<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Теория языка. Семиотика. Семантика</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-2299</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2411-1236</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">37649</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2313-2299-2023-14-4-994-1012</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">FJZYDS</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>PSYCHOLINGUISTICS</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ПСИХОЛИНГВИСТИКА</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Recursiveness as the Dominant Feature of Communicative Behavior in Day-to-Day Interaction</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Рекурсивность как доминанта коммуникативного поведения участника бытового общения: по данным эксперимента</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0992-0466</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="scopus">57214930556</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="researcherid">HKN-8152-2023</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">2480-2244</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Pishchalnikova</surname><given-names>Vera A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Пищальникова</surname><given-names>Вера Анатольевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>D.Sc. in Philology, Full Professor, Professor with the Chair of general and comparative linguistics</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор филологических наук, профессор, профессор кафедры общего и сравнительного языкознания</p></bio><email>pishchalnikova@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6773-1129</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="scopus">57205289987</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="researcherid">M-8605-2018</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">4523-4210</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kardanova-Biryukova</surname><given-names>Ksenya S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Карданова-Бирюкова</surname><given-names>Ксения Суфьяновна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>D.Sc. in Philology, Associate Professor, Head of the Chair of linguistics and translation studies with the Institute of foreign languages</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор филологических наук, доцент, заведующий кафедрой языкознания и переводоведения института иностранных языков</p></bio><email>kardanova-biryukovaks@mgpu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Moscow State Linguistic University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Московский государственный лингвистический университет</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Moscow City University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Московский городской педагогический университет</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2023-12-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>12</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>4</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH OF LANGUAGE AND SPEECH</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">МЕЖДИСЦИПЛИНАРНЫЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ ЯЗЫКА И РЕЧИ</issue-title><fpage>994</fpage><lpage>1012</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2024-01-29"><day>29</day><month>01</month><year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2023, Pishchalnikova V.A., Kardanova-Biryukova K.S.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2023, Пищальникова В.А., Карданова-Бирюкова К.С.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Pishchalnikova V.A., Kardanova-Biryukova K.S.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Пищальникова В.А., Карданова-Бирюкова К.С.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/semiotics-semantics/article/view/37649">https://journals.rudn.ru/semiotics-semantics/article/view/37649</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p style="text-align: justify;">Day-to-day interaction is overtly standardized and being associated with the expectations and norms imposed by a society as well as stereotypical societal being. When communicating, an individual is perfectly aware of the roles that could be attributed to him and aims to stand up to them. At the same time he intends to promptly comprehend and process the data he obtains from the outside and fit them into his niche, or the hierarchical environment determined by his unique set of properties. To put it differently, the subject of communication reflects upon those elements which are relevant for his being, and he can comprehend given his organization. With this it makes sense to relate to repetitive nature of some actions that have proven instrumental in maintaining the hierarchy of this environment and ensure self-preservation of the subject. Chilean biologists Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela have coined the term recursiveness to relate to the repetitive character of the activities of a living entity in different cases of this living entity’s interaction with is medium. The authors of the theory of autopoiesis mainly focused on biological species, and humans being one of those. In the publications while they cover the foundations of their theory, Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela refer to social systems as complex third order systems being regulated by the same self-preservation laws as a living entity. This serves as a prerequisite to attribute recursiveness to communicative behavior of a human aiming to step into social interaction and design a model of recursive communicative behavior. To verify this model we planned and ran a psycholinguistic experiment to measure the degree of the steoretypization in communicative behavior of mainstream representatives of the society. The participants were subdivided into two contrasting subclusters: “those under 24” and “those over 45”. They were offered a number of experimental cases with a task to model the communicative behavioral patterns typical for them in various day-to-day communication settings. Overall the experiment involved 219 subjects. The analysis of the data obtained outlines those settings implying a higher degree of the standardization in communicative behavior as well as the gender and age-related specifics of the participants with more stereotypical speech patterns.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p style="text-align: justify;">Бытовое общение характеризуется высокой степенью стандартизации, связанной с известными социальными ожиданиями и стереотипностью общественного бытия. Вступая в коммуникацию, человек понимает, какие роли могут быть потенциально ему предписаны, и стремится им соответствовать. Одновременно он ориентирован на быстрое восприятие и обработку поступающих извне данных, встраивая их в собственную нишу, или иерархически выстроенное пространство, задаваемое свойствами субъекта. Иными словами, для субъекта коммуникации значимо только то, что он способен воспринимать с учетом собственной организации и что определяет его жизнедеятельность. Позволяют поддерживать сложившуюся иерархию этого пространства и обеспечивают самосохранение субъекта одни и те же повторяющиеся действия. Чилийские биологи У. Матурана и Фр. Варела ввели в научный оборот понятие рекурсивности , или повторяющийся характер действий живой системы в разных ситуациях интеракции её со средой. Авторы аутопоэтической теории говорили о рекурсивности применительно к биологическим организмам, в том числе и к человеку как биологическому виду. В цикле публикаций на эту тему У. Матурана и Фр. Варела пишут о социальных системах как сложных системах третьего порядка, подчиняющихся тем же законам самосохранения, что и отдельный человек. Это дает основания атрибутировать рекурсивность коммуникативному поведению индивида, вступающего в социальное взаимодействие, и строить соответствующую модель рекурсивного коммуникативного поведения. Для экспериментальной верификации построенной модели был спланирован и проведен психолингвистический эксперимент, направленный на измерение степени стереотипизации коммуникативного поведения среднестатистических представителей социума. Испытуемым, входящим в две полярные экспериментальные подгруппы: «до 24 лет» vs. «от 45 лет», были предложены экспериментальные кейсы, в которых требовалось смоделировать собственное коммуникативное поведение в различных бытовых ситуациях общения. Всего было задействовано 219 человек. В результате анализа полученных экспериментальным путем данных были выявлены условия, в которых наблюдается более высокая степень стандартизации коммуникативного поведения, а также гендерные и возрастные особенности участников эксперимента, характеризующихся более шаблонным речевым поведением.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>theory of autopoiesis</kwd><kwd>psycholinguistic experiment</kwd><kwd>communicative behavior</kwd><kwd>modeling</kwd><kwd>subject of communication</kwd><kwd>recursiveness</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>аутопоэтическая теория</kwd><kwd>психолингвистический эксперимент</kwd><kwd>коммуникативное поведение</kwd><kwd>моделирование</kwd><kwd>субъект коммуникации</kwd><kwd>рекурсивность</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Maturana, H.R. (2014). Understanding social systems? Constructivist Foundations, 9(2), 187–188.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Maturana H.R. Understanding social systems? // Constructivist Foundations. 2014. № 9(2). P. 187-188.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Maturana, H.R. &amp; Varela, Fr. (1980). Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 42. Dordecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Maturana H.R., Varela Fr. Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living // Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. № 42. Dordecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co., 1980.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Maturana, H.R. (1987). The biological foundation of self-consciousness and the physical domain of existence. In: Physics of cognitive Processes. World Scientific. Singapore. pp. 324–379.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Maturana H.R. The biological foundation of self-consciousness and the physical domain of existence // Physics of cognitive Processes. World Scientific. Singapore, 1987. P. 324-379.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Maturana, H.R. (1995). Biology of Cognition. In: Language and Intellect. Moscow: Progress. pp. 95–142. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Матурана У. Биология познания // Язык и интеллект: сборник научных трудов; сост. и вступ. ст. В.В. Петрова. М.: Прогресс, 1995. С. 95-142.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Maturana, H.R. (1978). Biology of Language: the Epistemology of Reality. In: Psychology and Biology of Language and Thought: Essays in Honor of Eric Lenneberg, Miller G.A., Lenneberg E. (eds.). New York: Academic Press. pp. 27–63.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Maturana H.R. Biology of language: the epistemology of reality // Psychology and biology of language and thought: Essays in honor of Eric Lenneberg / G.A. Miller, E. Lenneberg (Eds.). New York: Academic Press, 1978. P. 27-63.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Luhmann, N. (2007). Social Systems. Saint-Petersburg: Nauka. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Луман Н. Социальные системы: очерк общей теории / Под ред. Н.А. Головина. СПб: Наука, 2007.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Parsons, T. (2008). Social Systems. Issues of Social Theory, II 1(2), 38–71. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Парсонс Т. Социальные системы // Вопросы социальной теории. 2008. Т. II. Вып. 1(2). C. 38-71.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Urrestarazu, H. (2014). Social autopoiesis? Constructivist Foundations, 9(2), 153–166.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Urrestarazu H. Social autopoiesis? // Constructivist Foundations. 2014. 9(2). P. 153-166.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Luhmann, N. (2004). Society as a Social System. Moscow: Logos. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Луман Н. Общество как социальная система. М.: Логос, 2004.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shchus, A. &amp; Parsons, T. (2021). Theory of Social Action. Moscow: Elementarny formy. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шюц А., Парсонс Т. Теория социального действия. М.: Элементарные формы, 2021.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday: Garden City.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Goffman E. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday: Garden City, 1959.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brown, P. &amp; Levinson, S.C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Brown P., Levinson S.C. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cialdini, R. (1984). Influence. The Psychology of Persuasion. New York: William Morrow &amp; Company.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cialdini R. Influence. The psychology of persuasion. New York: William Morrow &amp; Company, 1984.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gumperz, J. (1975). Types of Language Communities. In: New Issues of Linguistics. Iss. VII. Sociolinguistics. Moscow. pp. 182–198. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гамперц Дж. Типы языковых обществ // Новое в лингвистике. Вып. VII. Социолингвистика. М., 1975. С. 182-198.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Maturana, H.R. &amp; Varela, Fr. (2001). The Tree of Knowledge. Moscow: Progress. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Матурана У., Варела Ф. Древо познания. М.: Прогресс, 2001.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Maturana, H.R. &amp; Varela, Fr. (1980). Biology of cognition. In: Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 42. Dordecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co. pp. 5–58.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Maturana H.R., Varela Fr. Biology of cognition // Autopoiesis and cognition: The Realization of the Living. Boston studies in the philosophy of science. Vol. 42. Dordecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co., 1980. P. 5-58.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Damasio, A.R. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York: Avan Books.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Damasio A.R. Descartes’ error: emotion, reason and the human brain. New York: Avan Books, 1994.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Edelman, G.M. &amp; Totoni, G. (2000). A Universe of Consciousness. How Matter Becomes Imagination. New York: Basic Books.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Edelman G.M., Toton G. A universe of consciousness. How matter becomes imagination. New York: Basic Books, 2000.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zelazo, P.D., Gao, H.H. &amp; Todd, R. (2007). The development of consciousness. In: The Cambridge handbook of consciousness, P.D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, E. Thompson (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9780511816789.016</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zelazo P.D., Gao H.H., Todd R. The development of consciousness // The Cambridge handbook of consciousness / P.D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, E. Thompson (Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. P. 405-432. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816789.016</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Totaro, P. &amp; Ninno, D. (2018). A duality in recursion to analyse digital society. Advance. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31124/advance.7228325.v1</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Totaro P., Ninno D. A duality in recursion to analyse digital society // Advance. 2018. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31124/advance.7228325.v1</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rubin, S. (2023). Cartography of the multiple formal systems of molecular autopoiesis: from the biology of cognition and enaction to anticipation and active inference. Biosystems, 230. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303264723001302 (accessed: 06.07.2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2023.104955</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rubin S. Cartography of the multiple formal systems of molecular autopoiesis: from the biology of cognition and enaction to anticipation and active inference // Biosystems. 2023. Vol. 230. Режим доступа: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303264723001302 (дата обращения: 06.07.2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2023.104955</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pishchal’nikova, V.A., Stepykin, N.I., Bubnova, I.A., Adamova, Z.G., Myagkova, E.Yu., Kruzhilina, T.V. &amp; Butakova, L.O. Functional Illiteracy as Object of Psycholinguistics (2022). Moscow: R-Valent. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Пищальникова В.А., Степыкин Н.И., Бубнова И.А., Адамова З.Г., Мягкова Е.Ю., Кружилина Т.В., Бутакова Л.О. Функциональная неграмотность как объект психолингвистики: монография / под ред. В.А. Пищальниковой. М.: Р-Валент, 2022.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stepykin, N.I. (2021). Potential in Using Formalized Parameters for Modeling Speech Actions. Scientific Dialogue, 8, 112–127. https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-8-112127 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Степыкин Н.И. Потенциал применения формализованных параметров для моделирования речевого действия // Научный диалог. 2021. № 8. С. 112-127. https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-8-112-127</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Trofimova, I.N. (2004). Synergy of Body Dynamics and World Perception. In: Synergetics and Psychology. Moscow: Cognito-center. pp. 61–81. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Трофимова И.Н. Синергия динамики тела и восприятия мира // Синергетика и психология. Вып. 3. Когнитивные процессы / под ред. В.И. Аршинова, И.Н. Трофимовой, В. Шендяпина. М.: Когнито-центр, 2004. С. 61-81.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
