<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Теория языка. Семиотика. Семантика</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-2299</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2411-1236</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">35252</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2313-2299-2023-14-2-435-445</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">LCJJAR</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>LANGUAGE AND SOCIETY</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ЯЗЫК И ОБЩЕСТВО</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Semiotic Approach in Psycholinguistics</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Семиотический подход в психолингвистике</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6985-802X</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">9565-1834</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Nikitina</surname><given-names>Elena S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Никитина</surname><given-names>Елена Сергеевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD in Philology, Associate Professor of the Department of Journalism, Advertising and PR</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат филологических наук, доцент кафедры журналистики, рекламы и PR</p></bio><email>m1253076@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Moscow Financial and Law University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Московский финансово-юридический университет</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2023-06-30" publication-format="electronic"><day>30</day><month>06</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">VOL 14, NO2 (2023)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 14, №2 (2023)</issue-title><fpage>435</fpage><lpage>445</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2023-07-06"><day>06</day><month>07</month><year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2023, Nikitina E.S.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2023, Никитина Е.С.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Nikitina E.S.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Никитина Е.С.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/semiotics-semantics/article/view/35252">https://journals.rudn.ru/semiotics-semantics/article/view/35252</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p style="text-align: justify;">The study is devoted to psycholinguistics as one of the angles of the study of consciousness. The relevance of the study is due to the fact that psycholinguistics has not yet succeeded in constructing a valid ontological picture defining the specific “reality” of a given science, and finding a place for it in the scientific picture of the world. If we take into account the spatial structure of the sign, then we can assume the presence of at least three points of view on semiotics as a subject of study of the sign organization of consciousness. These are linguistic semiotics, philosophical semiotics and psychological-hermeneutical semiotics. The novelty of the study lies in the introduction of psycholinguistics into the intersubject communicative space of disciplines that study consciousness in order to highlight its subject-methodological features. The symbolic nature of consciousness makes it possible to consider semiotics not only as a scientific subject of study, but also as a method of organizing and transferring experience. As a result of the analysis of the problem, the statement can be proposed that psycholinguistics methodically explores understanding as an accompanying function of text creation. In culture, relations between people are reified, and this reification is semiotic. In the psyche, these relationships are psycholinguistic. The socio-cultural encounter of these relationships occurs at the metacognition level.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p style="text-align: justify;">Исследование посвящено психолингвистике как одному из ракурсов изучения сознания. Актуальность исследования обусловлена тем, что психолингвистике до сих пор не удалось построить специальную онтологическую картину, задающую особую «действительность» данной науки, и найти ей место в научной картине мира. Если принять во внимание пространственную структуру знака, то можно предположить наличие, по крайней мере, трех точек зрения на семиотику как предмет изучения знаковой организации сознания. Это лингвистическая семиотика, философская семиотика и психолого-герменевтическая семиотика. Новизна исследования состоит во введении психолингвистики в межпредметное коммуникативное пространство дисциплин, изучающих сознание, с целью высвечивания ее предметно-методических особенностей. Знаковая природа сознания позволяет рассмотреть семиотику не только как научный предмет изучения, но и как метод организации и передачи опыта. Результатом анализа проблемы может быть предложено утверждение, что психолингвистика в методическом плане исследует понимание как сопровождающую функцию творения текста. В культуре отношения между людьми овеществляются, и это овеществление семиотично. В психике эти отношения психолингвистичны. Социокультурная встреча этих взаимоотношений происходит на уровне метасознания.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>sign</kwd><kwd>consciousness</kwd><kwd>psycholinguistics</kwd><kwd>text</kwd><kwd>evidential paradigm</kwd><kwd>understanding</kwd><kwd>meta-cognition</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>знак</kwd><kwd>сознание</kwd><kwd>семиотика</kwd><kwd>психолингвистика</kwd><kwd>текст</kwd><kwd>уликовая парадигма</kwd><kwd>понимание</kwd><kwd>метасознание</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Semiotics. Dictionaries and encyclopedias on the Academician. (2021). URL: https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/ruwiki/8181 (accessed: 01.02.2021). (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Семиотика. Словари и энциклопедии на Академике. Режим доступа: https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/ruwiki/8181 (дата обращения: 02.10.2021).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Martin, Br. &amp; Ringkhem F. (2009). Dictionary of Semiotics. Moscow: URSS. Р. 253. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мартин Б., Рингхэм Ф. Словарь семиотики. М.: URSS, 2009.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zotov, A.F. (2011). Scientific rationality: history, modernity, prospects. Questions of philosophy, 5, 5-17. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Зотов А.Ф. Научная рациональность: история, современность, перспективы // Вопросы философии. 2011. № 5. С. 5–17.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shatin, Yu.V. (1996). Three vectors of semiotics. Discourse, 2, 41-47. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шатин Ю.В. Три вектора семиотики // Дискурс. 1996. № 2. С. 41–47.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Morris, Ch. (1946): Signs, Language and Behavior. New York: Prentice Hall.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Morris Ch. Signs, Language and Behavior. New York: Prentice Hall,1946.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Makhlina, S.T. (2010). Lectures on semiotics of culture and linguistics. St. Petersburg: SPbKO. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Махлина С.Т. Лекции по семиотике культуры и лингвистике. СПб: СПбКО, 2010.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ginzburg, C. (1989). Clues: Roots of an Evidential Paradigm. In: Clues, Myths, and the Historical Method. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 96-125.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ginzburg C. Clues: Roots of an Evidential Paradigm // Clues, Myths, and the Historical Method. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989. P. 96–125.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nikitina, E.S. (2006). Semiotics. Course of lectures. Moscow: Academic Project; Trickst. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Никитина Е.С. Семиотика. Курс лекций. М.: Академический Проект; Трикста, 2006.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Morris, Ch.U. (1983). Foundation of the sign theory. In: Semiotics. Moscow: Raduga. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Моррис Ч.У. Основания теории знаков // Семиотика. М.: Радуга, 1983.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lebedev, S.A. (2014). Course of lectures on the philosophy of science. Moscow. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лебедев С.А. Курс лекций по философии науки. М.: Изд-во МГТУ им. Н.Э. Баумана, 2014.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Eko, U. (1998). Missing structure. Introduction to semiology. Moscow: Petrópolis. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Эко У. Отсутствующая структура. Введение в семиологию. М.: Петрополис, 1998.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Leont'ev, A.A. (1997). Basics of psycholinguistics. Moscow: Smysl. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Леонтьев А.А. Основы психолингвистики. М.: Смысл, 1997.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kassirer, E. (2002). Philosophy of symbolic forms. Moscow: Univer. kn.; SPb., Yazyk. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кассирер Э. Философия символических форм. М.: Универ. кн.; СПб.: Язык, 2002.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Averintsev, S.S. (1976). Symbol. In: Brief literary encyclopedia. Vol. 6. Moscow. P. 828. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Аверинцев С.С. Символ // Краткая литературная энциклопедия. Т. 6. М., 1976. С. 828.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sapogova, E.E. (1999). Psycholinguistics for psychologists: in search of didactic paradigm. Izvestiya TulGU. Series: Problems of linguistics, 2, 63-72. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сапогова Е.Е. Психолингвистика для психологов: в поисках дидактической парадигмы // Известия ТулГУ. Серия: Проблемы языкознания. 1999. Вып. 2. С. 63–72.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mamardashvili, M.K. &amp; Pyatigorsky, A.M. (1997). Symbol and consciousness. Metaphysical reasoning about consciousness, symbolism and language. Moscow: Yazyki russkoy kul'tury. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мамардашвили М.К., Пятигорский А.М. Символ и сознание. Метафизические рассуждения о сознании, символике и языке. М.: Языки русской культуры, 1997.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bogin, G.I. (2001). Gaining the Ability to Understand. Introduction to Philological Hermeneutics. Moscow: Psychology and Business OnLine. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Богин Г.И. Обретение способности понимать. Введение в филологическую герменевтику. М.: Психология и Бизнес ОнЛайн, 2001.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brudnyi, A.A. (1998). Psychological hermeneutics. Moscow: Labirint. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Брудный А.А. Психологическая герменевтика. М.: Лабиринт, 1998.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nikitina, E.S. (2016). Semantic analysis of the text: psychosemiotic approach. Moscow: URSS: Lenand. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Никитина Е.С. Смысловой анализ текста: психосемиотический подход. М.: URSS: Ленанд, 2016.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sapogova, E.E. (2006). Chronotop Bakhtina: the temptation of penetration. Cultural and historical psychology, 2(1), 94-98. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сапогова Е.Е. Хронотоп Бахтина: соблазн проникновения // Культурно-историческая психология. 2006. № 2(1). С. 94–98.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lotman, Yu.M. (2002). Semiotics of Culture and the Concept of the Text. In: History and Typology of Russian Culture. St. Petersburg: Art. pp. 158-162. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лотман Ю.М. Семиотика культуры и понятие текста // История и типология русской культуры. Санкт–Петербург: Искусство, 2002. С. 158–162.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
