<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Sociology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Sociology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Социология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-2272</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2408-8897</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumamba</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">24530</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2313-2272-2020-20-3-471-486</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Theory, Methodology and History of Sociological Research</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Вопросы истории, теории и методологии</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Social assessment of technology and humanitarization of engineering in the information society</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Социальная оценка техники и гуманитаризация инженерной деятельности в информационном обществе</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Tsvyk</surname><given-names>V. A</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Цвык</surname><given-names>Владимир Анатольевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор философских наук, заведующий кафедрой этики и декан факультета гуманитарных и социальных наук</p></bio><email>tsvyk-va@rudn.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Tsvyk</surname><given-names>I. V</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Цвык</surname><given-names>Ирина Вячеславовна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор философских наук, профессор кафедры философии Московского авиационного института; доцент очно-заочного отделения факультета гуманитарных и социальных наук Российского университета дружбы народов</p></bio><email>tsvykirina@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">RUDN University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Российский университет дружбы народов</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Moscow Aviation Institute</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Московский авиационный институт</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2020-12-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>12</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">VOL 20, NO3 (2020)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 20, №3 (2020)</issue-title><fpage>471</fpage><lpage>486</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-09-11"><day>11</day><month>09</month><year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2020, Tsvyk V.A., Tsvyk I.V.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2020, Цвык В.А., Цвык И.В.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Tsvyk V.A., Tsvyk I.V.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Цвык В.А., Цвык И.В.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/24530">https://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/24530</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article considers definitions of the contemporary technology and its social and moral assessment. In the information society, humanitarization of engineering and technical education in general becomes extremely important together with the social-humanitarian knowledge in the interdisciplinary assessment of the scientific-technological development. Technology Assessment (TA) is a new scientific discipline, a theory of assessing and forecasting the development of technology, and a practice of consulting. Based on the TA, algorithms are developed to identify negative effects of technology and to make scientifically sound decisions. An interdisciplinary dialogue on the social assessment of technology should focus not only on technocratic tasks but also on the social-humanitarian methodological and epistemological foundations of the TA. In recent years, this component of the social assessment of technology has influenced the Western-European academic discourse on Responsible Research and Innovation, which reflects the scientific understanding of the importance of ethical reflection of technical activity. Thus, there is an obvious need for the combination of the social-humanitarian expertise of innovative technological projects with technical, mathematical and applied methods in the information age. Contemporary radical changes determined by the scientific-technological revolution require new approaches, methods and forms of interaction between people and communities, while their global nature determines universal ethical principles of these relationships. The post-modern information development of Russia will be accompanied not only by implementation of information technologies in all spheres of life, but also by the social-moral assessment of technology, humanization and humanitarization of engineering, strengthening personal professionalism and creative abilities.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Статья посвящена определению сущности современной техники, ее социальной и нравственной оценке. Отмечается, что в условиях информационного общества на первый план выходит проблема гуманитаризации инженерного и в целом технического образования, а также роль социально-гуманитарного познания в междисциплинарной оценке научно-технологического развития. Technology Assessment (ТА) - новая научная дисциплина, теория оценки и прогнозирования развития конкретных технологий, а также практика политического консультирования. На базе ТА разрабатываются алгоритмы распознавания негативных последствий техники в целях принятия научно обоснованных решений в сфере научно-технической политики. Подключение к междисциплинарному диалогу о социальной оценке техники помимо технократической элиты представителей социально-гуманитарного знания позволило разработать методологические и эпистемологические основания TA. Этический компонент социальной оценки техники прослеживается в укоренившемся в западноевропейской академической среде концепте «Responsible Research and Innovation». Очевидна необходимость интегрального подхода, призванного объединить социально-гуманитарную экспертизу инновационных технологических проектов, технонаучную парадигму и прикладную этику в информационном обществе. Кардинальные перемены в современном мире, обусловленные научно-технологической революцией, требуют поиска новых подходов, способов и форм взаимоотношений между людьми и общностями, а глобальность перемен обусловливает планетарный характер этических принципов, лежащих в основе этих взаимоотношений. Вхождение России в постсовременную информационную цивилизацию будет сопровождаться не только освоением и внедрением во все сферы жизни информационных технологий, но и социально-нравственной оценкой техники, гуманизацией и гуманитаризацией инженерной деятельности, укреплением и развитием профессионализма личности и ее творческих способностей.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>technology</kwd><kwd>technosphere</kwd><kwd>technogenic civilization</kwd><kwd>information society</kwd><kwd>Technology Assessment</kwd><kwd>Responsible Research and Innovation</kwd><kwd>engineering</kwd><kwd>engineering ethics</kwd><kwd>humanitarization of engineering education</kwd><kwd>Technology Assessment</kwd><kwd>Responsible Research and Innovation</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>техника</kwd><kwd>техносфера</kwd><kwd>техногенная цивилизация</kwd><kwd>информационное общество</kwd><kwd>инженерная деятельность</kwd><kwd>инженерная этика</kwd><kwd>гуманитаризация инженерного образования</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Al-Ani N.M. Filosofiya tekhniki: ocherki istorii i teorii [Philosophy of Technology: Essays on History and Theory]. Saint Petersburg; 2004 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Berdyaev N.A. Tsarstvo dukha i tsarstvo kesarya [Kingdom of Spirit and Kingdom of Caesar]. Moscow; 1995 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Fedorov N.F. Sochineniya [Works]. Moscow; 1982 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Filosofiya tekhniki v FRG [Philosophy of Technology in FRG]. Moscow; 1989 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Filosofsky entsiklopedichesky slovar [Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Moscow; 2003 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Gavrilina E.A. Inzhenernoe tvorchestvo v informatsionnom obshchestve: tipologiya, dinamika, kriterii otsenki inzhenernoy kompetentsii [Engineering Creativity in the Information Society: Typology, Dynamics, Criteria for Assessing Competences]. Moscow; 2011 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Gerasimova I.A. Neustranimost neopredelennosti v sotsialnoy otsenke tekhniki [Unavoidable uncertainty in the social assessment of technology]. Epistemology &amp; Philosophy of Science. 2012; 2 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Gorokhov V.G., Deker M. Sotsialnye tekhnologii prikladnykh mezhdistsiplinarnykh issledovaniy v sfere sotsialnoy otsenki tekhniki [Social technologies of the applied interdisciplinary research in the social assessment of technology]. Epistemology &amp; Philosophy of Science. 2013; 1 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Grunwald A. Responsible innovation: Bringing together technology assessment, applied ethics, and STS research. Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies. 2011; 7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Hahn J., Ladikas M. Responsible research and innovation: Global perspective. Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies. 2014; 10.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Hahn J., Merz C., Scherz C. Identity shaping: Challenges of advising parliaments and society - a brief history of parliamentary technology assessment. Philosophy of Science and Technology. 2015; 2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Handbuch Technikethik. Grunwald A. (Hrsg.). Stuttgart; 2013.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Hunning A. Inzhenernaya deyatelnost s tochki zreniya eticheskoy i sotsialnoy otvetstvennosti [Engineering in the ethical and social responsibility perspective]. Filosofiya tekhniki v FRG. Moscow; 1989 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Istoriya i filosofiya nauki (Filosofiya nauki) [History and Philosophy of Science (Philosophy of Science)]. Moscow; 2019 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Kapp E. Grundlinien einer Philosophie der Technik; Zur Entstehungsgeschichte der Kultur aus neuen Gesichtpunkten. Duesseldorf; 1978.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Nauchno-tekhnichesky progress i eticheskaya paradigma XXI veka [Scientific-Technological Progress and Ethical Paradigm of the 21st Century]. V.A. Tsvyk (Ed.). Moscow; 2018 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Owen R., Macnaghten P., Stigoe J. Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy. 2012; 39.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Rozin V.M. Sushchnost tekhniki [The essence of technology]. Pravo, mirovozzrenie, filosofiya. 2004; 1-2 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Sadowski J., Guston D. Technology assessment in the USA: Distributed institutional governance. Journal for Technology Assessment in Theory and Practice. 2015; 1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Seredkina E.V., Chernikova I.V. Gumanitarizatsiya inzhenernogo obrazovaniya i sotsialnaya otsenka tekhniki [Humanitarization of engineering education and social assessment of technology]. Technologos. 2015; 2 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Seredkina E.V. Otvetstvennye issledovaniya i innovatsii, sotsialnaya otsenka tekhniki i ustoychivoe razvitie [Responsible research and innovation, social assessment of technology and sustainable development]. PNRPU Sociology and Economics Bulletin. 2015; 2 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Seredkina E.V. Sotsialnaya otsenka tekhniki v povorotnye vremena: vyzovy transdistsiplinarnosti i natsionalnogo [Social assessment of technology in the times of change: Challenges of the transdisciplinary and national]. Technologos. 2017; 2 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Sovremennye filosofskie problemy estestvennykh, tekhnicheskikh i sotsialno-gumanitarnykh nauk [Contemporary Philosophical Issues of Natural, Technical and Social Sciences]. V.V. Mironov (Ed.). Moscow; 2006 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Stepin V.S. Istoriya i filosofiya nauki [History and Philosophy of Science]. Moscow; 2011 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Tsvyk A.V. Etika politicheskoy otvetstvennosti v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh [Ethics of political responsibility in international relations]. RUDN Journal of International Relations. 2017; 17 (2) (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Tsvyk V.A., Tsvyk I.V. Professional development in the information society: Challenges and prospects. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2018; 18 (3).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Tsvyk V.A., Tsvyk I.V. Moral education of the youth in the information society. Voprosy Filosofii. 2020; 4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Tsvyk I.V. Filosofiya tekhniki: sushchnost, perspektivy razvitiya. [Philosophy of technology: Essence and development prospects]. Lichnost. Kultura. Obshchestvo. 2010; 12 (1) (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Tsvyk I.V. Nravstvennaya otsenka tekhniki [Moral assessment of technology]. RUDN Journal of Philosophy. 2014; 2 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Tsvyk I.V. Sotsialnaya otsenka tekhniki [Social assessment of technology]. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2011; 5 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Voronin A.A. Kontury gumanitarnoy ekspertizy [Contours of the humanitarian expertise]. Chelovek. 2014; 1 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
