecologies. Routledge; 2010.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Manca S., Ranieri M. Implications of social network sites for teaching and learning. Where we are and where we want to go. Education and Information Technologies. 2017; 22 (2).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Marson S.M. Internet ethics for social workers. New Social Worker. 2000; 7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Martin M., Noakes M. Fostering a web 2.0 ethos in a traditional e-learning environment. Electronic Journal of E-Learning. 2012; 10 (3).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Menduni E., Nencioni G., Pannozzo M. Social Networks: Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Others: Social Relations, Aesthetics, Emotions. Milan; 2011.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Murphy D. The Architecture of Failure. John Hunt Publishing; 2012.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Negroponte N. Being Digital. Milano; 1999.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Postman N. Media ecology education. Explorations in Media Ecology. 2006; 5 (1).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Reales de Castro E., Bohorquez M.S., Rueda Barrera A.A. Lineamientos conceptuales de las redes sociales: una aproximación de su aplicabilidad a la regulación de la violencia. Lineamientos conceptuales de las redes sociales: una aproximación de su aplicabilidad a la regulación de la violencia; 1995.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Requena Santos F. El concepto de red social. Revista española de investigaciones sociológicas. 1989; 48.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Seery A. Education, the formation of self and the world of Web 2.0. London Review of Education. 2010; 8 (1).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Siemens G. Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. 2005; 2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Trend D. Cultural Pedagogy: Art, Education, Politics. Greenwood Publishing Group; 1992.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Ushakov K.M., Kukso K.N. Advantages of social network analysis in educational research. Russian Education &amp; Society. 2015; 57 (10).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Voivonta T., Avraamidou L. Facebook: A potentially valuable educational tool? Educational Media International. 2018; 55 (1).</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
