<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Sociology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Sociology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Социология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-2272</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2408-8897</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumamba</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">26825</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2313-2272-2021-21-2-391-402</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Sociological lectures</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Социологический лекторий</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Online communities in the study of political communication</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Онлайн-сообщества в исследованиях политической коммуникации</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Platonov</surname><given-names>K. A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Платонов</surname><given-names>Константин Аркадьевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат социологических наук, специалист Центра социологических и интернет-исследований</p></bio><email>konplatonov@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Legostaeva</surname><given-names>N. I.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Легостаева</surname><given-names>Наталья Игоревна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат социологических наук, старший научный сотрудник Лаборатории изучения социально-экономических и политических процессов современного общества</p></bio><email>n.legostaeva@spbu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Saint Petersburg State University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2021-06-24" publication-format="electronic"><day>24</day><month>06</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">VOL 21, NO2 (2021)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 21, №2 (2021)</issue-title><fpage>391</fpage><lpage>402</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2021-06-24"><day>24</day><month>06</month><year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2021, Platonov K.A., Legostaeva N.I.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2021, Платонов К.А., Легостаева Н.И.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2021</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Platonov K.A., Legostaeva N.I.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Платонов К.А., Легостаева Н.И.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/26825">https://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/26825</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p style="text-align: justify;">Online communities in the study of political communication are a relatively new research field. Within its framework, independent thematic sections are developing, which in many respects remain fragmented due to the insufficient systematization. The article presents the results of the analysis and description of the research field of online communities in the context of political communication based on 60 English-language sources. This sample included publications on a wide range of issues: from the activity of official accounts and websites of politicians, parties, organizations to the user behavior and political discussions in virtual communities. The authors identified five large thematic groups that consider online communities in different research perspectives: classification of communities, study of their structure and elements, analysis of their strategies and tactics, functions and effects, and ‘life cycles’. The article describes the main features and internal structure of the identified thematic groups, considers approaches and methods for solving specific tasks in the study of actors, channels, practices and models of political communication. The authors also consider the technical factors of the formation of communities, differences in methods and units of analysis, types of political communicants. The authors make a conclusion about the sufficient ‘maturity’ of the research field and its thematic sections, which is combined with the differing popularity of research topics. Online communities represent a special public space which allows researchers to answer questions about the success of political leaders, movements and organizations, the effects of the viral spread of online protests and flash mobs, and the audience’s response to significant politicized issues. The authors identify two trends in the development of the corresponding methodology: strengthening practical orientation and increasingly complex techniques based on the machine algorithms for data analysis.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p style="text-align: justify;">Онлайн-сообщества в исследованиях политической коммуникации - сравнительно новая предметная область. В ее рамках активно формируются самостоятельные тематические разделы, которые во многом остаются фрагментированными в условиях недостаточной систематизации. В статье представлены результаты анализа и описание предметной области исследований онлайн-сообществ в контексте политической коммуникации на основе 60 англоязычных источников. В выборку вошли публикации, охватывающие широкий спектр вопросов: от активности официальных аккаунтов и сайтов политиков, партий, организаций до пользовательского поведения и политических дискуссий в виртуальных сообществах. Авторы выделили пять больших тематических групп, рассматривающих онлайн-сообщества с разных исследовательских ракурсов: классификация сообществ, изучение их структуры и элементов, анализ стратегий и тактик, функций и эффектов, а также «жизненного цикла». В статье описаны основные особенности и внутренняя структура выявленных групп, рассмотрены подходы и методики решения конкретных задач, связанных с изучением акторов, каналов, практик и моделей политической коммуникации. Авторы также рассматривают технические факторы формирования сообществ, различия в методах и единицах анализа, типы политических коммуникантов. В статье сделан вывод о достаточной «зрелости» рассматриваемого исследовательского направления и отдельных его подразделов, которая сочетается с неравномерной популярностью разных тематик. Онлайн-сообщества представляют собой особое публичное пространство, обращаясь к которому исследователи могут ответить на вопросы об успешности политических лидеров, движений и организаций, эффектах вирусного распространения онлайн-протестов и флешмобов, отклике аудитории на значимые политизированные проблемы. Авторы называют две тенденции в развитии соответствующей методологии: усиление практической ориентации и усложнение методических решений за счет использования машинных алгоритмов анализа данных.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>political communication</kwd><kwd>online communication</kwd><kwd>Internet</kwd><kwd>communities</kwd><kwd>online communities</kwd><kwd>political communities</kwd><kwd>social media</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>политическая коммуникация</kwd><kwd>онлайн-коммуникация</kwd><kwd>Интернет</kwd><kwd>сообщества</kwd><kwd>онлайн-сообщества</kwd><kwd>политические сообщества</kwd><kwd>социальные сети</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="en">The research was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and the Expert Institute for Social Research. Project No. 20-011-31318.</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Исследование выполнено при финансовой поддержке РФФИ и ЭИСИ в рамках научного проекта № 20-011-31318.</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Allison K., Bussey K. Communal quirks and circlejerks: A taxonomy of processes contributing to insularity in online communities. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. 2020; 14.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Backstrom L. et al. Group formation in large social networks: Membership, growth, and evolution. Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; 2006.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Bainbridge W. The Social Structure of Online Communities (Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences). Cambridge; 2020.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Barnes R. Uncovering Online Commenting Culture: Trolls, Fanboys and Lurkers. Springer; 2018.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Ben-David A., Fernández A.M. Hate speech and covert discrimination on social media: Monitoring the Facebook pages of extreme-right political parties in Spain. International Journal of Communication. 2016; 10.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Beyer J.L. Expect Us: Online Communities and Political Mobilization. Oxford University Press; 2014.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Boulianne S. Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication &amp; Society. 2015; 18 (5).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Christensen H.S. Political activities on the Internet: Slacktivism or political participation by other means? First Monday. 2011. URL: https:/doi.org/10.5210/fm.v16i2.3336.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Christensen K., David L. Encyclopedia of Community: From the Village to the Virtual World. Sage Publications; 2003.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Conover M.D. et al. Political polarization on Twitter. ICWSM. 2011; 133 (26).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Dolata U., Schrape J.F. Masses, crowds, communities, movements: Collective action in the Internet age. Social Movement Studies. 2016; 15 (1).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Earl J., Kimport K. Digitally Enabled Social Change: Activism in the Internet Age. MIT Press; 2011.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Ekman M. The dark side of online activism: Swedish right-wing extremist video activism on YouTube. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research. 2014; 30.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Eltantawy N., Wiest J.B. The Arab spring: Social media in the Egyptian revolution: Reconsidering resource mobilization theory. International Journal of Communication. 2011; 5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Fernando S. et al. Towards a large-scale Twitter observatory for political events. Future Generation Computer Systems. 2020; 110.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Ferrucci P., Hopp T., Vargo C.J. Civic engagement, social capital, and ideological extremity: Exploring online political engagement and political expression on Facebook. New Media &amp; Society. 2020; 22 (6).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Freelon D., Lokot T. Russian disinformation campaigns on Twitter target political communities across the spectrum. Misinformation Review. 2020. URL: https:/doi.org/ 10.37016/mr-2020-003.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Gayo Avello D., Metaxas P.T., Mustafaraj E. Limits of electoral predictions using Twitter. Proceedings of the 5th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media; 2011.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Gerbaudo P. Tweets and the Streets: Social Media and Contemporary Activism. Pluto Press; 2012.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Glubok B. Understanding Digital Political Communities: A Juxtapolitical Approach to Intimacy Online. 2020. URL: https:/escholarship.org/uc/item/16q2c1tw.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>González-Bailón S., Wang N. Networked discontent: The anatomy of protest campaigns in social media. Social Networks. 2016; 44.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Guleva V. et al. Topology of thematic communities in online social networks: A comparative study. International Conference on Computational Science. Springer; 2018.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Hammond M. What is an online community? A new definition based around commitment, connection, reciprocity, interaction, agency, and consequences. International Journal of Web Based Communities. 2017;13 (1).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Han S.H., Brazeal L.A.M., Pennington N. Is civility contagious? Examining the impact of modeling in online political discussions. Social Media+ Society. 2018; 4 (3).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Hill B.M., Shaw A. Studying Populations of Online Communities. The Handbook of Networked Communication. New York; 2017.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Hopkinson C. Trolling in online discussions: From provocation to community-building. Brno Studies. 2013; 39 (1).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Iriberri A., Leroy G. A life-cycle perspective on online community success. ACM Computing Surveys. 2009; 41 (2).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Karpf D.A. Unexpected Transformations: The Internet’s Effect on Political Associations in American Politics. Philadelphia; 2009.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Kreiss D. Seizing the moment: The presidential campaigns’ use of Twitter during the 2012 electoral cycle. New Media &amp; Society. 2016; 18 (8).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Lazar J., Preece J. Classification schema for online communities. AMCIS Proceedings; 1998.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Lee S. Characterization and detection of political manipulation in online communities. Journal of Internet Technology. 2018; 19 (4).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Lovejoy K., Saxton G.D. Information, community, and action: How nonprofit organizations use social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2012; 17 (3).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Man C.K. Luring the lurkers: Increasing participations in the online discussions of a blended learning course. International Journal on E-Learning Practices. 2014; 1 (1).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Morales A.J., Losada J.C., Benito R.M. Users structure and behavior on an online social network during a political protest. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 2012; 391 (21).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Myagkov M. et al. Islamist communities on VKontakte: Identification mechanisms and network structure. Europe-Asia Studies. 2020: 1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Nazi A., Das M., Das G. The TagAdvisor: Luring the lurkers to review web items. Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data; 2015.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Nonnecke B., Preece J. Lurker demographics: Counting the silent. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2000.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>Papacharissi Z. The virtual sphere: The internet as a public sphere. New Media &amp; Society. 2002; 4 (1).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Parmelee J.H. The agenda-building function of political tweets. New Media &amp; Society. 2014; 16 (3).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>Pérez-Curiel C., Limón-Naharro P. Political influencers. A study of Donald Trump’s personal brand on Twitter and its impact on the media and users. Communication &amp; Society. 2019; 32 (1).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>Preece J., Maloney-Krichmar D., Abras C. History of online communities. Encyclopedia of Community. 2003; 3.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><mixed-citation>Rentschler C.A., Thrift S.C. Doing feminism in the network: Networked laughter and the ‘Binders Full of Women’ meme. Feminist Theory. 2015; 16 (3).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><mixed-citation>Rheingold H. The Virtual Community: Finding Connection in a Computerized World. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing; 1993.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><mixed-citation>Ridings C.M., Gefen D., Arinze B. Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities. Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 2002; 11 (3-4).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><label>45.</label><mixed-citation>Rowe M., Saif H. Mining pro-ISIS radicalization signals from social media users. Proceedings of the 10th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media; 2016.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><label>46.</label><mixed-citation>Shim KJ. et al. Does fear of isolation disappear online? Attention-seeking motivators in online political engagement. Media and Communication. 2019; 7 (1).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B47"><label>47.</label><mixed-citation>Smitten S.I. Political potential and capabilities of online communities. German Policy Studies. 2008; 4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B48"><label>48.</label><mixed-citation>Soon C., Kluver R. The Internet and online political communities in Singapore. Asian Journal of Communication. 2007; 17 (3).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B49"><label>49.</label><mixed-citation>Syerov Y., Trach O., Fedushko S. Effect of implementation of improved methods of the life cycle stages organisation to the online community management. URL: arXiv:1901.00736. 2018.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B50"><label>50.</label><mixed-citation>Takikawa H., Nagayoshi K. Political polarization in social media: Analysis of the ‘Twitter political field’ in Japan. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data; 2017.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B51"><label>51.</label><mixed-citation>Thelwall M., Cugelman B. Monitoring Twitter strategies to discover resonating topics: The case of the UNDP. El Profesional de la Información. 2017; 26 (4).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B52"><label>52.</label><mixed-citation>Theocharis Y. et al. Using Twitter to mobilize protest action: Online mobilization patterns and action repertoires in the Occupy Wall Street, Indignados, and Aganaktismenoi movements. Information, Communication &amp; Society. 2015; 18 (2).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B53"><label>53.</label><mixed-citation>Tsao R., Preece J., Lazar J. One foot in cyberspace &amp; the Other on the ground: A case study of analysis and design issues in a hybrid virtual and physical community. WebNet Journal: Internet Technologies, Applications &amp; Issues. 1999; 1 (3).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B54"><label>54.</label><mixed-citation>Tufekci Z., Wilson C. Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: Observations from Tahrir Square. Journal of Communication. 2012; 62 (2).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B55"><label>55.</label><mixed-citation>Van Es K., Wieringa M., Schäfer M.T. Tool criticism: From digital methods to digital methodology. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Web Studies; 2018.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B56"><label>56.</label><mixed-citation>Velasquez A. Social media and online political discussion: The effect of cues and informational cascades on participation in online political communities. New Media &amp; Society. 2012; 14 (8).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B57"><label>57.</label><mixed-citation>Vidgen B., Yasseri T. Detecting weak and strong Islamophobic hate speech on social media. Journal of Information Technology &amp; Politics. 2020; 17 (1).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B58"><label>58.</label><mixed-citation>Vromen A. et al. Online movement mobilization and electoral politics: The case of GetUp! Communication, Politics &amp; Culture. 2011; 44 (2).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B59"><label>59.</label><mixed-citation>Wieringa M. et al. Political topic-communities and their framing practices in the Dutch Twittersphere. Internet Policy Review. 2018; 7 (2).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B60"><label>60.</label><mixed-citation>Zhou X., Chan Y.Y., Peng Z.M. Deliberativeness of online political discussion: A content analysis of the Guangzhou Daily website. Journalism Studies. 2008; 9 (5).</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
