<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Russian Language Studies</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Russian Language Studies</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Русистика</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2618-8163</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2618-8171</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">34137</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2618-8163-2023-21-1-7-17</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">YFQFRP</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Key Issues of Russian Language Research</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Актуальные проблемы исследований русского языка</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Speech acts and Russian text-generating discourse</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Речевые акты и русский текстопорождающий дискурс</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8363-3326</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Abdelhamid</surname><given-names>Said Ahmed Mohamed</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Абдельхамид</surname><given-names>Саид Ахмед Мохамед</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Candidate of Philology, lecturer, Russian Language Department, Al-Alsun Faculty of Foreign Languages</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат филологических наук, преподаватель кафедры русского языка, факультет иностранных языков «Аль-Альсун»</p></bio><email>said_abdelhameed@alsun.asu.edu.eg</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4083-4486</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Alefirenko</surname><given-names>Nikolai F.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Алефиренко</surname><given-names>Николай Федорович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Doctor of Philology, Professor, Professor of the Department of Russian Language and Russian Literature</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор филологических наук, профессор, профессор кафедры русского языка и русской литературы</p></bio><email>alefirenko@bsu.edu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6790-1418</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Chumak-Zhun</surname><given-names>Irina I.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Чумак-Жунь</surname><given-names>Ирина Ивановна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Doctor of Philology, Head of the Department of Russian Language and Russian Literature</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор филологических наук, профессор, заведующая кафедрой русского языка и русской литературы</p></bio><email>chumak@bsu.edu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Ain Shams University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Айн-Шамский университет</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Belgorod State National Research University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Белгородский государственный национальный исследовательский университет</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2023-03-30" publication-format="electronic"><day>30</day><month>03</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">Functional description of the modern Russian language</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">Функциональный вектор описания современного русского языка</issue-title><fpage>7</fpage><lpage>17</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2023-03-30"><day>30</day><month>03</month><year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2023, Abdelhamid S.A., Alefirenko N.F., Chumak-Zhun I.I.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2023, Абдельхамид С.А., Алефиренко Н.Ф., Чумак-Жунь И.И.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Abdelhamid S.A., Alefirenko N.F., Chumak-Zhun I.I.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Абдельхамид С.А., Алефиренко Н.Ф., Чумак-Жунь И.И.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/russian-language-studies/article/view/34137">https://journals.rudn.ru/russian-language-studies/article/view/34137</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p style="text-align: justify;">The relevance of the study is determined by the hidden turbulence of such concepts often used in Russian studies as “speech activity”, “speech acts” and “discourse”. The aim of the work is to determine the genetic connections of this trinity and the functional purpose of each of the categories under consideration. The main research means is the authors’ method of discursive-modus analysis of artistic speech. The research materials were dictionary definitions from explanatory dictionaries of the Russian language, in particular from “Dictionary of expressive stable phrases of the Russian language” compiled by V.Ju. Melikyan, as well as utterances extracted from the Russian National Corpus. The authors found that the communicative-speech act is a synergistic combination of mental-psychic and speech activity. Mental-psychic activity involves mental acts - the thought processes of the communicant at the moment of his locative readiness to make a statement and psychic activity of searching for adequate ways to reflect a communicatively significant event in the discursive consciousness of the communicants. Mental-psychic activity encodes and decodes the semantic content of the author's intentions with the help of the means of the language system. Speech activity produces speech acts - functional units of speech communication embodying a purposeful speech action. In conclusion, the categorical essence of the speech act and discourse are generalized. The perspective of the research is the development of a cognitive-pragmatic theory of speech-thinking activity based on the material of the Russian language.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p style="text-align: justify;">Актуальность исследования определяется скрытой турбулентностью таких часто используемых в русистике понятий, как «речевая деятельность», «речевые акты» и «дискурс». Цель работы - определение генетических связей этого триединства и функционального предназначения каждой из рассматриваемых категорий. Основной инструментарий исследования - авторский метод дискурсивно-модусного анализа художественной речи. Материалами исследования послужили словарные дефиниции из толковых словарей русского языка, в частности из «Словаря экспрессивных устойчивых фраз русского языка» В.Ю. Меликяна, а также высказывания, извлеченные из Национального корпуса русского языка. Установлено, что коммуникативно-речевой акт представляет собой синергийное сочетание ментально-психической и речевой деятельности. В ментально-психической деятельности сопряжены ментальные акты - мыслительные процессы коммуниканта в момент его локутивной готовности производить высказывание и психическая деятельность, ведущая поиск адекватных способов отражения коммуникативно значимого события в дискурсивном сознании общающихся. Ментально-психическая деятельность с помощью средств языковой системы кодирует и декодирует смысловое содержание авторских интенций. Речевая деятельность производит речевые акты - функциональные единицы речевого общения, которые воплощают целенаправленное речевое действие. Даны обобщения категориальной сущности речевого акта и дискурса. Перспективой исследования является разработка на материале русского языка когнитивно-прагматической теории речемыслительной деятельности.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>communicative-speech activity</kwd><kwd>speech act</kwd><kwd>Russian discourse</kwd><kwd>utterance</kwd><kwd>thinking processes</kwd><kwd>communicative event</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>коммуникативно-речевая деятельность</kwd><kwd>русский дискурс</kwd><kwd>высказывание</kwd><kwd>мыслительные процессы</kwd><kwd>коммуникативное событие</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Alefirenko, N., &amp; Nurtazina, M. (2018). Metaphorical discourse. Search for the essence of speech imagery. Cuadernos de Rusística Española, 14, 15-28. https://doi.org/10.30827/cre.v14i0.6366</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Алефиренко Н.Ф., Чумак-Жунь И.И. Коммуникативная ситуация как когнитивно-прагматический фактор порождения поэтического дискурса // Auspicia. 2008. № 1. C. 68–73.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Alefirenko, N.F., &amp; Chumak-Zhun, I.I. (2008). Communicative situation as cognitive-pragmatical factor of generation of poetic discourse. Auspicia, (1), 68-73. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Боргер Я.В. Комплексный анализ речевых актов негативной реакции (на материале современных драматических произведений) : автореф. дис. … канд. филол. наук. Тюмень, 2004. 21 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Austin, J. (1999). Selected works. (L.B. Makeeva, V.P. Rudnev, Trans.). Moscow: Ideya-Press, Dom Intellektual'noi Knigi Publ. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Григорьева В.С. Дискурс как элемент коммуникативного процесса: прагмалингвистический и когнитивный аспекты : монография. Тамбов : ТГТУ, 2007. 288 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ballmer, T., &amp; Brennstuhl, W. (1981). Speech act classification. Berlin, New York: Springer.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гуревич Л.С. Коммуникативный акт vs речевой акт : проблемы соотношения понятий // Вестник НГУ. Серия : Лингвистика и межкультурная коммуникация. 2007. Т. 5. № 1. С. 103–108.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Borger, Ya.V. (2004). Comprehensive analysis of speech acts of a negative reaction (on the material of modern dramatic works). [Author’s abstr. cand. philol. diss.]. Tyumen. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Жирова И.Г. Структура высказывания и система языковых коммуникативных средств : на материале современных художественных произведений // Научный результат. Вопросы теоретической и прикладной лингвистики. 2020. Т. 6. № 3. С. 85–98. https://doi.org/10.18413/2313-8912-2020-6-3-0-7</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chang, B.G. (2020). To read what is not written: From psychoanalysis to rhetoric and back. Review of Communication, 20(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2019.1707269</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Зимняя И.А. Лингвопсихология речевой деятельности. М. : ОАНО ВО МПСУ ; Воронеж : Модэк, 2001. 432 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chumak-Zhun, I.I. (2017). Poetic text and poetic discourse: To the limitation of concepts. Humanitarian Researches, (4), 56-60. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кибрик А.Е. Очерки по общим и прикладным вопросам языкознания (универсальное, типовое и специфическое в языке). М. : Изд-во МГУ, 1992. 336 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Frank, D. (1999). Seven sins of pragmatism: Theses on the theory of speech acts, analysis of speech communication and rhetoric. Foreign Linguistics, (2), 254-264. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Клюев Е.В. Речевая коммуникация. М. : Рипол Классик, 2002. 320 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Geißner, H. (1981). Sprechwissenschaft: Theorie der műndlichen Kommunikation. Königstein: Konigstein im Taunus.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Леонтьев А.А. Язык, речь, речевая деятельность. М. : КомКнига, 2007. 451 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Grigoreva, V.S. (2007). Discourse as an element of the communicative process: Pragmalinguistic and cognitive aspects. Tambov: TGTU Publ. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Остин Дж. Избранное / пер. с англ. Л.Б. Макеевой, В.П. Руднева. М. : Идея-Пресс : Дом интеллектуальной книги, 1999. 332 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gruber, H. (1996). Streitgespräche: Zur Pragmatikeiner Diskursform. Opladen.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Пинкер С. Язык как инстинкт. М. : Эдиториал УРСС, 2004. 456 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gurevich, L.S. (2007). Communicative act vs speech act: Problems of relationship of concepts. NSU Vestnik. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 5(1), 103-108. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Почепцов Г.Г. Основы прагматического описания предложения. Киев : Вища школа, 1986. 170 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hirvonen, M., &amp; Wiklund, M. (2021). From image to text to speech: The effects of speech prosody on information sequencing in audio description. Text and Talk, 41(3), 309-334. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2019-0172</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Прозоров В.В. Лирический дискурс/текст как речежанровый кроссовер // Жанры речи. 2021. № 2 (30). С. 126–135. https://doi.org/10.18500/2311-0740-2021-2-30-126-135</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jacobson, R.O. (1985). Selected works. Moscow: Progress Publ. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Серль Дж.Р. Что такое речевой акт? Косвенные речевые акты. Классификация речевых актов // Новое в зарубежной лингвистике. 1986. Вып. 17. С. 151–222.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kibrik, A.E. (1992). Essays on general and applied issues of linguistics (universal, typical and specific in language). Moscow: Lomonosov Moscow State University - Publishing House. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Франк Д. Семь грехов прагматики : тезисы о теории речевых актов, анализе речевого общения и риторике // Зарубежная лингвистика. 1999. Вып. 2. С. 254–264.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Klyuev, E.V. (2002). Speech communication. Moscow: RIPOL Classic Publishing Group. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Чумак-Жунь И.И. Поэтический текст и поэтический дискурс : к разграничению понятий // Гуманитарные исследования. 2017. № 4 (64). С. 56–60.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Leontev, A.A. (2007). Language. Speech. Speech activity. Moscow: KomKniga Publ. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шевченко И.С. Речевой акт как единица дискурса : когнитивно-прагматический подход // Тверской лингвистический меридиан. 2007. Вып. 7. С. 69–80.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mei, T. (2019). The poetics of meaningful work: An analogy to speech acts. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 45(1), 50-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453718768359</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Якобсон Р.О. Избранные работы. М. : Прогресс, 1985. 460 c.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pinker, S. (2004). The language instinct. Moscow: Editorial URSS Publ. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Alefirenko N., Nurtazina M. Metaphorical discourse. Search for the essence of speech imagery // Cuadernos de Rusística Española. 2018. Vol. 14. Pp. 15–28. https://doi.org/10.30827/cre.v14i0.6366</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pocheptsov, G.G. (1986). Fundamentals of the pragmatic description of the proposal. Kyiv: Vishcha shkola Publ. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ballmer T., Brennstuhl W. Speech act classification. Berlin – New York : Springer, 1981. 274 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Prozorov, V.V. (2021). A lyrical discourse/text as a speech genre crossover. Speech Genres, (2), 126-135. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chang B.G. To read what is not written : from psychoanalysis to rhetoric and back // Review of Communication. 2020. Vol. 20. No. 1. Pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2019.1707269</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Searle, J.R. (1986). What is a speech act? Indirect speech. A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. New in Foreign Linguistics, (17), 151-222. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Geißner H. Sprechwissenschaft : Theorie der műndlichen Kommunikation. Königstein : Konigstein im Taunus, 1981. 235 s.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shevchenko, I.S. (2007). Speech act as a unit of discourse: A cognitive-pragmatic approach. Tverskoi Lingvisticheskii Meridian, (7), 69-80. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gruber H. Streitgespräche : Zur Pragmatikeiner Diskursform. Opladen, 1996. 352 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Oxford: Blackwell Publ.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hirvonen M., Wiklund M. From image to text to speech : the effects of speech prosody on information sequencing in audio description // Text and Talk. 2021. Vol. 41. No. 3. Pp. 309–334. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2019-0172</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tiittula, L. (1993). Metadiskurs: Explizite Strukturier ungsmittelimmündlichen Diskurs. Hamburg: Buske.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mei T. The poetics of meaningful work : an analogy to speech acts // Philosophy and Social Criticism. 2019. Vol. 45. No. 1. Pp. 50–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453718768359</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Van Dijk, T.A. (1981). Studies in the pragmatics of discourse. Hague: Mouton.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stubbs M. Discourse analysis : the sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Oxford : Blackwell, 1983. 272 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Van Dijk, T.A. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tiittula L. Metadiskurs : Explizite Strukturier ungsmittelimmündlichen Diskurs. Hamburg : Buske, 1993. 301 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Witek, M. (2021). Self-expression in speech acts. Organon F, 28(2), 326-359. https://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2021.28204</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Van Dijk T.A. Studies in the pragmatics of discourse. Hague : Mouton, 1981. 331 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhirova, I.G. (2020). The structure of utterance and the system of language communication tools: Based on contemporary literary works of art. Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 6(3), 85-98. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18413/2313-8912-2020-6-3-0-7</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Van Dijk T.A., Kintsch W. Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York : Academic Press, 1983. 418 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zimnyaya, I.A. (2001). Linguopsychology of speech activity. Moscow: Moscow Psychology and Sociology Institute; Voronezh: Modek Publ. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Witek M. Self-expression in speech acts // Organon F. 2021. Vol. 28. No. 2. Pp. 326–359. https://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2021.28204</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
