RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and SemanticsRUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and SemanticsВестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Теория языка. Семиотика. Семантика2313-22992411-1236Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)7502ARTICLESСТАТЬИResearch ArticleFormalist Criticism and Reader-Response TheoryКритика формализма и реакция читательской аудиторииMohammad Al Fuadi-Мохаммед Аль Фуади-General and Russian Linguistics Department Philological FacultyКафедра общего и русского языкознания Филологический факультетraf_yazyk_rudn@mail.ruPeoples’ Friendship University of RussiaРоссийский университет дружбы народов150420144NO4 (2014)№4 (2014)11912808092016Copyright ©; 2014, Mohammad Al Fuadi -.Copyright ©; 2014, Мохаммед Аль Фуади -.2014Mohammad Al Fuadi -.Мохаммед Аль Фуади -.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0https://journals.rudn.ru/semiotics-semantics/article/view/7502The article deals with the interaction of formalism as a trend in language and literature studies, on the one hand, and a teaching method, a technique of teaching to understand and investigate literary text proceeding from its structure and content, on the other hand. One of the main principles is dialogism (M. Bakhtin) that creates the coeducation between the writer and reader. Thus the process becomes bilateral, or even multilateral and it includes criticism on both parts - a teacher and a student-reader as they are interpreting a literary text.В статье обсуждается взаимодействие формализма как тенденции в лингвистических и литературных исследованиях, с одной стороны, и как метод обучения, технология понимания и исследования художественного текста исходя из его формы и содержания, - с другой. Один из ведущих принципов - диалогичность (М.М. Бахтин), которая создает ситуацию совместного, общего знания между автором и читателем. Таким образом, процесс становится двусторонним или даже многосторонним, включая критическое отношение обеих сторон - преподавателя и студента, поскольку они оба интерпретируют художественный текст.literary criticismformalismdialogismcoeducationreaderlyreader-response theoryliterarismлитературная критикаформализмдиалогичностьсовместное образованиечитательская аудиториятеория учета читательской аудиториилитературность[Bakhtin M.M. The Dialogic Imagination / Transl. by Garyl Emerson and Michael Holquist. University of Texas Press, 1981.][Bloom A. The Closing of The American Mind: How Higher Education has failed Democracy and impoverished the souls of Today's Students. A Touchstone book, Published by Simon & Schuster, Inc., 1988.][Booth W.C. The Rhetoric Fiction. London, 1961.][Booth W.C. In the Company We Keep. Ethics Fiction. University of California Press, 1988.][Gardiner M. Bakhtin and the Human Sciences: No Last words. SAGE publication, Ltd., 1998.][Gibson W. Persona: A style study for Readers and Writers. Random House, Inc., 1969.][Knapp S. Literary interest: The Limits of Anti-Formalism. Harvard University Press, 1993.][Krieger M. Northrop Fry in Modern Criticism. Columbia University Press, 1966.][Krieger M. The Institution of Theory. Baltimore; Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994.][Morson G., Emerson C. Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a Prosaic. Stanford University press, 1990.][Richards I.A. Practical Criticism: A Study of Literary Judgment. L.: K. Paul, Trench, and Trubner, 1929.][Rosenblatt L.M. The Reader, the text, the poem, the transactional Theory of the literary work. Southern Illinois University, 1978.][Rosenblatt L.M., Booth W.C. Literature as Exploration. The Modern Language Association of America, 1995 (5th ed.).][Suleiman S.R. Subversive intent Gender, Politics and the Avon-grade. Harvard University Press, 1990.][Tompkins J. Reader-Response Criticism: From Formalism to poststructuralism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University press, 1980.]